Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2017

01-12-2017 | Brief Communication

Novel simulator for robotic surgery

Authors: Francisco Schlottmann, Marco G. Patti

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Surgical simulation avoids practicing skills in patients, allowing trainees to learn in a safe, controlled, and standardized environment. Current robotic surgical simulators available include virtual reality simulators, human cadavers, and live animals. The use of cadavers has the highest possible fidelity available to practice entire operations. Nevertheless, their cost, availability, tissue compliance, and infection risk outweigh the advantages of cadaver models. Drawbacks of using live animals include anatomical differences with humans, high costs due to their housing and handling requirements, and ethical concerns. We designed a novel robotic surgical simulator based on porcine perfused tissue blocks that allows the simulation of entire surgical procedures. Our simulation allows trainees to increase familiarity with the robotic console and its controls, as well as with the docking process. It provides an opportunity to learn not only universal skills needed in robotic surgery, such as camera and instrument targeting, but also to perform complete surgical procedures such as an antireflux procedure. The adoption of robotic simulation curricula with realistic models will decrease overall operative time while increasing resident participation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR et al (1999) Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 282(9):861–866CrossRefPubMed Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR et al (1999) Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 282(9):861–866CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M et al (2010) Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2:i34–i43CrossRef Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M et al (2010) Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2:i34–i43CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills–changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355(25):2664–2669CrossRefPubMed Reznick RK, MacRae H (2006) Teaching surgical skills–changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 355(25):2664–2669CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kenngott HG, Fischer L, Nickel F et al (2012) Status of robotic assistance–a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery? Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(3):333–341CrossRefPubMed Kenngott HG, Fischer L, Nickel F et al (2012) Status of robotic assistance–a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery? Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(3):333–341CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schootman M, Hendren S, Ratnapradipa K et al (2016) Adoption of robotic technology for treating colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 59(11):1011–1018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schootman M, Hendren S, Ratnapradipa K et al (2016) Adoption of robotic technology for treating colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 59(11):1011–1018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Tanaka A, Graddy C, Simpson K et al (2016) Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis. Surg Endosc 30(9):3720–3729CrossRefPubMed Tanaka A, Graddy C, Simpson K et al (2016) Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis. Surg Endosc 30(9):3720–3729CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Foell K, Furse A, Honey RJ et al (2013) Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device. J Robot Surg 7(4):365–369CrossRefPubMed Foell K, Furse A, Honey RJ et al (2013) Multidisciplinary validation study of the da Vinci Skills Simulator: educational tool and assessment device. J Robot Surg 7(4):365–369CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rehman S, Raza SJ, Stegemann AP et al (2013) Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation. Int J Surg 11(9):841–846CrossRefPubMed Rehman S, Raza SJ, Stegemann AP et al (2013) Simulation-based robot-assisted surgical training: a health economic evaluation. Int J Surg 11(9):841–846CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mehaffey JH, Michaels AD, Mullen MG et al (2017) Adoption of robotics in a general surgery residency program: at what cost? J Surg Res 213:269–273CrossRefPubMed Mehaffey JH, Michaels AD, Mullen MG et al (2017) Adoption of robotics in a general surgery residency program: at what cost? J Surg Res 213:269–273CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Novel simulator for robotic surgery
Authors
Francisco Schlottmann
Marco G. Patti
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0746-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2017 Go to the issue