Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 9/2021

01-09-2021 | Obesity | New Concept

Sutureless Duodeno-Ileal Anastomosis with Self-Assembling Magnets: Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Metabolic Procedure

Authors: Francisco Schlottmann, Marvin Ryou, David Lautz, Christopher C. Thompson, Rudolf Buxhoeveden

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 9/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Less invasive and safer anastomotic techniques are desirable. We aimed to determine technical feasibility and safety of sutureless duodeno-ileal side-to-side anastomosis in obese patients using self-assembling magnets.

Methods

This was an open-label, prospective, and single-arm study including obese patients (BMI 30–50 kg/m2) with type II diabetes. The ileal magnet was deployed laparoscopically, and the duodenal magnet was deployed endoscopically. Both magnets were coupled under laparoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. The primary endpoints were technical feasibility and safety. The secondary endpoints were patency of the anastomosis, HbA1c reduction, and weight loss 12 months after the procedure.

Results

A total of 8 patients were enrolled in the study; median age was 51.5 years (range: 34–65), and median BMI was 38.8 kg/m2 (range: 35–47.9). The mean procedural duration was 63.5 min (range: 41–95). No intraoperative complications were recorded, and no major postoperative morbidity related to the procedure occurred. Magnets were expelled at a median of 29.5 days after the procedure with no associated complications. Upper endoscopy at 12 months confirmed patent anastomoses with healthy-appearing mucosa in all patients. HbA1c reduced below 7.0% in 6 out of 8 (75%) patients, and greater than 5% of total body weight loss was observed in 7 out of 8 (87.5%) patients at 12 months.

Conclusions

Sutureless duodeno-ileal side-to-side anastomosis using self-assembling magnets is feasible and safe in obese patients, and a dual-path enteral diversion with large-caliber and durable anastomosis can be achieved.

Graphical abstract

Literature
1.
go back to reference Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766–78.CrossRef Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766–78.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hill JO, Wyat HR, Reed GW, et al. Obesity and the environment, where do we go from here? Science. 2003;299:853–5.CrossRef Hill JO, Wyat HR, Reed GW, et al. Obesity and the environment, where do we go from here? Science. 2003;299:853–5.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, et al. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2011–2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015;219:1–8. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, et al. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2011–2014. NCHS Data Brief. 2015;219:1–8.
4.
go back to reference Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):563–70.CrossRef Finkelstein EA, Khavjou OA, Thompson H, et al. Obesity and severe obesity forecasts through 2030. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(6):563–70.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jakobsen GS, Smastuen MC, Sandbu R, et al. Association of bariatric surgery vs medical obesity treatment with long-term medical complications and obesity-related comorbidities. JAMA. 2018;319:291–301.CrossRef Jakobsen GS, Smastuen MC, Sandbu R, et al. Association of bariatric surgery vs medical obesity treatment with long-term medical complications and obesity-related comorbidities. JAMA. 2018;319:291–301.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Salminen P, Helmio M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):241–54.CrossRef Salminen P, Helmio M, Ovaska J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):241–54.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-enY gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.CrossRef Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-enY gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yashkov Y, Bordan N, Torres A, et al. SADI-S 250 vs Roux-en-Y duodenal switch (RY-DS): results of 5-year observational study. Obes Surg. 2020; Yashkov Y, Bordan N, Torres A, et al. SADI-S 250 vs Roux-en-Y duodenal switch (RY-DS): results of 5-year observational study. Obes Surg. 2020;
9.
go back to reference Pichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S, et al. Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(1):42–9.CrossRef Pichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S, et al. Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(1):42–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gonzales KD, Douglas G, Pichakron KO, et al. Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(6):1291–5.CrossRef Gonzales KD, Douglas G, Pichakron KO, et al. Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(6):1291–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lebares CC, Graves CE, Lin MY, et al. Endoscopic magnetic compression anastomosis for small bowel bypass in a high operative risk setting. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019;29(5):84–7.CrossRef Lebares CC, Graves CE, Lin MY, et al. Endoscopic magnetic compression anastomosis for small bowel bypass in a high operative risk setting. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019;29(5):84–7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kamada T, Ohdaira H, Takeuchi H, et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for non-anastomotic stenosis of the proximal jejunum after total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2020;6(1):167.CrossRef Kamada T, Ohdaira H, Takeuchi H, et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for non-anastomotic stenosis of the proximal jejunum after total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2020;6(1):167.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kaidar-Person O, Rosenthal RJ, Wexner SD. Compression anastomosis: history and clinical considerations. Am J Surg. 2008;195:818–26.CrossRef Kaidar-Person O, Rosenthal RJ, Wexner SD. Compression anastomosis: history and clinical considerations. Am J Surg. 2008;195:818–26.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Khromov Y, Pliakos I, Ibrahim M, et al. A prospective multi-institutional study assessing clinical outcome with the NiTi compression anastomosis ring (Biodynamix ColonRing) in elective colorectal anastomoses. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60:522–7.PubMed Khromov Y, Pliakos I, Ibrahim M, et al. A prospective multi-institutional study assessing clinical outcome with the NiTi compression anastomosis ring (Biodynamix ColonRing) in elective colorectal anastomoses. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60:522–7.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Luo R, Mills S, et al. Compression anastomosis ring device in colorectal anastomosis: a review of 1,180 patients. Am J Surg. 2013;205:447–51.CrossRef Masoomi H, Luo R, Mills S, et al. Compression anastomosis ring device in colorectal anastomosis: a review of 1,180 patients. Am J Surg. 2013;205:447–51.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG, et al. Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(1):222–8.CrossRef Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG, et al. Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(1):222–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Cope C, Ginsberg GG. Long-term patency of experimental magnetic compression gastroenteric anastomoses achieved with covered stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(7):780–4.CrossRef Cope C, Ginsberg GG. Long-term patency of experimental magnetic compression gastroenteric anastomoses achieved with covered stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(7):780–4.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kawabata H, Sone D, Yamaguchi K, et al. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy for superior mesenteric artery syndrome using magnetic compression anastomosis. Gastroenterol Res. 2019;12(6):320–3.CrossRef Kawabata H, Sone D, Yamaguchi K, et al. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy for superior mesenteric artery syndrome using magnetic compression anastomosis. Gastroenterol Res. 2019;12(6):320–3.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ryou M, Agoston AT, Thompson CC. Endoscopic intestinal bypass creation by using self-assembling magnets in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(4):821–5.CrossRef Ryou M, Agoston AT, Thompson CC. Endoscopic intestinal bypass creation by using self-assembling magnets in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(4):821–5.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ryou M, Aihara H, Thompson CC. Minimally invasive entero-enteral dual-path bypass using self-assembling magnets. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(10):4533–8.CrossRef Ryou M, Aihara H, Thompson CC. Minimally invasive entero-enteral dual-path bypass using self-assembling magnets. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(10):4533–8.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Machytka E, Bužga M, Zonca P, et al. Partial jejunal diversion using an incisionless magnetic anastomosis system: 1-year interim results in patients with obesity and diabetes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(5):904–12.CrossRef Machytka E, Bužga M, Zonca P, et al. Partial jejunal diversion using an incisionless magnetic anastomosis system: 1-year interim results in patients with obesity and diabetes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(5):904–12.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, et al. A multi-institutional study on the mid-term outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass as a surgical revision option after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3165–73.CrossRef Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, et al. A multi-institutional study on the mid-term outcomes of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass as a surgical revision option after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3165–73.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Merz AE, Blackstone RB, Gagner M, et al. Duodenal switch in revisional bariatric surgery: conclusions from an expert consensus panel. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:894–9.CrossRef Merz AE, Blackstone RB, Gagner M, et al. Duodenal switch in revisional bariatric surgery: conclusions from an expert consensus panel. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:894–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre ME, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre ME, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):104–13.CrossRef Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):104–13.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cottam A, Cottam D, Roslin M, et al. A matched cohort analysis of sleeve gastrectomy with and without 300 cm loop duodenal switch with 18-month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2363–9.CrossRef Cottam A, Cottam D, Roslin M, et al. A matched cohort analysis of sleeve gastrectomy with and without 300 cm loop duodenal switch with 18-month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2363–9.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Topart P, Becouarn G, Finel JB. Comparison of 2-year results of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy for superobesity. Obes Surg. 2020;30(9):3402–7.CrossRef Topart P, Becouarn G, Finel JB. Comparison of 2-year results of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy for superobesity. Obes Surg. 2020;30(9):3402–7.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Azevedo FR, Santoro S, Correa-Giannella ML, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the metabolic effects of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition. Obes Surg. 2018;28(10):3012–9.CrossRef Azevedo FR, Santoro S, Correa-Giannella ML, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the metabolic effects of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition. Obes Surg. 2018;28(10):3012–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hu B, Ye LS. Endoscopic applications of magnets for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;11(12):548–60.CrossRef Hu B, Ye LS. Endoscopic applications of magnets for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;11(12):548–60.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kamada T, Ohdaira H, Takeuchi H, Takahashi J, Ito E, Suzuki N, Narihiro S, Yoshida M, Yamanouchi E, Suzuki Y. New technique for magnetic compression anastomosis without incision for gastrointestinal obstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2020. Kamada T, Ohdaira H, Takeuchi H, Takahashi J, Ito E, Suzuki N, Narihiro S, Yoshida M, Yamanouchi E, Suzuki Y. New technique for magnetic compression anastomosis without incision for gastrointestinal obstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2020.
32.
go back to reference Caiazzo R, Branche J, Daoudi M, et al. Increased postprandial glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) production after endoscopic gastrointestinal bypass using the Cousin lumen-apposing stent in a porcine model. Endoscopy. 2018;50(1):14–21.PubMed Caiazzo R, Branche J, Daoudi M, et al. Increased postprandial glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) production after endoscopic gastrointestinal bypass using the Cousin lumen-apposing stent in a porcine model. Endoscopy. 2018;50(1):14–21.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Monino L, Gonzalez JM, Serrero M, et al. First case of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunal anastomosis for duodenal stricture in refractory Crohn’s disease: a bridge toward inflammation control. Endoscopy. 2020;52(6):E204–5.CrossRef Monino L, Gonzalez JM, Serrero M, et al. First case of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunal anastomosis for duodenal stricture in refractory Crohn’s disease: a bridge toward inflammation control. Endoscopy. 2020;52(6):E204–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Sutureless Duodeno-Ileal Anastomosis with Self-Assembling Magnets: Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Metabolic Procedure
Authors
Francisco Schlottmann
Marvin Ryou
David Lautz
Christopher C. Thompson
Rudolf Buxhoeveden
Publication date
01-09-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Keywords
Obesity
Obesity
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 9/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05554-z

Other articles of this Issue 9/2021

Obesity Surgery 9/2021 Go to the issue