Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Keep up to date with all the top stories and latest evidence with our hub page, including official congress videos and expert takeaways.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2010

Open Access 01-12-2010 | Research

Non- medical prescribing in Australasia and the UK: the case of podiatry

Authors: Alan M Borthwick, Anthony J Short, Susan A Nancarrow, Rosalie Boyce

Published in: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The last decade has witnessed a rapid transformation in the role boundaries of the allied health professions, enabled through the creation of new roles and the expansion of existing, traditional roles. A strategy of health care 'modernisation' has encompassed calls for the redrawing of professional boundaries and identities, linked with demands for greater workforce flexibility. Several tasks and roles previously within the exclusive domain of medicine have been delegated to, or assumed by, allied health professionals, as the workforce is reshaped to meet the challenges posed by changing demographic, social and political contexts. The prescribing of medicines by non-medically qualified healthcare professionals, and in particular the podiatry profession, reflects these changes.

Methods

Using a range of key primary documentary sources derived from published material in the public domain and unpublished material in private possession, this paper traces the development of contemporary UK and Australasian podiatric prescribing, access, supply and administration of medicines. Documentary sources include material from legislative, health policy, regulatory and professional bodies (including both State and Federal sources in Australia).

Results

Tracing a chronological, comparative, socio-historical account of the emergence and development of 'prescribing' in podiatry in both Australasia and the UK enables an analysis of the impact of health policy reforms on the use of, and access to, medicines by podiatrists. The advent of neo-liberal healthcare policies, coupled with demands for workforce flexibility and role transfer within a climate of demographic, economic and social change has enabled allied health professionals to undertake an expanding number of tasks involving the sale, supply, administration and prescription of medicines.

Conclusion

As a challenge to medical dominance, these changes, although driven by wider healthcare policy, have met with resistance. As anticipated in the theory of medical dominance, inter-professional jurisdictional disputes centred on the right to access, administer, supply and prescribe medicines act as obstacles to workforce change. Nevertheless, the broader policy agenda continues to ensure workforce redesign in which podiatry has assumed wider roles and responsibilities in prescribing.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Dent M: Disciplining the medical profession? Implications of patient choice for medical dominance. Health Sociol Rev. 2006, 15: 458-468.CrossRef
2.
Willis E: Introduction: taking stock of medical dominance. Health Sociol Rev. 2006, 15: 421-431.CrossRef
3.
Eaton G, Webb B: Boundary encroachment: pharmacists in the clinical setting. Sociol Health Illn. 1979, 1: 69-89. 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11006781.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Freidson E: Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care. 1970, New York: Atherton Press
5.
Weiss M, Fitzpatrick R: Challenges to medicine: the case of prescribing. Sociol Health Illn. 1997, 19: 69-89.
6.
Elston M: The politics of professional power: medicine in a changing health service. The Sociology of the Health Service. Edited by: Gabe J, Calnan M, Bury M. 1991, London: Routledge
7.
8.
Freidson E: Profession of Medicine - A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. 1988, London: University of Chicago Press
9.
Freidson E: Professionalism Reborn - Theory, Prophecy and Policy. 1994, Cambridge: Polity Press
10.
Freidson E: Professionalism: The Third Logic. 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press
11.
Willis E: Medical Dominance: The Division of Labour in Australian Healthcare. 1989, London: George Allen and Unwin, 2
12.
Berlant J: Profession and Monopoly - A Study of Medicine in the United States and Great Britain. 1975, Los Angeles: University of California Press
13.
Johnson T: Professions and Power. 1972, London: Macmillan Press
14.
Larkin G: Occupational Monopoly and Modern Medicine. 1983, London: Tavistock
15.
Larkin G: Continuity in Change: Medical Dominance in the United Kingdom. The Changing Medical Profession: An International Perspective. Edited by: Hafferty W, McKinlay JB. 1993, Oxford: Oxford University Press
16.
Larkin G: State control and the health professions in the United Kingdom: historical perspectives. Health Professions and the State in Europe. Edited by: Johnson T, Larkin G, Saks M. 1995, London: Routledge
17.
Larkin G: Regulating the Professions Allied to Medicine. Regulating the Health Professions. Edited by: Allsop J, Saks M. 2002, London: Sage
18.
Turner B: Medical Power and Social Knowledge. 1995, London: Sage, 2
19.
Macdonald K: The Sociology of the Professions. 1995, London: Sage
20.
Allsop J: Medical dominance in a changing world: the UK case. Health Sociol Rev. 2006, 15: 444-457.CrossRef
21.
De Voe J, Short S: A Shift in the Trajectory of Medical Dominance: the case of Medibank and the Australian Doctors' Lobby. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 57: 343-353. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00362-3.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Marjoribanks T, Lewis J: Reform and Autonomy: Perceptions of the Australian General Practice Community. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56: 2229-2239. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00239-3.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Tousijn W: Medical Dominance in Italy: A Partial Decline. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 55: 733-741. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00199-X.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Weller D: Workforce substitution and primary care. Med J Aust. 2006, 185: 8-9.PubMed
25.
Dent M, Whitehead S: Managing Professional Identities - Knowledge, Performativity and the 'New' Professional. 2002, London: Routledge
26.
Gabe J, Kelleher D, Williams G: Challenging Medicine. 1994, London: Routledge
27.
Bradley E, Nolan P: Non-Medical Prescribing - Multidisciplinary Perspectives. 2008, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
28.
Borthwick A: Drug prescribing in podiatry: Radicalism or Tokenism?. Brit J Podiatr. 2001, 4: 56-64.
29.
Borthwick A: Predicting the Impact of New Prescribing Rights (Guest Editorial). Diabetic Foot. 2001, 4: 4-8.
30.
Borthwick A: Attaining Prescribing Rights: Miracle or Mirage? (Editorial). Podiatr Now. 2002, 5: 158-
31.
Borthwick A: Prescribing Rights for the Allied Health Professions: Temporary Lull or Quiet Abandonment?. Podium. 2003, 1: 4-6.
32.
Borthwick A: The Politics of Allied Health Prescribing: Reflections on a New Discourse (Editorial). Brit J Podiatr. 2004, 7: 31-
33.
Borthwick A, Nancarrow S: Promoting Health: the Role of the Specialist Podiatrist. Health Promoting Practice. Edited by: Scriven A. 2005, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
34.
Borthwick AM: 'In the Beginning': Local anaesthesia and the Croydon Postgraduate Group. Brit J Podiatr. 2005, 8: 87-94.
35.
Borthwick AM: Professions allied to medicine and prescribing. Non-Medical Prescribing - Multi-disciplinary Perspectives. Edited by: Nolan P, Bradley E. 2008, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 133-164.
36.
Lawrenson JG: Telephone interview, Academic Committee and Research Sub-Committee, College of Optometrists. 2007
37.
Short A: Prescribing by Podiatrists: A Critical Analysis within the Context of Health Workforce Reform in Australasia. 2006, University of South Australia
38.
Titcomb L, Lawrenson JG: Recent Changes in Medicines Legislation that affects Optometrists. Optometry in Practice. 2006, 7: 23-34.
39.
ACT: Non-Medical Prescribing. 2007, Canberra: ACT Health
40.
Hogg P, Hogg D: Prescription, supply and administration of drugs in diagnosis and therapy. Synergy News. 2006, 4-8.
41.
Chartered Society of Physiotherapists: A Clinical Guideline for the use of Injection Therapy by Physical Therapists. 1999, London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapists
42.
Larson M: The Rise of Professionalism - a sociological analysis. 1977, London: University of California Press
43.
Department of Health: Final Report of the Review of Prescribing, Supply and Administration of Medicines (Crown Report). 1999, London: Department of Health
44.
Adonis A: Parliament Today. 1993, Manchester: University of Manchester Press
45.
Editorial: Control of Drugs. Br Med J. 1967, 5567: 689-690.
46.
Editorial: Proposed legislation on drugs. Br Med J. 1967, 5567: 734-
47.
Ham C: Health Policy in Britain. 2004, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
48.
Malin N, Wilmot S, Manthorpe J: Key Concepts and Debates in Health and Social Care. 2002, Maidenhead: Open University Press
49.
Bradlow J, Coulter A: Effect of fundholding and indicative prescribing scheme on general practitioners' prescribing costs. Br Med J. 1993, 307: 1186-1189. 10.1136/bmj.307.6913.1186.CrossRef
50.
McCartney W, Tyrer S, Brazier M, Prayle D: Nurse Prescribing: Radicalism or Tokenism?. J Adv Nurs. 1999, 29: 348-354. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00895.x.CrossRefPubMed
51.
52.
Borthwick A: Challenging Medicine: the case of podiatric surgery. Work Employ Soc. 2000, 14: 369-383.CrossRef
53.
Cameron A, Masterson A: Reconfiguring the Clinical Workforce. The Future Health Workforce. Edited by: Davies C. 2003, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 68-86.
54.
Duckett S: Interventions to facilitate health workforce restructure. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2005, 2:
55.
56.
Fournier V: Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions. Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace. Edited by: Malin N. 2000, London: Routledge
57.
Frossard L, Liebich G, Hooker R, Brooks P, Robinson L: Introducing physician assistants into new roles: international experiences. Med J Aust. 2008, 188: 199-201.PubMed
58.
Needle J, Lawrenson JG, Petchey R: Scope and Therapeutic Practice: A Survey of UK Optometrists: a report prepared for the College of Optometrists. 2007, London: City of London University
59.
Department of Health: Patient Group Directions - Guidance on Group Directions, Health Service Circular, HSC2000/026 (England only). 2000, London: Department of Health
60.
Department of Health: Patient Group Directions, Health Service Circular, NHS HDL (2001)7 (Scotland only). 2000, London: Department of Health
61.
Department of Health: Patient Group Directions, Health Service Circular, NHS WHC2000/16 (Wales only). 2000, London: Department of Health
62.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Podiatry Labour Force 2003. 2006, Canberra: AIHW
63.
Australian Productivity Commission: Australia's Health Workforce. 2005, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
64.
Council of Procedural Specialists: Public Statement on the Productivity Commission's Research Report (PCRR), Australia's Health Workforce December 2005. accessed 14th July 2008, [http://​www.​asos.​org.​au]
65.
66.
Australian Consumers Association: Press Release: ACA Supports Productivity Commission Medical Workforce Report. ACA. 2005
67.
Australian Physiotherapy Association: Media Release: Physios' back plans for Australia's health recovery. APA. 2006
68.
69.
Australian Government: Report on the Audit of Health Workforce in Rural and Regional Australia. 2008, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
70.
Optometry Association of Australia - Queensland and the Northern Territory Division: An eye for an eye. See Magazine. 2007
71.
72.
73.
74.
Statutory Instrument: The Medicines (Prescription Only) Order 1980. 1980, London: The Stationery Office
75.
O'Kane C, Kilmartin T: Orthopaedic and podiatric surgery: Will you get the same operation?. Podiatr Now. 2007, 10: 24-26.
76.
Editorial: Forging ahead with prescription only medicines. J Brit Podiatr Med. 1994, 49: 2-
77.
Department of Health: Feet First - Report of the Joint Department of Health and NHS Chiropody Task Force,1085,16 M, 9/94. 1994, London: Department of Health
78.
The Medicines (Pharmacy and General Sale - Exemption) Amendment Order. Statutory Instrument 1998 No. 107. 1998, London: HMSO
79.
The Prescription Only Medicines (Human Use) Amendment Order. Statutory Instrument 1998 No. 108. 1998, London: HMSO
80.
Department of Health: The NHS Plan - A Plan for Investment, A Plan for Reform. 2001, London: Department of Health
81.
Health & Social Care Act. Part 5, Clause 68. 2001, London: The Stationery Office
82.
Kerr D, Richardson T: The Diabetic Foot and the Crossroads: Vanguard or Oblivion?. The Diabetic Foot. 2000, 3: 70-71.
83.
Department of Health: Supplementary Prescribing by Nurses, Pharmacists, Chiropodists/Podiatrists, Physiotherapists and Radiographers within the NHS in England. 2005, London: Department of Health
84.
Society of Chiropodists & Podiatrists. Minutes of Meeting of Medicines Committee 19th January. 2006, London: Society of Chiropodists & Podiatrists
85.
Department of Health: Allied health professions, prescribing and medicines supply scoping project report. 2009, London: Department of Health
86.
Medicines for Human Use (Administration and Sale or Supply) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order. Statutory Instrument No. 2006/2807. 2006, London: The Stationery Office
87.
Nancarrow S, Borthwick A: Dynamic professional boundaries in the healthcare workforce. Sociol Health Illn. 2005, 27: 897-919. 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00463.x.CrossRefPubMed
88.
National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission: A Healthier Future for all Australians (Interim Report). Canberra. 2008
89.
Australasian Podiatry Council: Combined Heads of Podiatrists Boards, Australasian Podiatry Council and Heads of Podiatry Schools 2003. Extract of Minutes of Meeting from Annual Meeting. 2003, Melbourne: Australian Podiatry Council
90.
Australian Medical Association. Victoria Submission to the Regulation of Health Professions in Victoria. 2003, Melbourne: Australian Medical Association
91.
92.
93.
Podiatrists Board of New Zealand: Application for Consideration of Extended Prescribing Authority for Registered Podiatrists. 2007, Wellington: Podiatrists Board of New Zealand
94.
Metadata
Title
Non- medical prescribing in Australasia and the UK: the case of podiatry
Authors
Alan M Borthwick
Anthony J Short
Susan A Nancarrow
Rosalie Boyce
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research / Issue 1/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1757-1146
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2010 Go to the issue

Editorial

'Foot' and 'surgeon': a tale of two definitions

Research

'Choosing shoes': a preliminary study into the challenges facing clinicians in assessing footwear for rheumatoid patients

Review

Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Commentary

Looking through the 'window of opportunity': is there a new paradigm of podiatry care on the horizon in earlyrheumatoid arthritis?

Research

A comparison of foot arch measurement reliability using both digital photography and calliper methods

Study protocol

Heel raises versus prefabricated orthoses in the treatment of posterior heel pain associated with calcaneal apophysitis (Sever's Disease): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial