Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2007

01-06-2007

Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions

Authors: Liam A. Haveran, Yuri W. Novitsky, Donald R. Czerniach, Gordie K. Kaban, Melinda Taylor, Karen Gallagher-Dorval, Richard Schmidt, John J. Kelly, Demetrius E. M. Litwin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Alterations of video monitor and laparoscopic camera position may create perceptual distortion of the operative field, possibly leading to decreased laparoscopic efficiency. We aimed to determine the influence of monitor/camera position on the laparoscopic performance of surgeons of varying skill levels.

Methods

Twelve experienced and 12 novice participants performed a one-handed task with their dominant hand in a modified laparoscopic trainer. Initially, the camera was fixed directly in front of the participant (0°) and the monitor location was varied between three positions, to the left of midline (120°), directly across from the participant (180°), and to the right of the midline (240°). In the second experiment monitor position was constant straight across from the participant (180°) while the camera position was adjusted between the center position (0°), to the left of midline (60°), and to the right of midline (300°). Participants completed five trials in each monitor/camera setting. The significance of the effects of skill level and combinations of camera and monitor angle were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures using restricted maximum likelihood estimation.

Results

Experienced surgeons completed the task significantly faster at all monitor/camera positions. The best performance in both groups was observed when the monitor and camera were located at 180° and 0°, respectively. Monitor positioning to the right of midline (240°) resulted in significantly worse performance compared to 180° for both experienced and novice surgeons. Compared to 0° (center), camera position to the left or the right resulted in significantly prolonged task times for both groups. Novice subjects also demonstrated a significantly lower ability to adjust to suboptimal camera/monitor positions.

Conclusion

Experienced subjects demonstrated superior performance under all study conditions. Optimally, the camera should be directly in front and the monitor should be directly across from a surgeon. Alternatively, the monitor/camera could be placed opposite to the surgeon’s non-dominant hand. The suboptimal camera/monitor conditions are especially difficult to overcome for inexperienced subjects. Monitor and camera positioning must be emphasized to ensure optimal laparoscopic performance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Holden JG, Flach JM, Donchin Y (1999) Perceptual-motor coordination in an endoscopic surgery simulation. Surg Endosc 13: 127–132PubMedCrossRef Holden JG, Flach JM, Donchin Y (1999) Perceptual-motor coordination in an endoscopic surgery simulation. Surg Endosc 13: 127–132PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Omar AM, Wade NJ, Brown SI, Cuschieri A (2005) Assessing the benefits of “gaze-down” display location in complex tasks. Surg Endosc 19: 105–108PubMedCrossRef Omar AM, Wade NJ, Brown SI, Cuschieri A (2005) Assessing the benefits of “gaze-down” display location in complex tasks. Surg Endosc 19: 105–108PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Emam TA, Hanna G, Cuschieri A (2002) Comparison of orthodox vs off-optical axis endoscopic manipulations: importance of monitor display angles. Surg Endosc 16: 401–405PubMedCrossRef Emam TA, Hanna G, Cuschieri A (2002) Comparison of orthodox vs off-optical axis endoscopic manipulations: importance of monitor display angles. Surg Endosc 16: 401–405PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G (2005) Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 436–440PubMedCrossRef Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G (2005) Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19: 436–440PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Conrad J, Shah AH, Divino CM, Schluender S, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A (2006) The role of mental rotation and memory scanning on the performance of laparoscopic skills: a study on the effect of camera rotational angle. Surg Endosc 20: 504–510PubMedCrossRef Conrad J, Shah AH, Divino CM, Schluender S, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A (2006) The role of mental rotation and memory scanning on the performance of laparoscopic skills: a study on the effect of camera rotational angle. Surg Endosc 20: 504–510PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Smith WD, Berguer R, Nguyen NT (2005) Monitor height affects surgeons’ stress level and performance on minimally invasive surgery tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform 111:498–501PubMed Smith WD, Berguer R, Nguyen NT (2005) Monitor height affects surgeons’ stress level and performance on minimally invasive surgery tasks. Stud Health Technol Inform 111:498–501PubMed
7.
go back to reference Zehetner J, Kaltenbacher A, Wayand W, Shamiyeh A (2006) Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:139–141PubMedCrossRef Zehetner J, Kaltenbacher A, Wayand W, Shamiyeh A (2006) Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:139–141PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Moschos E, Coleman RL (2004) Acquiring laparoscopic skill proficiency: does orientation matter. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: 1782–1787PubMedCrossRef Moschos E, Coleman RL (2004) Acquiring laparoscopic skill proficiency: does orientation matter. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191: 1782–1787PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227:481–484PubMedCrossRef Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227:481–484PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Medina M (1997) Image rotation and reversal: major obstacles in learning intracorporeal suturing and knot-tying. JSLS 1: 331–336PubMed Medina M (1997) Image rotation and reversal: major obstacles in learning intracorporeal suturing and knot-tying. JSLS 1: 331–336PubMed
11.
go back to reference Breedveld P, Stassen HG, Meijer DW, Jakimowicz JJ (2000) Observation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10: 231–41PubMed Breedveld P, Stassen HG, Meijer DW, Jakimowicz JJ (2000) Observation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10: 231–41PubMed
12.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30: 617–620PubMedCrossRef Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30: 617–620PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Lederman AB, McClusky DA, Smith CD (2005) Video-assisted surgery represents more than a loss of three-dimensional vision. The American Journal of Surgery 189: 76–80CrossRef Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Lederman AB, McClusky DA, Smith CD (2005) Video-assisted surgery represents more than a loss of three-dimensional vision. The American Journal of Surgery 189: 76–80CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Crothers I, Gallagher A, McClure N, et al. (1999) Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the “fulcrum effect”: an ergonomic demonstration. Endoscopy 31: 365–369PubMedCrossRef Crothers I, Gallagher A, McClure N, et al. (1999) Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the “fulcrum effect”: an ergonomic demonstration. Endoscopy 31: 365–369PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Emam TA, Hanna G, Cuschieri A (2002) Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Surg Endosc 16: 267–271PubMedCrossRef Emam TA, Hanna G, Cuschieri A (2002) Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Surg Endosc 16: 267–271PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zheng B, Janmohamed Z, MacKenzie CL (2003) Reactio times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery: an experimental study. Surg Endosc 17: 1475–1480PubMedCrossRef Zheng B, Janmohamed Z, MacKenzie CL (2003) Reactio times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery: an experimental study. Surg Endosc 17: 1475–1480PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions
Authors
Liam A. Haveran
Yuri W. Novitsky
Donald R. Czerniach
Gordie K. Kaban
Melinda Taylor
Karen Gallagher-Dorval
Richard Schmidt
John J. Kelly
Demetrius E. M. Litwin
Publication date
01-06-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9360-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2007 Go to the issue