Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2019

01-01-2019 | Clinical trial

Oral etoposide in heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer: results from the ESME cohort and comparison with other chemotherapy regimens

Authors: Luc Cabel, Matthieu Carton, Bianca Cheaib, Jean-Yves Pierga, Florence Dalenc, Audrey Mailliez, Christelle Levy, William Jacot, Marc Debled, Marianne Leheurteur, Isabelle Desmoulins, Claudia Lefeuvre, Anthony Gonçalves, Lionel Uwer, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Jean-Christophe Eymard, Thierry Petit, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier, Geneviève Perrocheau, Irwin Piot, David Pérol, Gaëtane Simon, Florence Lerebours

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a common setting in which chemotherapy could be effective even in later lines of treatment. Oral etoposide has demonstrated clinical activity in this setting in small-scale studies, but its efficacy has not been compared to that of other chemotherapy regimens.

Methods

We used the ESME database (Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics), a real-life national French multicentre cohort of MBC patients initiating therapy between 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2014. HER2-negative MBC patients who received oral etoposide as > 3rd chemotherapy line and for more than 14 days were included. Primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), and propensity-score matched Cox models including comparison with other therapies in the same setting.

Results

Three hundred forty-five out of 16,702 patients received oral etoposide and 222 were eligible. Median PFS was 3.2 months [95% CI 2.8–4] and median OS 7.3 months [95% CI 5.7–10.3]. Median PFS did not significantly differ according to the therapeutic line. The only prognostic factor for both PFS and OS was the MBC phenotype (hormone receptor-positive versus triple-negative, HR = 0.71 [95% CI 0.52–0.97], p = 0.028 for PFS and HR = 0.65 [0.46–0.92], p = 0.014 for OS). After matching for the propensity score, no differential effect on PFS or OS was observed between oral etoposide and other chemotherapy regimens administered in the same setting (HR = 0.94 [95% CI 0.77–1.15], p = 0.55 for PFS and HR = 1.10 [95% CI 0.88–1.37], p = 0.40 for OS).

Conclusion

Oral etoposide retains some efficacy in selected heavily pre-treated patients with HER2-negative MBC, with the advantages of oral administration.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Pusztai L, Walters RS, Valero V et al (1998) Daily oral etoposide in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 21:442–446CrossRefPubMed Pusztai L, Walters RS, Valero V et al (1998) Daily oral etoposide in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 21:442–446CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Atienza DM, Vogel CL, Trock B, Swain SM (1995) Phase II study of oral etoposide for patients with advanced breast cancer. Cancer 76:2485–2490CrossRefPubMed Atienza DM, Vogel CL, Trock B, Swain SM (1995) Phase II study of oral etoposide for patients with advanced breast cancer. Cancer 76:2485–2490CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nesković-Konstantinović ZB, Bosnjak SM, Radulović SS, Mitrović LB (1996) Daily oral etoposide in metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 7:543–547CrossRefPubMed Nesković-Konstantinović ZB, Bosnjak SM, Radulović SS, Mitrović LB (1996) Daily oral etoposide in metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 7:543–547CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jagodic M, Cufer T, Zakotnik B, Cervek J (2001) Selection of candidates for oral etoposide salvage chemotherapy in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients. Anticancer Drugs 12:199–204CrossRefPubMed Jagodic M, Cufer T, Zakotnik B, Cervek J (2001) Selection of candidates for oral etoposide salvage chemotherapy in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients. Anticancer Drugs 12:199–204CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ming K, Rosenbaum PR (2000) Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching with a variable number of controls. Biometrics 56:118–124CrossRefPubMed Ming K, Rosenbaum PR (2000) Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching with a variable number of controls. Biometrics 56:118–124CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
17.
go back to reference Saphner T, Weller EA, Tormey DC et al (2000) 21-day oral etoposide for metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study and review of the literature. Am J Clin Oncol 23:258–262CrossRefPubMed Saphner T, Weller EA, Tormey DC et al (2000) 21-day oral etoposide for metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study and review of the literature. Am J Clin Oncol 23:258–262CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Palombo H, Estapé J, Viñolas N et al (1994) Chronic oral etoposide in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 33:527–529CrossRefPubMed Palombo H, Estapé J, Viñolas N et al (1994) Chronic oral etoposide in advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 33:527–529CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Oral etoposide in heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer: results from the ESME cohort and comparison with other chemotherapy regimens
Authors
Luc Cabel
Matthieu Carton
Bianca Cheaib
Jean-Yves Pierga
Florence Dalenc
Audrey Mailliez
Christelle Levy
William Jacot
Marc Debled
Marianne Leheurteur
Isabelle Desmoulins
Claudia Lefeuvre
Anthony Gonçalves
Lionel Uwer
Jean-Marc Ferrero
Jean-Christophe Eymard
Thierry Petit
Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier
Geneviève Perrocheau
Irwin Piot
David Pérol
Gaëtane Simon
Florence Lerebours
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-5017-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine