Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Open, trusting relationships underpin safety in rural maternity a hermeneutic phenomenology study

Authors: Susan Crowther, Elizabeth Smythe

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are interwoven personal, professional and organisational relationships to be navigated in maternity in all regions. In rural regions relationships are integral to safe maternity care. Yet there is a paucity of research on how relationships influence safety and nurture satisfying experiences for rural maternity care providers and mothers and families in these regions. This paper draws attention to how these relationships matter.

Methods

This research is informed by hermeneutic phenomenology drawing on Heidegger and Gadamer. Thirteen participants were recruited via purposeful sampling and asked to share their experiences of rural maternity care in recorded unstructured in-depth interviews. Participants were women and health care providers living and working in rural regions. Recordings were transcribed and data interpretively analysed until a plausible and trustworthy thematic pattern emerged.

Results

Throughout the data the relational nature of rural living surfaced as an interweaving tapestry of connectivity. Relationships in rural maternity are revealed in myriad ways: for some optimal relationships, for others feeling isolated, living with discord and professional disharmony. Professional misunderstandings undermine relationships. Rural maternity can become unsustainable and unsettling when relationships break down leading to unsafeness.

Conclusions

This study reveals how relationships are an important and vital aspect to the lived-experience of rural maternity care. Relationships are founded on mutual understanding and attuned to trust matter. These relationships are forged over time and keep childbirth safe and enable maternity care providers to work sustainably. Yet hidden unspoken pre-understandings of individuals and groups build tension in relationships leading to discord. Trust builds healthy rural communities of practice within which everyone can flourish, feel accepted, supported and safe. This is facilitated by collaborative learning activities and open respectful communication founded on what matters most (safe positive childbirth) whilst appreciating and acknowledging professional and personal differences.
Literature
1.
Grzybowski S, Fahey J, Lai B, Zhang S, Aelicks N, Leung BM, Stoll K, Attenborough R. The safety of Canadian rural maternity services: a multi-jurisdictional cohort analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):1–7.CrossRef
2.
Hunter B, Berg M, Lundgren I, Ólafsdóttir ÓÁ, Kirkham M. Relationships: The hidden threads in the tapestry of maternity care. Midwifery. 2008;24(2):132–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Dahlberg U, Aune I. The woman’s birth experience-The effect of interpersonal relationships and continuity of care. Midwifery. 2013.
4.
Simmonds AH, Peter E, Hodnett ED, McGillis Hall L. Understanding the moral nature of intrapartum nursing. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2013;42(2):148–56.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Martin CH, Fleming V. The birth satisfaction scale. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):124–35.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Jenkins M, Ford J, Morris JM, Roberts C. Women’s expectations and experiences of maternity care in NSW - What women highlight as most important. Women Birth. 2014;27:2014–219.CrossRef
7.
Harris FM, Van Teijlingen E, Hundley V, Farmer J, Bryers H, Caldow J, Ireland J, Kiger A, Tucker J. The buck stops here: Midwives and maternity care in rural Scotland. Midwifery. 2011;27(3):301–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Munro S, Kornelsen J, Grzybowski S. Models of maternity care in rural environments: Barriers and attributes of interprofessional collaboration with midwives. Midwifery. 2013;29(6):646–52.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Crowther S. All is not as it first may seem: Experiences of maternity in rural and remote rural regions in New Zealand from the perspectives of families and health care providers. In. Auckland: AUT University; 2015.
10.
Ministry of Health. In: New Zealand. MN, editor. Section 88 Primary Maternity Services Notice 2007. 2007.
11.
Adair A, Coster H, Adair V. Review of International and New Zealand Literature Relating to Rural Models of Care, Workforce Requirements and Opportunities for the Use of New Technologies. In: Commissioned by The New Zealand Institute of Rural Health. 2012.
12.
Janes R. New Zealand Rural After-Hours Primary Care Provider Survey. In: Rural GP Network. 2005.
13.
14.
Ministry of Health. 2012: Guidelines for Consultation with Obstetric and Related Medical Services (Referral Guidelines). Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2012.
15.
National Health Committee. Rural Health: Challenges of Distance, Opportunities for Innovation. Wellington: National Health Committee; 2010.
16.
17.
Williams MA, Andrews JA, Zanni KL, Fahs PSS. Rural Nursing: Searching for the State of the Science. Online J Rural Nurs Health Care. 2012;12(2):102–17.
18.
Hart LG, Larson EH, Lishner DM. Critical concepts for reaching populations at risk. Rural definitions for health policy and research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(7):1149–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Cheyne H, Dalgleish L, Tucker J, Kane F, Shetty A, McLeod S, Niven C. Risk assessment and decision making about in-labour transfer from rural maternity care: a social judgment and signal detection analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12(1):122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Hundley VA, Tucker JS, Van Teijlingen E, Kiger A, Ireland JC, Harris F, Farmer J, Caldow JL, Bryers H. Midwives’ competence: Is it affected by working in a rural location? Rural Remote Health. 2007;7:764.PubMed
21.
Kyle M, Aileone L. In: Zealand HWN, editor. Mapping the rural midwifery workforce in New Zealand. 2013.
22.
Miller KJ, Couchie C, Ehman W, Graves L, Grzybowski S, Medves J. Rural maternity care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(10):984–91.
23.
Patterson JA, Foureur M, Skinne JP. Patterns of transfer in labour and birth in rural New Zealand. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11:2.
24.
Tucker J, Kiger A, Hundley V, Harris F, Caldow J, Farmer J, Bryers H, Ireland J, Van Teijlingen E. Sustainable maternity services in remote and rural Scotland? A qualitative survey of staff viewson required skills, competencies and training. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:34–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Van Manen M. Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing: Left Coast Press. 2014.
26.
Heidegger M: Being and time. New York: Harper; 1927/1962.
27.
Gadamer HG: Truth and method. New York: Seabury; 1960/1975.
28.
Gadamer HG. David Edward Linge HGG: Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2008.
29.
Van Manen M. Researching lived experience. London: The Althouse Press; 1990.
30.
Caelli K. Engaging with phenomenology: Is it more of a challenge than it needs to be? Qual Health Res. 2001;11(2):273–81.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Crowther, S, Ironside, P, Spence, D, Smythe, L. Crafting stories in Hermeneutic Phenomenology: methodological device Qualitative Health Research 2016, 1–10 DOI: 10.1177/1049732316656161
32.
Smythe E, Thomson G, Dykes F, Downe S. From beginning to end: how to do hermeneutic interpretive phenomenology. In: Qualitative research in midwifery and childbirth: Phenomenological approaches. London: Routledge; 2011. p. 35–54.
33.
Huber US, Sandall J. A qualitative exploration of the creation of calm in a continuity of carer model of maternity care in London. Midwifery. 2009;25(6):613–21.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD004667.
35.
McAra-Couper J, Gilkison A, Crowther S, Hunter M, Hotchin C, Gunn J. Partnership and reciprocity with women sustain lead maternity carer midwives in practice. NZ Coll Midwives J. 2014;49:27–31.CrossRef
36.
Ministry of Health. In: Health NZDo, editor. Nurses Amendment Act information for health providers. Wellington: Department of Health; 1990.
37.
Miller D, Mason Z, Jaye C. GP obstetricians’ views of the model of maternity care in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;53:21–5.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Preston H, Jaye C, Miller D. General practice registrars’ views on maternity care in general practice in New Zealand. J Prim Health Care. 2015;7(4):316–23.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Hunter B. Conflicting ideologies as a source of emotion work in midwifery. Midwifery. 2004;20:261–72.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Hunter B, Deery R. Emotions in midwifery and reproduction. NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.CrossRef
41.
Gilkison A, McAra-Couper J, Gunn J, Crowther S, Hunter M, Macgregor D, Hotchin C. Midwifery practice arrangements which sustain caseloading Lead Maternity Carer midwives in New Zealand. NZCOM Journal. 2015;51:11–6.CrossRef
42.
43.
44.
Heidegger M. The fundamental concepts of metaphysics: World, finitude, solitude. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1995.
45.
Tannen D. The argument culture: Moving from debate to dialogue. 1st ed. New York: Random House; 1998.
46.
Robertson AM: Rural Women and Maternity Services. In: Rural Nursing: Aspects of Practice. edn. Edited by Ross J: Rural Health Opportunities, ruralhealthopportunities@xtra.co.nz; 2008.
47.
Hunter B, Segrott J. Renegotiating inter-professional boundaries in maternity care: implementing a clinical pathway for normal labour. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(5):719–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Lampert J. Gadamer and cross-cultural hermeneutics. The philosophical forum. 1997;XXVIII(4):351–68.
49.
Heron J. Feeling and Personhood: Psychology in Another Key: Sage Publications (CA). 1992.
50.
Bourke L, Humphreys JS, Wakerman J, Taylor J. From ‘problem-describing’ to ‘problem-solving’: Challenging the ‘deficit’ view of remote and rural health. Aust J Rural Health. 2010;18:205–9.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Stoll K, Kornelsen J. Midwifery Care in Rural and Remote British Columbia: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Perinatal Outcomes of Rural Parturient Women with a Midwife Involved in Their Care, 2003 to 2008. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(1):60–6.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Bar-Zeev SJ, Barclay L, Farrington C, Kildea S. From hospital to home: The quality and safety of a postnatal discharge system used for remote dwelling Aboriginal mothers and infants in the top end of Australia. Midwifery. 2011;28:366–73.CrossRef
53.
Bar-Zeev SJ, Barclay L, Kruske S, Kildea S. Factors affecting the quality of antenatal care provided to remote dwelling Ab. Midwifery. 2014;30:289–96.CrossRefPubMed
54.
55.
Kornelsen JA, Grzybowski SW. Obstetric services in small rural communities: what are the risks to care providers? Rural Remote Health. 2008;8(2):943.PubMed
56.
McDonald G, Jackson D, Wilkes L, Vickers MH. A work-based educational intervention to support the development of personal resilience in nurses and midwives. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(4):378–84.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Mitchell R, Paliadelis P, McNeil K, Parker V, Giles M, Higgins I, Parmenter G, Ahrens Y. Effective interprofessional collaboration in rural contexts: a research protocol. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(10):2317–26.CrossRefPubMed
58.
De Witt L, Ploeg J. Critical appraisal of rigour in interpretive phenomenological nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2006;55(2):215–29.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Open, trusting relationships underpin safety in rural maternity a hermeneutic phenomenology study
Authors
Susan Crowther
Elizabeth Smythe
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1164-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

The relationship of prenatal maternal depression or anxiety to maternal caregiving behavior and infant behavior self-regulation during infant heel lance: an ethological time-based study of behavior

Research article

Amniotic fluid embolism as a cause of maternal mortality in China between 1996 and 2013: a population-based retrospective study

Research article

Does acupuncture have a role in the treatment of threatened miscarriage? Findings from a feasibility randomised trial and semi-structured participant interviews

Research article

Birth preparedness, complication readiness and other determinants of place of delivery among mothers in Goba District, Bale Zone, South East Ethiopia

Research article

“Why screen if we cannot follow-up and manage?” Challenges for gestational diabetes screening and management in low and lower-middle income countries: results of a cross-sectional survey

Study protocol

The Breathing for Life Trial: a randomised controlled trial of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO)-based management of asthma during pregnancy and its impact on perinatal outcomes and infant and childhood respiratory health