Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 1/2011

01-01-2011 | Scientific Article

Os naviculare: the multi-ossicle configuration of a normal variant

Authors: Evangelos Perdikakis, Eleni Grigoraki, Apostolos Karantanas

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To describe the multi-ossicle appearance of the os naviculare on MRI and CT examinations and to correlate this appearance with the published classification of this well-known skeletal variant.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 148 patients, examined within a 2-year period (170 CT and MRI studies of the foot-ankle), for the presence of os naviculare. This variant was classified according to a widely used system (type I, II, III). In addition, each navicular variant was further reclassified according to the presence of one or more ossicles. The presence of bone marrow edema was also recorded.

Results

Accessory navicular bone was identified in 34 cases (20%) of the 170 exams. It was detected in 14 male and 14 female patients with the following incidence: 11.15% type I (19 cases), 4.11% type II (7 cases) and 4.74% type III (8 cases). In six cases the location was bilateral. Among patients with os naviculare, a multi-ossicle appearance with a total incidence of 14.7% (8.8% two ossicle configuration and 5.9% three ossicle configuration) was observed. In two type II cases studied with MRI, there was bone marrow edema suggesting a painful pseudarthrosis.

Conclusion

The presence of multiple accessory navicular bone ossicles, not previously described with cross-sectional imaging, is reported herein. The pathogenesis and clinical relevance of this uncommon variant needs to be elucidated with further studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kidner FC. The prehallux (accessory scaphoid) in its relation to flat-foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1929;11:831–7. Kidner FC. The prehallux (accessory scaphoid) in its relation to flat-foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1929;11:831–7.
2.
go back to reference Miller TT. Painful accessory bones of the foot. Semin Musculoskel Radiol. 2002;6:153–61.CrossRef Miller TT. Painful accessory bones of the foot. Semin Musculoskel Radiol. 2002;6:153–61.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lawson JP, Ogden JA, Sella E, Barwick KW. The painful accessory navicular. Skeletal Radiol. 1984;12:250–62.CrossRefPubMed Lawson JP, Ogden JA, Sella E, Barwick KW. The painful accessory navicular. Skeletal Radiol. 1984;12:250–62.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Coskun NK, Arican RY, Utuk A, Ozcanli H, Sindel T. The incidence of accessory navicular bone types in Turkish subjects. J Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31:675–9.CrossRef Coskun NK, Arican RY, Utuk A, Ozcanli H, Sindel T. The incidence of accessory navicular bone types in Turkish subjects. J Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31:675–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the posterior tibialis tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:627–35.PubMed Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the posterior tibialis tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:627–35.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Issever AS, Minden K, Eshed I, Hermann KG. Accessory navicular bone: when ankle pain does not originate from the ankle. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:2143–4.CrossRefPubMed Issever AS, Minden K, Eshed I, Hermann KG. Accessory navicular bone: when ankle pain does not originate from the ankle. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26:2143–4.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvadó E, Camins A, Danús M, Saurí A. Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:L164–77.CrossRef Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvadó E, Camins A, Danús M, Saurí A. Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:L164–77.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chen YJ, Hsu RW, Liang SC. Degeneration of the accessory navicular synchondrosis presenting as rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1791–8.PubMed Chen YJ, Hsu RW, Liang SC. Degeneration of the accessory navicular synchondrosis presenting as rupture of the posterior tibial tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1791–8.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Dyal CM, Feder J, Deland JT, Thompson FM. Pes planus in patients with posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: asymptomatic versus symptomatic foot. Foot Ankle. 1997;18:85–8.PubMed Dyal CM, Feder J, Deland JT, Thompson FM. Pes planus in patients with posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: asymptomatic versus symptomatic foot. Foot Ankle. 1997;18:85–8.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Sullivan JA, Miller WA. The relationship of the accessory navicular to the development of the flat foot. Clin Orthop. 1979;144:233–7.PubMed Sullivan JA, Miller WA. The relationship of the accessory navicular to the development of the flat foot. Clin Orthop. 1979;144:233–7.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Prichasuk S, Sinphurmsukskul O. Kidner procedure for symptomatic accessory navicular and its relation to pes planus. Foot Ankle. 1995;16:500–3.PubMed Prichasuk S, Sinphurmsukskul O. Kidner procedure for symptomatic accessory navicular and its relation to pes planus. Foot Ankle. 1995;16:500–3.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bernaerts A, Vanhoenacker FM, Van de Perre S, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM. Accessory navicular bone: not such a normal variant. JBR-BTR. 2004;87:250–2.PubMed Bernaerts A, Vanhoenacker FM, Van de Perre S, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM. Accessory navicular bone: not such a normal variant. JBR-BTR. 2004;87:250–2.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Zadek I. The significance of the accessory tarsal scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1926;24:618–26. Zadek I. The significance of the accessory tarsal scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1926;24:618–26.
14.
go back to reference Sella EJ, Lawson JP. Biomechanics of the accessory navicular synchondrosis. Foot Ankle. 1987;8:156–63.PubMed Sella EJ, Lawson JP. Biomechanics of the accessory navicular synchondrosis. Foot Ankle. 1987;8:156–63.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Kopp FJ, Marcus RE. Clinical outcome of surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:27–30.PubMed Kopp FJ, Marcus RE. Clinical outcome of surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:27–30.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Nakayama S, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kasanami R. Percutaneous drilling of symptomatic accessory navicular in young athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:531–5.CrossRefPubMed Nakayama S, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kasanami R. Percutaneous drilling of symptomatic accessory navicular in young athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:531–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Malicky ES, Levine DS, Sangeorzan BJ. Modification of the Kidner Procedure with fusion of the primary and accessory navicular bones. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:53–4.PubMed Malicky ES, Levine DS, Sangeorzan BJ. Modification of the Kidner Procedure with fusion of the primary and accessory navicular bones. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:53–4.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Os naviculare: the multi-ossicle configuration of a normal variant
Authors
Evangelos Perdikakis
Eleni Grigoraki
Apostolos Karantanas
Publication date
01-01-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0944-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Skeletal Radiology 1/2011 Go to the issue