Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Pancreatectomy

Comparison of minimal invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single center retrospective study

Authors: Hanyu Zhang, Yatong Li, Quan Liao, Cheng Xing, Cheng Ding, Taiping Zhang, Junchao Guo, Xianlin Han, Qiang Xu, Wenming Wu, Yupei Zhao, Menghua Dai

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) was proposed a decade ago with the aim to achieve higher R0 tangential margin and radical N1 lymph node resection for left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which has been widely accepted worldwide at present. Laparoscopic RAMPS (Lap-RAMPS) has been attempted for PDAC during last several years, however, no outcomes evaluation by comparison between laparoscopic vs open RAMPS has been reported yet.

Materials and methods

From August, 2012 to March, 2018, patients undergoing open or lap-RAMPS for the diagnosis of left-sided PDAC were reviewed from a prospective database. Patients excluded if they were related with combined organs or vessels resection, systematic metastasis as well as conversion from open RAMPS to lap RAMPS. The surgical and oncologic outcomes were compared.

Results

A total of 48 PDAC patients were enrolled (25 underwent lap-RAMPS and 23 underwent open-RAMPS). There were no significant differences in demographic or perioperative morbidity. In the lap-RAMPS group, R0 transection margin and retroperitoneal margin were both achieved in 23 of 25 patients (92%). In the open RAMPS group, R0 transection margin was achieved in 21 of 23 patients (91.3%), R0 retroperitoneal margin was 22 of 23 patients (95.65%). There were no differences in pathological examinations. The number of lymph node (LN) retrieved between lap-RAMPS and open- RAMPS group was not significant difference (15.84 vs 18.22; P = 0.268). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was analogous in two groups (18.11 m vs 20.00 m, P = 0.999). Median overall survival (OS) was 24.53 m in lap-RAMPS group and 28.73 m in the open-RAMPS group (P = 0.633).

Conclusions

Lap-RAMPS is technically feasible, and has comparable long-term oncological outcome with open-RMAPS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Muniraj T, Jamidar PA, Aslanian HR (2013) Pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive review and update. Dis Mon 59(11):368–402\PubMed Muniraj T, Jamidar PA, Aslanian HR (2013) Pancreatic cancer: a comprehensive review and update. Dis Mon 59(11):368–402\PubMed
2.
go back to reference Harrison LE, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF (1996) Isolated portal vein involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinomacy. A contraindication for resection? Ann Surg 224:342–349PubMedPubMedCentral Harrison LE, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF (1996) Isolated portal vein involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinomacy. A contraindication for resection? Ann Surg 224:342–349PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Jimenez RE, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, Willett CG, McGrath D, Castillo CF (2000) Impact of laparoscopic staging in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 135:409–414PubMed Jimenez RE, Warshaw AL, Rattner DW, Willett CG, McGrath D, Castillo CF (2000) Impact of laparoscopic staging in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 135:409–414PubMed
4.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Schwall G, Flechtenmacher J, Trede M (1993) Resection for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Br J Surg 80:1177–1179PubMed Johnson CD, Schwall G, Flechtenmacher J, Trede M (1993) Resection for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Br J Surg 80:1177–1179PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kalser MH, Barkin J, MacIntyre JM (1985) Pancreatic cancer. Assessment of prognosis by clinical presentation. Cancer 56:397–402PubMed Kalser MH, Barkin J, MacIntyre JM (1985) Pancreatic cancer. Assessment of prognosis by clinical presentation. Cancer 56:397–402PubMed
6.
go back to reference Nakase A, Matsumoto Y, Uchida K, Honjo I (1977) Surgical treatment of cancer of the pancreas and the periampullary region: cumulative results in 57 institutions in Japan. Ann Surg 185:52–57PubMedPubMedCentral Nakase A, Matsumoto Y, Uchida K, Honjo I (1977) Surgical treatment of cancer of the pancreas and the periampullary region: cumulative results in 57 institutions in Japan. Ann Surg 185:52–57PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D (2003) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 133(5):521–527PubMed Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D (2003) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery 133(5):521–527PubMed
8.
go back to reference O’morchoe CC (1997) Lymphatic system of the pancreas. Microsc Res Tech 37(5–6):456–477PubMed O’morchoe CC (1997) Lymphatic system of the pancreas. Microsc Res Tech 37(5–6):456–477PubMed
9.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204(2):244–249PubMed Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG (2007) Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg 204(2):244–249PubMed
10.
go back to reference Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP (2017) The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more ”personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA: Cancer J Clin 67 (2):93–99 Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP (2017) The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more ”personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA: Cancer J Clin 67 (2):93–99
11.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13PubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13PubMed
12.
go back to reference Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591 Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161(3):584–591
13.
go back to reference Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768PubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142(5):761–768PubMed
14.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2017) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 67(1):7–30PubMed Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2017) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 67(1):7–30PubMed
16.
go back to reference Yeh R, Steinman J, Luk L, Kluger MD, Hecht EM (2017) Imaging of pancreatic cancer: what the surgeon wants to know. Clin Imaging 42:203–217PubMed Yeh R, Steinman J, Luk L, Kluger MD, Hecht EM (2017) Imaging of pancreatic cancer: what the surgeon wants to know. Clin Imaging 42:203–217PubMed
17.
go back to reference Sperti C, Pasquali C, Pedrazzoli S (1997) Ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg 185(3):255–259PubMed Sperti C, Pasquali C, Pedrazzoli S (1997) Ductal adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Am Coll Surg 185(3):255–259PubMed
18.
go back to reference Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, Ohta T, Kitagawa H, Arakawa H, Yagi H, Tajima H, Miwa K (1998) Distal pancreatectomy: does it have a role for pancreatic body and tail cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 45(21):827–832PubMed Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K, Ohta T, Kitagawa H, Arakawa H, Yagi H, Tajima H, Miwa K (1998) Distal pancreatectomy: does it have a role for pancreatic body and tail cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 45(21):827–832PubMed
19.
go back to reference Burcharth F, Trillingsgaard J, Olsen SD, Moesgaard F, Federspiel B, Struckmann JR (2003) Resection of cancer of the body and tail of the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 50(50):563–566PubMed Burcharth F, Trillingsgaard J, Olsen SD, Moesgaard F, Federspiel B, Struckmann JR (2003) Resection of cancer of the body and tail of the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 50(50):563–566PubMed
20.
go back to reference Brennan MF, Moccia RD, Klimstra D (1996) Management of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Ann Surg 223(5):506–502PubMedPubMedCentral Brennan MF, Moccia RD, Klimstra D (1996) Management of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Ann Surg 223(5):506–502PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Christein JD, Kendrick ML, Iqbal CW, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB (2005) Distal pancreatectomy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 9(7):922–927PubMed Christein JD, Kendrick ML, Iqbal CW, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB (2005) Distal pancreatectomy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 9(7):922–927PubMed
22.
go back to reference Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Nara S, Esaki M, Kosuge T, Hiraoka N (2010) Analysis of 5-year survivors after a macroscopic curative pancreatectomy for invasive ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 34(8):1908–1915PubMed Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Nara S, Esaki M, Kosuge T, Hiraoka N (2010) Analysis of 5-year survivors after a macroscopic curative pancreatectomy for invasive ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg 34(8):1908–1915PubMed
23.
go back to reference Bollschweiler E (2003) Benefits and limitations of Kaplan-Meier calculations of survival chance in cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:239–244PubMed Bollschweiler E (2003) Benefits and limitations of Kaplan-Meier calculations of survival chance in cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388:239–244PubMed
24.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111:518–526PubMed
25.
go back to reference Park HJ, You D, Choi DW, Heo JS, Choi SH (2014) Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. World J Surg 38(1):186–193PubMed Park HJ, You D, Choi DW, Heo JS, Choi SH (2014) Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. World J Surg 38(1):186–193PubMed
26.
go back to reference Trottman P, Swett K, Shen P, Sirintrapun J (2014) Comparison of standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Am Surg 80(3):295–300PubMedPubMedCentral Trottman P, Swett K, Shen P, Sirintrapun J (2014) Comparison of standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Am Surg 80(3):295–300PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Abe T, Ohuchida K, Miyasaka Y, Ohtsuka T, Oda Y, Nakamura M (2016) Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 40(9):2267–2275PubMed Abe T, Ohuchida K, Miyasaka Y, Ohtsuka T, Oda Y, Nakamura M (2016) Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 40(9):2267–2275PubMed
28.
go back to reference Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24(7):1533–1541PubMed Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ (2010) Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc 24(7):1533–1541PubMed
29.
go back to reference Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann surg 255(6):1048–1059PubMed Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL (2012) Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann surg 255(6):1048–1059PubMed
30.
go back to reference Jin T, Altaf K, Xiong JJ, Huang W, Javed MA, Mai G, Liu XB, Hu WM, Xia Q (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB 14(11):711–724PubMedPubMedCentral Jin T, Altaf K, Xiong JJ, Huang W, Javed MA, Mai G, Liu XB, Hu WM, Xia Q (2012) A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. HPB 14(11):711–724PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Guerrini GP, Lauretta A, Belluco C, Olivieri M, Forlin M, Basso S, Breda B, Bertola G, Di Benedetto F (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis. BMC Surg 17(1):105s Guerrini GP, Lauretta A, Belluco C, Olivieri M, Forlin M, Basso S, Breda B, Bertola G, Di Benedetto F (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis. BMC Surg 17(1):105s
32.
go back to reference Yamamoto M, Zaima M, Yamamoto H, Harada H, Kawamura J, Yamada M, Yazawa T, Kawasoe J (2017) New laparoscopic procedure for left-sided pancreatic cancer-artery-first approach laparoscopic RAMPS using 3D technique. World J Surg Oncol 15(1):213PubMedPubMedCentral Yamamoto M, Zaima M, Yamamoto H, Harada H, Kawamura J, Yamada M, Yazawa T, Kawasoe J (2017) New laparoscopic procedure for left-sided pancreatic cancer-artery-first approach laparoscopic RAMPS using 3D technique. World J Surg Oncol 15(1):213PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Magge D (2013) Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 148(6):525–531PubMed Magge D (2013) Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 148(6):525–531PubMed
34.
go back to reference Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, Vollmer CM, Besselink MG, Davidson BR, van Laarhoven CJ (2016) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):CD011391PubMed Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, Vollmer CM, Besselink MG, Davidson BR, van Laarhoven CJ (2016) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):CD011391PubMed
35.
go back to reference Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM, Weber SM, Bentrem DJ, Gillespie TW, Sellers JB, Merchant NB, Scoggins CR, Martin RC, Kim HJ, Ahmad S, Cho CS, Parikh AA, Chu CK, Hamilton NA, Doyle CJ, Pinchot S, Hayman A, McClaine R, Nakeeb A, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Lillemoe KD (2010) A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg 210(5):779–787PubMed Kooby DA, Hawkins WG, Schmidt CM, Weber SM, Bentrem DJ, Gillespie TW, Sellers JB, Merchant NB, Scoggins CR, Martin RC, Kim HJ, Ahmad S, Cho CS, Parikh AA, Chu CK, Hamilton NA, Doyle CJ, Pinchot S, Hayman A, McClaine R, Nakeeb A, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Lillemoe KD (2010) A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate? J Am Coll Surg 210(5):779–787PubMed
36.
go back to reference Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee D, Lee JW, Jun E, Park KM, Lee YJ (2015) A comparative study of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg 220:2 Shin SH, Kim SC, Song KB, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee D, Lee JW, Jun E, Park KM, Lee YJ (2015) A comparative study of laparoscopic vs open distal pancreatectomy for left-sided ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg 220:2
37.
go back to reference Van HJ, De RT, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, Alseidi A, Ateeb Z, Balzano G, Berrevoet F, Björnsson B, Boggi U, Busch OR, Butturini G, Casadei R, Del Chiaro M, Chikhladze S, Cipriani F, van Dam R, Damoli I, van Dieren S, Dokmak S, Edwin B, van Eijck C, Fabre JM, Falconi M, Farges O, Fernández-Cruz L, Forgione A, Frigerio I, Fuks D, Gavazzi F, Gayet B, Giardino A, Groot Koerkamp B, Hackert T, Hassenpflug M, Kabir I, Keck T, Khatkov I, Kusar M, Lombardo C, Marchegiani G, Marshall R, Menon KV, Montorsi M, Orville M, de Pastena M, Pietrabissa A, Poves I, Primrose J, Pugliese R, Ricci C, Roberts K, Røsok B, Sahakyan MA, Sánchez-Cabús S, Sandström P, Scovel L, Solaini L, Soonawalla Z, Souche FR, Sutcliffe RP, Tiberio GA, Tomazic A, Troisi R, Wellner U, White S, Wittel UA, Zerbi A, Bassi C, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M, European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS) (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 269:10–17 Van HJ, De RT, Klompmaker S, Rawashdeh M, Aleotti F, Al-Sarireh B, Alseidi A, Ateeb Z, Balzano G, Berrevoet F, Björnsson B, Boggi U, Busch OR, Butturini G, Casadei R, Del Chiaro M, Chikhladze S, Cipriani F, van Dam R, Damoli I, van Dieren S, Dokmak S, Edwin B, van Eijck C, Fabre JM, Falconi M, Farges O, Fernández-Cruz L, Forgione A, Frigerio I, Fuks D, Gavazzi F, Gayet B, Giardino A, Groot Koerkamp B, Hackert T, Hassenpflug M, Kabir I, Keck T, Khatkov I, Kusar M, Lombardo C, Marchegiani G, Marshall R, Menon KV, Montorsi M, Orville M, de Pastena M, Pietrabissa A, Poves I, Primrose J, Pugliese R, Ricci C, Roberts K, Røsok B, Sahakyan MA, Sánchez-Cabús S, Sandström P, Scovel L, Solaini L, Soonawalla Z, Souche FR, Sutcliffe RP, Tiberio GA, Tomazic A, Troisi R, Wellner U, White S, Wittel UA, Zerbi A, Bassi C, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M, European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS) (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 269:10–17
38.
go back to reference Kim EY, Hong TH (2017) Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes. BMC Surg 17(1):2PubMedPubMedCentral Kim EY, Hong TH (2017) Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes. BMC Surg 17(1):2PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Kang CM, Lee SH, Lee WJ (2014) Minimally invasive radical pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 20(9):2343–3235PubMedPubMedCentral Kang CM, Lee SH, Lee WJ (2014) Minimally invasive radical pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 20(9):2343–3235PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Ome Y, Hashida K, Yokota M, Nagahisa Y, Michio O, Kawamoto K (2017) Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach. Surg Endosc 31(11):4836–4837PubMed Ome Y, Hashida K, Yokota M, Nagahisa Y, Michio O, Kawamoto K (2017) Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach. Surg Endosc 31(11):4836–4837PubMed
41.
go back to reference Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260:633–640PubMed Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260:633–640PubMed
42.
go back to reference Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: technical feasibility and interim results. Surg Endosc 25(7):2360–2361PubMed Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: technical feasibility and interim results. Surg Endosc 25(7):2360–2361PubMed
43.
go back to reference Chong JU, Kim SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Lee WJ (2017) Yonsei criteria: a clinical reflection of stage I left-sided pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 8(67):110830–110836PubMedPubMedCentral Chong JU, Kim SH, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Lee WJ (2017) Yonsei criteria: a clinical reflection of stage I left-sided pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 8(67):110830–110836PubMedPubMedCentral
44.
go back to reference Van HJ, De RT, Bosscha K, Brinkman DJ, van Dieren S, Dijkgraaf MG, Gerhards MF, de Hingh IH, Karsten TM, Lips DJ, Luyer MD, Busch OR, Festen S, Besselink MG, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (2019) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(3):199–207 Van HJ, De RT, Bosscha K, Brinkman DJ, van Dieren S, Dijkgraaf MG, Gerhards MF, de Hingh IH, Karsten TM, Lips DJ, Luyer MD, Busch OR, Festen S, Besselink MG, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (2019) Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(3):199–207
45.
go back to reference Makino T, Shukla PJ, Rubino F, Milsom JW (2012) The impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Ann Surg 255(2):228–236PubMed Makino T, Shukla PJ, Rubino F, Milsom JW (2012) The impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Ann Surg 255(2):228–236PubMed
46.
go back to reference Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N, Isla D, Tamura M, Zhu T, Robledo KP, Gebski V, Asher R, Behan V, Nicklin JL, Coleman RL, Obermair A (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895–1904PubMed Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N, Isla D, Tamura M, Zhu T, Robledo KP, Gebski V, Asher R, Behan V, Nicklin JL, Coleman RL, Obermair A (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895–1904PubMed
47.
go back to reference Tomlinson JS, Jain S, Bentrem DJ, Sekeris EG, Maggard MA, Hines OJ, Reber HA, Ko CY (2007) Accuracy of staging node-negative pancreas cancer: a potential quality measure. Arch Surg 142(8):767–774PubMed Tomlinson JS, Jain S, Bentrem DJ, Sekeris EG, Maggard MA, Hines OJ, Reber HA, Ko CY (2007) Accuracy of staging node-negative pancreas cancer: a potential quality measure. Arch Surg 142(8):767–774PubMed
48.
go back to reference Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F, Hawkins WG, Linehan DC, Strasberg SM (2012) Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 214(1):46–52PubMed Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F, Hawkins WG, Linehan DC, Strasberg SM (2012) Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 214(1):46–52PubMed
49.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Shi B, Wu L, Si X (2017) A systematic review of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. HPB 19(1):10–15PubMed Zhou Y, Shi B, Wu L, Si X (2017) A systematic review of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. HPB 19(1):10–15PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of minimal invasive versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single center retrospective study
Authors
Hanyu Zhang
Yatong Li
Quan Liao
Cheng Xing
Cheng Ding
Taiping Zhang
Junchao Guo
Xianlin Han
Qiang Xu
Wenming Wu
Yupei Zhao
Menghua Dai
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07938-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021 Go to the issue