Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2019

Open Access 01-10-2019 | NSCLC | Original Article

Introducing FDG PET/CT-guided chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC in low- and middle-income countries: preliminary results from the IAEA PERTAIN trial

Authors: T. Konert, W. V. Vogel, D. Paez, A. Polo, E. Fidarova, H. Carvalho, P. S. Duarte, A. C. Zuliani, A. O. Santos, D. Altuhhova, L. Karusoo, R. Kapoor, A. Sood, J. Khader, A. Al-Ibraheem, Y. Numair, S. Abubaker, C. Soydal, T. Kütük, T. A. Le, N. X. Canh, B. Q. Bieu, L. N. Ha, J. S. A. Belderbos, M. P. MacManus, D. Thorwarth, G. G. Hanna

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 11/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) continue to have a poor prognosis. It is known that FDG PET/CT improves staging, treatment selection and target volume delineation (TVD), and although its use has grown rapidly, it is still not widely available in LMIC. CRT is often used as sequential treatment, but is known to be more effective when given concurrently. The aim of the PERTAIN study was to assess the impact of introducing FDG PET/CT-guided concurrent CRT, supported by training and quality control (QC), on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with stage III NSCLC.

Methods

The study included patients with stage III NSCLC from nine medical centres in seven countries. A retrospective cohort was managed according to local practices between January 2010 and July 2014, which involved only optional diagnostic FDG PET/CT for staging (not for TVD), followed by sequential or concurrent CRT. A prospective cohort between August 2015 and October 2018 was treated according to the study protocol including FDG PET/CT in treatment position for staging and multimodal TVD followed by concurrent CRT by specialists trained in protocol-specific TVD and with TVD QC. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess OS and PFS in the retrospective and prospective cohorts.

Results

Guidelines for FDG PET/CT image acquisition and TVD were developed and published. All specialists involved in the PERTAIN study received training between June 2014 and May 2016. The PET/CT scanners used received EARL accreditation. In November 2018 a planned interim analysis was performed including 230 patients in the retrospective cohort with a median follow-up of 14 months and 128 patients in the prospective cohort, of whom 69 had a follow-up of at least 1 year. Using the Kaplan–Meier method, OS was significantly longer in the prospective cohort than in the retrospective cohort (23 vs. 14 months, p = 0.012). In addition, median PFS was significantly longer in the prospective cohort than in the retrospective cohort (17 vs. 11 months, p = 0.012).

Conclusion

In the PERTAIN study, the preliminary results indicate that introducing FDG PET/CT-guided concurrent CRT for patients with stage III NSCLC in LMIC resulted in a significant improvement in OS and PFS. The final study results based on complete data are expected in 2020.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Ung YC, Bezjak A, Coakley N, Evans WK; the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario. Positron emission tomography with 18fluorodeoxyglucose in radiation treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:86–97. Ung YC, Bezjak A, Coakley N, Evans WK; the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group of Cancer Care Ontario. Positron emission tomography with 18fluorodeoxyglucose in radiation treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:86–97.
4.
go back to reference Gregory DL, Hicks RJ, Hogg A, Binns DS, Shum PL, Milner A, et al. Effect of PET/CT on management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: results of a prospective study with 5-year survival data. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1007–15.CrossRefPubMed Gregory DL, Hicks RJ, Hogg A, Binns DS, Shum PL, Milner A, et al. Effect of PET/CT on management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: results of a prospective study with 5-year survival data. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1007–15.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Aupérin A, Le Péchoux C, Rolland E, Curran WJ, Furuse K, Fournel P, et al. Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2181–90.CrossRefPubMed Aupérin A, Le Péchoux C, Rolland E, Curran WJ, Furuse K, Fournel P, et al. Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2181–90.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Liao ZX, Komaki RR, Thames HD Jr, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Mohan R, et al. Influence of technologic advances on outcomes in patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3):775–81.CrossRefPubMed Liao ZX, Komaki RR, Thames HD Jr, Liu HH, Tucker SL, Mohan R, et al. Influence of technologic advances on outcomes in patients with unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3):775–81.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chun SG, Hu C, Choy H, Komaki RU, Timmerman RD, Schild SE, et al. Comparison of 3-D conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy outcomes for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in NRG oncology/RTOG 0617. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93(3 Suppl):S1–2. Chun SG, Hu C, Choy H, Komaki RU, Timmerman RD, Schild SE, et al. Comparison of 3-D conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy outcomes for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in NRG oncology/RTOG 0617. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93(3 Suppl):S1–2.
9.
10.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report No. 50. Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. Washington, DC: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 1993. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU Report No. 50. Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. Washington, DC: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 1993.
11.
go back to reference Steenbakkers RJ, Duppen JC, Fitton I, Deurloo KE, Zijp L, Uitterhoeve AL, et al. Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: a ‘big brother’ evaluation. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:182–90.CrossRefPubMed Steenbakkers RJ, Duppen JC, Fitton I, Deurloo KE, Zijp L, Uitterhoeve AL, et al. Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: a ‘big brother’ evaluation. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:182–90.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rasch C, Belderbos J, van Giersbergen A, De Kok I, Laura T, Boer M, et al. The influence of a multi-disciplinary meeting for quality assurance on target delineation in radiotherapy treatment preparation. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2009(3 Suppl);75:S452–3.CrossRef Rasch C, Belderbos J, van Giersbergen A, De Kok I, Laura T, Boer M, et al. The influence of a multi-disciplinary meeting for quality assurance on target delineation in radiotherapy treatment preparation. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2009(3 Suppl);75:S452–3.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hanna G, McAleese J, Carson KJ, Stewart DP, Cosgrove VP, Eakin RL, et al. (18)F-FDG PET-CT simulation for non-small-cell lung cancer: effect in patients already staged by PET-CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:24–30.CrossRefPubMed Hanna G, McAleese J, Carson KJ, Stewart DP, Cosgrove VP, Eakin RL, et al. (18)F-FDG PET-CT simulation for non-small-cell lung cancer: effect in patients already staged by PET-CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:24–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Greco C, Rosenzweig K, Cascini GL, Tamburrini O. Current status of PET/CT for tumor volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer. 2007;57:125–34.CrossRefPubMed Greco C, Rosenzweig K, Cascini GL, Tamburrini O. Current status of PET/CT for tumor volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer. 2007;57:125–34.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fox JL, Rengan R, O’Meara W, Yorke E, Erdi Y, Nehmeh S, et al. Does registration of PET and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:70–5.CrossRefPubMed Fox JL, Rengan R, O’Meara W, Yorke E, Erdi Y, Nehmeh S, et al. Does registration of PET and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:70–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hatt M, Lee JA, Schmidtlein CR, Naqa IE, Caldwell C, De Bernardi E, et al. Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: report of AAPM task group no. 211. Med Phys. 2017;44(6):e1–e42.CrossRefPubMed Hatt M, Lee JA, Schmidtlein CR, Naqa IE, Caldwell C, De Bernardi E, et al. Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: report of AAPM task group no. 211. Med Phys. 2017;44(6):e1–e42.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Konert T, Vogel W, MacManus MP, Nestle U, Belderbos J, Grégoire V, et al. PET/CT imaging for target volume delineation in curative intent radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: IAEA consensus report 2014. Radiother Oncol. 2015;116:27–34.CrossRefPubMed Konert T, Vogel W, MacManus MP, Nestle U, Belderbos J, Grégoire V, et al. PET/CT imaging for target volume delineation in curative intent radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: IAEA consensus report 2014. Radiother Oncol. 2015;116:27–34.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Caldwell CB, Mah K, Ung YC, Danjoux CE, Balogh JM, Ganguli SN, et al. Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non small-cell lung tumors on CT: the impact of 18FDG-hybrid PET fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:923–31.CrossRefPubMed Caldwell CB, Mah K, Ung YC, Danjoux CE, Balogh JM, Ganguli SN, et al. Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non small-cell lung tumors on CT: the impact of 18FDG-hybrid PET fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:923–31.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Konert T, Vogel WV, Everitt S, MacManus MP, Thorwarth D, Fidarova E, et al. Multiple training interventions significantly improve reproducibility of PET/CT-based lung cancer radiotherapy target volume delineation using an IAEA study protocol. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121:39–45.CrossRefPubMed Konert T, Vogel WV, Everitt S, MacManus MP, Thorwarth D, Fidarova E, et al. Multiple training interventions significantly improve reproducibility of PET/CT-based lung cancer radiotherapy target volume delineation using an IAEA study protocol. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121:39–45.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Van de Steene J, Linthout N, de Mey J, Vinh-Hung V, Claassens C, Noppen M, et al. Definition of gross tumor volume in lung cancer: inter-observer variability. Radiother Oncol. 2002;62(1):37–49.CrossRefPubMed Van de Steene J, Linthout N, de Mey J, Vinh-Hung V, Claassens C, Noppen M, et al. Definition of gross tumor volume in lung cancer: inter-observer variability. Radiother Oncol. 2002;62(1):37–49.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bayne M, Hicks RJ, Everitt S, Fimmell N, Ball D, Reynolds J, et al. Reproducibility of “intelligent” contouring of gross tumor volume in non-small-cell lung cancer on PET/CT images using a standardized visual method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:1151–7.CrossRefPubMed Bayne M, Hicks RJ, Everitt S, Fimmell N, Ball D, Reynolds J, et al. Reproducibility of “intelligent” contouring of gross tumor volume in non-small-cell lung cancer on PET/CT images using a standardized visual method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:1151–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jameson MG, Kumar S, Vinod SK, Metcalfe PE3, Holloway LC. Correlation of contouring variation with modeled outcome for conformal non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2014;112:332–6. Jameson MG, Kumar S, Vinod SK, Metcalfe PE3, Holloway LC. Correlation of contouring variation with modeled outcome for conformal non-small cell lung cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2014;112:332–6.
23.
go back to reference Peters LJ, O’Sullivan B, Giralt J, Fitzgerald TJ, Trotti A, Bernier J, et al. Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer: results from TROG 02.02. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):2996–3001.CrossRefPubMed Peters LJ, O’Sullivan B, Giralt J, Fitzgerald TJ, Trotti A, Bernier J, et al. Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer: results from TROG 02.02. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):2996–3001.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Schimek-Jasch T, Troost EG, Rücker G, Prokic V, Avlar M, Duncker-Rohr V, et al. A teaching intervention in a contouring dummy run improved target volume delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: reducing the interobserver variability in multicentre clinical studies. Strahlenther Onkol. 2015;191:525–33.CrossRefPubMed Schimek-Jasch T, Troost EG, Rücker G, Prokic V, Avlar M, Duncker-Rohr V, et al. A teaching intervention in a contouring dummy run improved target volume delineation in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: reducing the interobserver variability in multicentre clinical studies. Strahlenther Onkol. 2015;191:525–33.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Spoelstra FO, Senan S, Le Péchoux C, Ishikura S, Casas F, Ball D, et al. Variations in target volume definition for postoperative radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of an international contouring study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:1106–13.CrossRefPubMed Spoelstra FO, Senan S, Le Péchoux C, Ishikura S, Casas F, Ball D, et al. Variations in target volume definition for postoperative radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of an international contouring study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:1106–13.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Nestle U, Rischke HC, Eschmann SM, Holl G, Tosch M, Miederer M, et al. Improved inter-observer agreement of an expert review panel in an oncology treatment trial – insights from a structured interventional process. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2525–33.CrossRefPubMed Nestle U, Rischke HC, Eschmann SM, Holl G, Tosch M, Miederer M, et al. Improved inter-observer agreement of an expert review panel in an oncology treatment trial – insights from a structured interventional process. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2525–33.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Detterbeck FC, Boffa JB, Kim AW, Tanoue LT. The Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification. Chest. 2017;151(1):193–203.CrossRefPubMed Detterbeck FC, Boffa JB, Kim AW, Tanoue LT. The Eighth Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification. Chest. 2017;151(1):193–203.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumor imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328–54.CrossRefPubMed Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumor imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328–54.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ball D, Mac Manus M, Siva S, Plumridge N, Bressel M, Kron T. Routine use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is neither choosing wisely nor personalized medicine. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(13):1492–3.CrossRefPubMed Ball D, Mac Manus M, Siva S, Plumridge N, Bressel M, Kron T. Routine use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is neither choosing wisely nor personalized medicine. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(13):1492–3.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Prabhu Das I, Baker M, Altice C, Castro KM, Brandys B, Mitchell SA. Outcomes of multidisciplinary treatment planning in US cancer care settings. Cancer. 2018;124(18):3656–67.CrossRefPubMed Prabhu Das I, Baker M, Altice C, Castro KM, Brandys B, Mitchell SA. Outcomes of multidisciplinary treatment planning in US cancer care settings. Cancer. 2018;124(18):3656–67.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, Corcoran N, Tran B, Bowden P, et al. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;42:56–72.CrossRefPubMed Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, Corcoran N, Tran B, Bowden P, et al. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;42:56–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Introducing FDG PET/CT-guided chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC in low- and middle-income countries: preliminary results from the IAEA PERTAIN trial
Authors
T. Konert
W. V. Vogel
D. Paez
A. Polo
E. Fidarova
H. Carvalho
P. S. Duarte
A. C. Zuliani
A. O. Santos
D. Altuhhova
L. Karusoo
R. Kapoor
A. Sood
J. Khader
A. Al-Ibraheem
Y. Numair
S. Abubaker
C. Soydal
T. Kütük
T. A. Le
N. X. Canh
B. Q. Bieu
L. N. Ha
J. S. A. Belderbos
M. P. MacManus
D. Thorwarth
G. G. Hanna
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 11/2019
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04421-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2019

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2019 Go to the issue