Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Diabetes Reports 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Economics and Policy in Diabetes (ES Huang and AA Baig, Section Editors)

Novel Therapeutics for Diabetes: Uptake, Usage Trends, and Comparative Effectiveness

Authors: Vishal Ahuja, Chia-Hung Chou

Published in: Current Diabetes Reports | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The number of available therapies for treating type 2 diabetes has grown considerably in recent years. This growth has been fueled by availability of newer medications, whose benefits and risks have not been fully established. In this study, we review and synthesize the existing literature on the uptake, efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of novel antidiabetic agents. Specifically, we focus on three drug classes that were introduced in the market recently: thiazolidinediones (TZDs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists. Not surprisingly, we find that the usage trends reflect the efficacy and safety profile of these novel drugs. The use of TZDs increased initially but decreased after a black-box warning was issued for rosiglitazone in 2007 that highlighted the cardiovascular risks associated with using the drug. Conversely, DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists gained market shares due to their efficacy in glycemic control as an add-on treatment to metformin. DPP-4 inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed agents among the three novel drug classes, likely because they are relatively less expensive, have better safety profile, are administered orally, and are weight neutral. Sitagliptin was the most preferred DPP-4 inhibitor. The level of evidence on the comparative effectiveness, safety, and cost implications of using novel antidiabetic agents remains low and further studies with long-term follow-ups are needed.
Literature
2.
go back to reference American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39 Suppl 1:S1–S112. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39 Suppl 1:S1–S112.
3.
go back to reference Fowler MJ. Diabetes treatment, Part 2: oral agents for glycemic management. Clin Diabetes. 2007;25:131–4.CrossRef Fowler MJ. Diabetes treatment, Part 2: oral agents for glycemic management. Clin Diabetes. 2007;25:131–4.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
5.
go back to reference Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1364–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1364–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Alexander GC, Sehgal NL, Moloney RM, Stafford RS. National trends in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 1994–2007. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2088–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alexander GC, Sehgal NL, Moloney RM, Stafford RS. National trends in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 1994–2007. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2088–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference McIntosh B, Cameron C, Singh SR, et al. Second-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis. Open Med. 2011;5:e35–48.PubMedPubMedCentral McIntosh B, Cameron C, Singh SR, et al. Second-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a systematic review and mixed-treatment comparison meta-analysis. Open Med. 2011;5:e35–48.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Gerstein HC, Miller ME, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2545–59.CrossRefPubMed Gerstein HC, Miller ME, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2545–59.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2560–72.CrossRefPubMed Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2560–72.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:129–39.CrossRefPubMed Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:129–39.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Torre C, Guerreiro J, de Oliveira Martins S, et al. Patterns of glucose lowering drugs utilization in Portugal and in the Netherlands. Trends over time. Prim Care Diabetes. 2015;9:482–9.CrossRefPubMed Torre C, Guerreiro J, de Oliveira Martins S, et al. Patterns of glucose lowering drugs utilization in Portugal and in the Netherlands. Trends over time. Prim Care Diabetes. 2015;9:482–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.••
go back to reference Hampp C, Borders-Hemphill V, Moeny DG, Wysowski DK. Use of antidiabetic drugs in the U.S., 2003–2012. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1367–74. This is one of the few articles that evaluate novel antidiabetic medications and provides a comprehensive summary including market trends and effects of safety concerns on drug use. Hampp C, Borders-Hemphill V, Moeny DG, Wysowski DK. Use of antidiabetic drugs in the U.S., 2003–2012. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1367–74. This is one of the few articles that evaluate novel antidiabetic medications and provides a comprehensive summary including market trends and effects of safety concerns on drug use.
15.
go back to reference Clemens KK, Shariff S, Liu K, et al. Trends in Antihyperglycemic medication prescriptions and hypoglycemia in older adults: 2002–2013. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137596.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clemens KK, Shariff S, Liu K, et al. Trends in Antihyperglycemic medication prescriptions and hypoglycemia in older adults: 2002–2013. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137596.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Pottegard A, Bjerregaard BK, Larsen MD, et al. Use of exenatide and liraglutide in Denmark: a drug utilization study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70:205–14.CrossRefPubMed Pottegard A, Bjerregaard BK, Larsen MD, et al. Use of exenatide and liraglutide in Denmark: a drug utilization study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;70:205–14.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kohro T, Yamazaki T, Sato H, et al. Trends in antidiabetic prescription patterns in Japan from 2005 to 2011. Int Heart J. 2013;54:93–7.CrossRefPubMed Kohro T, Yamazaki T, Sato H, et al. Trends in antidiabetic prescription patterns in Japan from 2005 to 2011. Int Heart J. 2013;54:93–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Oishi M, Yamazaki K, Okuguchi F, et al. Changes in oral antidiabetic prescriptions and improved glycemic control during the years 2002–2011 in Japan (JDDM32). J Diabetes Investig. 2014;5:581–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oishi M, Yamazaki K, Okuguchi F, et al. Changes in oral antidiabetic prescriptions and improved glycemic control during the years 2002–2011 in Japan (JDDM32). J Diabetes Investig. 2014;5:581–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Rafaniello C, Arcoraci V, Ferrajolo C, et al. Trends in the prescription of antidiabetic medications from 2009 to 2012 in a general practice of Southern Italy: a population-based study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108:157–63.CrossRefPubMed Rafaniello C, Arcoraci V, Ferrajolo C, et al. Trends in the prescription of antidiabetic medications from 2009 to 2012 in a general practice of Southern Italy: a population-based study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108:157–63.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Filion KB, Joseph L, Boivin JF, et al. Trends in the prescription of anti-diabetic medications in the United Kingdom: a population-based analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:973–6.CrossRefPubMed Filion KB, Joseph L, Boivin JF, et al. Trends in the prescription of anti-diabetic medications in the United Kingdom: a population-based analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:973–6.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Huang ES, Basu A, O’Grady M, Capretta JC. Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the US. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2225–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang ES, Basu A, O’Grady M, Capretta JC. Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the US. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2225–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference UPDSU Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998;352:854–65.CrossRef UPDSU Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998;352:854–65.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2457–71.CrossRefPubMed Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2457–71.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Shah ND, Montori VM, Krumholz HM, et al. Responding to an FDA warning—geographic variation in the use of rosiglitazone. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2081–4.CrossRefPubMed Shah ND, Montori VM, Krumholz HM, et al. Responding to an FDA warning—geographic variation in the use of rosiglitazone. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2081–4.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Starner CI, Schafer JA, Heaton AH, Gleason PP. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone utilization from January 2007 through May 2008 associated with five risk-warning events. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14:523–31.PubMed Starner CI, Schafer JA, Heaton AH, Gleason PP. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone utilization from January 2007 through May 2008 associated with five risk-warning events. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14:523–31.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Stewart KA, Natzke BM, Williams T, et al. Temporal trends in anti-diabetes drug use in TRICARE following safety warnings in 2007 about rosiglitazone. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:1048–52.CrossRefPubMed Stewart KA, Natzke BM, Williams T, et al. Temporal trends in anti-diabetes drug use in TRICARE following safety warnings in 2007 about rosiglitazone. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:1048–52.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Cohen A, Rabbani A, Shah N, Alexander GC. Changes in glitazone use among office-based physicians in the U.S., 2003–2009. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:823–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cohen A, Rabbani A, Shah N, Alexander GC. Changes in glitazone use among office-based physicians in the U.S., 2003–2009. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:823–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Hurren KM, Taylor TN, Jaber LA. Antidiabetic prescribing trends and predictors of thiazolidinedione discontinuation following the 2007 rosiglitazone safety alert. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93:49–55.CrossRefPubMed Hurren KM, Taylor TN, Jaber LA. Antidiabetic prescribing trends and predictors of thiazolidinedione discontinuation following the 2007 rosiglitazone safety alert. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93:49–55.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Shi L, Zhao Y, Szymanski K, et al. Impact of thiazolidinedione safety warnings on medication use patterns and glycemic control among veterans with diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2011;25:143–50.CrossRefPubMed Shi L, Zhao Y, Szymanski K, et al. Impact of thiazolidinedione safety warnings on medication use patterns and glycemic control among veterans with diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2011;25:143–50.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Jain R, Mullins CD, Lee H, Wong W. Use of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone immediately after the cardiovascular risk warnings. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012;8:47–59.CrossRefPubMed Jain R, Mullins CD, Lee H, Wong W. Use of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone immediately after the cardiovascular risk warnings. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2012;8:47–59.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ross JS, Jackevicius C, Krumholz HM, et al. State Medicaid programs did not make use of prior authorization to promote safer prescribing after rosiglitazone warning. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:188–98.CrossRef Ross JS, Jackevicius C, Krumholz HM, et al. State Medicaid programs did not make use of prior authorization to promote safer prescribing after rosiglitazone warning. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:188–98.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Aspinall SE, Zhao X, Good CB, et al. FDA warning and removal of rosiglitazone from VA national formulary. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:748–58.PubMed Aspinall SE, Zhao X, Good CB, et al. FDA warning and removal of rosiglitazone from VA national formulary. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:748–58.PubMed
33.•
go back to reference Ahuja V, Sohn MW, Birge JR, et al. Geographic variation in rosiglitazone use surrounding FDA warnings in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:1214–34. This article reviews the FDA decision to issue a black box warning for rosiglitazone and studies the impact of this warning on drug use and the resulting geographic variation. Ahuja V, Sohn MW, Birge JR, et al. Geographic variation in rosiglitazone use surrounding FDA warnings in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:1214–34. This article reviews the FDA decision to issue a black box warning for rosiglitazone and studies the impact of this warning on drug use and the resulting geographic variation.
37.
go back to reference Davidson MB, Peters AL. An overview of metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1997;102:99–110.CrossRefPubMed Davidson MB, Peters AL. An overview of metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 1997;102:99–110.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Dunn CJ, Peters DH. Metformin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 1995;49:721–49.CrossRefPubMed Dunn CJ, Peters DH. Metformin. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 1995;49:721–49.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Holman R. Metformin as first choice in oral diabetes treatment: the UKPDS experience. Journ Annu Diabetol Hotel Dieu 2007; 13–20. Holman R. Metformin as first choice in oral diabetes treatment: the UKPDS experience. Journ Annu Diabetol Hotel Dieu 2007; 13–20.
40.
go back to reference Bolen S, Feldman L, Vassy J, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:386–99.CrossRefPubMed Bolen S, Feldman L, Vassy J, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:386–99.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Bennett WL, Maruthur NM, Singh S, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of medications for type 2 diabetes: an update including new drugs and 2-drug combinations. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:602–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bennett WL, Maruthur NM, Singh S, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of medications for type 2 diabetes: an update including new drugs and 2-drug combinations. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:602–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Waugh N, Cummins E, Royle P, et al. Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14:1–248. Waugh N, Cummins E, Royle P, et al. Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14:1–248.
43.
go back to reference Liu X, Xiao Q, Zhang L, et al. The long-term efficacy and safety of DPP-IV inhibitors monotherapy and in combination with metformin in 18,980 patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus—a meta-analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23:687–98.CrossRefPubMed Liu X, Xiao Q, Zhang L, et al. The long-term efficacy and safety of DPP-IV inhibitors monotherapy and in combination with metformin in 18,980 patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus—a meta-analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23:687–98.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Wu D, Li L, Liu C. Efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and metformin as initial combination therapy and as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:30–7.CrossRefPubMed Wu D, Li L, Liu C. Efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and metformin as initial combination therapy and as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:30–7.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Cheng D, Fei Y, Liu Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with moderate to severe renal impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111543.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cheng D, Fei Y, Liu Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with moderate to severe renal impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e111543.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Antony J, Khan PA, et al. Safety and effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus intermediate-acting insulin or placebo for patients with type 2 diabetes failing two oral antihyperglycaemic agents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005752.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tricco AC, Antony J, Khan PA, et al. Safety and effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus intermediate-acting insulin or placebo for patients with type 2 diabetes failing two oral antihyperglycaemic agents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005752.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Karagiannis T, Paschos P, Paletas K, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e1369.CrossRefPubMed Karagiannis T, Paschos P, Paletas K, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e1369.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Hong J, Chi J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors and sulfonylureas—a meta-analysis from randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014;30:241–56.CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y, Hong J, Chi J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors and sulfonylureas—a meta-analysis from randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014;30:241–56.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Geng J, Yu H, Mao Y, et al. Cost effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:581–97.CrossRefPubMed Geng J, Yu H, Mao Y, et al. Cost effectiveness of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33:581–97.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Kiadaliri AA, Gerdtham UG, Eliasson B, Carlsson KS. Cost-utility analysis of glucagon-like Peptide-1 agonists compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or neutral protamine hagedorn basal insulin as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Diabetes Ther. 2014;5:591–607.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kiadaliri AA, Gerdtham UG, Eliasson B, Carlsson KS. Cost-utility analysis of glucagon-like Peptide-1 agonists compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or neutral protamine hagedorn basal insulin as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Diabetes Ther. 2014;5:591–607.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Novel Therapeutics for Diabetes: Uptake, Usage Trends, and Comparative Effectiveness
Authors
Vishal Ahuja
Chia-Hung Chou
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1534-4827
Electronic ISSN: 1539-0829
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-016-0744-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Current Diabetes Reports 6/2016 Go to the issue

Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes and Insulin Resistance (RM Watanabe, Section Editor)

Longer-Term Physiological and Metabolic Effects of Gastric Bypass Surgery

Psychosocial Aspects (S Jaser and KK Hood, Section Editors)

The Link Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Diabetes

Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes and Insulin Resistance (RM Watanabe, Section Editor)

What Does Diabetes “Taste” Like?

Economics and Policy in Diabetes (ES Huang and AA Baig, Section Editors)

The Impact of New Payment Models on Quality of Diabetes Care and Outcomes

Immunology and Transplantation (L PIEMONTI AND V SORDI, Section Editors)

Islet Autoantibodies

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.