Skip to main content
Top

20-04-2024 | Oral Antidiabetic Drugs | Original Research Article

Evaluating the Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Oral Antidiabetic Drugs Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Authors: Ling-Hsiang Chuang, Huanlan Zhang, Tianqi Hong, Shitong Xie

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To quantify the preferences for an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in China.

Methods

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) with hypothetical OAD profiles was performed among patients with T2DM recruited from both online and offline sources. Each patient completed 12 DCE choice tasks. The attributes, elicited through mixed methods, include blood glucose level decrease, blood glucose level stability, frequency of medication, gastrointestinal side effects, dose adjustment and out-of-pocket expense. The conditional logit regression model was used to analyze the data. Patients’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) was also calculated. Subgroup analyses based on patient characteristics were also conducted.

Results

A total of 741 respondents were included in the analysis sample, covering 456 respondents online and 285 offline. The result showed that all attributes and levels were statistically significant, except one level “dose adjustment required for patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency” in the attribute of dose adjustment. WTP results showed that patients were willing to pay 12.06 and 23.20 yuan, respectively to reduce the frequency of medication from “once per day” and “three times per day” to “once every 2 weeks”, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the frequency of medication (once versus two to three times per day) had the largest impact and influenced most coefficient estimates.

Conclusion

The results suggest that Chinese patients with T2DM prioritized better efficacy, less frequency of medication, lower gastrointestinal side effects, no dose adjustment required for patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency, and less out-of-pocket expense of OAD treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Li Y, Teng D, Shi X, Qin G, Qin Y, Quan H, et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study. Br Med J (Clinical research ed). 2020;369: m997. Li Y, Teng D, Shi X, Qin G, Qin Y, Quan H, et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study. Br Med J (Clinical research ed). 2020;369: m997.
2.
go back to reference A mass survey of diabetes mellitus in a population of 300,000 in 14 provinces and municipalities in China (author's transl). Zhonghua nei ke za zhi. 1981;20(11):678–83. A mass survey of diabetes mellitus in a population of 300,000 in 14 provinces and municipalities in China (author's transl). Zhonghua nei ke za zhi. 1981;20(11):678–83.
3.
go back to reference Tang X, Yan X, Zhou H, Yang X, Niu X, Liu J, et al. Prevalence and identification of type 1 diabetes in Chinese adults with newly diagnosed diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:1527–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tang X, Yan X, Zhou H, Yang X, Niu X, Liu J, et al. Prevalence and identification of type 1 diabetes in Chinese adults with newly diagnosed diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:1527–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Chinese Diabetes Society. Guideline for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China (2020 edition). Chin J Diabetes. 2021;13(4):315–409. Chinese Diabetes Society. Guideline for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China (2020 edition). Chin J Diabetes. 2021;13(4):315–409.
5.
go back to reference Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, Farmer AJ, Fenn P, Stevens RJ, et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia. 2004;47(10):1747–59.CrossRefPubMed Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, Farmer AJ, Fenn P, Stevens RJ, et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia. 2004;47(10):1747–59.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jash K, Gondaliya P, Kirave P, Kulkarni B, Sunkaria A, Kalia K. Cognitive dysfunction: a growing link between diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease. Drug Dev Res. 2020;81(2):144–64.CrossRefPubMed Jash K, Gondaliya P, Kirave P, Kulkarni B, Sunkaria A, Kalia K. Cognitive dysfunction: a growing link between diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease. Drug Dev Res. 2020;81(2):144–64.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Asmat K, Dhamani K, Gul R, Froelicher ES. The effectiveness of patient-centered care vs. usual care in type 2 diabetes self-management a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10:994766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Asmat K, Dhamani K, Gul R, Froelicher ES. The effectiveness of patient-centered care vs. usual care in type 2 diabetes self-management a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10:994766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Liu S, Yang Y, Sun H, Ming J, Chen Y. The significance, approaches and challenges of integrating patient preference evidence into health technology assessment. Chin J Health Policy. 2022;15(5):52–8. Liu S, Yang Y, Sun H, Ming J, Chen Y. The significance, approaches and challenges of integrating patient preference evidence into health technology assessment. Chin J Health Policy. 2022;15(5):52–8.
10.
go back to reference Chinese Diabetes Society, National Office for Primary Diabetes Care. National handbook for the prevention and control of diabetes in primary care. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2019;58(10):713–35. Chinese Diabetes Society, National Office for Primary Diabetes Care. National handbook for the prevention and control of diabetes in primary care. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2019;58(10):713–35.
11.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.CrossRefPubMed Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference von Arx LB, Kjeer T. The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research. Patient. 2014;7(3):283–300.CrossRef von Arx LB, Kjeer T. The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research. Patient. 2014;7(3):283–300.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fifer S, Rose J, Hamrosi KK, Swain D. Valuing injection frequency and other attributes of type 2 diabetes treatments in Australia: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):675.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fifer S, Rose J, Hamrosi KK, Swain D. Valuing injection frequency and other attributes of type 2 diabetes treatments in Australia: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):675.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Liu S, Liu J, Si L, Ke X, Liu L, Ren Y, et al. Patient preferences for anti-hyperglycaemic medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: findings from a national survey. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8(4):e010942.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu S, Liu J, Si L, Ke X, Liu L, Ren Y, et al. Patient preferences for anti-hyperglycaemic medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: findings from a national survey. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8(4):e010942.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Huang Y, Huang Q, Xu A, Lu M, Xi X. Patient preferences for diabetes treatment among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: a discrete choice experiment. Front Public Health. 2021;9: 782964.CrossRefPubMed Huang Y, Huang Q, Xu A, Lu M, Xi X. Patient preferences for diabetes treatment among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: a discrete choice experiment. Front Public Health. 2021;9: 782964.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lv Y, Ren R, Tang C, Song K, Li S, Wang H. Preferences for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for medications in Shandong Province, China: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022;16:2335–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lv Y, Ren R, Tang C, Song K, Li S, Wang H. Preferences for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for medications in Shandong Province, China: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022;16:2335–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Purnell TS, Joy S, Little E, Bridges JF, Maruthur N. Patient preferences for noninsulin diabetes medications: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(7):2055–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Purnell TS, Joy S, Little E, Bridges JF, Maruthur N. Patient preferences for noninsulin diabetes medications: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(7):2055–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Thieu VT, Robinson S, Kennedy-Martin T, Boye KS, Garcia-Perez LE. Patient preferences for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor-agonist treatment attributes. Patient Prefer Adherance. 2019;13:561–76.CrossRef Thieu VT, Robinson S, Kennedy-Martin T, Boye KS, Garcia-Perez LE. Patient preferences for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor-agonist treatment attributes. Patient Prefer Adherance. 2019;13:561–76.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mao Z, Chuang L-H, Xie S, Wu J. A qualitative study of oral antidiabetic medication treatment preference for type 2 diabetes patients: a case study of patients in Beijing. World Clin Drug. 2024;45(1):38–44. Mao Z, Chuang L-H, Xie S, Wu J. A qualitative study of oral antidiabetic medication treatment preference for type 2 diabetes patients: a case study of patients in Beijing. World Clin Drug. 2024;45(1):38–44.
22.
go back to reference de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA. Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient. 2015;8(5):373–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA. Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient. 2015;8(5):373–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Johnson FR, Mohamed AF, Ozdemir S, Marshall DA, Phillips KA. How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments? Health Econ. 2011;20(3):323–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johnson FR, Mohamed AF, Ozdemir S, Marshall DA, Phillips KA. How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments? Health Econ. 2011;20(3):323–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 17. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2021. StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 17. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2021.
25.
go back to reference Janssen EM, Hauber AB, Bridges JFP. Conducting a discrete-choice experiment study following recommendations for good research practices: an application for eliciting patient preferences for diabetes treatments. Value Health. 2018;21(1):59–68.CrossRefPubMed Janssen EM, Hauber AB, Bridges JFP. Conducting a discrete-choice experiment study following recommendations for good research practices: an application for eliciting patient preferences for diabetes treatments. Value Health. 2018;21(1):59–68.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Joshi SR, Standl E, Tong N, Shah P, Kalra S, Rathod R. Therapeutic potential of α-glucosidase inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evidence-based review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(13):1959–81.CrossRefPubMed Joshi SR, Standl E, Tong N, Shah P, Kalra S, Rathod R. Therapeutic potential of α-glucosidase inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evidence-based review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(13):1959–81.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Suzuki K, Hasegawa K, Watanabe M. Efficacy and patient satisfaction of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor after switching from once-daily DPP-4 inhibitor to once-weekly regimen. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10(8):641–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Suzuki K, Hasegawa K, Watanabe M. Efficacy and patient satisfaction of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor after switching from once-daily DPP-4 inhibitor to once-weekly regimen. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10(8):641–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Janssen EM, Segal JB, Bridges JF. A Framework for instrument development of a choice experiment: an application to type 2 diabetes. Patient. 2016;9(5):465–79.CrossRefPubMed Janssen EM, Segal JB, Bridges JF. A Framework for instrument development of a choice experiment: an application to type 2 diabetes. Patient. 2016;9(5):465–79.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hollin IL, Craig BM, Coast J, Beusterien K, Vass C, DiSantostefano R, et al. Reporting formative qualitative research to support the development of quantitative preference study protocols and corresponding survey instruments: guidelines for authors and reviewers. Patient. 2020;13(1):121–36.CrossRefPubMed Hollin IL, Craig BM, Coast J, Beusterien K, Vass C, DiSantostefano R, et al. Reporting formative qualitative research to support the development of quantitative preference study protocols and corresponding survey instruments: guidelines for authors and reviewers. Patient. 2020;13(1):121–36.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Oral Antidiabetic Drugs Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Authors
Ling-Hsiang Chuang
Huanlan Zhang
Tianqi Hong
Shitong Xie
Publication date
20-04-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-024-00694-7
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.