Top

Journal of Robotic Surgery

Published in:

01-12-2017 | Letter to the Editor

Stereotactic accuracy must be as high as possible in stereoelectroencephalography procedures

Authors: Francesco Cardinale, Michele Rizzi

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 4/2017

Excerpt

To the Editor, …

Brandmeir NJ, Savaliya S, Rohatgi P, Sather M (2017) The comparative accuracy of the ROSA stereotactic robot across a wide range of clinical applications and registration techniques. J Robot Surg. doi:10.1007/s11701-017-0712-2

Mullin JP, Shriver M, Alomar S, Najm I, Bulacio J, Chauvel P, Gonzalez-Martinez J (2016) Is SEEG safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereo-electroencephalography-related complications. Epilepsia 57:386–401CrossRefPubMed

Cardinale F, Casaceli G, Raneri F, Miller JP, Lo Russo G (2016) Implantation of StereoElectroEncephaloGraphy (SEEG) electrodes: a systematic review. J Clin Neurophysiol 33:490–502CrossRefPubMed

Vakharia VN, Sparks R, O’Keeffe AG, Rodionov R, Miserocchi A, McEvoy A, Ourselin S, Duncan J (2017) Accuracy of intracranial electrode placement for stereoencephalography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsia. doi:10.1111/epi.13713 PubMed

Cardinale F, Cossu M, Castana L, Casaceli G, Schiariti MP, Miserocchi A, Fuschillo D, Moscato A, Caborni C, Arnulfo G, Lo Russo G (2013) Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. Neurosurgery 72:353–366CrossRefPubMed

Cardinale F (2016) Stereoelectroencephalography: application accuracy, efficacy, and safety. World Neurosurg 94:570–571CrossRefPubMed

Cardinale F, Rizzi M, D’Orio P, Casaceli G, Arnulfo G, Narizzano M, Scorza D, De Momi E, Nichelatti M, Redaelli D, Sberna M, Moscato A, Castana L (2017) A new tool for touch-free patient registration for robot-assisted intracranial surgery: application accuracy from a phantom study and a retrospective surgical series. Neurosurg Focus 42:E8CrossRefPubMed

Mellis C (2017) Lies, damned lies and statistics: clinical importance versus statistical significance in research. Paediatr Respir Rev. doi:10.1016/j.prrv.2017.02.002 PubMed

Altman DG (1994) The scandal of poor medical research. Br Med J 308:283–284CrossRef

10.

Altman DG (1980) Statistics and ethics in medical research. VII—Interpreting results. Br Med J 281:1612–1614CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Stereotactic accuracy must be as high as possible in stereoelectroencephalography procedures
Authors: Francesco Cardinale
Michele Rizzi
Publication date: 01-12-2017
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0723-z

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Stereotactic accuracy must be as high as possible in stereoelectroencephalography procedures

Excerpt

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Simple vs six-branches autologous suburethral sling during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve early urinary continence recovery: prospective randomized study

Early assessment of feasibility and technical specificities of transoral robotic surgery using the da Vinci Xi

Extraperitoneal vs. transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with a history of prior inguinal hernia repair with mesh

Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with stentless intracorporeal modified Ves.Pa neobladder: early experience

Robotic resection of an obturator schwannoma with preservation of normal nerve fascicles and function

Early vs. standard unclamping technique in minimal access partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis of observational cohort studies and the Lister cohort