Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 1/2011

01-01-2011 | Scientific Article

Simplified approach to MR image quantification of the rheumatoid wrist: a pilot study

Authors: Tamotsu Kamishima, Kazuhide Tanimura, Yuko Aoki, Naoki Kosaka, Masato Shimizu, Megumi Matsuhashi, Jun Fukae, Yujiro Kon, Satoshi Terae, Hiroki Shirato

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To determine an optimal threshold in a simplified 3D-based volumetry of abnormal signals in rheumatoid wrists utilizing contrast and non-contrast MR data, and investigate the feasibility and reliability of this method.

Materials and methods

MR images of bilateral hands of 15 active rheumatoid patients were assessed before and 5 months after the initiation of tocilizumab infusion protocol. The volumes of abnormal signals were measured on STIR and post-contrast fat-suppressed T1-weighted images. Three-dimensional volume rendering of the images was used for segmentation of the wrist by an MR technologist and a radiologist. Volumetric data were obtained with variable thresholding (1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, and 2 times the muscle signal), and were compared to clinical data and semiquantitative MR scoring (RAMRIS) of the wrist. Intra- and interobserver variability and time needed for volumetry measurements were assessed.

Results

The volumetric data correlated favorably with clinical parameters almost throughout the pre-determined thresholds. Interval differences in volumetric data correlated favorably with those of RAMRIS when the threshold was set at more than 1.5 times the muscle signal. The repeatability index was lower than the average of the interval differences in volumetric data when the threshold was set at 1.5–1.75 for STIR data. Intra- and interobserver variability for volumetry was 0.79–0.84. The time required for volumetry was shorter than that for RAMRIS.

Conclusions

These results suggest that a simplified MR volumetric data acquisition may provide gross estimates of disease activity when the threshold is set properly. Such estimation can be achieved quickly by non-imaging specialists and without contrast administration.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dohn UM, Skjodt H, Hetland ML, Vestergaard A, Moller JM, Knudsen LS, et al. No erosive progression revealed by MRI in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with etanercept, even in patients with persistent MRI and clinical signs of joint inflammation. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26(11):1857–61.CrossRefPubMed Dohn UM, Skjodt H, Hetland ML, Vestergaard A, Moller JM, Knudsen LS, et al. No erosive progression revealed by MRI in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with etanercept, even in patients with persistent MRI and clinical signs of joint inflammation. Clin Rheumatol. 2007;26(11):1857–61.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lisbona MP, Maymo J, Perich J, Almirall M, Perez-Garcia C, Carbonell J. Etanercept reduces synovitis as measured by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after only 6 weeks. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(3):394–7.PubMed Lisbona MP, Maymo J, Perich J, Almirall M, Perez-Garcia C, Carbonell J. Etanercept reduces synovitis as measured by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after only 6 weeks. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(3):394–7.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ostergaard M, Edmonds J, McQueen F, Peterfy C, Lassere M, Ejbjerg B, et al. An introduction to the EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 Suppl 1:i3–7.CrossRefPubMed Ostergaard M, Edmonds J, McQueen F, Peterfy C, Lassere M, Ejbjerg B, et al. An introduction to the EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 Suppl 1:i3–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Quinn MA, Conaghan PG, O’Connor PJ, Karim Z, Greenstein A, Brown A, et al. Very early treatment with infliximab in addition to methotrexate in early, poor-prognosis rheumatoid arthritis reduces magnetic resonance imaging evidence of synovitis and damage, with sustained benefit after infliximab withdrawal: results from a twelve-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(1):27–35.CrossRefPubMed Quinn MA, Conaghan PG, O’Connor PJ, Karim Z, Greenstein A, Brown A, et al. Very early treatment with infliximab in addition to methotrexate in early, poor-prognosis rheumatoid arthritis reduces magnetic resonance imaging evidence of synovitis and damage, with sustained benefit after infliximab withdrawal: results from a twelve-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(1):27–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zikou AK, Argyropoulou MI, Voulgari PV, Xydis VG, Nikas SN, Efremidis SC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging quantification of hand synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(2):219–23.PubMed Zikou AK, Argyropoulou MI, Voulgari PV, Xydis VG, Nikas SN, Efremidis SC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging quantification of hand synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(2):219–23.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Argyropoulou MI, Glatzouni A, Voulgari PV, Xydis VG, Nikas SN, Efremidis SC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging quantification of hand synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab. Joint Bone Spine. 2005;72(6):557–61.CrossRefPubMed Argyropoulou MI, Glatzouni A, Voulgari PV, Xydis VG, Nikas SN, Efremidis SC, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging quantification of hand synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with infliximab. Joint Bone Spine. 2005;72(6):557–61.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Konig H, Sieper J, Wolf KJ. Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1990;176(2):473–7.PubMed Konig H, Sieper J, Wolf KJ. Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1990;176(2):473–7.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ostergaard M, Stoltenberg M, Lovgreen-Nielsen P, Volck B, Jensen CH, Lorenzen I. Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane and joint effusion volumes in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: comparison with the macroscopic and microscopic appearance of the synovium. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(10):1856–67.CrossRefPubMed Ostergaard M, Stoltenberg M, Lovgreen-Nielsen P, Volck B, Jensen CH, Lorenzen I. Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane and joint effusion volumes in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: comparison with the macroscopic and microscopic appearance of the synovium. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(10):1856–67.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ostergaard M, Stoltenberg M, Lovgreen-Nielsen P, Volck B, Sonne-Holm S, Lorenzen I. Quantification of synovitis by MRI: correlation between dynamic and static gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and microscopic and macroscopic signs of synovial inflammation. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;16(7):743–54.CrossRefPubMed Ostergaard M, Stoltenberg M, Lovgreen-Nielsen P, Volck B, Sonne-Holm S, Lorenzen I. Quantification of synovitis by MRI: correlation between dynamic and static gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and microscopic and macroscopic signs of synovial inflammation. Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;16(7):743–54.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ostergaard M, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M, Gideon P, Klarlund M, Jensen KE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(5):918–29.CrossRefPubMed Ostergaard M, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M, Gideon P, Klarlund M, Jensen KE, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(5):918–29.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sugimoto H, Takeda A, Kano S. Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging: quantification of pannus volume in the hands. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37(8):854–61.CrossRefPubMed Sugimoto H, Takeda A, Kano S. Assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging: quantification of pannus volume in the hands. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37(8):854–61.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ostergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Dohn UM. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis–status and recent advances for magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, computed tomography and conventional radiography. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22(6):1019–44.CrossRefPubMed Ostergaard M, Pedersen SJ, Dohn UM. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis–status and recent advances for magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, computed tomography and conventional radiography. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22(6):1019–44.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Palmer WE, Rosenthal DI, Schoenberg OI, Fischman AJ, Simon LS, Rubin RH, et al. Quantification of inflammation in the wrist with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology. 1995;196(3):647–55.PubMed Palmer WE, Rosenthal DI, Schoenberg OI, Fischman AJ, Simon LS, Rubin RH, et al. Quantification of inflammation in the wrist with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology. 1995;196(3):647–55.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Xanthopoulos E, Hutchinson CE, Adams JE, Bruce IN, Nash AF, Holmes AP, et al. Improved wrist pannus volume measurement from contrast-enhanced MRI in rheumatoid arthritis using shuffle transform. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25(1):110–6.CrossRefPubMed Xanthopoulos E, Hutchinson CE, Adams JE, Bruce IN, Nash AF, Holmes AP, et al. Improved wrist pannus volume measurement from contrast-enhanced MRI in rheumatoid arthritis using shuffle transform. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25(1):110–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(3):315–24.CrossRefPubMed Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988;31(3):315–24.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van't Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(1):34–40.CrossRefPubMed van Gestel AM, Prevoo ML, van't Hof MA, van Rijswijk MH, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Development and validation of the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison with the preliminary American College of Rheumatology and the World Health Organization/International League Against Rheumatism Criteria. Arthritis Rheum. 1996;39(1):34–40.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Cimmino MA, Innocenti S, Livrone F, Magnaguagno F, Silvestri E, Garlaschi G. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis can discriminate active from inactive disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(5):1207–13.CrossRefPubMed Cimmino MA, Innocenti S, Livrone F, Magnaguagno F, Silvestri E, Garlaschi G. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis can discriminate active from inactive disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(5):1207–13.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ruckmann A, Ehle B, Trampisch HJ. How to evaluate measuring methods in the case of non-defined external validity. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(10):1998–2000.PubMed Ruckmann A, Ehle B, Trampisch HJ. How to evaluate measuring methods in the case of non-defined external validity. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(10):1998–2000.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Sugimoto H, Sakai O, Shinozaki T, Ohsawa T, Kimura T. Effect of water fraction in selection of optimal TI value for STIR sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18(1):119–25.CrossRefPubMed Sugimoto H, Sakai O, Shinozaki T, Ohsawa T, Kimura T. Effect of water fraction in selection of optimal TI value for STIR sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18(1):119–25.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Ostergaard M, Conaghan PG, O’Connor P, Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Emery P, et al. Reducing invasiveness, duration, and cost of magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis by omitting intravenous contrast injection – Does it change the assessment of inflammatory and destructive joint changes by the OMERACT RAMRIS? J Rheumatol. 2009;36(8):1806–10.CrossRefPubMed Ostergaard M, Conaghan PG, O’Connor P, Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Emery P, et al. Reducing invasiveness, duration, and cost of magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis by omitting intravenous contrast injection – Does it change the assessment of inflammatory and destructive joint changes by the OMERACT RAMRIS? J Rheumatol. 2009;36(8):1806–10.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Simplified approach to MR image quantification of the rheumatoid wrist: a pilot study
Authors
Tamotsu Kamishima
Kazuhide Tanimura
Yuko Aoki
Naoki Kosaka
Masato Shimizu
Megumi Matsuhashi
Jun Fukae
Yujiro Kon
Satoshi Terae
Hiroki Shirato
Publication date
01-01-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-0935-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Skeletal Radiology 1/2011 Go to the issue