Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2018

01-01-2018 | Original Article

Objective Differences in Colonoscopy Technique Between Trainee and Expert Endoscopists Using the Colonoscopy Force Monitor

Authors: Alexander R. Ende, Piet De Groen, Bryan L. Balmadrid, Joo Ha Hwang, John Inadomi, Tomasz Wojtera, Vladimir Egorov, Noune Sarvazyan, Louis Korman

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Learning to perform colonoscopy safely and effectively is central to gastroenterology fellowship programs. The application of force to the colonoscope is an important part of colonoscopy technique.

Aims

We compared force application during colonoscopy between novice and expert endoscopists using a novel device to determine differences in colonoscopy technique.

Methods

This is an observational cohort study designed to compare force application during colonoscopy between novice and experienced trainees, made up of gastroenterology fellows from two training programs, and expert endoscopists from both academic and private practice settings.

Results

Force recordings were obtained for 257 colonoscopies by 37 endoscopists, 21 of whom were trainees. Experts used higher average forward forces during insertion compared to all trainees and significantly less clockwise torque compared to novice trainees.

Conclusions

We present significant, objective differences in colonoscopy technique between novice trainees, experienced trainees, and expert endoscopists. These findings suggest that the colonoscopy force monitor is an objective tool for measuring proficiency in colonoscopy. Furthermore, the device may be used as a teaching tool in training and continued medical education programs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference ASGE Training Committee, Adler DG, Bakis G, et al. Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:231–235.CrossRef ASGE Training Committee, Adler DG, Bakis G, et al. Principles of training in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:231–235.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Training Committee 2010–2011, Sedlack RE, Shami VM, et al. Colonoscopy core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:482–490.CrossRef Training Committee 2010–2011, Sedlack RE, Shami VM, et al. Colonoscopy core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:482–490.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:31–53.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:31–53.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sedlack R. Assessing fellow skills: practice what you preach, measure what you teach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1425–1426.CrossRefPubMed Sedlack R. Assessing fellow skills: practice what you preach, measure what you teach. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1425–1426.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Benson M, Lucey M, Pfau P. Training the competent colonoscopist. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:708–709.CrossRefPubMed Benson M, Lucey M, Pfau P. Training the competent colonoscopist. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:708–709.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference ASGE Training Committee, et al. ASGE’s assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:1–7.CrossRef ASGE Training Committee, et al. ASGE’s assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:1–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sedlack RE. Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:e1–e2.CrossRef Sedlack RE. Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:e1–e2.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, et al. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut. 2014;63:1746–1754.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, et al. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut. 2014;63:1746–1754.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ. Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: the use of self-assessment of performance measures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:971–975.CrossRefPubMed Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ. Competence measurement during colonoscopy training: the use of self-assessment of performance measures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:971–975.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Objective Differences in Colonoscopy Technique Between Trainee and Expert Endoscopists Using the Colonoscopy Force Monitor
Authors
Alexander R. Ende
Piet De Groen
Bryan L. Balmadrid
Joo Ha Hwang
John Inadomi
Tomasz Wojtera
Vladimir Egorov
Noune Sarvazyan
Louis Korman
Publication date
01-01-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4847-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.