Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2021

01-12-2021 | Pancreatectomy | Pancreatic Tumors

Does a Laparoscopic Approach to Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer Contribute to Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy Utilization?

Authors: Omid Salehi, MD, Eduardo A. Vega, MD, Onur C. Kutlu, MD, Sandeep Krishnan, MD, Danny Sleeman, MD, Nestor De La Cruz Munoz, MD, Sylvia V. Alarcon, MD, Vera Kazakova, MD, Olga Kozyreva, MD, Claudius Conrad, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) versus open approaches (ODP) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with reduced morbidity, its impact on optimal adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) utilization remains unclear. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether oncologic resection quality markers are equivalent between approaches.

Methods

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried between 2010 and 2016 for PDAC patients undergoing DP. Effect of LDP vs ODP and institutional case volumes on margin status, hospital stay, 30-day and 90-day mortality, administration of and delay to AC, and 30-day unplanned readmission were analyzed using binary and linear logistic regression. Cox multivariable regression was used to correct for confounders.

Results

The search yielded 3411 patients; 996 (29.2%) had LDP and 2415 (70.8%) had ODP. ODP had higher odds of readmission [odds ratio (OR) 1.681, p = 0.01] and longer hospital stay [β 1.745, p = 0.004]. No difference was found for 30-day mortality [OR 1.689, p = 0.303], 90-day mortality [OR 1.936, p = 0.207], and overall survival [HR 1.231, p = 0.057]. The highest-volume centers had improved odds of AC [OR 1.275, p = 0.027] regardless of approach. LDP conferred lower margin positivity [OR 0.581, p = 0.005], increased AC use [3rd quartile: OR 1.844, p = 0.026; 4th quartile; OR 2.144, p = 0.045], and fewer AC delays [4th quartile: OR 0.786, p = 0.045] in higher-volume centers.

Conclusions

In selected patients, LDP offers an oncologically safe alternative to ODP for PDAC independent of institutional volume. However, additional oncologic benefit due to optimal AC utilization and lower positive margin rates in higher volume centers suggests that LDP by experienced teams can achieve best possible cancer outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Apr 4 2016;4:Cd011391. Riviere D, Gurusamy KS, Kooby DA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Apr 4 2016;4:Cd011391.
2.
go back to reference Joliat GR, Demartines N, Halkic N, Petermann D, Schafer M. Short-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy: laparotomy vs laparoscopy—a single-center series. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;13:1–5.CrossRef Joliat GR, Demartines N, Halkic N, Petermann D, Schafer M. Short-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy: laparotomy vs laparoscopy—a single-center series. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;13:1–5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, et al. Minimally Invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a Pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):10–7.CrossRef van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Klompmaker S, et al. Minimally Invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a Pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):10–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Björnsson B, Larsson AL, Hjalmarsson C, Gasslander T, Sandström P. Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1281–2188.CrossRef Björnsson B, Larsson AL, Hjalmarsson C, Gasslander T, Sandström P. Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2020;107:1281–2188.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Chen XM, Sun DL. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:327.CrossRef Zhang Y, Chen XM, Sun DL. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a single-institution comparative study. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:327.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Mody K, Asbun HJ. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2016;40(6):1477–84.CrossRef Stauffer JA, Coppola A, Mody K, Asbun HJ. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2016;40(6):1477–84.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jarufe N, Soto P, Ahumada V, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: comparative analysis of clinical outcomes at a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018;28(1):62–6.CrossRef Jarufe N, Soto P, Ahumada V, et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: comparative analysis of clinical outcomes at a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018;28(1):62–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2018;118(5):278–86.CrossRef Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2018;118(5):278–86.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):2–9.CrossRef de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, et al. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):2–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bauman MD, Becerra DG, Kilbane EM, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1):53–61.CrossRef Bauman MD, Becerra DG, Kilbane EM, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer is safe and effective. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(1):53–61.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, et al. Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg. 2008;248(3):438–46.CrossRef Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, et al. Left-sided pancreatectomy: a multicenter comparison of laparoscopic and open approaches. Ann Surg. 2008;248(3):438–46.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhang AB, Wang Y, Hu C, Shen Y, Zheng SS. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017;18(6):532–8.CrossRef Zhang AB, Wang Y, Hu C, Shen Y, Zheng SS. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center experience. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2017;18(6):532–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution’s experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(1):18–27.CrossRef Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution’s experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(1):18–27.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kantor O, Bryan DS, Talamonti MS, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for cancer provides oncologic outcomes and overall survival identical to open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(10):1620–5.CrossRef Kantor O, Bryan DS, Talamonti MS, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for cancer provides oncologic outcomes and overall survival identical to open distal pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(10):1620–5.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Anderson KL Jr, Adam MA, Thomas S, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2017;213(4):601–5.CrossRef Anderson KL Jr, Adam MA, Thomas S, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2017;213(4):601–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Korrel M, Lof S, van Hilst J, et al. Predictors for survival in an international cohort of patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;28:1079–87.CrossRef Korrel M, Lof S, van Hilst J, et al. Predictors for survival in an international cohort of patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;28:1079–87.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ma SJ, Oladeru OT, Miccio JA, Iovoli AJ, Hermann GM, Singh AK. Association of timing of adjuvant therapy with survival in patients with resected stage I to II pancreatic cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e199126–e199126.CrossRef Ma SJ, Oladeru OT, Miccio JA, Iovoli AJ, Hermann GM, Singh AK. Association of timing of adjuvant therapy with survival in patients with resected stage I to II pancreatic cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e199126–e199126.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference White RJ, Hasan S, Monga D, et al. Time to adjuvant systemic therapy following pancreatic cancer resection and effect on outcome. Pancreas. Sep 2019;48(8):1086–91.CrossRef White RJ, Hasan S, Monga D, et al. Time to adjuvant systemic therapy following pancreatic cancer resection and effect on outcome. Pancreas. Sep 2019;48(8):1086–91.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Demir IE, Jäger C, Schlitter AM, et al. R0 versus R1 resection matters after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and less after distal or total pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2018;268(6):1058–68.CrossRef Demir IE, Jäger C, Schlitter AM, et al. R0 versus R1 resection matters after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and less after distal or total pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2018;268(6):1058–68.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D, Conlon K. Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):293–8.CrossRef Brennan MF, Kattan MW, Klimstra D, Conlon K. Prognostic nomogram for patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):293–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246(1):52–60.CrossRef Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, et al. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007;246(1):52–60.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Menon KV, Gomez D, Smith AM, Anthoney A, Verbeke CS. Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP). HPB (Oxf). 2009;11(1):18–24.CrossRef Menon KV, Gomez D, Smith AM, Anthoney A, Verbeke CS. Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP). HPB (Oxf). 2009;11(1):18–24.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Plotkin A, Ceppa EP, Zarzaur BL, Kilbane EM, Riall TS, Pitt HA. Reduced morbidity with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(3):279–85.CrossRef Plotkin A, Ceppa EP, Zarzaur BL, Kilbane EM, Riall TS, Pitt HA. Reduced morbidity with minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(3):279–85.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Raoof M, Ituarte PHG, Woo Y, et al. Propensity score-matched comparison of oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection. Br J Surg. 2018;105(5):578–86.CrossRef Raoof M, Ituarte PHG, Woo Y, et al. Propensity score-matched comparison of oncological outcomes between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatic resection. Br J Surg. 2018;105(5):578–86.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Adam MA, Choudhury K, Goffredo P, et al. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for cancer: short-term oncologic outcomes in 1,733 patients. World J Surg. 2015;39(10):2564–72.CrossRef Adam MA, Choudhury K, Goffredo P, et al. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for cancer: short-term oncologic outcomes in 1,733 patients. World J Surg. 2015;39(10):2564–72.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lemmens VE, Bosscha K, van der Schelling G, Brenninkmeijer S, Coebergh JW, de Hingh IH. Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization. Br J Surg. 2011;98(10):1455–62.CrossRef Lemmens VE, Bosscha K, van der Schelling G, Brenninkmeijer S, Coebergh JW, de Hingh IH. Improving outcome for patients with pancreatic cancer through centralization. Br J Surg. 2011;98(10):1455–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does a Laparoscopic Approach to Distal Pancreatectomy for Cancer Contribute to Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy Utilization?
Authors
Omid Salehi, MD
Eduardo A. Vega, MD
Onur C. Kutlu, MD
Sandeep Krishnan, MD
Danny Sleeman, MD
Nestor De La Cruz Munoz, MD
Sylvia V. Alarcon, MD
Vera Kazakova, MD
Olga Kozyreva, MD
Claudius Conrad, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10241-5

Other articles of this Issue 13/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2021 Go to the issue