Published in:
19-08-2022 | Opioids | KNEE
Use of intraoperative technology in total knee arthroplasty is not associated with reductions in postoperative pain
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 4/2023
Login to get accessAbstract
Purpose
Our systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess how technology-assistance impacts (1) post-operative pain and (2) opioid use in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods
Four online databases were queried for studies published up to October 2021 that reported on pain and opioid usage between technology-assisted and manual TKA (mTKA) patients. Mantel–Haenszel (M–H) models were utilized to calculate pooled mean difference (MDs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs). Subgroup analyses were conducted to isolate robotic-arm assisted (RAA) and computed-assisted navigation (CAN) cohorts. Risk of bias was assessed for all included non-randomized studies with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. For the randomized control trials included in our study, the Detsky scale was applied.
Results
Our analysis included 31 studies, reporting on a total of 761,300 TKAs (mTKA: n = 753,554; Computer-Assisted Navigation (CAN): n = 1,309; Robotic-Arm Assisted (RAA): n = 6437). No differences were demonstrated when evaluating WOMAC (MD: 0.00, 95% CI − 0.69 to 0.69; p = 1.00), KSS (MD: 0.01, 95% CI − 1.46 to 1.49; p = 0.99), KOOS (MD − 2.91, 95% CI − 6.17 to 0.34; p = 0.08), and VAS (MD − 0.54, 95% CI − 1.01 to − 0.007; p = 0.02) pain scores between cohorts. There was mixed evidence regarding how opioid consumption differed between TKA techniques.
Conclusion
The present analysis demonstrated no difference in terms of pain across a variety of utilized patient-reported pain measurements. However, there were mixed results regarding how opioid consumption varied between manual and technology-assisted cohorts, particularly in the immediate post-operative period.
Level of evidence
III.