Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Osteosarcoma | Original article

Functional and oncological outcomes of patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage

Authors: Wael Mohamed Safwat Sadek, Ibrahim Khairy Fayed Elshamly, Moustafa Saladin Mohammed Salem, Wessam Gamal AbouSenna, Emad Ebeid, Walid Atef Ebeid

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in skeletally immature patients. The proximal humerus is the third most common site of osteosarcoma. The literature shows a paucity of published data concerning the outcome of proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage. The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) do patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy show good functional and oncological outcomes, and (2) are there any prognostic factors that are associated with better oncological and functional outcomes?

Materials and methods

The study was a retrospective case series study assessing the overall outcome of 34 patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma. Eighteen patients were males (53%) while 16 were females. Biological reconstruction was done in 15 patients (44%), while nonbiological reconstruction was done in 19 patients. Resections were mainly intraarticular (82%). Functional outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, while oncological outcome was assessed based on local recurrence and development of chest metastasis. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test. To compare categorical data, the chi-square (χ2) test was performed. The exact test was used instead when the expected frequency was less than 5. Correlations between quantitative variables were examined using the Spearman correlation coefficient.

Results

The mean MSTS score was 25.5 (range 23–29). A younger age was statistically correlated with a poorer MSTS score (P = 0.0016). Six patients out of 34 (17.6%) had local recurrence and four of them (67%) were treated by forequarter amputation. 41% of patients developed chest metastasis, and the majority of them were treated by chemotherapy (71%). In comparison with patients with osteosarcoma at other sites who were also managed in our institution, proximal humerus osteosarcoma patients showed higher incidence rates of local recurrence and chest metastasis along with lower 5-year patient and limb survivorships compared to distal femur, proximal tibia and proximal femur osteosarcoma patients.

Conclusion

Treatment of osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus by limb salvage and chemotherapy yields a good functional outcome. The method of reconstruction does not impact the resultant function. The 5-year survivorship of these patients is 65%. Younger patients have a better oncological outcome and an inferior functional outcome.

Level of evidence

Level IV therapeutic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Böhler C, Brönimann S, Kaider A, Puchner S, Sigmund I, Windhager R et al (2018) Surgical and functional outcome after endoprosthetic reconstruction in patients with osteosarcoma of the humerus. Sci Rep 8:6224576CrossRef Böhler C, Brönimann S, Kaider A, Puchner S, Sigmund I, Windhager R et al (2018) Surgical and functional outcome after endoprosthetic reconstruction in patients with osteosarcoma of the humerus. Sci Rep 8:6224576CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Campanacci M, Cervellati G (1975) Osteosarcoma: a review of 345 cases. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1(1):5–22PubMed Campanacci M, Cervellati G (1975) Osteosarcoma: a review of 345 cases. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1(1):5–22PubMed
3.
go back to reference Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 102: quantitative data–parametric & nonparametric tests. Singapore Med J 44(8):391–396PubMed Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 102: quantitative data–parametric & nonparametric tests. Singapore Med J 44(8):391–396PubMed
4.
go back to reference Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 103: qualitative data—tests of independence. Singapore Med J 44(10):498–503PubMed Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 103: qualitative data—tests of independence. Singapore Med J 44(10):498–503PubMed
5.
go back to reference Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. Singapore Med J 44(12):614–619PubMed Chan YH (2003) Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. Singapore Med J 44(12):614–619PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cho WH, Song WS, Jeon DG, Kong CB, Kim MS, Lee JA, Yoo JY, Kim JD, Lee SY (2010) Differential presentations, clinical courses, and survivals of osteosarcomas of the proximal humerus over other extremity locations. Ann Surg Oncol 17(3):702–708CrossRefPubMed Cho WH, Song WS, Jeon DG, Kong CB, Kim MS, Lee JA, Yoo JY, Kim JD, Lee SY (2010) Differential presentations, clinical courses, and survivals of osteosarcomas of the proximal humerus over other extremity locations. Ann Surg Oncol 17(3):702–708CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dekutoski MB, Clarke MJ, Rose P, Luzzati A, Rhines LD, Varga PP, Fisher CG, Chou D, Fehlings MG, Reynolds JJ, Williams R, Quraishi NA, Germscheid NM, Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Boriani S (2016) Osteosarcoma of the spine: prognostic variables for local recurrence and overall survival, a multicenter ambispective study. J Neurosurg Spine. 25(1):59–68CrossRefPubMed Dekutoski MB, Clarke MJ, Rose P, Luzzati A, Rhines LD, Varga PP, Fisher CG, Chou D, Fehlings MG, Reynolds JJ, Williams R, Quraishi NA, Germscheid NM, Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Boriani S (2016) Osteosarcoma of the spine: prognostic variables for local recurrence and overall survival, a multicenter ambispective study. J Neurosurg Spine. 25(1):59–68CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gupta GR, Yasko AW, Lewis VO, Cannon CP, Raymond AK, Patel S et al (2009) Risk of local recurrence after deltoid-sparing resection for osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus. Cancer 115(16):3767–3773CrossRefPubMed Gupta GR, Yasko AW, Lewis VO, Cannon CP, Raymond AK, Patel S et al (2009) Risk of local recurrence after deltoid-sparing resection for osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus. Cancer 115(16):3767–3773CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Japie IM, Rădulescu D, Bădilă A, Papuc A, Ciobanu T, Stănculescu D (2020) Functional results of various reconstruction techniques in primary malignant bone tumors. Romanian J Orthop Surg Traumatol 3(1):15–19 Japie IM, Rădulescu D, Bădilă A, Papuc A, Ciobanu T, Stănculescu D (2020) Functional results of various reconstruction techniques in primary malignant bone tumors. Romanian J Orthop Surg Traumatol 3(1):15–19
11.
go back to reference Kawai A, Huvos AG, Meyers PA, Healey JH (1998) Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. Oncologic results of 40 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 348:196–207 Kawai A, Huvos AG, Meyers PA, Healey JH (1998) Osteosarcoma of the pelvis. Oncologic results of 40 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 348:196–207
12.
go back to reference Li J, Wang Z, Ji C, Chen G, Liu D, Zhu H (2017) What are the oncologic and functional outcomes after joint salvage resections for juxtaarticular osteosarcoma about the knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 475(8):2095–2104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li J, Wang Z, Ji C, Chen G, Liu D, Zhu H (2017) What are the oncologic and functional outcomes after joint salvage resections for juxtaarticular osteosarcoma about the knee? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 475(8):2095–2104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Liu T, Zhang Q, Guo X, Zhang X, Li Z, Li X (2014) Treatment and outcome of malignant bone tumors of the proximal humerus: biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15(1):69 Liu T, Zhang Q, Guo X, Zhang X, Li Z, Li X (2014) Treatment and outcome of malignant bone tumors of the proximal humerus: biological versus endoprosthetic reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15(1):69
15.
go back to reference Rafalla AA, Abdullah ESA (2017) Endoprosthetic replacement versus cement spacer in reconstruction of proximal humerus after tumor resection: Cost and benefits. J Orthop Surg Hong Kong 25(2):2309499017713937 Rafalla AA, Abdullah ESA (2017) Endoprosthetic replacement versus cement spacer in reconstruction of proximal humerus after tumor resection: Cost and benefits. J Orthop Surg Hong Kong 25(2):2309499017713937
17.
go back to reference Wittig JC, Bickels J, Kellar-Graney KL, Kim FH, Malawer MM (2002) Osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus: long-term results with limb-sparing surgery. Clin Orthop 397:156–176CrossRef Wittig JC, Bickels J, Kellar-Graney KL, Kim FH, Malawer MM (2002) Osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus: long-term results with limb-sparing surgery. Clin Orthop 397:156–176CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Yao W, Cai Q, Wang J, Hou J (2020) Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri. World J Surg Oncol 18(1):23 Yao W, Cai Q, Wang J, Hou J (2020) Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri. World J Surg Oncol 18(1):23
19.
go back to reference Zhang C, Hu J, Zhu K, Cai T, Ma X (2018) Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee. Int Orthop 42(4):927–938 Zhang C, Hu J, Zhu K, Cai T, Ma X (2018) Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee. Int Orthop 42(4):927–938
Metadata
Title
Functional and oncological outcomes of patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage
Authors
Wael Mohamed Safwat Sadek
Ibrahim Khairy Fayed Elshamly
Moustafa Saladin Mohammed Salem
Wessam Gamal AbouSenna
Emad Ebeid
Walid Atef Ebeid
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1590-9921
Electronic ISSN: 1590-9999
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00756-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 1/2024 Go to the issue