Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2013

01-01-2013 | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry

Authors: Fernando Maia Peixoto-Filho, Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá, Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde, Carolina de Castro Mocarzel, Laudelino Marques Lopes, Yves Ville

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram for fetal urine production (UPR) using biometric parameters.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was performed in 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational ages ranging from 20 to 40 weeks. UPR was measured using tridimensional ultrasound (3-DUS) virtual organ computer-aided analysis. UPR (ml/h) was calculated during the filling phase using the equation, UPR = (VFB2−VFB1)/time. The values for UPR were plotted as a function of fetal biometry (femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter) to obtain a nomogram for each parameter.

Results

A total of 110 normal singleton fetuses with gestational age between 20 and 40 weeks were investigated. Five of them were excluded because the image quality was insufficient for correct visualization of the bladder contour. Linear regression analysis of UPR as a function of femur, humerus, abdominal circumference, and head circumference and biparietal diameter generated curves that represents the normal range for UPR by fetal biometry, and expressed by the following equations: (1) Humerus length (HL): ln (UPR) = −5.9546 + 0.0958 × HL (mm); (R 2 0.6422); (2) abdominal circumference: ln (UPR) = −1.0981 + 0.158 × AC (mm); (R 2 0.6328); (3) femur length: ln (UPR) = −1.5133 + 0.0803 × FL (mm); (R 2 0.6611); (4) biparietal diameter ln (UPR) = −7.8779 + 0.2368 × BPD−0.0012 × DBP2; (R 0.7066). Although BPD has the highest correlation coefficient (R 2 0.7066) there was no statistical significant difference between the parameters investigated for UPR prediction.

Conclusion

The use of biometric parameters for prediction of fetal UPR seems to be useful and can avoid the necessity of building local nomograms for different populations. The same strategy should be considered to other fields in fetal medicine.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nicolaides KH, Rosen D, Rabinowitz R, Campbell S (1988) Urine production and bladder function in fetuses with open spina bifida. Fetal Ther 3(3):135–140PubMedCrossRef Nicolaides KH, Rosen D, Rabinowitz R, Campbell S (1988) Urine production and bladder function in fetuses with open spina bifida. Fetal Ther 3(3):135–140PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Xie JX, Lv GR, Chen QY, Hou M (2012) The effect of fetal congenital heart disease on in utero urine production rate. Prenat Diagn 32(6):536–541PubMedCrossRef Xie JX, Lv GR, Chen QY, Hou M (2012) The effect of fetal congenital heart disease on in utero urine production rate. Prenat Diagn 32(6):536–541PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nicolaides KH, Peters MT, Vyas S, Rabinowitz R, Rosen DJ, Campbell S (1990) Relation of rate of urine production to oxygen tension in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162(2):387–391PubMed Nicolaides KH, Peters MT, Vyas S, Rabinowitz R, Rosen DJ, Campbell S (1990) Relation of rate of urine production to oxygen tension in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162(2):387–391PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sumie M, Nakata M, Murata S, Miwa I, Sugino N (2009) Two cases of reversal of twin–twin transfusion syndrome diagnosed by measuring hourly fetal urine production. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35(5):983–986PubMedCrossRef Sumie M, Nakata M, Murata S, Miwa I, Sugino N (2009) Two cases of reversal of twin–twin transfusion syndrome diagnosed by measuring hourly fetal urine production. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35(5):983–986PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Yamamoto M, Essaoui M, Nasr B, Malek N, Takahashi Y (2007) Moreira de Sa R, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic assessment of fetal urine production before and after laser surgery in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(7):972–976PubMedCrossRef Yamamoto M, Essaoui M, Nasr B, Malek N, Takahashi Y (2007) Moreira de Sa R, et al. Three-dimensional sonographic assessment of fetal urine production before and after laser surgery in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(7):972–976PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference van Otterlo LC, Wladimiroff JW, Wallenburg HC (1977) Relationship between fetal urine production and amniotic fluid volume in normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84(3):205–209PubMedCrossRef van Otterlo LC, Wladimiroff JW, Wallenburg HC (1977) Relationship between fetal urine production and amniotic fluid volume in normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 84(3):205–209PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee SM, Jun JK, Lee EJ, Lee JH, Park CW, Park JS et al (2010) Measurement of fetal urine production to differentiate causes of increased amniotic fluid volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(2):191–195PubMedCrossRef Lee SM, Jun JK, Lee EJ, Lee JH, Park CW, Park JS et al (2010) Measurement of fetal urine production to differentiate causes of increased amniotic fluid volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36(2):191–195PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Touboul C, Picone O, Levaillant JM, Boithias C, Frydman R, Boulvain M et al (2009) Clinical application of fetal urine production rate in unexplained polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(5):521–525PubMedCrossRef Touboul C, Picone O, Levaillant JM, Boithias C, Frydman R, Boulvain M et al (2009) Clinical application of fetal urine production rate in unexplained polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(5):521–525PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lee SM, Park SK, Shim SS, Jun JK, Park JS, Syn HC (2007) Measurement of fetal urine production by three-dimensional ultrasonography in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(3):281–286PubMedCrossRef Lee SM, Park SK, Shim SS, Jun JK, Park JS, Syn HC (2007) Measurement of fetal urine production by three-dimensional ultrasonography in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(3):281–286PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Touboul C, Boulvain M, Picone O, Levaillant JM, Frydman R, Senat MV (2008) Normal fetal urine production rate estimated with 3-dimensional ultrasonography using the rotational technique (virtual organ computer-aided analysis). Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(1):57 e1–5 Touboul C, Boulvain M, Picone O, Levaillant JM, Frydman R, Senat MV (2008) Normal fetal urine production rate estimated with 3-dimensional ultrasonography using the rotational technique (virtual organ computer-aided analysis). Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(1):57 e1–5
11.
go back to reference Peixoto-Filho FM, de Sa RA, Velarde LG, Lopes LM, Ville Y (2011) Normal range for fetal urine production rate by 3-D ultrasound in Brazilian population. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283(3):497–500PubMedCrossRef Peixoto-Filho FM, de Sa RA, Velarde LG, Lopes LM, Ville Y (2011) Normal range for fetal urine production rate by 3-D ultrasound in Brazilian population. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283(3):497–500PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Wladimiroff JW, Barentsen R, Wallenburg HC, Drogendijk AC (1975) Fetal urine production in a case of diabetes associated with polyhydraminios. Obstet Gynecol 46(1):101–102PubMedCrossRef Wladimiroff JW, Barentsen R, Wallenburg HC, Drogendijk AC (1975) Fetal urine production in a case of diabetes associated with polyhydraminios. Obstet Gynecol 46(1):101–102PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ulker K, Cecen K, Temur I, Gul A, Karaca M (2011) Effects of the maternal position and rest on the fetal urine production rate: a prospective study conducted by 3-dimensional sonography using the rotational technique (virtual organ computer-aided analysis). J Ultrasound Med 30(4):481–486PubMed Ulker K, Cecen K, Temur I, Gul A, Karaca M (2011) Effects of the maternal position and rest on the fetal urine production rate: a prospective study conducted by 3-dimensional sonography using the rotational technique (virtual organ computer-aided analysis). J Ultrasound Med 30(4):481–486PubMed
14.
go back to reference Nijland MJ, Ross MG (2000) Ovine hourly fetal urine production: relation to fetal electrocortical activity. J Matern Fetal Med 9(5):267–272PubMedCrossRef Nijland MJ, Ross MG (2000) Ovine hourly fetal urine production: relation to fetal electrocortical activity. J Matern Fetal Med 9(5):267–272PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Verburg BO, Geelhoed JJ, Steegers EA, Hofman A, Moll HA, Witteman JC et al (2007) Fetal kidney volume and its association with growth and blood flow in fetal life: the Generation R Study. Kidney Int 72(6):754–761PubMedCrossRef Verburg BO, Geelhoed JJ, Steegers EA, Hofman A, Moll HA, Witteman JC et al (2007) Fetal kidney volume and its association with growth and blood flow in fetal life: the Generation R Study. Kidney Int 72(6):754–761PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kist WJ, Slaghekke F, Papanna R, Johnson A, Vandenbussche FP, Wolterbeek R et al (2011) Sonography-based automated volume count to estimate fetal urine production in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: comparison with virtual organ computer-aided analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(6):e5741–e5745CrossRef Kist WJ, Slaghekke F, Papanna R, Johnson A, Vandenbussche FP, Wolterbeek R et al (2011) Sonography-based automated volume count to estimate fetal urine production in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: comparison with virtual organ computer-aided analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(6):e5741–e5745CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry
Authors
Fernando Maia Peixoto-Filho
Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá
Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde
Carolina de Castro Mocarzel
Laudelino Marques Lopes
Yves Ville
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2516-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1/2013 Go to the issue