Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Original Article

Organ-sparing treatment of penile cancer with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy

Authors: Johannes Seibold, Vratislav Strnad, Rainer Fietkau

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

To assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of protocol-based interstitial pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy for penile carcinoma.

Patients and methods

From August 2002 to February 2014, 13 men with penile cancer were treated by interstitial brachytherapy. The tumor stage was T1 for eight patients, T2 for four patients, and T3 for one patient. The tumor grade was well differentiated for five patients and moderately differentiated for seven patients, while it was unknown for one patient. Lymph node staging was positive for three of 13 patients. All patients were treated using interstitial PDR brachytherapy with dose specifications according to the Paris system. For data collection of erectile dysfunction, the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire was used, supplemented by the follow-up data.

Results

The median follow-up was 54.0 months (range, 13–155 months). Only one patient (1/13, 7.7 %) with local failure was documented. At 5 and 10 years, the local cumulative recurrence rate, disease-free survival, and the cancer-specific survival rates were 12.5 % (95 % CI, 80.4–119.6), 80.8 % (95 % CI, 75.2–124.8), and 77.9 % (95 % CI, 74.3–125.7), respectively. At the time of analysis, nine of 13 men were alive; two of 13 men died of distant metastases from the tumor and two for other reasons with no sign of cancer disease. Serious late side effects such as soft tissue necrosis occurred in four of 13 patients (30 %) and all were successfully treated with medication. Mutilating salvage surgery was not necessary in any of the cases. Urethral stenosis was documented for two of 13 (15.4 %) and dysuria occurred in four of 13 patients (30.8 %). Eight of 11 men (72.7 %) never or only sometimes had erectile dysfunction.

Conclusion

In selected patients, interstitial PDR brachytherapy of penile cancer is effective as an organ-sparing treatment. It yields satisfactory results for the conservation of sexual function.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Backes DM, Kurman RJ, Pimenta JM et al (2009) Systematic review of human papillomavirus prevalence in invasive penile cancer. Cancer Causes Control 20:449–457CrossRefPubMed Backes DM, Kurman RJ, Pimenta JM et al (2009) Systematic review of human papillomavirus prevalence in invasive penile cancer. Cancer Causes Control 20:449–457CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chaudhary AJ, Ghosh S, Bhalavat RL et al (1999) Interstitial brachytherapy in carcinoma of the penis. Strahlenther Onkol 175:17–20CrossRefPubMed Chaudhary AJ, Ghosh S, Bhalavat RL et al (1999) Interstitial brachytherapy in carcinoma of the penis. Strahlenther Onkol 175:17–20CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chaux A, Netto GJ, Rodriguez IM et al (2013) Epidemiologic profile, sexual history, pathologic features, and human papillomavirus status of 103 patients with penile carcinoma. World J Urol 31:861–867CrossRefPubMed Chaux A, Netto GJ, Rodriguez IM et al (2013) Epidemiologic profile, sexual history, pathologic features, and human papillomavirus status of 103 patients with penile carcinoma. World J Urol 31:861–867CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Crook J, Ma C, Grimard L (2009) Radiation therapy in the management of the primary penile tumor: an update. World J Urol 27:189–196CrossRefPubMed Crook J, Ma C, Grimard L (2009) Radiation therapy in the management of the primary penile tumor: an update. World J Urol 27:189–196CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Crook JM, Jezioranski J, Grimard L et al (2005) Penile brachytherapy: results for 49 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:460–467CrossRefPubMed Crook JM, Jezioranski J, Grimard L et al (2005) Penile brachytherapy: results for 49 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:460–467CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Crook JM, Haie-Meder C, Demanes DJ et al (2013) American Brachytherapy Society - Groupe Europeen de Curietherapie - European Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ABS-GEC-ESTRO) consensus statement for penile brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 12:191–198CrossRefPubMed Crook JM, Haie-Meder C, Demanes DJ et al (2013) American Brachytherapy Society - Groupe Europeen de Curietherapie - European Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ABS-GEC-ESTRO) consensus statement for penile brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 12:191–198CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Crevoisier R de, Slimane K, Sanfilippo N et al (2009) Long-term results of brachytherapy for carcinoma of the penis confined to the glans (N- or NX). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:1150–1156CrossRefPubMed Crevoisier R de, Slimane K, Sanfilippo N et al (2009) Long-term results of brachytherapy for carcinoma of the penis confined to the glans (N- or NX). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:1150–1156CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Delannes M, Malavaud B, Douchez J et al (1992) Iridium-192 interstitial therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 24:479–483CrossRefPubMed Delannes M, Malavaud B, Douchez J et al (1992) Iridium-192 interstitial therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 24:479–483CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Delaunay B, Soh PN, Delannes M et al (2014) Brachytherapy for penile cancer: efficacy and impact on sexual function. Brachytherapy 13:380–387CrossRefPubMed Delaunay B, Soh PN, Delannes M et al (2014) Brachytherapy for penile cancer: efficacy and impact on sexual function. Brachytherapy 13:380–387CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Righetti R, D’Amico A et al (2000) General state of health and psychological well-being in patients after surgery for urological malignant neoplasms. Urol Int 65:130–134CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Righetti R, D’Amico A et al (2000) General state of health and psychological well-being in patients after surgery for urological malignant neoplasms. Urol Int 65:130–134CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hakenberg OW, Comperat EM, Minhas S et al (2015) EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:142–150CrossRefPubMed Hakenberg OW, Comperat EM, Minhas S et al (2015) EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:142–150CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hasan S, Francis A, Hagenauer A et al (2015) The role of brachytherapy in organ preservation for penile cancer: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Brachytherapy 14:517–524CrossRefPubMed Hasan S, Francis A, Hagenauer A et al (2015) The role of brachytherapy in organ preservation for penile cancer: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Brachytherapy 14:517–524CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Heideman DA, Waterboer T, Pawlita M et al (2007) Human papillomavirus-16 is the predominant type etiologically involved in penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25:4550–4556CrossRefPubMed Heideman DA, Waterboer T, Pawlita M et al (2007) Human papillomavirus-16 is the predominant type etiologically involved in penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 25:4550–4556CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kamsu-Kom L, Bidault F, Mazeron R et al (2015) Clinical experience with pulse dose rate brachytherapy for conservative treatment of penile carcinoma and comparison with historical data of low dose rate brachytherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 27:387–393CrossRef Kamsu-Kom L, Bidault F, Mazeron R et al (2015) Clinical experience with pulse dose rate brachytherapy for conservative treatment of penile carcinoma and comparison with historical data of low dose rate brachytherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 27:387–393CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kiltie AE, Elwell C, Close HJ et al (2000) Iridium-192 implantation for node-negative carcinoma of the penis: the Cookridge Hospital experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 12:25–31 Kiltie AE, Elwell C, Close HJ et al (2000) Iridium-192 implantation for node-negative carcinoma of the penis: the Cookridge Hospital experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 12:25–31
16.
go back to reference Krengli M, Masini L, Comoli AM et al (2014) Interstitial brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma. Outcome analysis in 60 patients. Strahlenther Onkol 190:245–249CrossRefPubMed Krengli M, Masini L, Comoli AM et al (2014) Interstitial brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma. Outcome analysis in 60 patients. Strahlenther Onkol 190:245–249CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Langsenlehner T, Mayer R, Quehenberger F et al (2008) The role of radiation therapy after incomplete resection of penile cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 184:359–363CrossRefPubMed Langsenlehner T, Mayer R, Quehenberger F et al (2008) The role of radiation therapy after incomplete resection of penile cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 184:359–363CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lestrade L, Bari B De, Pommier P et al (2014) Role of brachytherapy in the treatment of cancers of the anal canal. Long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of a large monocentric retrospective series. Strahlenther Onkol 190:546–554CrossRefPubMed Lestrade L, Bari B De, Pommier P et al (2014) Role of brachytherapy in the treatment of cancers of the anal canal. Long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of a large monocentric retrospective series. Strahlenther Onkol 190:546–554CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lont AP, Kroon BK, Horenblas S et al (2006) Presence of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA in penile carcinoma predicts favorable outcome in survival. Int J Cancer 119:1078–1081CrossRefPubMed Lont AP, Kroon BK, Horenblas S et al (2006) Presence of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA in penile carcinoma predicts favorable outcome in survival. Int J Cancer 119:1078–1081CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mosconi AM, Roila F, Gatta G et al (2005) Cancer of the penis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 53:165–177CrossRefPubMed Mosconi AM, Roila F, Gatta G et al (2005) Cancer of the penis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 53:165–177CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pimenta A, Gutierrez C, Mosquera D et al (2015) Penile brachytherapy-Retrospective review of a single institution. Brachytherapy 14:525–530CrossRefPubMed Pimenta A, Gutierrez C, Mosquera D et al (2015) Penile brachytherapy-Retrospective review of a single institution. Brachytherapy 14:525–530CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA et al (2005) Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology 66:1292–1295CrossRefPubMed Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA et al (2005) Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology 66:1292–1295CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rozan R, Albuisson E, Giraud B et al (1995) Interstitial brachytherapy for penile carcinoma: a multicentric survey (259 patients). Radiother Oncol 36:83–93CrossRefPubMed Rozan R, Albuisson E, Giraud B et al (1995) Interstitial brachytherapy for penile carcinoma: a multicentric survey (259 patients). Radiother Oncol 36:83–93CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Soh PN, Delaunay B, Nasr EB et al (2014) Evaluation of sexual functions and sexual behaviors after penile brachytherapy in men treated for penile carcinoma. Basic Clin Androl 24:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Soh PN, Delaunay B, Nasr EB et al (2014) Evaluation of sexual functions and sexual behaviors after penile brachytherapy in men treated for penile carcinoma. Basic Clin Androl 24:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Yoshida K, Yamazaki H, Takenaka T et al (2014) High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: are high-risk patients good candidates? Strahlenther Onkol 190:1015–1020CrossRefPubMed Yoshida K, Yamazaki H, Takenaka T et al (2014) High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: are high-risk patients good candidates? Strahlenther Onkol 190:1015–1020CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Organ-sparing treatment of penile cancer with interstitial pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy
Authors
Johannes Seibold
Vratislav Strnad
Rainer Fietkau
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-0968-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 7/2016 Go to the issue