Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Online gambling’s moderators: how effective? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Julie Caillon, Marie Grall-Bronnec, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Jean-Luc Venisse, Gaelle Challet-Bouju

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Online gambling has been legalized in France in 2010. Licenses are issued to gambling operators who demonstrate their ability to respect the legal framework (security, taxation, consumer protection, etc.). The preventive measures to protect vulnerable gamblers include an obligation to provide online gambling moderators. These moderators should allow gamblers to limit their bets, exclude themselves from the website for 7 days, and consult the balance of the gambler’s account at any time. However, there are only a few published reports of empirical research investigating the effectiveness of Internet-based protective measures implemented by French law. Moreover, no empirical research has yet studied the impact of bonuses on gambling behaviors.

Methods/Design

This research is an experimental randomized controlled trial, risk prevention targeted. The research is divided into four sub-studies depending on the studied moderator: limiting bonuses, self-exclusion, self-limitation and information. The study sample consists of 485 volunteers. For each experimental condition and the control groups, the sample is composed of gamblers equally recruited from gamblers having preferences in each of the three major forms of games (lottery and scratch tickets, sports and horserace betting, and poker). For each form of gambling, the gamblers are recruited in order to obtain as many problem gamblers as non-problem gamblers. According to the randomization, the experimental session begins. The experimental session is a gambling situation on a computer in our research center. The gambler is invited to play on his favorite gambling site as usual, with his own gambler account and his own money. Data collected comprise sociodemographic characteristics, gambling habits, an interview about enjoyment and feeling out of control during the gambling session, moderator impact on gambling practice, statement of gambling parameters and questionnaires (BMIS, GRCS, CPGI, GACS). Moderator efficiency is assessed based on the two major characteristics of gambling behavior: money wagered and time spent in gambling.

Discussion

The results of this research will be important to prevent online problem gambling and influence policy-makers.

Trial registration number

NCT01789580. Registered 8 February 2013
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Costes JM, Pousset M, Eroukmanoff V, Le Nezet O, Richard JB, Guignard R, et al. Les niveaux et pratiques des jeux de hasard et d’argent en 2010. Tendances. 2011;2011(77):1–8. Costes JM, Pousset M, Eroukmanoff V, Le Nezet O, Richard JB, Guignard R, et al. Les niveaux et pratiques des jeux de hasard et d’argent en 2010. Tendances. 2011;2011(77):1–8.
3.
go back to reference Tovar ML, Costes JM, Eroukmanoff V. Les jeux d’argent et de hasard sur internet en France en 2012. Tendances. 2013;85:1–6. Tovar ML, Costes JM, Eroukmanoff V. Les jeux d’argent et de hasard sur internet en France en 2012. Tendances. 2013;85:1–6.
4.
go back to reference Griffiths M. Internet gambling: issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003;6(6):557–68.CrossRef Griffiths M. Internet gambling: issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003;6(6):557–68.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Suler J. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7(3):321–6.CrossRef Suler J. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7(3):321–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ladouceur R, Sylvain C, Gosselin P. Self-exclusion program: a longitudinal evaluation study. J Gambl Stud. 2007;23(1):85–94.CrossRef Ladouceur R, Sylvain C, Gosselin P. Self-exclusion program: a longitudinal evaluation study. J Gambl Stud. 2007;23(1):85–94.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hayer T, Meyer G. Internet self-exclusion: characteristics of self-excluded gamblers and preliminary evidence for its effectiveness. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2011;9(3):296–307.CrossRef Hayer T, Meyer G. Internet self-exclusion: characteristics of self-excluded gamblers and preliminary evidence for its effectiveness. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2011;9(3):296–307.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nelson SE, Kleschinsky JH, LaBrie RA, Kaplan S, Shaffer HJ. One decade of self exclusion: Missouri casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrollment. J Gambl Stud. 2010;26(1):129–44.CrossRef Nelson SE, Kleschinsky JH, LaBrie RA, Kaplan S, Shaffer HJ. One decade of self exclusion: Missouri casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrollment. J Gambl Stud. 2010;26(1):129–44.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tremblay N, Boutin C, Ladouceur R. Improved self-exclusion program: preliminary results. J Gambl Stud. 2008;24(4):505–18.CrossRef Tremblay N, Boutin C, Ladouceur R. Improved self-exclusion program: preliminary results. J Gambl Stud. 2008;24(4):505–18.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nelson SE, LaPlante DA, Peller AJ, Schumann A, LaBrie RA, Shaffer HJ. Real limits in the virtual world: self-limiting behavior of internet gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2008;24(4):463–77.CrossRef Nelson SE, LaPlante DA, Peller AJ, Schumann A, LaBrie RA, Shaffer HJ. Real limits in the virtual world: self-limiting behavior of internet gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2008;24(4):463–77.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Monaghan S, Blaszczynski A. Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2010;26(1):67–88.CrossRef Monaghan S, Blaszczynski A. Impact of mode of display and message content of responsible gambling signs for electronic gaming machines on regular gamblers. J Gambl Stud. 2010;26(1):67–88.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boutin C. Le jeu : chance ou stratégie ? Choisir librement la place du jeu dans votre vie. Montréal: Les éditions de l'homme; 2010. Boutin C. Le jeu : chance ou stratégie ? Choisir librement la place du jeu dans votre vie. Montréal: Les éditions de l'homme; 2010.
14.
go back to reference Ferris J, Wynne H. L’indice canadien du jeu excessif: rapport final. Centre canadien de lutte contre l’alcoolisme et les toxicomanies; Ottawa 2001. Ferris J, Wynne H. L’indice canadien du jeu excessif: rapport final. Centre canadien de lutte contre l’alcoolisme et les toxicomanies; Ottawa 2001.
15.
go back to reference Grall-Bronnec M, Bouju G, Sébille-Rivain V, Gorwood P, Boutin C, Vénisse JL, et al. A French adaptation of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): a useful tool for assessment of irrational thoughts among gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues. 2012;27:1–21.CrossRef Grall-Bronnec M, Bouju G, Sébille-Rivain V, Gorwood P, Boutin C, Vénisse JL, et al. A French adaptation of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): a useful tool for assessment of irrational thoughts among gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues. 2012;27:1–21.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mayer JD, Gaschke YN. The experience and meta-experience of mood. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;55(1):102–11.CrossRef Mayer JD, Gaschke YN. The experience and meta-experience of mood. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;55(1):102–11.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Young MM, Wohl MJ. The Gambling Craving Scale: psychometric validation and behavioral outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009;23(3):512–22.CrossRef Young MM, Wohl MJ. The Gambling Craving Scale: psychometric validation and behavioral outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009;23(3):512–22.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Julious SA. sample sizes for clinical trials. Chapman and Hall/CRC; London 2009. Julious SA. sample sizes for clinical trials. Chapman and Hall/CRC; London 2009.
19.
go back to reference Gainsbury S, Blaszczynski A. The appropriateness of using laboratories and student participants in gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2010 27(1):83-97. Gainsbury S, Blaszczynski A. The appropriateness of using laboratories and student participants in gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2010 27(1):83-97.
20.
go back to reference Weatherly JN, Brandt AE. Participants’ sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues. 2004;13:33–50.CrossRef Weatherly JN, Brandt AE. Participants’ sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues. 2004;13:33–50.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Weatherly JN, Meier E. Studying gambling experimentally: the value of money. AGB Winter. 2007;1(2):133–40. Weatherly JN, Meier E. Studying gambling experimentally: the value of money. AGB Winter. 2007;1(2):133–40.
Metadata
Title
Online gambling’s moderators: how effective? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Julie Caillon
Marie Grall-Bronnec
Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Jean-Luc Venisse
Gaelle Challet-Bouju
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1846-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Reviewer acknowledgement

Reviewer acknowledgement 2014