Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 1/2020

01-01-2020 | NSCLC | Original Article – Cancer Research

Marital status independently predicts non-small cell lung cancer survival: a propensity-adjusted SEER database analysis

Authors: Zongwei Chen, Kanhua Yin, Difan Zheng, Jie Gu, Jizhuang Luo, Shuai Wang, Haiquan Chen

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Marital status has been demonstrated as an independent prognostic factor in many cancer types. The impact of marital status on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival has not been assessed at the population level. Here, we used the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) database, a US national cancer registry, to address this issue.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with NSCLC from 2004 to 2009 were identified in the SEER database (version 8.3.2, updated at April 14, 2016). Those with incomplete clinicopathological information were excluded. The tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging was based on the criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 6th edition. We used propensity-score matching analysis to balance baseline characteristics between the patients who were married and those who were not married. The impact of marital status on cancer-specific survival was analyzed with Cox proportional-hazards regression.

Result

A total of 72, 984 NSCLC patients (41, 095 married patients, 56.3%) were enrolled in this study. After propensity-score matching, 25, 617 patients in the married group were 1:1 matched with patients in the unmarried group. Being unmarried was found to be associated with significantly decreased cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio (HR): 1.142, 95% CI: 1.119–1.166, p < 0.001). Among the unmarried group, patients who were single had worse cancer-specific survival (median survival 12 months, 95% CI: 11.37–12.63 months) than those who were divorced (median survival 15 months, 95% CI: 14.24–15.76 months, p < 0.001) or widowed (median survival 15 months, 95% CI: 14.25–15.76 months, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study shows that marital status is an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival in NSCLC patients. Patients who were married had better cancer-specific survival compared to the unmarried ones.
Literature
go back to reference Ikeda A, Kawachi I, Iso H, Iwasaki M, Inoue M, Tsugane S (2013) Social support and cancer incidence and mortality: the JPHC study cohort II. Cancer Causes Control 24(5):847–860CrossRef Ikeda A, Kawachi I, Iso H, Iwasaki M, Inoue M, Tsugane S (2013) Social support and cancer incidence and mortality: the JPHC study cohort II. Cancer Causes Control 24(5):847–860CrossRef
go back to reference Jatoi A, Novotny P, Cassivi S et al (2007) Does marital status impact survival and quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer? Observations from the mayo clinic lung cancer cohort. Oncologist 12(12):1456–1463CrossRef Jatoi A, Novotny P, Cassivi S et al (2007) Does marital status impact survival and quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer? Observations from the mayo clinic lung cancer cohort. Oncologist 12(12):1456–1463CrossRef
go back to reference Konski AA, Pajak TF, Movsas B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group et al (2006) Disadvantage of men living alone participating in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group head and neck trials. J Clin Oncol 24:4177–4183CrossRef Konski AA, Pajak TF, Movsas B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group et al (2006) Disadvantage of men living alone participating in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group head and neck trials. J Clin Oncol 24:4177–4183CrossRef
go back to reference Kravdal O (2001) The impact of marital status on cancer survival. Soc Sci Med 52(3):357–368CrossRef Kravdal O (2001) The impact of marital status on cancer survival. Soc Sci Med 52(3):357–368CrossRef
go back to reference Kravdal O (2002) A cancer survival model that takes sociodemographic variations in “normal” mortality into account: comparison with other models. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:309–318CrossRef Kravdal O (2002) A cancer survival model that takes sociodemographic variations in “normal” mortality into account: comparison with other models. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:309–318CrossRef
go back to reference Ou SH, Ziogas A, Zell JA (2009) Prognostic factors for survival in extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC): the importance of smoking history, socioeconomic and marital statuses, and ethnicity. J Thorac Oncol 4(1):37–43CrossRef Ou SH, Ziogas A, Zell JA (2009) Prognostic factors for survival in extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC): the importance of smoking history, socioeconomic and marital statuses, and ethnicity. J Thorac Oncol 4(1):37–43CrossRef
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray FJ, Ferlay L, Pissani P (2002) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108CrossRef Parkin DM, Bray FJ, Ferlay L, Pissani P (2002) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108CrossRef
go back to reference Saito-Nakaya K, Nakaya N, Fujimori M et al (2006) Marital status, social support and survival after curative resection in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci 97(3):206–213CrossRef Saito-Nakaya K, Nakaya N, Fujimori M et al (2006) Marital status, social support and survival after curative resection in non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci 97(3):206–213CrossRef
go back to reference Saito-Nakaya K, Nakaya N, Akechi T et al (2008) Marital status and non-small cell lung cancer survival: the Lung Cancer Database Project in Japan. Psychooncology 17(9):869–876CrossRef Saito-Nakaya K, Nakaya N, Akechi T et al (2008) Marital status and non-small cell lung cancer survival: the Lung Cancer Database Project in Japan. Psychooncology 17(9):869–876CrossRef
go back to reference Sculier JP, Chansky K, Crowley JJ, International Staging Committee and Participating Institutions et al (2008) The impact of additional prognostic factors on survival and their relationship with the anatomical extent of disease expressed by the 6th Edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors and the proposals for the 7th Edition. J Thorac Oncol 3:457–466CrossRef Sculier JP, Chansky K, Crowley JJ, International Staging Committee and Participating Institutions et al (2008) The impact of additional prognostic factors on survival and their relationship with the anatomical extent of disease expressed by the 6th Edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors and the proposals for the 7th Edition. J Thorac Oncol 3:457–466CrossRef
go back to reference Siegel R, Naishadham D (2013) Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 63(1):11–30CrossRef Siegel R, Naishadham D (2013) Jemal A (2013) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 63(1):11–30CrossRef
go back to reference Tammemagi CM, Neslund-Dudas C, Simoff M et al (2004a) Smoking and lung cancer survival: the role of comorbidity and treatment. Chest 125:27–37CrossRef Tammemagi CM, Neslund-Dudas C, Simoff M et al (2004a) Smoking and lung cancer survival: the role of comorbidity and treatment. Chest 125:27–37CrossRef
go back to reference Tammemagi CM, Neslund-Dudas C, Simoff M et al (2004b) Lung carcinoma symptoms-an independent predictor of survival and an important mediator of African-American disparity in survival. Cancer 101:1655–1663CrossRef Tammemagi CM, Neslund-Dudas C, Simoff M et al (2004b) Lung carcinoma symptoms-an independent predictor of survival and an important mediator of African-American disparity in survival. Cancer 101:1655–1663CrossRef
go back to reference Tannenbaum SL, Zhao W, Koru-Sengul T et al (2013) Marital status and its effect on lung cancer survival. Springerplus 2:504CrossRef Tannenbaum SL, Zhao W, Koru-Sengul T et al (2013) Marital status and its effect on lung cancer survival. Springerplus 2:504CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Marital status independently predicts non-small cell lung cancer survival: a propensity-adjusted SEER database analysis
Authors
Zongwei Chen
Kanhua Yin
Difan Zheng
Jie Gu
Jizhuang Luo
Shuai Wang
Haiquan Chen
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords
NSCLC
NSCLC
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03084-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 1/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine