Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Pancreatic Tumors

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Venous Involvement: Is Up-Front Synchronous Portal-Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection Still Justified? A Survey of the Association Française de Chirurgie

Authors: Jean Robert Delpero, MD, Jean Marie Boher, PhD, Alain Sauvanet, MD, Yves Patrice Le Treut, MD, Antonio Sa-Cunha, MD, Jean Yves Mabrut, MD, Laurence Chiche, MD, Olivier Turrini, MD, Philippe Bachellier, MD, François Paye, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Venous resection (VR) during pancreatectomy has been reported to neither increase mortality nor morbidity and to provide similar survival outcomes in same stage tumors. However, controversy remains regarding the indications for up-front surgery according to the degree of venous involvement.

Methods

From 2004 to 2009, 1,399 patients included in a French multicenter survey underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, either without VR (997 standard resections [SR]) or with VR (402 patients; 29 %). Postoperative and long-term outcomes were compared in both groups.

Results

VR was associated with the following factors: larger tumors (p < 0.001), poorly differentiated tumors (p = 0.004), higher numbers of positive lymph nodes (p = 0.042), and positive resection margins (R1; p < 0.001). Overall, VR increased neither postoperative morbidity nor postoperative mortality (5 vs. 3 % in SR patients; p = 0.16). The median and 3-year survival rates in VR patients versus SR patients were 21 months and 31 % vs. 29 months and 44 %, respectively (p = 0.0002). In the entire cohort, multivariate analysis identified VR as a significant poor prognostic factor for long-term survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.28–2.40; p = 0.0005). In the VR patients, lymph node ratio, whatever the cutoff (<0.3: p = 0.093; ≥0.3: p = 0.0098), R1 resection (p = 0.010), and segmental resection (p = 0.016) were independent risk factors; neoadjuvant treatment (HR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.29–0.94; p = 0.031) and adjuvant treatment (HR 0.55, 95 % CI 0.35–0.85; p = 0.006) were significantly associated with improved long-term survival.

Conclusions

Long-term survival after pancreatectomy was significantly altered when up-front VR was performed. Neoadjuvant treatment may be a better strategy than up-front resection in patients with preoperative suspicion of venous involvement.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304:1073–81.CrossRefPubMed Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Bassi C, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304:1073–81.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1473–81.CrossRefPubMed Oettle H, Neuhaus P, Hochhaus A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1473–81.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Regine WF, Winter KA, Abrams R, et al. Fluorouracil-based chemoradiation with either gemcitabine or fluorouracil chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 5-year analysis of the U.S. Intergroup/RTOG 9704 phase III trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1319–26.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Regine WF, Winter KA, Abrams R, et al. Fluorouracil-based chemoradiation with either gemcitabine or fluorouracil chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: 5-year analysis of the U.S. Intergroup/RTOG 9704 phase III trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1319–26.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Warshaw AL, Lillemoe KD, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Pancreatic surgery for adenocarcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28:488–93.CrossRefPubMed Warshaw AL, Lillemoe KD, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Pancreatic surgery for adenocarcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28:488–93.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:935–50.CrossRefPubMed Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:935–50.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Riediger H, Makowiec F, Fischer E, et al. Postoperative morbidity and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenterico-portal vein resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1106–15.CrossRefPubMed Riediger H, Makowiec F, Fischer E, et al. Postoperative morbidity and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenterico-portal vein resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1106–15.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Yekebas EF, Bogoevski D, Cataldegirmen G, et al. En bloc vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies infiltrating major blood vessels: perioperative outcome and long-term survival in 136 patients. Ann Surg. 2008;247:300–9.CrossRefPubMed Yekebas EF, Bogoevski D, Cataldegirmen G, et al. En bloc vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies infiltrating major blood vessels: perioperative outcome and long-term survival in 136 patients. Ann Surg. 2008;247:300–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kelly KJ, Winslow E, Kooby D, et al. Vein involvement during pancreaticoduodenectomy: is there a need for redefinition of “borderline resectable disease”? J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1209–17.CrossRefPubMed Kelly KJ, Winslow E, Kooby D, et al. Vein involvement during pancreaticoduodenectomy: is there a need for redefinition of “borderline resectable disease”? J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1209–17.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Siriwardana HPP, Siriwardena AK. Systematic review of outcome of synchronous portal–superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:662–73.CrossRefPubMed Siriwardana HPP, Siriwardena AK. Systematic review of outcome of synchronous portal–superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:662–73.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, Petrucciani N, et al. Does portal–superior mesenteric vein invasion still indicate irresectability for pancreatic carcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:817–25.CrossRefPubMed Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, Petrucciani N, et al. Does portal–superior mesenteric vein invasion still indicate irresectability for pancreatic carcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:817–25.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chua TC, Saxena A. Extended pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1442–52.CrossRefPubMed Chua TC, Saxena A. Extended pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1442–52.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y, et al. Pancreatectomy combined with superior mesenteric veinportal vein resection for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2012;36:884–91.CrossRefPubMed Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y, et al. Pancreatectomy combined with superior mesenteric veinportal vein resection for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2012;36:884–91.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Yu XZ, Li J, Fu DL, et al. Benefit from synchronous portal–superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:371–8.CrossRefPubMed Yu XZ, Li J, Fu DL, et al. Benefit from synchronous portal–superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:371–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Capussotti L, Massucco P, Ribero D, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy and vein resection for pancreatic head cancer: outcomes and implications for therapy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1316–22.CrossRefPubMed Capussotti L, Massucco P, Ribero D, et al. Extended lymphadenectomy and vein resection for pancreatic head cancer: outcomes and implications for therapy. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1316–22.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, et al. Clinical implications of combined portal vein resection as a palliative procedure in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1569–78.CrossRefPubMed Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, et al. Clinical implications of combined portal vein resection as a palliative procedure in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1569–78.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Irving GRB, Cameron IC. Vascular reconstruction in pancreatic resections: the case against. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91:95–9.PubMedCentralPubMed Irving GRB, Cameron IC. Vascular reconstruction in pancreatic resections: the case against. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009;91:95–9.PubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Christians K, Evans DB. Pancreaticoduodenectomy and vascular resection: persistent controversy and current recommendations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:789–91.CrossRefPubMed Christians K, Evans DB. Pancreaticoduodenectomy and vascular resection: persistent controversy and current recommendations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:789–91.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Yamada S, Fujii T, Sugimoto H, et al. Aggressive surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: evaluation of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Pancreas. 2013;42:1004–10.CrossRefPubMed Yamada S, Fujii T, Sugimoto H, et al. Aggressive surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: evaluation of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Pancreas. 2013;42:1004–10.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Gong Y, Zhang L, He T, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection and reconstruction for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, retrospective analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70340.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Gong Y, Zhang L, He T, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection and reconstruction for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, retrospective analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70340.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
22.
go back to reference Makowiec F, Post S, Saeger HD, et al. Current practice patterns in pancreatic surgery: results of a multi-institutional analysis of seven large surgical departments in Germany with 1454 pancreatic head resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group). J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1080–7.CrossRefPubMed Makowiec F, Post S, Saeger HD, et al. Current practice patterns in pancreatic surgery: results of a multi-institutional analysis of seven large surgical departments in Germany with 1454 pancreatic head resections, 1999 to 2004 (German Advanced Surgical Treatment Study Group). J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:1080–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Castleberry AW, White RR, De La Fuente SG, et al. The impact of vascular resection on early postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4068–77.CrossRefPubMed Castleberry AW, White RR, De La Fuente SG, et al. The impact of vascular resection on early postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4068–77.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Worni M, Castleberry AW, Clary BM, et al. Concomitant vascular reconstruction during pancreatectomy for malignant disease A propensity score–adjusted, population-based trend analysis involving 10 206 patients. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:331–888.CrossRefPubMed Worni M, Castleberry AW, Clary BM, et al. Concomitant vascular reconstruction during pancreatectomy for malignant disease A propensity score–adjusted, population-based trend analysis involving 10 206 patients. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:331–888.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, et al. Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1727–33.CrossRefPubMed Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, et al. Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1727–33.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;155:977–88.CrossRefPubMed Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;155:977–88.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Abrams RA, Lowy AM, O’Reilly EM, et al. Combined modality treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1751–6.CrossRefPubMed Abrams RA, Lowy AM, O’Reilly EM, et al. Combined modality treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreas cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1751–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Evans DB, Erickson BA, Ritch P. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions and the importance of multimodality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2803–5.CrossRefPubMed Evans DB, Erickson BA, Ritch P. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions and the importance of multimodality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2803–5.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tzeng CW, Tran Cao HS, Lee JE, et al. (2014) Treatment sequencing for resectable pancreatic cancer: influence of early metastases and surgical complications on multimodality therapy completion and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 18:16–25.CrossRefPubMed Tzeng CW, Tran Cao HS, Lee JE, et al. (2014) Treatment sequencing for resectable pancreatic cancer: influence of early metastases and surgical complications on multimodality therapy completion and survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 18:16–25.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Barbier L, Turrini O, Grégoire E, et al. Pancreatic head resectable adenocarcinoma: preoperative chemoradiation improves local control but does not affect survival. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:64–9.CrossRef Barbier L, Turrini O, Grégoire E, et al. Pancreatic head resectable adenocarcinoma: preoperative chemoradiation improves local control but does not affect survival. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:64–9.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Katz MH, Wang H, Balachandran A, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical technique on recurrence of localized pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:68–79.CrossRefPubMed Katz MH, Wang H, Balachandran A, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical technique on recurrence of localized pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:68–79.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Chun YS, Milestone BN, Watson JC, et al. Defining venous involvement in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2832–8.CrossRefPubMed Chun YS, Milestone BN, Watson JC, et al. Defining venous involvement in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2832–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Abbott DE, Tzeng CW, Merkow RP, et al. The cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiation is superior to a surgery-first approach in the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(suppl 3):S500–8.CrossRefPubMed Abbott DE, Tzeng CW, Merkow RP, et al. The cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemoradiation is superior to a surgery-first approach in the treatment of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(suppl 3):S500–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.CrossRefPubMed Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1035–46.CrossRefPubMed Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1035–46.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Imaoka S, et al. Preoperative indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreas cancer involving the portal vein. Ann Surg. 1992;215:231–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Imaoka S, et al. Preoperative indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreas cancer involving the portal vein. Ann Surg. 1992;215:231–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
38.
go back to reference Nakao A, Kanzaki A, Fujii T, et al. Correlation between radiographic classification and pathological grade of portal vein wall invasion in pancreatic head cancer. Ann Surg. 2012;255:103–8.CrossRefPubMed Nakao A, Kanzaki A, Fujii T, et al. Correlation between radiographic classification and pathological grade of portal vein wall invasion in pancreatic head cancer. Ann Surg. 2012;255:103–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010. Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2010.
41.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
42.
go back to reference Wang J, Estrella JS, Peng L, et al. Histologic tumor involvement of superior mesenteric vein/portal vein predicts poor prognosis in patients with stage II pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Cancer. 2011;118:3801–11.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Wang J, Estrella JS, Peng L, et al. Histologic tumor involvement of superior mesenteric vein/portal vein predicts poor prognosis in patients with stage II pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Cancer. 2011;118:3801–11.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
43.
go back to reference Kaneoka Y, Yamaguchi A, Isogai M. Portal or superior mesenteric vein resection for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of the length of venous resection. Surgery. 2009;145:417–25.CrossRefPubMed Kaneoka Y, Yamaguchi A, Isogai M. Portal or superior mesenteric vein resection for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: prognostic value of the length of venous resection. Surgery. 2009;145:417–25.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Hristov B, Reddy S, Lin SH, et al. Outcomes of adjuvant chemoradiation after pancreaticoduodenectomy with mesenterico-portal vein resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:176–80.CrossRefPubMed Hristov B, Reddy S, Lin SH, et al. Outcomes of adjuvant chemoradiation after pancreaticoduodenectomy with mesenterico-portal vein resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:176–80.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:485–94.CrossRefPubMed Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MW, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2011;98:485–94.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G, et al. Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:518–23.CrossRefPubMed Pecorelli N, Balzano G, Capretti G, et al. Effect of surgeon volume on outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume hospital. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:518–23.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Tomlinson JS, et al. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. (in press). Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Tomlinson JS, et al. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. (in press).
49.
go back to reference Weber CE, Bock EA, Hurtuk MG, et al. Clinical and pathologic features influencing survival in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:340–7.CrossRefPubMed Weber CE, Bock EA, Hurtuk MG, et al. Clinical and pathologic features influencing survival in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:340–7.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Howard TJ, Krug JE, Yu J, et al. A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1338–46.CrossRefPubMed Howard TJ, Krug JE, Yu J, et al. A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1338–46.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U, et al. Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium: better prediction of outcome. Ann Surg. 2011;254:311–9.CrossRefPubMed Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U, et al. Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium: better prediction of outcome. Ann Surg. 2011;254:311–9.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Campbell F, Bennett M, Foulis AJ. Minimum dataset for histopathological reporting of pancreatic, ampulla of Vater and bile duct carcinoma. London: Royal College of Pathologists; 2002. http://www.rcpath.org. Accessed 2 Feb 2014. Campbell F, Bennett M, Foulis AJ. Minimum dataset for histopathological reporting of pancreatic, ampulla of Vater and bile duct carcinoma. London: Royal College of Pathologists; 2002. http://​www.​rcpath.​org. Accessed 2 Feb 2014.
53.
go back to reference Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, et al. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1232–7.CrossRefPubMed Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, et al. Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1232–7.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, et al. Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1651–60.CrossRefPubMed Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, et al. Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1651–60.CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA, et al. Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1003–10.CrossRefPubMed Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA, et al. Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1003–10.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Konstantinidis IT, Warshaw AL, Allen JN, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a “true” R0 resection? Ann Surg. 2013;257:731–6.CrossRefPubMed Konstantinidis IT, Warshaw AL, Allen JN, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a “true” R0 resection? Ann Surg. 2013;257:731–6.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:20–33.CrossRef Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16:20–33.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Katz MH, Merchant NB, Brower S, et al. Standardization of surgical and pathologic variables is needed in multicenter trials of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z5031 trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:337–44.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Katz MH, Merchant NB, Brower S, et al. Standardization of surgical and pathologic variables is needed in multicenter trials of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z5031 trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:337–44.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
59.
go back to reference Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:52–60.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246:52–60.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
60.
go back to reference Wang F, Gill AJ, Neale M et al. Adverse tumor biology associated with mesenterico-portal vein resection influences survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1937-47.CrossRefPubMed Wang F, Gill AJ, Neale M et al. Adverse tumor biology associated with mesenterico-portal vein resection influences survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1937-47.CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Turrini O, Ewald J, Barbier L, et al. Should the portal vein be routinely resected during pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma? Ann Surg. 2013;257:726–30.CrossRefPubMed Turrini O, Ewald J, Barbier L, et al. Should the portal vein be routinely resected during pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma? Ann Surg. 2013;257:726–30.CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Buchler MW, Werner J, Weitz J. R0 in pancreatic cancer surgery: surgery, pathology, biology, or definition matters? Ann Surg. 2010;251:1011–2.CrossRefPubMed Buchler MW, Werner J, Weitz J. R0 in pancreatic cancer surgery: surgery, pathology, biology, or definition matters? Ann Surg. 2010;251:1011–2.CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN, et al. Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2008;143:75–83.CrossRefPubMed Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN, et al. Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2008;143:75–83.CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Riediger H, Keck T, Wellner U, et al. The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1337–44.CrossRefPubMed Riediger H, Keck T, Wellner U, et al. The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1337–44.CrossRefPubMed
65.
go back to reference Valsangkar NP, Bush DM, Michaelson JS, et al. N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:257–66.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Valsangkar NP, Bush DM, Michaelson JS, et al. N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:257–66.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
66.
go back to reference Valle JW, Palmer D, Jackson R, et al. Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:504–12.CrossRefPubMed Valle JW, Palmer D, Jackson R, et al. Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:504–12.CrossRefPubMed
67.
go back to reference McClaine RJ, Lowy AM, Sussman JJ, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy may lead to successful surgical resection and improved survival in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:73–9.CrossRef McClaine RJ, Lowy AM, Sussman JJ, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy may lead to successful surgical resection and improved survival in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:73–9.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Stokes JB, Nolan NJ, Stelow EB, et al. Preoperative capecitabine and concurrent radiation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:619–27.CrossRefPubMed Stokes JB, Nolan NJ, Stelow EB, et al. Preoperative capecitabine and concurrent radiation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:619–27.CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference Rose JB, Rocha FG, Alseidi A, et al. Extended neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer demonstrates promising postoperative outcomes and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1530–7.CrossRefPubMed Rose JB, Rocha FG, Alseidi A, et al. Extended neoadjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer demonstrates promising postoperative outcomes and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1530–7.CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Gillen S, Schuster T, Büschenfelde C, et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000267.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Gillen S, Schuster T, Büschenfelde C, et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000267.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
71.
go back to reference Andriulli A, Festa V, Botteri E, et al. Neoadjuvant/preoperative gemcitabine for patients with localized pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1644–62.CrossRefPubMed Andriulli A, Festa V, Botteri E, et al. Neoadjuvant/preoperative gemcitabine for patients with localized pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1644–62.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma with Venous Involvement: Is Up-Front Synchronous Portal-Superior Mesenteric Vein Resection Still Justified? A Survey of the Association Française de Chirurgie
Authors
Jean Robert Delpero, MD
Jean Marie Boher, PhD
Alain Sauvanet, MD
Yves Patrice Le Treut, MD
Antonio Sa-Cunha, MD
Jean Yves Mabrut, MD
Laurence Chiche, MD
Olivier Turrini, MD
Philippe Bachellier, MD
François Paye, MD
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4304-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2015 Go to the issue