Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2016

01-10-2016

Minimally invasive entero-enteral dual-path bypass using self-assembling magnets

Authors: Marvin Ryou, Hiroyuki Aihara, Christopher C. Thompson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A minimally invasive method of entero-enteral bypass may be desirable for treatment of obstruction, obesity, or metabolic syndrome. We have developed a technology based on miniature self-assembling magnets which create large-caliber anastomoses (incisionless anastomosis system or IAS). The aim of this study was to assess (a) procedural characteristics of IAS deployment and (b) long-term integrity and patency of the resulting jejuno-ileal dual-path bypass.

Methods

Endoscopic jejuno-ileal bypass creation using IAS magnets was performed in 8 Yorkshire pigs survived 3 months. Procedure: The jejunal magnet was endoscopically deployed. However, the ileal magnet required surgical delivery given restraints of porcine anatomy. A 5-mm enterotomy was created through which the ileal magnet was inserted using a modified laparoscopic delivery tool. Magnets were manually coupled. Pigs underwent serial endoscopies for anastomosis assessment. Three-month necropsies were performed, followed by pressure testing of anastomoses and histological analysis.

Results

Jejuno-ileal bypass creation using self-assembling IAS magnets was successful in all 8 pigs (100 %). Patent, leak-free bypasses formed in all animals by day 10. All IAS magnets were expelled by day 12. Anastomoses were widely patent at 3 months, with mean maximal diameter of 30 mm. At necropsy, adhesions were minimal. Pressure testing confirmed superior integrity of anastomotic tissue. Histology showed full epithelialization across the anastomosis with no evidence of submucosal fibrosis or inflammation.

Conclusions

Entero-enteral bypass using self-assembling IAS magnets is safe and technically feasible in the porcine model. IAS magnets can be rapidly delivered endoscopically or through a modified laparoscopic device. Expulsion of fused magnets avoids retention of prosthetic material. Anastomoses are widely patent and fully re-epithelialized. Three-month pressure testing reveals anastomotic tissue to be as robust as native tissue, while necropsy and histology suggests minimal/absent tissue inflammation. In human anatomy, a fully endoscopic jejuno-ileal bypass using IAS magnets may be feasible.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ly J, O’Grady G, Mittal A, Plank L, Windsor JA (2010) A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 24:290–297CrossRefPubMed Ly J, O’Grady G, Mittal A, Plank L, Windsor JA (2010) A systematic review of methods to palliate malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc 24:290–297CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gentileschi P, Kini S, Catarci M, Gagner M (2002) Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 16:736–744CrossRefPubMed Gentileschi P, Kini S, Catarci M, Gagner M (2002) Evidence-based medicine: open and laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 16:736–744CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Duan J, Tan C, Xu H et al (2015) Side-to-side jejunoileal bypass induces better glucose-lowering effect than end-to-side jejunoileal bypass on nonobese diabetic rats. Obes Surg 25:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed Duan J, Tan C, Xu H et al (2015) Side-to-side jejunoileal bypass induces better glucose-lowering effect than end-to-side jejunoileal bypass on nonobese diabetic rats. Obes Surg 25:1458–1467CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Himpens JM (2004) The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Semin Laparosc Surg 11:171–177PubMed Himpens JM (2004) The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Semin Laparosc Surg 11:171–177PubMed
5.
go back to reference Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H et al (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292CrossRefPubMed Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H et al (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62:287–292CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P (2006) Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63:307–312CrossRefPubMed Bergstrom M, Ikeda K, Swain P, Park P (2006) Transgastric anastomosis by using flexible endoscopy in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 63:307–312CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chiu PW, Wai Ng EK, Teoh AY et al (2010) Transgastric endoluminal gastrojejunostomy: technical development from bench to animal study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 71:390–393CrossRefPubMed Chiu PW, Wai Ng EK, Teoh AY et al (2010) Transgastric endoluminal gastrojejunostomy: technical development from bench to animal study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 71:390–393CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shang E, Hasenberg T, Magdeburg R, Keese M, Post S, Weiner R (2009) First experiences with a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy by a new transorally introducible stapler system in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 19:230–236CrossRefPubMed Shang E, Hasenberg T, Magdeburg R, Keese M, Post S, Weiner R (2009) First experiences with a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy by a new transorally introducible stapler system in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 19:230–236CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Swain CP, Mills TN (1991) Anastomosis at flexible endoscopy: an experimental study of compression button gastrojejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 37:626–631CrossRef Swain CP, Mills TN (1991) Anastomosis at flexible endoscopy: an experimental study of compression button gastrojejunostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 37:626–631CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Villaverde A, Cope C, Chopita N et al (2004) Long term follow-up of endoscopic gastroenteric anastomoses with magnets (EGAM) [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 59:AB92CrossRef Villaverde A, Cope C, Chopita N et al (2004) Long term follow-up of endoscopic gastroenteric anastomoses with magnets (EGAM) [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 59:AB92CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mukherjee D et al (2003) Transluminal endosurgery: single lumen access anastomotic device for flexible endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 58:585–591CrossRefPubMed Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mukherjee D et al (2003) Transluminal endosurgery: single lumen access anastomotic device for flexible endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 58:585–591CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG et al (2009) Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg 44:222–228CrossRefPubMed Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG et al (2009) Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg 44:222–228CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S et al (2011) Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg 212:42–49CrossRefPubMed Pichakron KO, Jelin EB, Hirose S et al (2011) Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg 212:42–49CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gonzales KD, Douglas G, Pichakron KO et al (2012) Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. Pediatr Surg 47:1291–1295CrossRef Gonzales KD, Douglas G, Pichakron KO et al (2012) Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. Pediatr Surg 47:1291–1295CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wall J, Diana M, Leroy J et al (2013) Magnamosis IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy 45:643–648CrossRefPubMed Wall J, Diana M, Leroy J et al (2013) Magnamosis IV: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Endoscopy 45:643–648CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Diana M, Wall J, Perretta S et al (2011) Totally endoscopic magnetic enteral bypass by external guided rendezvous technique. Surg Innov 18:317–320CrossRefPubMed Diana M, Wall J, Perretta S et al (2011) Totally endoscopic magnetic enteral bypass by external guided rendezvous technique. Surg Innov 18:317–320CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chopita N, Vaillaverde A, Cope C et al (2005) Endoscopic gastroenteric anastomosis using magnets. Endoscopy 37:313–317CrossRefPubMed Chopita N, Vaillaverde A, Cope C et al (2005) Endoscopic gastroenteric anastomosis using magnets. Endoscopy 37:313–317CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cope C (1995) Creation of compression gastroenterostomy by means of the oral, percutaneous, or surgical introduction of magnets: feasibility study in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:539–545CrossRefPubMed Cope C (1995) Creation of compression gastroenterostomy by means of the oral, percutaneous, or surgical introduction of magnets: feasibility study in swine. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:539–545CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Cope C, Ginsberg GG (2001) Long-term patency of experimental magnetic compression gastroenteric anastomoses achieved with covered stents. Gastrointest Endosc 53:780–784CrossRefPubMed Cope C, Ginsberg GG (2001) Long-term patency of experimental magnetic compression gastroenteric anastomoses achieved with covered stents. Gastrointest Endosc 53:780–784CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ryou M, Cantillon-Murphy P, Azagury D et al (2011) Smart self-assembling magnets for endoscopy (SAMSEN) for transoral endoscopic creation of immediate gastrojejunostomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 73:353–359CrossRefPubMed Ryou M, Cantillon-Murphy P, Azagury D et al (2011) Smart self-assembling magnets for endoscopy (SAMSEN) for transoral endoscopic creation of immediate gastrojejunostomy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 73:353–359CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Romagnuolo J, Morris J, Palesch S et al (2010) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for inadvertent colon injury repair: feasibility, risk of abdominal adhesions, and peritoneal contamination in a porcine survival model. Gastrointest Endosc 71:817–823CrossRefPubMed Romagnuolo J, Morris J, Palesch S et al (2010) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for inadvertent colon injury repair: feasibility, risk of abdominal adhesions, and peritoneal contamination in a porcine survival model. Gastrointest Endosc 71:817–823CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ryou M, Fong DG, Pai RD et al (2008) Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrostomy and colotomy closure modalities. Endoscopy 40:432–436CrossRefPubMed Ryou M, Fong DG, Pai RD et al (2008) Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrostomy and colotomy closure modalities. Endoscopy 40:432–436CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Minimally invasive entero-enteral dual-path bypass using self-assembling magnets
Authors
Marvin Ryou
Hiroyuki Aihara
Christopher C. Thompson
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4789-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2016 Go to the issue