Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012

01-08-2012 | Clinical trial

Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery

Authors: Hee-Chul Shin, Wonshik Han, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Nariya Cho, Woo Kyung Moon, In-Ae Park, Sung Jun Park, Dong-Young Noh

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

A positive resection margin after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the most important risk factor for tumor recurrence. Re-excision after BCS often results in unnecessary wider excisions, or even mastectomies and poor cosmetic results, as well as increased medical costs and patients’ anxiety. A nomogram for predicting positive resection margins may allow the surgeon to develop an individualized surgical plan. Data from 1,034 consecutive breast cancer patients with invasive or in situ breast cancer who initially underwent BCS between January 2008 and December 2009 were used to develop a nomogram for predicting positive resection margins. The nomogram was then validated independently using a cohort of 563 patients who underwent breast surgery in 2010. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that microcalcifications (OR 1.574, P = 0.034), grade 4 mammographic density (OR 4.515, P = 0.005), >0.5 cm difference in tumor size between magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (OR 10.001, P < 0.0001), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on needle biopsy (OR 1.575, P = 0.044), and lobular component on needle biopsy (OR 3.985, P = 0.015) were independent predictors of positive resection margins. These significant variables were used to develop a nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after BCS; the AUCs of the study and the validation cohorts were 0.823 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.785–0.862] and 0.846 (95 % CI, 0.800–0.892), respectively. Our new nomogram using 5 variables that were determined before surgery to predict positive resection margins should aid the surgeon in developing individualized surgical plans for breast cancer patients who are scheduled for BCS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, van der Schueren E, Helle PA, van Zijl K, Bartelink H (2000) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1143–1150PubMedCrossRef van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, Legrand C, Sylvester RJ, Tong D, van der Schueren E, Helle PA, van Zijl K, Bartelink H (2000) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1143–1150PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022152 PubMedCrossRef Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMoa022152 PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kreike B, Hart AA, van de Velde T, Borger J, Peterse H, Rutgers E, Bartelink H, van de Vijver MJ (2008) Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:1014–1021. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.029 PubMedCrossRef Kreike B, Hart AA, van de Velde T, Borger J, Peterse H, Rutgers E, Bartelink H, van de Vijver MJ (2008) Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:1014–1021. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2007.​11.​029 PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pleijhuis RG, Graafland M, de Vries J, Bart J, de Jong JS, van Dam GM (2009) Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2717–2730. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0609-z PubMedCrossRef Pleijhuis RG, Graafland M, de Vries J, Bart J, de Jong JS, van Dam GM (2009) Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2717–2730. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-009-0609-z PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weber WP, Engelberger S, Viehl CT, Zanetti-Dallenbach R, Kuster S, Dirnhofer S, Wruk D, Oertli D, Marti WR (2008) Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions. World J Surg 32:2599–2606. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9757-8 PubMedCrossRef Weber WP, Engelberger S, Viehl CT, Zanetti-Dallenbach R, Kuster S, Dirnhofer S, Wruk D, Oertli D, Marti WR (2008) Accuracy of frozen section analysis versus specimen radiography during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions. World J Surg 32:2599–2606. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-008-9757-8 PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Cho N, Kim SM, Park JS, Jang M, Kim SY, Chang JM, Moon WK (2011) Contralateral lesions detected by preoperative MRI in patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer: application of MR CAD in differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.060 Cho N, Kim SM, Park JS, Jang M, Kim SY, Chang JM, Moon WK (2011) Contralateral lesions detected by preoperative MRI in patients with recently diagnosed breast cancer: application of MR CAD in differentiation of benign and malignant lesions. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2011.​03.​060
12.
go back to reference Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO, Burstein HJ, Carter WB, Edge SB, Erban JK, Farrar WB, Forero A, Giodano SH, Goldstein LJ, Gradishar WJ, Hayes DF, Hudis CA, Ljung B-M, Mankoff DA, Marcom PK, Mayer IA, McCormick B, Pierce LJ, Reed EC, Sachdev J, Smith ML, Somlo G, Ward JH, Wolff AC, Zellars R (2011) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer version 2.2011. http://www.nccn.org. Accessed 11 Nov 2011 Carlson RW, Allred DC, Anderson BO, Burstein HJ, Carter WB, Edge SB, Erban JK, Farrar WB, Forero A, Giodano SH, Goldstein LJ, Gradishar WJ, Hayes DF, Hudis CA, Ljung B-M, Mankoff DA, Marcom PK, Mayer IA, McCormick B, Pierce LJ, Reed EC, Sachdev J, Smith ML, Somlo G, Ward JH, Wolff AC, Zellars R (2011) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer version 2.2011. http://​www.​nccn.​org. Accessed 11 Nov 2011
13.
15.
go back to reference Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, Silver B, Hetelekidis S, Abner A, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ (2000) Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18:1668–1675PubMed Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, Recht A, Connolly J, Gelman R, Silver B, Hetelekidis S, Abner A, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ (2000) Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol 18:1668–1675PubMed
16.
go back to reference Groot G, Rees H, Pahwa P, Kanagaratnam S, Kinloch M (2011) Predicting local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer: the significance of a narrow (≤2 mm) surgical resection margin. J Surg Oncol 103:212–216. doi:10.1002/jso.21826 PubMedCrossRef Groot G, Rees H, Pahwa P, Kanagaratnam S, Kinloch M (2011) Predicting local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for early stage breast cancer: the significance of a narrow (≤2 mm) surgical resection margin. J Surg Oncol 103:212–216. doi:10.​1002/​jso.​21826 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Galimberti V, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, Viale G, Sangalli C, Sargenti M, Brenelli F, Gentilini O, Intra M, Bassi F, Luini A, Zurrida S, Veronesi P, Colleoni M, Veronesi U (2011) Influence of margin status on outcomes in lobular carcinoma: experience of the European Institute of Oncology. Ann Surg 253:580–584. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820d9a81 PubMedCrossRef Galimberti V, Maisonneuve P, Rotmensz N, Viale G, Sangalli C, Sargenti M, Brenelli F, Gentilini O, Intra M, Bassi F, Luini A, Zurrida S, Veronesi P, Colleoni M, Veronesi U (2011) Influence of margin status on outcomes in lobular carcinoma: experience of the European Institute of Oncology. Ann Surg 253:580–584. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e31820d9a81​ PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rudloff U, Brogi E, Reiner AS, Goldberg JI, Brockway JP, Wynveen CA, McCormick B, Patil S, Van Zee KJ (2010) The influence of margin width and volume of disease near margin on benefit of radiation therapy for women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg 251:583–591. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b5931e PubMedCrossRef Rudloff U, Brogi E, Reiner AS, Goldberg JI, Brockway JP, Wynveen CA, McCormick B, Patil S, Van Zee KJ (2010) The influence of margin width and volume of disease near margin on benefit of radiation therapy for women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg 251:583–591. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181b5931e​ PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S, Waisman JR, Lewinsky BS, Martino S, Gamagami P, Colburn WJ (1999) The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 340:1455–1461. doi:10.1056/NEJM199905133401902 PubMedCrossRef Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S, Waisman JR, Lewinsky BS, Martino S, Gamagami P, Colburn WJ (1999) The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 340:1455–1461. doi:10.​1056/​NEJM199905133401​902 PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, Hanby A, Brown J (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571PubMedCrossRef Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, Olivier C, Drew P, Napp V, Hanby A, Brown J (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA, Storm RK, Plaisier PW, van Dalen T, Diepstraten SC, Weits T, Westenend PJ, Stapper G, Fernandez-Gallardo MA, Borel Rinkes IH, van Hillegersberg R, Mali WP, Peeters PH (2011) Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET—randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 47:879–886. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.11.035 PubMedCrossRef Peters NH, van Esser S, van den Bosch MA, Storm RK, Plaisier PW, van Dalen T, Diepstraten SC, Weits T, Westenend PJ, Stapper G, Fernandez-Gallardo MA, Borel Rinkes IH, van Hillegersberg R, Mali WP, Peeters PH (2011) Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET—randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 47:879–886. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2010.​11.​035 PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Olson TP, Harter J, Munoz A, Mahvi DM, Breslin T (2007) Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2953–2960. doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9437-1 PubMedCrossRef Olson TP, Harter J, Munoz A, Mahvi DM, Breslin T (2007) Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2953–2960. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-007-9437-1 PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fukamachi K, Ishida T, Usami S, Takeda M, Watanabe M, Sasano H, Ohuchi N (2010) Total-circumference intraoperative frozen section analysis reduces margin-positive rate in breast-conservation surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:513–520. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyq006 PubMedCrossRef Fukamachi K, Ishida T, Usami S, Takeda M, Watanabe M, Sasano H, Ohuchi N (2010) Total-circumference intraoperative frozen section analysis reduces margin-positive rate in breast-conservation surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40:513–520. doi:10.​1093/​jjco/​hyq006 PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cendan JC, Coco D, Copeland EM 3rd (2005) Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 201:194–198PubMedCrossRef Cendan JC, Coco D, Copeland EM 3rd (2005) Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. J Am Coll Surg 201:194–198PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, Gajdos C, Kong A, Ahmed S, Zapetti D (2000) Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 179:81–85PubMedCrossRef Tartter PI, Kaplan J, Bleiweiss I, Gajdos C, Kong A, Ahmed S, Zapetti D (2000) Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 179:81–85PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, Rose A, Mou A, Buchanan M, Collins JP, Miller JA, Gruen RL, Mann GB (2008) Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2542–2549. doi:10.1245/s10434-008-0054-4 PubMedCrossRef Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, Rose A, Mou A, Buchanan M, Collins JP, Miller JA, Gruen RL, Mann GB (2008) Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2542–2549. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-008-0054-4 PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL, Lockwood GA, Miller AB (2000) Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Eur J Cancer Prev 9:15–24PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Jensen HM, Cooke G, Han HL, Lockwood GA, Miller AB (2000) Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Eur J Cancer Prev 9:15–24PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, Schnitt SJ, Rosner B, Vachon C, Tamimi RM (2011) Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:1179–1189PubMedCrossRef Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, Schnitt SJ, Rosner B, Vachon C, Tamimi RM (2011) Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 103:1179–1189PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK (2003) Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:519–525PubMed Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK (2003) Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:519–525PubMed
34.
go back to reference Tresserra F, Feu J, Grases PJ, Navarro B, Alegret X, Fernandez-Cid A (1999) Assessment of breast cancer size: sonographic and pathologic correlation. J Clin Ultrasound 27:485–491PubMedCrossRef Tresserra F, Feu J, Grases PJ, Navarro B, Alegret X, Fernandez-Cid A (1999) Assessment of breast cancer size: sonographic and pathologic correlation. J Clin Ultrasound 27:485–491PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Satake H, Shimamoto K, Sawaki A, Niimi R, Ando Y, Ishiguchi T, Ishigaki T, Yamakawa K, Nagasaka T, Funahashi H (2000) Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging. Eur Radiol 10:1726–1732PubMedCrossRef Satake H, Shimamoto K, Sawaki A, Niimi R, Ando Y, Ishiguchi T, Ishigaki T, Yamakawa K, Nagasaka T, Funahashi H (2000) Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings, mammography and MR imaging. Eur Radiol 10:1726–1732PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Shin HC, Han W, Moon HG, Yom CK, Ahn SK, You JM, Kim JS, Chang JM, Cho N, Moon WK, Park IA, Noh DY (2012) Limited value and utility of breast MRI in patients undergoing breast-conserving cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2289-3 Shin HC, Han W, Moon HG, Yom CK, Ahn SK, You JM, Kim JS, Chang JM, Cho N, Moon WK, Park IA, Noh DY (2012) Limited value and utility of breast MRI in patients undergoing breast-conserving cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-012-2289-3
37.
go back to reference Dillon MF, Maguire AA, McDermott EW, Myers C, Hill AD, O’Doherty A, Quinn CM (2008) Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery. Mod Pathol 21:39–45. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800975 PubMedCrossRef Dillon MF, Maguire AA, McDermott EW, Myers C, Hill AD, O’Doherty A, Quinn CM (2008) Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery. Mod Pathol 21:39–45. doi:10.​1038/​modpathol.​3800975 PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery
Authors
Hee-Chul Shin
Wonshik Han
Hyeong-Gon Moon
Nariya Cho
Woo Kyung Moon
In-Ae Park
Sung Jun Park
Dong-Young Noh
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2124-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine