Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs & Aging 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Original Research Article

Olmesartan Medoxomil in Elderly Patients with Essential or Isolated Systolic Hypertension

Efficacy and Safety Data from Clinical Trials

Authors: Dr Anthony M. Heagerty, Jean-Michel Mallion

Published in: Drugs & Aging | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The appearance and progression of essential hypertension is associated with increasing age. Older patients also frequently have an abnormally elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) [≥140 mmHg] without an elevated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) [≤90 mmHg], a phenomenon known as isolated systolic hypertension. Thus, management of hypertension in elderly patients requires agents that can effectively treat isolated systolic hypertension as well as essential hypertension.

Objective

The aim of this analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) olmesartan medoxomil in elderly patients with either essential hypertension or isolated systolic hypertension.

Methods

Efficacy data were obtained from two studies and safety data from an Integrated Summary of Safety. The efficacy of individually optimized doses of olmesartan medoxomil 20 or 40 mg/day, with or without hydrochlorothiazide, in elderly patients (≥65 years) was assessed in two separate randomized, doubleblind studies. One study assessed DBP changes in 251 patients with essential hypertension (mean seated DBP [seDBP] 100–114 mmHg and mean seated SBP [seSBP] >150 mmHg); the other study evaluated SBP changes in 256 patients with isolated systolic hypertension (mean seSBP >160 mmHg and mean seDBP <90 mmHg). Safety and tolerability were assessed in each study and in an Integrated Summary of Safety, which comprised data from 1646 hypertensive patients aged ≥65 years.

Results

In patients with essential hypertension, 12 weeks of treatment reduced mean seDBP (primary efficacy parameter) by 17.9 mmHg; mean seSBP was also significantly reduced. At study end (week 52), the proportion of diastolic responders (seDBP ≥90 mmHg) was 93%. In patients with isolated systolic hypertension, mean seSBP was reduced by 30.0 mmHg at week 12 (primary efficacy parameter); mean seDBP was only slightly reduced. At study end (week 24), the proportion of systolic responders (seSBP ≥135 mmHg) was 62.5%. Reductions in blood pressure (BP) were maintained throughout treatment in both patient populations. In each study, doubling the olmesartan medoxomil dose from 20 to 40 mg/day or adding hydrochlorothiazide delivered additional BP-lowering efficacy without any tolerability concerns, and the Integrated Summary of Safety also showed that olmesartan medoxomil with or without hydrochlorothiazide was well tolerated. Efficacy and safety results were similar in elderly (65–74 years) and very elderly (≥75 years) patients.

Conclusion

Olmesartan medoxomil provides effective and well tolerated control of hypertension in elderly patients with either essential hypertension or isolated systolic hypertension.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360(9349): 1903–13CrossRef Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360(9349): 1903–13CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289(19): 2560–72CrossRef Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289(19): 2560–72CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vasan RS, Beiser A, Seshadri S, et al. Residual lifetime risk for developing hypertension in middle-aged women and men: The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA 2002; 287(8): 1003–10CrossRef Vasan RS, Beiser A, Seshadri S, et al. Residual lifetime risk for developing hypertension in middle-aged women and men: The Framingham Heart Study. JAMA 2002; 287(8): 1003–10CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA 2003; 290(2): 199–206CrossRef Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA 2003; 290(2): 199–206CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hyman DJ, Pavlik VN. Characteristics of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the United States. N Engl J Med 2001; 345(7): 479–86CrossRef Hyman DJ, Pavlik VN. Characteristics of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the United States. N Engl J Med 2001; 345(7): 479–86CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; (25): 1105–87 Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2007; (25): 1105–87
7.
go back to reference Franklin SS, Gustin WT, Wong ND, et al. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1997; 96(1): 308–15CrossRef Franklin SS, Gustin WT, Wong ND, et al. Hemodynamic patterns of age-related changes in blood pressure. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1997; 96(1): 308–15CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Borzecki AM, Wong AT, Hickey EC, et al. Hypertension control: how well are we doing? Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(22): 2705–11CrossRef Borzecki AM, Wong AT, Hickey EC, et al. Hypertension control: how well are we doing? Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(22): 2705–11CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Whitworth JA, World Health Organization International Society of Hypertension Writing Group. 2003 World Health Organization (WHOyinternational Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21(11): 1983–92CrossRef Whitworth JA, World Health Organization International Society of Hypertension Writing Group. 2003 World Health Organization (WHOyinternational Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21(11): 1983–92CrossRef
10.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Clinical guideline 34: Hypertension: management of hypertension in adults in primary care: partial update. June 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nice.org.uk/CG034guidance [Accessed 2007 Mar 12] National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Clinical guideline 34: Hypertension: management of hypertension in adults in primary care: partial update. June 2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​CG034guidance [Accessed 2007 Mar 12]
11.
go back to reference McInnes GT, O’Kane KP, Jonker J, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil in an elderly hypertensive population. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11 Suppl. 2: S75–80PubMed McInnes GT, O’Kane KP, Jonker J, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil in an elderly hypertensive population. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11 Suppl. 2: S75–80PubMed
12.
go back to reference Conlin PR, Elkins M, Liss C, et al. A study of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide vs nifedipine GITS in elderly patients with diastolic hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 1998; 12(10): 693–9CrossRef Conlin PR, Elkins M, Liss C, et al. A study of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide vs nifedipine GITS in elderly patients with diastolic hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 1998; 12(10): 693–9CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lacourciere Y. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of irbesartan in patients aged > or = 65 years with mild to moderate hypertension. Clin Ther 2000; 22(10): 1213–24CrossRef Lacourciere Y. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of irbesartan in patients aged > or = 65 years with mild to moderate hypertension. Clin Ther 2000; 22(10): 1213–24CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mogensen CE, Neldam S, Tikkanen I, et al. Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension, microalbuminuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the Candesartan And Lisinopril Microalbuminuria (CALM) study. BMJ 2000; 321(7274): 1440–4CrossRef Mogensen CE, Neldam S, Tikkanen I, et al. Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension, microalbuminuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the Candesartan And Lisinopril Microalbuminuria (CALM) study. BMJ 2000; 321(7274): 1440–4CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For End-point reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359(9311): 995–1003CrossRef Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For End-point reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359(9311): 995–1003CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Malacco E, Vari N, Capuano V, et al. A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group comparison of val-sartan and amlodipine in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in elderly patients: the Val-Syst study. Clin Ther 2003; 25(11): 2765–80CrossRef Malacco E, Vari N, Capuano V, et al. A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group comparison of val-sartan and amlodipine in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in elderly patients: the Val-Syst study. Clin Ther 2003; 25(11): 2765–80CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Punzi HA, Punzi CF. Once-daily eprosartan mesylate in the treatment of elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension: data from a 13-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter study. J Hum Hypertens 2004; 18(9): 655–61CrossRef Punzi HA, Punzi CF. Once-daily eprosartan mesylate in the treatment of elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension: data from a 13-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter study. J Hum Hypertens 2004; 18(9): 655–61CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mangoni AA, Jackson SH. The implications of a growing evidence base for drug use in elderly patients. Part 2: ACE Inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure and high cardiovascular risk patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 61(5): 502–12CrossRef Mangoni AA, Jackson SH. The implications of a growing evidence base for drug use in elderly patients. Part 2: ACE Inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure and high cardiovascular risk patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 61(5): 502–12CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Thomas GN, Chan P, Tomlinson B. The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in elderly patients with hypertension. Drugs Aging 2006; 23(2): 131–55CrossRef Thomas GN, Chan P, Tomlinson B. The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in elderly patients with hypertension. Drugs Aging 2006; 23(2): 131–55CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Winkelmayer WC, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S, et al. Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II receptor blockade in elderly patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006; 29(10): 2210–7CrossRef Winkelmayer WC, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S, et al. Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II receptor blockade in elderly patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006; 29(10): 2210–7CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Oparil S, Williams D, Chrysant SG, et al. Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2001; 3(5): 283–91, 318CrossRef Oparil S, Williams D, Chrysant SG, et al. Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2001; 3(5): 283–91, 318CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Brunner HR, Stumpe KO, Januszewicz A. Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Drug Invest 2003; 23(7): 419–30CrossRef Brunner HR, Stumpe KO, Januszewicz A. Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Drug Invest 2003; 23(7): 419–30CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Smith DH, Dubiel R, Jones M. Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2005; 5(1): 41–50CrossRef Smith DH, Dubiel R, Jones M. Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2005; 5(1): 41–50CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brunner H, Arakawa K. Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil in achieving 24-hour blood pressure reductions and ambulatory blood pressure goals. Clin Drug Invest 2006; 26(4): 485–93CrossRef Brunner H, Arakawa K. Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil in achieving 24-hour blood pressure reductions and ambulatory blood pressure goals. Clin Drug Invest 2006; 26(4): 485–93CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mallion JM, Heagerty A, Laeis P. Systolic blood pressure reduction with olmesartan medoxomil versus nitrendipine in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 2168–77CrossRef Mallion JM, Heagerty A, Laeis P. Systolic blood pressure reduction with olmesartan medoxomil versus nitrendipine in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 2168–77CrossRef
26.
27.
28.
go back to reference Bowman TS, Sesso HD, Gaziano JM. Effect of age on blood pressure parameters and risk of cardiovascular death in men. Am J Hypertens 2006; 19: 47–52CrossRef Bowman TS, Sesso HD, Gaziano JM. Effect of age on blood pressure parameters and risk of cardiovascular death in men. Am J Hypertens 2006; 19: 47–52CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Brown DW, Giles WH, Greenlund KJ. Blood pressure parameters and risk of fatal stroke, NHANES II mortality study. Am J Hypertens 2007; 20: 338–41CrossRef Brown DW, Giles WH, Greenlund KJ. Blood pressure parameters and risk of fatal stroke, NHANES II mortality study. Am J Hypertens 2007; 20: 338–41CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Neal B, MacMahon S, Hapman N. Effects of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomised trials. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Lancet 2000; 356(9246): 1955–64CrossRef Neal B, MacMahon S, Hapman N. Effects of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood-pressure-lowering drugs: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomised trials. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Lancet 2000; 356(9246): 1955–64CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Brindel P, Hanon O, Dartigues JF, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the elderly: the Three City study. J Hypertens 2006; 24(1): 51–8CrossRef Brindel P, Hanon O, Dartigues JF, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the elderly: the Three City study. J Hypertens 2006; 24(1): 51–8CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Somes GW, Pahor M, Shorr RI, et al. The role of diastolic blood pressure when treating isolated systolic hypertension. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(17): 2004–9CrossRef Somes GW, Pahor M, Shorr RI, et al. The role of diastolic blood pressure when treating isolated systolic hypertension. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(17): 2004–9CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Blacher J, Staessen JA, Girerd X, et al. Pulse pressure not mean pressure determines cardiovascular risk in older hypertensive patients. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160(8): 1085–9CrossRef Blacher J, Staessen JA, Girerd X, et al. Pulse pressure not mean pressure determines cardiovascular risk in older hypertensive patients. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160(8): 1085–9CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Vaccarino V, Berger AK, Abramson J, et al. Pulse pressure and risk of cardiovascular events in the systolic hypertension in the elderly program. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88(9): 980–6CrossRef Vaccarino V, Berger AK, Abramson J, et al. Pulse pressure and risk of cardiovascular events in the systolic hypertension in the elderly program. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88(9): 980–6CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bremner AD, Baur M, Oddou-Stock P, et al. Valsartan: long-term efficacy and tolerability compared to lisinopril in elderly patients with essential hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens 1997; 19(8): 1263–85CrossRef Bremner AD, Baur M, Oddou-Stock P, et al. Valsartan: long-term efficacy and tolerability compared to lisinopril in elderly patients with essential hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens 1997; 19(8): 1263–85CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Simpson KL, McClellan KJ. Losartan: a review of its use, with special focus on elderly patients. Drugs Aging 2000; 16(3): 227–50CrossRef Simpson KL, McClellan KJ. Losartan: a review of its use, with special focus on elderly patients. Drugs Aging 2000; 16(3): 227–50CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Mallion JM, Carretta R, Trenkwalder P, et al. Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is effective in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by valsartan monotherapy. Blood Press 2003; Suppl. 1: 36–43 Mallion JM, Carretta R, Trenkwalder P, et al. Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide is effective in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by valsartan monotherapy. Blood Press 2003; Suppl. 1: 36–43
38.
go back to reference Neutel JM, Bedigian MP. Efficacy of valsartan in patients aged > or = 65 years with systolic hypertension. Clin Ther 2000; 22(8): 961–9CrossRef Neutel JM, Bedigian MP. Efficacy of valsartan in patients aged > or = 65 years with systolic hypertension. Clin Ther 2000; 22(8): 961–9CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Schroeder K, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. How can we improve adherence to blood pressure-lowering medication in ambulatory care? Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2004 Apr 12; 164: 722–32CrossRef Schroeder K, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. How can we improve adherence to blood pressure-lowering medication in ambulatory care? Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2004 Apr 12; 164: 722–32CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Olmesartan Medoxomil in Elderly Patients with Essential or Isolated Systolic Hypertension
Efficacy and Safety Data from Clinical Trials
Authors
Dr Anthony M. Heagerty
Jean-Michel Mallion
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs & Aging / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1170-229X
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1969
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/0002512-200926010-00005

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Drugs & Aging 1/2009 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.