Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the benefits of “gaze-down” display location in complex tasks

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Location of the image display is one of several factors that influence perceptual processing and endoscopic manipulation in minimal access surgery. Previous studies have proved the benefits of the gaze-down stance, as compared with the conventional gaze-up stance. This study investigates the effect of the gaze-down stance on the performance of a task with varying manipulative and perceptual demands.

Methods

The participants in this study were 20 medical students. Each student performed endoscopic touching tasks under standard conditions using the Dundee Projection System (DPS) display, positioned to provide gaze-up and gaze-down stances. To increase task complexity, two kinds of manual coordination (unilateral vs bilateral) and three endoscope positions (different positions of misalignment) were used. The outcome measures were task execution time and number of errors.

Results

Overall, the gaze-down stance reduced time and errors, as compared with the gaze-up display. However, the benefit obtained from the gaze-down stance was more significant in the more difficult tasks (bilateral task and 90° misalignments).

Conclusions

The gaze-down stance reduces task time and errors, as compared with a gaze-up stance. The reduction in time and errors is more appreciable as task complexity increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S Abeele O Bock (2001) ArticleTitleSensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input: different mechanisms for small versus large rotations Exp Brain Res 140 407–410 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002210100846 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnhtVagtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11685393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. P Breedveld M Wentink (2001) ArticleTitleEye–hand coordination in laparoscopy: an overview of experiments and supporting aids Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 10 155–162 Occurrence Handle10.1080/136457001753192277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. AB Cresswell AI Macmillan GB Hanna A Cuschieri (1999) ArticleTitleMethods for improving performance under reverse alignment conditions during endoscopic surgery Surg Endosc 13 591–594 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901048 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3nvVGntg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10347298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. GB Hanna SM Shimi A Cuschieri (1998) ArticleTitleTask performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display Ann Surg 227 481–484 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199804000-00005 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3it12qtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9563533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. WH Ittelson (1993) ArticleTitleMirror reversals: real and perceived Perception 22 855–861 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC2MbksVA%3D Occurrence Handle8115243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. NJ Wade (1996) ArticleTitleFrames of reference in vision Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 5 435–439

    Google Scholar 

  7. RB Welch (1986) Adaptation of space perception KR Boff L Kaufman JP Thomas (Eds) Handbook of perception and human performance Wiley New York 24.1–24.45

    Google Scholar 

  8. RB Welch (1978) Perceptual modification: adaptation to altered sensory environments Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. M Wentink P Breedveld DW Meijer HG Stassen (2000) ArticleTitleEndoscopic camera rotation: a conceptual solution to improve hand–eye coordination in minimally invasive surgery Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 9 125–132

    Google Scholar 

  10. M Wentink JJ Jakimowicz LM Vos DW Meijer PA Wieringa (2002) ArticleTitleQuantitative evaluation of three advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies: a stereo endoscope, an image projection display, and a TFT display Surg.Endosc 16 1237–1241 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9127-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vjt1egtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11984691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. B Zheng Z Janmohamed CL MacKenzie (2003) ArticleTitleReaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery Surg Endosc 17 1475–1480 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8759-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ks1OmtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12811661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Cuschieri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omar, A.M., Wade, N.J., Brown, S.I. et al. Assessing the benefits of “gaze-down” display location in complex tasks. Surg Endosc 19, 105–108 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8141-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8141-5

Keywords

Navigation