Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Chest

Optimal image reconstruction for detection and characterization of small pulmonary nodules during low-dose CT

Authors: SayedMasoud Hashemi, Hatem Mehrez, Richard S. C. Cobbold, Narinder S. Paul

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To optimize the slice thickness/overlap parameters for image reconstruction and to study the effect of iterative reconstruction (IR) on detectability and characterization of small non-calcified pulmonary nodules during low-dose thoracic CT.

Materials and methods

Data was obtained from computer simulations, phantom, and patient CTs. Simulations and phantom CTs were performed with 9 nodules (5, 8, and 10 mm with 100, −630, and −800 HU). Patient data were based on 11 ground glass opacities (GGO) and 9 solid nodules. For each analysis the nodules were reconstructed with filtered back projection and IR algorithms using 10 different combinations of slice thickness/overlap (0.5–5 mm). The attenuation (CT#) and the contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Spearman’s coefficient was used to correlate the error in CT# measurements and slice thickness. Paired Student’s t test was used to measure the significance of the errors.

Results

CNR measurements: CNR increases with increasing slice thickness/overlap for large nodules and peaks at 4.0/2.0 mm for smaller ones. Use of IR increases the CNR of GGOs by 60 %.
CT# measurements: Increasing slice thickness/overlap above 3.0/1.5 mm results in decreased CT# measurement accuracy.

Conclusion

Optimal detection of small pulmonary nodules requires slice thickness/overlap of 4.0/2.0 mm. Slice thickness/overlap of 2.0/2.0 mm is required for optimal nodule characterization. IR improves conspicuity of small ground glass nodules through a significant increase in nodule CNR.

Key Points

• Slice thickness/overlap affects the accuracy of pulmonary nodule detection and characterization.
• Slice thickness ≥3 mm increases the risk of misclassifying small nodules.
• Optimal nodule detection during low-dose CT requires 4.0/2.0-mm reconstructions.
• Optimal nodule characterization during low-dose CT requires 2.0/2.0-mm reconstructions.
• Iterative reconstruction improves the CNR of ground glass nodules by 60 %.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Beadsmoore C, Screaton N (2003) Classification, staging and prognosis of lung cancer. Eur J Radiol 45:8–17PubMedCrossRef Beadsmoore C, Screaton N (2003) Classification, staging and prognosis of lung cancer. Eur J Radiol 45:8–17PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF et al (2006) Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 355(17):1763–71PubMedCrossRef International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators, Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF et al (2006) Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N Engl J Med 355(17):1763–71PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G et al (2005) Fleischner society guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner society. Radiology 237:395–400PubMedCrossRef MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G et al (2005) Fleischner society guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner society. Radiology 237:395–400PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Henschke C, McCauley D, Yankelevitz D et al (1999) Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105PubMedCrossRef Henschke C, McCauley D, Yankelevitz D et al (1999) Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) National lung screening trial research team reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409PubMedCrossRef National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM et al (2011) National lung screening trial research team reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 365:395–409PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Goodsitt MM, Chan HP, Way TW, Larson SC, Christodoulou EG, Kim J (2006) Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners. Med Phys 33:3006–3017PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Goodsitt MM, Chan HP, Way TW, Larson SC, Christodoulou EG, Kim J (2006) Accuracy of the CT numbers of simulated lung nodules imaged with multi-detector CT scanners. Med Phys 33:3006–3017PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ravenel JG, Leue WM, Nietert PJ, Miller JV, Taylor KK, Silvestri GA (2008) Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements—a phantom study. Radiology 247:400–408PubMedCrossRef Ravenel JG, Leue WM, Nietert PJ, Miller JV, Taylor KK, Silvestri GA (2008) Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements—a phantom study. Radiology 247:400–408PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lifeng Y, Liu X, Leng S et al (2009) Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med 1:65–84CrossRef Lifeng Y, Liu X, Leng S et al (2009) Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. Imaging Med 1:65–84CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS, ELCAP Group (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057PubMedCrossRef Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mirtcheva R, McGuinness G, McCauley D, Miettinen OS, ELCAP Group (2002) CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1053–1057PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goo JM, Park CM, Lee HJ (2011) Ground-glass nodules on chest CT as imaging biomarkers in the management of lung adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:533–543PubMedCrossRef Goo JM, Park CM, Lee HJ (2011) Ground-glass nodules on chest CT as imaging biomarkers in the management of lung adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:533–543PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Xu DM, van Klaveren RJ, de Bock GH et al (2009) Role of baseline nodule density and changes in density and nodule features in the discrimination between benign and malignant solid indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol 70:492–498PubMedCrossRef Xu DM, van Klaveren RJ, de Bock GH et al (2009) Role of baseline nodule density and changes in density and nodule features in the discrimination between benign and malignant solid indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol 70:492–498PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R (2003) Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 13:2378–2383PubMedCrossRef Fischbach F, Knollmann F, Griesshaber V, Freund T, Akkol E, Felix R (2003) Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness. Eur Radiol 13:2378–2383PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Petrou M, Quint LE, Nan B, Baker LH (2007) Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:306–312PubMedCrossRef Petrou M, Quint LE, Nan B, Baker LH (2007) Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:306–312PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Diederich S, Lentschig MG, Winter F, Roos N, Bongartz G (1999) Detection of pulmonary nodules with overlapping vs. non-overlapping image reconstruction at spiral CT. Eur Radiol 9:281–286PubMedCrossRef Diederich S, Lentschig MG, Winter F, Roos N, Bongartz G (1999) Detection of pulmonary nodules with overlapping vs. non-overlapping image reconstruction at spiral CT. Eur Radiol 9:281–286PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gavrielides MA, Zeng R, Myers KJ, Sahiner B, Petrick N (2013) Benefit of overlapping reconstruction for improving the quantitative assessment of CT lung nodule volume. Acad Radiol 20:173–180PubMedCrossRef Gavrielides MA, Zeng R, Myers KJ, Sahiner B, Petrick N (2013) Benefit of overlapping reconstruction for improving the quantitative assessment of CT lung nodule volume. Acad Radiol 20:173–180PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Honda O, Sumikawa H, Johkoh T et al (2007) Computer-assisted lung nodule volumetry from multi-detector row CT: influence of image reconstruction parameters. Eur J Radiol 62:106–113PubMedCrossRef Honda O, Sumikawa H, Johkoh T et al (2007) Computer-assisted lung nodule volumetry from multi-detector row CT: influence of image reconstruction parameters. Eur J Radiol 62:106–113PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruc. Eur Radiol 22:1613–1623PubMedCrossRef Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M et al (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruc. Eur Radiol 22:1613–1623PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors (RECIST Guidelines). J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors (RECIST Guidelines). J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gramer BM, Muenzel D, Leber V et al (2012) Impact of iterative reconstruction on CNR and SNR in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging in an animal model. Eur Radiol 22:2654–2661PubMedCrossRef Gramer BM, Muenzel D, Leber V et al (2012) Impact of iterative reconstruction on CNR and SNR in dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging in an animal model. Eur Radiol 22:2654–2661PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Li Q, Yu H, Zhang L, Fan L, Liu SY (2013) Combining low tube voltage and iterative reconstruction for contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the chest-initial clinical experience. Clin Radiol 68:e249–e253PubMedCrossRef Li Q, Yu H, Zhang L, Fan L, Liu SY (2013) Combining low tube voltage and iterative reconstruction for contrast-enhanced CT imaging of the chest-initial clinical experience. Clin Radiol 68:e249–e253PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yanagawa M, Tanaka Y, Kusumoto M et al (2010) Automated assessment of malignant degree of small peripheral adenocarcinomas using volumetric CT data: correlation with pathologic prognostic factors. Lung Cancer 70:286–294PubMedCrossRef Yanagawa M, Tanaka Y, Kusumoto M et al (2010) Automated assessment of malignant degree of small peripheral adenocarcinomas using volumetric CT data: correlation with pathologic prognostic factors. Lung Cancer 70:286–294PubMedCrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Knight K (2000) Mathematical statistics. Chapman and Hall, New York (proposition 2.11) Knight K (2000) Mathematical statistics. Chapman and Hall, New York (proposition 2.11)
26.
go back to reference Paul NS, Blobel J, Prezelj E et al (2010) The reduction of image noise and streak artifact in the thoracic inlet during low dose and ultra-low dose thoracic CT. Phys Med Biol 55:1363–1380PubMedCrossRef Paul NS, Blobel J, Prezelj E et al (2010) The reduction of image noise and streak artifact in the thoracic inlet during low dose and ultra-low dose thoracic CT. Phys Med Biol 55:1363–1380PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Schindera ST, Odedra D, Raza SA et al (2013) Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved? Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.13122349 PubMed Schindera ST, Odedra D, Raza SA et al (2013) Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved? Radiology. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​13122349 PubMed
28.
go back to reference Iwano S, Makino N, Ikeda M, Itoh S et al (2004) Solitary pulmonary nodules: optimal slice thickness of high-resolution CT in differentiating malignant from benign. Clin Imaging 28:322–328PubMedCrossRef Iwano S, Makino N, Ikeda M, Itoh S et al (2004) Solitary pulmonary nodules: optimal slice thickness of high-resolution CT in differentiating malignant from benign. Clin Imaging 28:322–328PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sinsuat M, Saita S, Kawata Y et al (2011) Influence of slice thickness on diagnoses of pulmonary nodules using low-dose CT: potential dependence of detection and diagnostic agreement on features and location of nodule. Acad Radiol 18:594–604PubMedCrossRef Sinsuat M, Saita S, Kawata Y et al (2011) Influence of slice thickness on diagnoses of pulmonary nodules using low-dose CT: potential dependence of detection and diagnostic agreement on features and location of nodule. Acad Radiol 18:594–604PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Optimal image reconstruction for detection and characterization of small pulmonary nodules during low-dose CT
Authors
SayedMasoud Hashemi
Hatem Mehrez
Richard S. C. Cobbold
Narinder S. Paul
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3142-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

European Radiology 6/2014 Go to the issue