Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Otosclerosis | Otology

Otosclerosis revision surgery in Sweden: hearing outcome, predictive factors and complications

Authors: Lars Lundman, Karin Strömbäck, Andreas Björsne, Joakim Grendin, Ylva Dahlin-Redfors

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the procedures and investigate the hearing outcomes and complications after revision surgery for patients with otosclerosis in Sweden and compare these with previously published reports and to investigate factors that may predict the outcomes of revision surgery.

Methods

A total of 254 patients from the Swedish Quality Register for otosclerosis surgery who underwent surgery at 21 clinics were identified as having undergone revision surgery for otosclerosis from 2003 to 2013. Clinical records and audiograms from each of these patients were collected and analyzed.

Results

Improvement in hearing by 20 dB or more and closure of air–bone gap (≤ 20 dB) was achieved in 43% and 69% of patients after a first revision operation and in 46% and 70% of patients after a second revision operation. Most patients who underwent surgery because of dizziness were relieved of their dizziness. Postoperative deafness occurred in 2.3% of patients. Prior successful otosclerosis surgery predicted successful revision surgery, especially after a second revision operation. Fixation of the incus or malleus and finding of no obvious reason for the conductive hearing loss predicted a worse hearing outcome.

Conclusions

The hearing results after revision surgery in Sweden is somewhat inferior to those of previously published results involving large centers. Postoperative deafness may be as much as fivefold more common after revision surgery than after primary surgery. Meticulous reading of previous charts and honest counseling regarding the risks and expectations is mandatory before planning revision surgery for otosclerosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Skrivan J, Cada Z, Kluh J, Boucek J, Profant O, Betka J (2014) Revision operations after previous stapes surgery for persisting hearing loss. Bratisl Lek Listy 115(7):442–444PubMed Skrivan J, Cada Z, Kluh J, Boucek J, Profant O, Betka J (2014) Revision operations after previous stapes surgery for persisting hearing loss. Bratisl Lek Listy 115(7):442–444PubMed
2.
go back to reference Albers AE, Schönfeld U, Kandilakis K, Jovanovic S (2013) CO2 laser revision stapedotomy. Laryngoscope 123(6):1519–1526CrossRef Albers AE, Schönfeld U, Kandilakis K, Jovanovic S (2013) CO2 laser revision stapedotomy. Laryngoscope 123(6):1519–1526CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stucken EZ, Brown KD, Selesnick SH (2012) The use of KTP laser in revision stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 33(8):1297–1299CrossRef Stucken EZ, Brown KD, Selesnick SH (2012) The use of KTP laser in revision stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 33(8):1297–1299CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thiel G, Mills R (2011) Persistent and recurrent conductive deafness following stapedotomy. J Laryngol Otol 125(5):460–466CrossRef Thiel G, Mills R (2011) Persistent and recurrent conductive deafness following stapedotomy. J Laryngol Otol 125(5):460–466CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bakhos D, Lescanne E, Charretier C, Robier A (2010) A review of 89 revision stapes surgeries for otosclerosis. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 127(5):177–182CrossRef Bakhos D, Lescanne E, Charretier C, Robier A (2010) A review of 89 revision stapes surgeries for otosclerosis. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 127(5):177–182CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vincent R, Rovers M, Zingade N, Oates J, Sperling N, Devèze A, Grolman W (2010) Revision stapedotomy: operative findings and hearing results. A prospective study of 652 cases from the Otology-Neurotology Database. Otol Neurotol 31(6):875–882CrossRef Vincent R, Rovers M, Zingade N, Oates J, Sperling N, Devèze A, Grolman W (2010) Revision stapedotomy: operative findings and hearing results. A prospective study of 652 cases from the Otology-Neurotology Database. Otol Neurotol 31(6):875–882CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Babighian GG, Albu S (2009) Failures in stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg 141(3):395–400CrossRef Babighian GG, Albu S (2009) Failures in stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg 141(3):395–400CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mangham CA (2009) Long-term impact of incus necrosis on revision stapes surgery: incus versus malleus reconstruction. Otol Neurotol 30(8):1145–1151CrossRef Mangham CA (2009) Long-term impact of incus necrosis on revision stapes surgery: incus versus malleus reconstruction. Otol Neurotol 30(8):1145–1151CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schmid P, Häusler R (2009) Revision stapedectomy: an analysis of 201 operations. Otol Neurotol 30(8):1092–1100CrossRef Schmid P, Häusler R (2009) Revision stapedectomy: an analysis of 201 operations. Otol Neurotol 30(8):1092–1100CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gros A, Vatovec J, Zargi M, Jenko K (2005) Success rate in revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 26(6):1143–1148CrossRef Gros A, Vatovec J, Zargi M, Jenko K (2005) Success rate in revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 26(6):1143–1148CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Puxeddu R, Ledda GP, Pelagatti CL, Salis G, Puxeddu P (2005) Revision stapes surgery for recurrent transmissional hearing loss after stapedectomy and stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital organo Uff della Soc Ital di Otorinolaringol e Chir cervico-facciale 25(6):347–352 Puxeddu R, Ledda GP, Pelagatti CL, Salis G, Puxeddu P (2005) Revision stapes surgery for recurrent transmissional hearing loss after stapedectomy and stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital organo Uff della Soc Ital di Otorinolaringol e Chir cervico-facciale 25(6):347–352
12.
go back to reference Kohan D, Sorin A (2003) Revision stapes surgery: the malleus to oval window wire-piston technique. Laryngoscope 113(9):1520–1524CrossRef Kohan D, Sorin A (2003) Revision stapes surgery: the malleus to oval window wire-piston technique. Laryngoscope 113(9):1520–1524CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lippy WH, Battista RA, Berenholz L, Schuring AG, Burkey JM (2003) Twenty-year review of revision stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 24(4):560–566CrossRef Lippy WH, Battista RA, Berenholz L, Schuring AG, Burkey JM (2003) Twenty-year review of revision stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 24(4):560–566CrossRef
14.
go back to reference De La Cruz A, Fayad JN (2000) Revision stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(6):728–732CrossRef De La Cruz A, Fayad JN (2000) Revision stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(6):728–732CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hammerschlag PE, Fishman A, Scheer AA (1998) A review of 308 cases of revision stapedectomy. Laryngoscope 108(12):1794–1800CrossRef Hammerschlag PE, Fishman A, Scheer AA (1998) A review of 308 cases of revision stapedectomy. Laryngoscope 108(12):1794–1800CrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Han WW, Incesulu A, McKenna MJ, Rauch SD, Nadol JB, Glynn RJ (1997) Revision stapedectomy: intraoperative findings, results, and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 107(9):1185–1192CrossRef Han WW, Incesulu A, McKenna MJ, Rauch SD, Nadol JB, Glynn RJ (1997) Revision stapedectomy: intraoperative findings, results, and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 107(9):1185–1192CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Magliulo G, Cristofari P, Terranova G (1997) Functional hearing results in revision stapes surgery. Am J Otol 18(4):408–412PubMed Magliulo G, Cristofari P, Terranova G (1997) Functional hearing results in revision stapes surgery. Am J Otol 18(4):408–412PubMed
19.
go back to reference Somers T, Govaerts P, de Varebeke SJ, Offeciers E (1997) Revision stapes surgery. J Laryngol Otol 111(3):233–239CrossRef Somers T, Govaerts P, de Varebeke SJ, Offeciers E (1997) Revision stapes surgery. J Laryngol Otol 111(3):233–239CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Battista RA, Wiet RJ, Joy J (2006) Revision Stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Clin. North 39(4):677–697 Battista RA, Wiet RJ, Joy J (2006) Revision Stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Clin. North 39(4):677–697
22.
go back to reference Strömbäck K, Lundman L, Bjorsne A, Grendin J, Stjernquist-Desatnik A, Dahlin-Redfors Y (2017) Stapes surgery in Sweden: evaluation of a national-based register. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 274(6):2421–2427CrossRef Strömbäck K, Lundman L, Bjorsne A, Grendin J, Stjernquist-Desatnik A, Dahlin-Redfors Y (2017) Stapes surgery in Sweden: evaluation of a national-based register. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 274(6):2421–2427CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wegner I, Vincent R, Derks LSM, Rauh SP, Heymans MW, Stegeman I, Grolman W (2018) An internally validated prognostic model for success in revision stapes surgery for tosclerosis. Laryngoscope 128:2390–2396CrossRef Wegner I, Vincent R, Derks LSM, Rauh SP, Heymans MW, Stegeman I, Grolman W (2018) An internally validated prognostic model for success in revision stapes surgery for tosclerosis. Laryngoscope 128:2390–2396CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lachance S, Bussières R, Côté M (2012) Stapes surgery in profound hearing loss due to otosclerosis. Otolo Neurotol 33:721–723CrossRef Lachance S, Bussières R, Côté M (2012) Stapes surgery in profound hearing loss due to otosclerosis. Otolo Neurotol 33:721–723CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Merkus P, van LOON MC, Smit CF, Smits C, de Cock AF, Hensen EF (2011) Decision making in advanced otosclerosis: an evidence-based strategy. Laryngoscope 121:1935–1941PubMed Merkus P, van LOON MC, Smit CF, Smits C, de Cock AF, Hensen EF (2011) Decision making in advanced otosclerosis: an evidence-based strategy. Laryngoscope 121:1935–1941PubMed
26.
go back to reference Mangam CA (2009) Long-term impact of incus necrosis on revision stapes surgery: incus versus malleus reconstruction. Otol Neurotol 30:1145–1151CrossRef Mangam CA (2009) Long-term impact of incus necrosis on revision stapes surgery: incus versus malleus reconstruction. Otol Neurotol 30:1145–1151CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rambouesek A, Schlegel CH, Linder TE (2012) From incus bypass to malleostapedotomy: technical improvements and results. J Laryngol Otol 126(10):995–1002CrossRef Rambouesek A, Schlegel CH, Linder TE (2012) From incus bypass to malleostapedotomy: technical improvements and results. J Laryngol Otol 126(10):995–1002CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Whetstone J, Nguyen A, Nguyen-Huynh A, Hamilton BE (2014) Surgical and clinical confirmation of temporal bone CT findings in patients with otosclerosis with failed stapes surgery. Head Neck 35(6), 1195–120129. Guyot J-P, Sakbani K (2007) Patients’ lives following stapedectomy complications. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65:348–352 Whetstone J, Nguyen A, Nguyen-Huynh A, Hamilton BE (2014) Surgical and clinical confirmation of temporal bone CT findings in patients with otosclerosis with failed stapes surgery. Head Neck 35(6), 1195–120129. Guyot J-P, Sakbani K (2007) Patients’ lives following stapedectomy complications. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65:348–352
29.
go back to reference Ramaswamy AT, Lustig LR (2018) Revision surgery for otosclerosis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 51:463–474CrossRef Ramaswamy AT, Lustig LR (2018) Revision surgery for otosclerosis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 51:463–474CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Otosclerosis revision surgery in Sweden: hearing outcome, predictive factors and complications
Authors
Lars Lundman
Karin Strömbäck
Andreas Björsne
Joakim Grendin
Ylva Dahlin-Redfors
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Otosclerosis
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05652-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2020 Go to the issue