Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 12/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Article

Non-participation in systematic screening for osteoporosis—the ROSE trial

Authors: M. J. Rothmann, S. Möller, T. Holmberg, M. Højberg, J. Gram, M. Bech, K. Brixen, A. P. Hermann, C.-C. Glüer, R. Barkmann, K. H. Rubin

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Population-based screening for osteoporosis is still controversial and has not been implemented. Non-participation in systematic screening was evaluated in 34,229 women age 65–81 years. Although participation rate was high, non-participation was associated with comorbidity, aging other risk factors for fractures, and markers of low social status, e.g., low income, pension, and living alone. A range of strategies is needed to increase participation, including development of targeted information and further research to better understand the barriers and enablers in screening for osteoporosis.

Introduction

Participation is crucial to the success of a screening program. The objective of this study was to analyze non-participation in Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, a two-step population-based screening program for osteoporosis.

Methods

Thirty-four thousand two hundred twenty-nine women aged 65 to 81 years were randomly selected from the background population and randomized to either a screening group (intervention) or a control group. All women received a self-administered questionnaire designed to allow calculation of future risk of fracture based on FRAX. In the intervention group, women with an estimated high risk of future fracture were invited to DXA scanning. Information on individual socioeconomic status and comorbidity was obtained from national registers.

Results

A completed questionnaire was returned by 20,905 (61%) women. Non-completion was associated with older age, living alone, lower education, lower income, and higher comorbidity. In the intervention group, ticking “not interested in DXA” in the questionnaire was associated with older age, living alone, and low self-perceived fracture risk. Women with previous fracture or history of parental hip fracture were more likely to accept screening by DXA. Dropping out when offered DXA, was associated with older age, current smoking, higher alcohol consumption, and physical impairment.

Conclusions

Barriers to population-based screening for osteoporosis appear to be both psychosocial and physical in nature. Women who decline are older, have lower self-perceived fracture risk, and more often live alone compared to women who accept the program. Dropping out after primary acceptance is associated not only with aging and physical impairment but also with current smoking and alcohol consumption. Measures to increase program participation could include targeted information and reducing physical barriers for attending screening procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY (2013) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 24:23–57CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY (2013) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 24:23–57CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S3–S7CrossRefPubMed Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S3–S7CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Lunsjo K, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Rehnberg C, Jonsson B (2006) Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 17:637–650CrossRefPubMed Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Lunsjo K, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Rehnberg C, Jonsson B (2006) Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 17:637–650CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733CrossRefPubMed Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Strom O, Borgstrom F, Kanis JA, Compston J, Cooper C, McCloskey EV, Jonsson B (2011) Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 6:59–155CrossRefPubMed Strom O, Borgstrom F, Kanis JA, Compston J, Cooper C, McCloskey EV, Jonsson B (2011) Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 6:59–155CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Black DM, Rosen CJ (2016) Clinical Practice. Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 374:254–262CrossRefPubMed Black DM, Rosen CJ (2016) Clinical Practice. Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 374:254–262CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lidgren L (2012) Looking back at the start of the bone and joint decade what have we learnt? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 26:169–171CrossRefPubMed Lidgren L (2012) Looking back at the start of the bone and joint decade what have we learnt? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 26:169–171CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D (1997) Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int 7:390–406CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D (1997) Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int 7:390–406CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Haney EM, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Chou R (2010) Screening for osteoporosis: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 153:99–111CrossRefPubMed Nelson HD, Haney EM, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Chou R (2010) Screening for osteoporosis: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 153:99–111CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD, Kyer C, Cooper C (2013) Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24:2135–2152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD, Kyer C, Cooper C (2013) Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24:2135–2152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2005) Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark. Osteoporos Int 16:134–141CrossRefPubMed Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2005) Osteoporosis is markedly underdiagnosed: a nationwide study from Denmark. Osteoporos Int 16:134–141CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van Dam L, Korfage IJ, Kuipers EJ, Hol L, van Roon AH, Reijerink JC, van Ballegooijen M, van Leerdam ME (2013) What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy? Eur J Cancer 49:2321–2330CrossRefPubMed van Dam L, Korfage IJ, Kuipers EJ, Hol L, van Roon AH, Reijerink JC, van Ballegooijen M, van Leerdam ME (2013) What influences the decision to participate in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy? Eur J Cancer 49:2321–2330CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Strech D (2014) Participation rate or informed choice? Rethinking the European key performance indicators for mammography screening. Health Policy 115(1):100–103CrossRefPubMed Strech D (2014) Participation rate or informed choice? Rethinking the European key performance indicators for mammography screening. Health Policy 115(1):100–103CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rothmann MJ, Huniche L, Ammentorp J, Brakmann R, Glüer CC, Hermann AP (2014) Women’s perspectives and experiences on screening for osteoporosis (Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, ROSE). Arch Osteoporos 9:192CrossRefPubMed Rothmann MJ, Huniche L, Ammentorp J, Brakmann R, Glüer CC, Hermann AP (2014) Women’s perspectives and experiences on screening for osteoporosis (Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation, ROSE). Arch Osteoporos 9:192CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference McLellan AR, Wolowacz SE, Zimovetz EA, Beard SM, Lock S, McCrink L, Adekunle F, Roberts D (2011) Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int 22:2083–2098CrossRefPubMed McLellan AR, Wolowacz SE, Zimovetz EA, Beard SM, Lock S, McCrink L, Adekunle F, Roberts D (2011) Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int 22:2083–2098CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rubin KH, Holmberg T, Rothmann MJ, Hoiberg M, Barkmann R, Gram J, Hermann AP, Bech M, Rasmussen O, Gluer CC, Brixen K (2015) The risk-stratified osteoporosis strategy evaluation study (ROSE): a randomized prospective population-based study. Design and baseline characteristics. Calcif Tissue Int 96:167–179CrossRefPubMed Rubin KH, Holmberg T, Rothmann MJ, Hoiberg M, Barkmann R, Gram J, Hermann AP, Bech M, Rasmussen O, Gluer CC, Brixen K (2015) The risk-stratified osteoporosis strategy evaluation study (ROSE): a randomized prospective population-based study. Design and baseline characteristics. Calcif Tissue Int 96:167–179CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Hermann AP, Bech M, Gram J, Brixen K (2011) Fracture risk assessed by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) compared with fracture risk derived from population fracture rates. Scand J Public Health 39:312–318CrossRefPubMed Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Hermann AP, Bech M, Gram J, Brixen K (2011) Fracture risk assessed by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) compared with fracture risk derived from population fracture rates. Scand J Public Health 39:312–318CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Andersen TF, Madsen M, Jorgensen J, Mellemkjoer L, Olsen JH (1999) The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. Dan Med Bull 46:263–268PubMed Andersen TF, Madsen M, Jorgensen J, Mellemkjoer L, Olsen JH (1999) The Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciences. Dan Med Bull 46:263–268PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M (2011) The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 39:30–33CrossRefPubMed Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M (2011) The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 39:30–33CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CRA (1987) New method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CRA (1987) New method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
go back to reference Baadsgaard M, Quitzau J (2011) Danish registers on personal income and transfer payments. Scand J Public Health 39:103–105CrossRefPubMed Baadsgaard M, Quitzau J (2011) Danish registers on personal income and transfer payments. Scand J Public Health 39:103–105CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Jensen LF, Pedersen AF, Andersen B, Vedsted P (2012) Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening—population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography. BMC Cancer 12:518CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jensen LF, Pedersen AF, Andersen B, Vedsted P (2012) Identifying specific non-attending groups in breast cancer screening—population-based registry study of participation and socio-demography. BMC Cancer 12:518CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Frederiksen BL, Jorgensen T, Brasso K, Holten I, Osler M (2010) Socioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screening. Br J Cancer 103:1496–1501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frederiksen BL, Jorgensen T, Brasso K, Holten I, Osler M (2010) Socioeconomic position and participation in colorectal cancer screening. Br J Cancer 103:1496–1501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Davisson L, Warden M, Manivannan S, Kolar M, Kincaid C, Bashir S, Layne R (2009) Osteoporosis screening: factors associated with bone mineral density testing of older women. J Women's Health (Larchmt) 18:989–994CrossRef Davisson L, Warden M, Manivannan S, Kolar M, Kincaid C, Bashir S, Layne R (2009) Osteoporosis screening: factors associated with bone mineral density testing of older women. J Women's Health (Larchmt) 18:989–994CrossRef
32.
go back to reference McNally DN, Kenny AM, Smith JA (2007) Adherence of academic geriatric practitioners to osteoporosis screening guidelines. Osteoporos Int 18:177–183CrossRefPubMed McNally DN, Kenny AM, Smith JA (2007) Adherence of academic geriatric practitioners to osteoporosis screening guidelines. Osteoporos Int 18:177–183CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Barr RJ, Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Seymour DG, Reid DM (2005) Screening elderly women for risk of future fractures—participation rates and impact on incidence of falls and fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 76:243–248CrossRefPubMed Barr RJ, Stewart A, Torgerson DJ, Seymour DG, Reid DM (2005) Screening elderly women for risk of future fractures—participation rates and impact on incidence of falls and fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 76:243–248CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Hermann AP, Bech M, Gram J, Brixen K (2011) Prevalence of risk factors for fractures and use of DXA scanning in Danish women. A regional population-based study. Osteoporos Int 22:1401–1409CrossRefPubMed Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Hermann AP, Bech M, Gram J, Brixen K (2011) Prevalence of risk factors for fractures and use of DXA scanning in Danish women. A regional population-based study. Osteoporos Int 22:1401–1409CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Hoiberg MP, Rubin KH, Gram J, Hermann AP, Brixen K, Haugeberg G (2015) Risk factors for osteoporosis and factors related to the use of DXA in Norway. Arch Osteoporos 10:16CrossRefPubMed Hoiberg MP, Rubin KH, Gram J, Hermann AP, Brixen K, Haugeberg G (2015) Risk factors for osteoporosis and factors related to the use of DXA in Norway. Arch Osteoporos 10:16CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Siris ES, Brenneman SK, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Sajjan S, Berger ML, Chen YT (2006) The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50-99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). Osteoporos Int 17:565–574CrossRefPubMed Siris ES, Brenneman SK, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Sajjan S, Berger ML, Chen YT (2006) The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50-99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). Osteoporos Int 17:565–574CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Walker-Bone K (2012) Recognizing and treating secondary osteoporosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 8:480–492CrossRefPubMed Walker-Bone K (2012) Recognizing and treating secondary osteoporosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 8:480–492CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Demeter S, Leslie WD, Lix L, MacWilliam L, Finlayson GS, Reed M (2007) The effect of socioeconomic status on bone density testing in a public health-care system. Osteoporos Int 18:153–158CrossRefPubMed Demeter S, Leslie WD, Lix L, MacWilliam L, Finlayson GS, Reed M (2007) The effect of socioeconomic status on bone density testing in a public health-care system. Osteoporos Int 18:153–158CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Jones MP, Ullrich F, Wehby GL, Cram P, Wolinsky FD (2016) Predictors of bone mineral density testing among older women on Medicare. Osteoporos Int 27:3577–3586CrossRefPubMed Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Jones MP, Ullrich F, Wehby GL, Cram P, Wolinsky FD (2016) Predictors of bone mineral density testing among older women on Medicare. Osteoporos Int 27:3577–3586CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Rothmann MJ, Ammentorp J, Bech M, Barkmann R, Goemaere S, Hermann AP (2015) Self-perceived facture risk: factors underlying women’s perception of risk for osteoporotic fractures: the Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation study (ROSE). Osteoporos Int 26(2):689–697CrossRefPubMed Rothmann MJ, Ammentorp J, Bech M, Barkmann R, Goemaere S, Hermann AP (2015) Self-perceived facture risk: factors underlying women’s perception of risk for osteoporotic fractures: the Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation study (ROSE). Osteoporos Int 26(2):689–697CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Edmonds SW, Solimeo SL, Nguyen VT, Wright NC, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P (2017) Understanding preferences for osteoporosis information to develop an osteoporosis patient education brochure. Perm J 21:16–024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edmonds SW, Solimeo SL, Nguyen VT, Wright NC, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P (2017) Understanding preferences for osteoporosis information to develop an osteoporosis patient education brochure. Perm J 21:16–024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Roh YH, Koh YD, Noh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH (2017) Effect of health literacy on adherence to osteoporosis treatment among patients with distal radius fracture. Arch Osteoporos 12:42CrossRefPubMed Roh YH, Koh YD, Noh JH, Gong HS, Baek GH (2017) Effect of health literacy on adherence to osteoporosis treatment among patients with distal radius fracture. Arch Osteoporos 12:42CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Bridges MJ, Ruddick S (2010) Can self-reported height and weight be used to calculate 10 year risk of osteoporotic fracture? J Nutr Health Aging 14:611–613CrossRefPubMed Bridges MJ, Ruddick S (2010) Can self-reported height and weight be used to calculate 10 year risk of osteoporotic fracture? J Nutr Health Aging 14:611–613CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Non-participation in systematic screening for osteoporosis—the ROSE trial
Authors
M. J. Rothmann
S. Möller
T. Holmberg
M. Højberg
J. Gram
M. Bech
K. Brixen
A. P. Hermann
C.-C. Glüer
R. Barkmann
K. H. Rubin
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4205-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Osteoporosis International 12/2017 Go to the issue