Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2018

01-12-2018 | Clinical trial

Only estrogen receptor “positive” is not enough to predict the prognosis of breast cancer

Authors: Jai Min Ryu, Hee Jun Choi, Isaac Kim, Se Kyung Lee, Jonghan Yu, Jee-Eun Kim, Byeong-il Kang, Jeong Eon Lee, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Beginning in 2018, biomarkers including estrogen receptor (ER) status were incorporated in the 8th AJCC staging system. ER expression levels were not considered in these changes. We hypothesized that the levels of ER expression could affect the prognosis of breast cancer.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted to identify all female patients with invasive breast cancer between 2003 and 2012. ER negative (group I), weakly ER-positive (group II), and strongly ER-positive (group III) were defined as Allred total scores of 0–2, 3–5, and 6–8, respectively. We examined a multigene panel, designated the BCT score, which is a newly developed prognostic model for predicting the risk of a distant metastasis.

Results

Among the 4949 patients enrolled in this study, 1310 (26.5%), 361 (7.3%), and 3277 (66.2%) were categorized as group I, II, and III, respectively. Median F/U duration was 57.8 months. Compared to group III, patients in group II were younger, had larger tumors, and were also more likely to have PR-negative tumors, HER-2 amplification, high Ki-67, and high nuclear grade. Between group II and III, there was a significant difference in OS (P = 0.0764, 0.909, and 0.010, respectively). After adjusting for additional factors that may affect OS, the HR for OS showed higher in group II than in group III. The baseline median BCT score indicated that lower ER expression was associated with significantly higher BCT score (P < 0.0001) and significantly more likely to have high risk group (P < 0.0001) relative to higher levels of ER expression group.

Conclusion

ER expression levels affect the prognosis of breast cancer. The risk for patients with weakly ER-positive breast cancer should not be underestimated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aaltomaa S, Lipponen P, Eskelinen M, Kosma VM, Marin S, Alhava E, Syrjanen K (1991) Hormone receptors as prognostic factors in female breast cancer. Ann Med 23:643–648CrossRef Aaltomaa S, Lipponen P, Eskelinen M, Kosma VM, Marin S, Alhava E, Syrjanen K (1991) Hormone receptors as prognostic factors in female breast cancer. Ann Med 23:643–648CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI (2007) Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 9:R6CrossRef Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI (2007) Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 9:R6CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Robertson JF, Bates K, Pearson D, Blamey RW, Nicholson RI (1992) Comparison of two oestrogen receptor assays in the prediction of the clinical course of patients with advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 65:727–730CrossRef Robertson JF, Bates K, Pearson D, Blamey RW, Nicholson RI (1992) Comparison of two oestrogen receptor assays in the prediction of the clinical course of patients with advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer 65:727–730CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Clark GM, Osborne CK, McGuire WL (1984) Correlations between estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and patient characteristics in human breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2:1102–1109CrossRef Clark GM, Osborne CK, McGuire WL (1984) Correlations between estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and patient characteristics in human breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2:1102–1109CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bagaria SP, Ray PS, Sim MS, Ye X, Shamonki JM, Cui X, Giuliano AE (2014) Personalizing breast cancer staging by the inclusion of ER, PR, and HER2. JAMA Surg 149:125–129CrossRef Bagaria SP, Ray PS, Sim MS, Ye X, Shamonki JM, Cui X, Giuliano AE (2014) Personalizing breast cancer staging by the inclusion of ER, PR, and HER2. JAMA Surg 149:125–129CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barnes DM, Harris WH, Smith P, Millis RR, Rubens RD (1996) Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 74:1445–1451CrossRef Barnes DM, Harris WH, Smith P, Millis RR, Rubens RD (1996) Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 74:1445–1451CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo HS, Solin LJ, Weaver DL, Winchester DJ, Hortobagyi GN (2017) Breast cancer-major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 67:290–303CrossRef Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo HS, Solin LJ, Weaver DL, Winchester DJ, Hortobagyi GN (2017) Breast cancer-major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 67:290–303CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Weiss A, Chavez-MacGregor M, Lichtensztajn DY, Yi M, Tadros A, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH, Hunt KK, Mittendorf EA (2018) Validation study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition prognostic stage compared with the anatomic stage in breast cancer. JAMA Oncol 4:203–209CrossRef Weiss A, Chavez-MacGregor M, Lichtensztajn DY, Yi M, Tadros A, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH, Hunt KK, Mittendorf EA (2018) Validation study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition prognostic stage compared with the anatomic stage in breast cancer. JAMA Oncol 4:203–209CrossRef
9.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer (2016) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, Chicago American Joint Committee on Cancer (2016) AJCC cancer staging manual, 8th edn. Springer, Chicago
10.
go back to reference Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York
11.
go back to reference Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1474–1481CrossRef Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, Allred DC (1999) Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:1474–1481CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Allred DC (2010) Issues and updates: evaluating estrogen receptor-alpha, progesterone receptor, and HER2 in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 23(Suppl 2):S52–S59CrossRef Allred DC (2010) Issues and updates: evaluating estrogen receptor-alpha, progesterone receptor, and HER2 in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 23(Suppl 2):S52–S59CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, Paik S, Perez EA, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, Hayes DF (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31:3997–4013CrossRef Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, Dowsett M, McShane LM, Allison KH, Allred DC, Bartlett JM, Bilous M, Fitzgibbons P, Hanna W, Jenkins RB, Mangu PB, Paik S, Perez EA, Press MF, Spears PA, Vance GH, Viale G, Hayes DF (2013) Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31:3997–4013CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gong G, Kwon MJ, Han J, Lee HJ, Lee SK, Lee JE, Lee SH, Park S, Choi JS, Cho SY, Ahn SH, Lee JW, Cho SR, Moon Y, Nam BH, Nam SJ, Choi YL, Shin YK (2017) A new molecular prognostic score for predicting the risk of distant metastasis in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer. Sci Rep 7:45554CrossRef Gong G, Kwon MJ, Han J, Lee HJ, Lee SK, Lee JE, Lee SH, Park S, Choi JS, Cho SY, Ahn SH, Lee JW, Cho SR, Moon Y, Nam BH, Nam SJ, Choi YL, Shin YK (2017) A new molecular prognostic score for predicting the risk of distant metastasis in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer. Sci Rep 7:45554CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, Kim C, Bake rJ, Kim W, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Watson D, Bryant J, Costantino JP, Geyer CE Jr, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3726–3734CrossRef Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, Kim C, Bake rJ, Kim W, Cronin M, Baehner FL, Watson D, Bryant J, Costantino JP, Geyer CE Jr, Wickerham DL, Wolmark N (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3726–3734CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lee MH, Han W, Lee JE, Kim KS, Park H, Kim J, Bae SY, Shin HJ, Lee JW, Lee ES (2015) The clinical impact of 21-gene recurrence score on treatment decisions for patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 47:208–214CrossRef Lee MH, Han W, Lee JE, Kim KS, Park H, Kim J, Bae SY, Shin HJ, Lee JW, Lee ES (2015) The clinical impact of 21-gene recurrence score on treatment decisions for patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 47:208–214CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Klein ME, Dabbs DJ, Shuai Y, Brufsky AM, Jankowitz R, Puhalla SL, Bhargava R (2013) Prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score: use of pathology-generated equations derived by linear regression analysis. Mod Pathol 26:658–664CrossRef Klein ME, Dabbs DJ, Shuai Y, Brufsky AM, Jankowitz R, Puhalla SL, Bhargava R (2013) Prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score: use of pathology-generated equations derived by linear regression analysis. Mod Pathol 26:658–664CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gage MM, Rosman M, Mylander WC, Giblin E, Kim HS, Cope L, Umbricht C, Wolff AC, Tafra L (2015) A validated model for identifying patients unlikely to benefit from the 21-gene recurrence score assay. Clin Breast Cancer 15:467–472CrossRef Gage MM, Rosman M, Mylander WC, Giblin E, Kim HS, Cope L, Umbricht C, Wolff AC, Tafra L (2015) A validated model for identifying patients unlikely to benefit from the 21-gene recurrence score assay. Clin Breast Cancer 15:467–472CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Orucevic A, Bell JL, McNabb AP, Heidel RE (2017) Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted with a novel nomogram using clinicopathologic data. Breast Cancer Res Treat 163:51–61CrossRef Orucevic A, Bell JL, McNabb AP, Heidel RE (2017) Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted with a novel nomogram using clinicopathologic data. Breast Cancer Res Treat 163:51–61CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tang P, Wang J, Hicks DG, Wang X, Schiffhauer L, McMahon L, Yang Q, Shayne M, Huston A, Skinner KA, Griggs J, Lyman G (2010) A lower Allred score for progesterone receptor is strongly associated with a higher recurrence score of 21-gene assay in breast cancer. Cancer Invest 28:978–982CrossRef Tang P, Wang J, Hicks DG, Wang X, Schiffhauer L, McMahon L, Yang Q, Shayne M, Huston A, Skinner KA, Griggs J, Lyman G (2010) A lower Allred score for progesterone receptor is strongly associated with a higher recurrence score of 21-gene assay in breast cancer. Cancer Invest 28:978–982CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Turner B, Tang P, Hicks D (2017) The value of algorithms predicting the Oncotype DX recurrence score should not be underestimated!Breast Cancer Res Treat 164:249–250CrossRef Turner B, Tang P, Hicks D (2017) The value of algorithms predicting the Oncotype DX recurrence score should not be underestimated!Breast Cancer Res Treat 164:249–250CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sheffield BS, Kos Z, Asleh-Aburaya K, Wang XQ, Leung S, Gao D, Won J, Chow C, Rachamadugu R, Stijleman I, Wolber R, Gilks CB, Myles N, Thomson T, Hayes MM, Bernard PS, Nielsen TO, Chia SK (2016) Molecular subtype profiling of invasive breast cancers weakly positive for estrogen receptor. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155:483–490CrossRef Sheffield BS, Kos Z, Asleh-Aburaya K, Wang XQ, Leung S, Gao D, Won J, Chow C, Rachamadugu R, Stijleman I, Wolber R, Gilks CB, Myles N, Thomson T, Hayes MM, Bernard PS, Nielsen TO, Chia SK (2016) Molecular subtype profiling of invasive breast cancers weakly positive for estrogen receptor. Breast Cancer Res Treat 155:483–490CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Iwamoto T, Booser D, Valero V, Murray JL, Koenig K, Esteva FJ, Ueno NT, Zhang J, Shi W, Qi Y, Matsuoka J, Yang EJ, Hortobagyi GN, Hatzis C, Symmans WF, Pusztai L (2012) Estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA and ER-related gene expression in breast cancers that are 1–10% ER-positive by immunohistochemistry. J Clin Oncol 30:729–734CrossRef Iwamoto T, Booser D, Valero V, Murray JL, Koenig K, Esteva FJ, Ueno NT, Zhang J, Shi W, Qi Y, Matsuoka J, Yang EJ, Hortobagyi GN, Hatzis C, Symmans WF, Pusztai L (2012) Estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA and ER-related gene expression in breast cancers that are 1–10% ER-positive by immunohistochemistry. J Clin Oncol 30:729–734CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Deyarmin B, Kane JL, Valente AL, van Laar R, Gallagher C, Shriver CD, Ellsworth RE (2013) Effect of ASCO/CAP guidelines for determining ER status on molecular subtype. Ann Surg Oncol 20:87–93CrossRef Deyarmin B, Kane JL, Valente AL, van Laar R, Gallagher C, Shriver CD, Ellsworth RE (2013) Effect of ASCO/CAP guidelines for determining ER status on molecular subtype. Ann Surg Oncol 20:87–93CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Wang J, Skinner KA, Shayne M, Hajdu SI, Bu H, Hicks DG, Tang P (2014) Pathological features and clinical outcomes of breast cancer according to levels of oestrogen receptor expression. Histopathology 65:508–516CrossRef Zhang Z, Wang J, Skinner KA, Shayne M, Hajdu SI, Bu H, Hicks DG, Tang P (2014) Pathological features and clinical outcomes of breast cancer according to levels of oestrogen receptor expression. Histopathology 65:508–516CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Balduzzi A, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N, Dellapasqua S, Montagna E, Cardillo A, Viale G, Veronesi P, Intra M, Luini A, Pruneri G, Mastropasqua G, Goldhirsch A, Colleoni M (2014) Survival outcomes in breast cancer patients with low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression. Clin Breast Cancer 14:258–264CrossRef Balduzzi A, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N, Dellapasqua S, Montagna E, Cardillo A, Viale G, Veronesi P, Intra M, Luini A, Pruneri G, Mastropasqua G, Goldhirsch A, Colleoni M (2014) Survival outcomes in breast cancer patients with low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression. Clin Breast Cancer 14:258–264CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bouchard-Fortier A, Provencher L, Blanchette C, Diorio C (2017) Prognostic and predictive value of low estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer. Curr Oncol 24:e106–e114CrossRef Bouchard-Fortier A, Provencher L, Blanchette C, Diorio C (2017) Prognostic and predictive value of low estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer. Curr Oncol 24:e106–e114CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hill DA, Barry M, Wiggins C, Nibbe A, Royce M, Prossnitz E, Lomo L (2017) Estrogen receptor quantitative measures and breast cancer survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 166:855–864CrossRef Hill DA, Barry M, Wiggins C, Nibbe A, Royce M, Prossnitz E, Lomo L (2017) Estrogen receptor quantitative measures and breast cancer survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 166:855–864CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Raghav KP, Hernandez-Aya LF, Lei X, Chavez-Macgregor M, Meric-Bernstam F, Buchholz TA, Sahin A, Do KA, Hortobagyi GN, Gonzalez-Angulo AM (2012) Impact of low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression on survival outcomes in breast cancers previously classified as triple negative breast cancers. Cancer 118:1498–1506CrossRef Raghav KP, Hernandez-Aya LF, Lei X, Chavez-Macgregor M, Meric-Bernstam F, Buchholz TA, Sahin A, Do KA, Hortobagyi GN, Gonzalez-Angulo AM (2012) Impact of low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression on survival outcomes in breast cancers previously classified as triple negative breast cancers. Cancer 118:1498–1506CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Yi M, Huo L, Koenig KB, Mittendorf EA, Meric-Bernstam F, Kuerer HM, Bedrosian I, Buzdar AU, Symmans WF, Crow JR, Bender M, Shah RR, Hortobagyi GN, Hunt KK (2014) Which threshold for ER positivity? A retrospective study based on 9639 patients. Ann Oncol 25:1004–1011CrossRef Yi M, Huo L, Koenig KB, Mittendorf EA, Meric-Bernstam F, Kuerer HM, Bedrosian I, Buzdar AU, Symmans WF, Crow JR, Bender M, Shah RR, Hortobagyi GN, Hunt KK (2014) Which threshold for ER positivity? A retrospective study based on 9639 patients. Ann Oncol 25:1004–1011CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kast K, Link T, Friedrich K, Petzold A, Niedostatek A, Schoffer O, Werner C, Klug SJ, Werner A, Gatzweiler A, Richter B, Baretton G, Wimberger P (2015) Impact of breast cancer subtypes and patterns of metastasis on outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150:621–629CrossRef Kast K, Link T, Friedrich K, Petzold A, Niedostatek A, Schoffer O, Werner C, Klug SJ, Werner A, Gatzweiler A, Richter B, Baretton G, Wimberger P (2015) Impact of breast cancer subtypes and patterns of metastasis on outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150:621–629CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lee ES, Jung SY, Kim JY, Kim JJ, Yoo TK, Kim YG, Lee KS, Lee ES, Kim EK, Min JW, Han W, Noh DY, Moon HG (2016) Identifying the potential long-term survivors among breast cancer patients with distant metastasis. Ann Oncol 27:828–833CrossRef Lee ES, Jung SY, Kim JY, Kim JJ, Yoo TK, Kim YG, Lee KS, Lee ES, Kim EK, Min JW, Han W, Noh DY, Moon HG (2016) Identifying the potential long-term survivors among breast cancer patients with distant metastasis. Ann Oncol 27:828–833CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dawood S, Broglio K, Ensor J, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH (2010) Survival differences among women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer. Ann Oncol 21:2169–2174CrossRef Dawood S, Broglio K, Ensor J, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH (2010) Survival differences among women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer. Ann Oncol 21:2169–2174CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Savci-Heijink CD, Halfwerk H, Hooijer GK, Horlings HM, Wesseling J, van de Vijver MJ (2015) Retrospective analysis of metastatic behaviour of breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150:547–557CrossRef Savci-Heijink CD, Halfwerk H, Hooijer GK, Horlings HM, Wesseling J, van de Vijver MJ (2015) Retrospective analysis of metastatic behaviour of breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150:547–557CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Only estrogen receptor “positive” is not enough to predict the prognosis of breast cancer
Authors
Jai Min Ryu
Hee Jun Choi
Isaac Kim
Se Kyung Lee
Jonghan Yu
Jee-Eun Kim
Byeong-il Kang
Jeong Eon Lee
Seok Jin Nam
Seok Won Kim
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4948-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine