Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 9/2020

Open Access 01-09-2020 | Nitroglycerin | Original Article

Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation

Authors: F. E. Vervaat, A. van der Gaag, H. van Suijlekom, C. J. Botman, K. Teeuwen, I. Wijnbergen

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Aims

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and without revascularisation options. Previous studies have shown that SCS improves the quality of life in this patient group and reduces the severity of the angina pectoris. The aim of this prospective, single-arm observational study is to show this effect in a single-centre cohort using a multidisciplinary team approach to the selection process, with a follow-up period of 1 year.

Methods and results

Between July 2010 and March 2017, 87 patients with RAP referred to our centre received SCS. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36) were completed at baseline, prior to implantation, and 1 year post-implantation. After 1 year of follow-up there was a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of angina pectoris attacks from more than 4 times a day to 1–2 times a week (p < 0.001). The SAQ showed statistically significant improvement in four of the five dimensions: physical limitation (p < 0.001), angina frequency (p < 0.001), angina stability (p < 0.001) and quality of life (p < 0.001). The RAND-36 showed statistically significant improvement in all nine dimensions: physical functioning (p = 0.001), role/physical (p < 0.001), social functioning (p = 0.03), role/emotional (p < 0.05), bodily pain (p < 0.001), general health (p < 0.001), vitality (p < 0.001), mental health (p = 0.02) and health change (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study showed a significant improvement in quality of life and reduction of angina pectoris severity after 1 year of follow-up in patients treated with SCS for RAP.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mannheimer C, Camici P, Chester MR, et al. The problem of chronic refractory angina: report from the ESC Joint Study Group on the Treatment of Refractory Angina. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:355–70.CrossRef Mannheimer C, Camici P, Chester MR, et al. The problem of chronic refractory angina: report from the ESC Joint Study Group on the Treatment of Refractory Angina. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:355–70.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Latif OA, Nedeukovic SS, Stevenson LW. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable angina pectoris: a unified theory on its mechanism. Clin Cardiol. 2001;24:533–41.CrossRef Latif OA, Nedeukovic SS, Stevenson LW. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable angina pectoris: a unified theory on its mechanism. Clin Cardiol. 2001;24:533–41.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eldabe S, Thomson S, Duarte R, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neuromodulation. 2016;19:60–70.CrossRef Eldabe S, Thomson S, Duarte R, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina (RASCAL study): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neuromodulation. 2016;19:60–70.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference De Jongste MJ, Haaksma J, Hautvast RW, et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischemia during daily life in patients with severe coronary artery disease. A prospective ambulatory electrocardiographic study. Br Heart J. 1994;71:413–8.CrossRef De Jongste MJ, Haaksma J, Hautvast RW, et al. Effects of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial ischemia during daily life in patients with severe coronary artery disease. A prospective ambulatory electrocardiographic study. Br Heart J. 1994;71:413–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hautvast RW, Blanksma PK, DeJongste MJ, et al. Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:462–7.CrossRef Hautvast RW, Blanksma PK, DeJongste MJ, et al. Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial blood flow assessed by positron emission tomography in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:462–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Saraste A, Ukkonen H, Varis A, et al. Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:449–55.CrossRef Saraste A, Ukkonen H, Varis A, et al. Effect of spinal cord stimulation on myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:449–55.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Andréll P, Yu W, Gersbach P, et al. Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris—results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL). Heart. 2010;96:1132–6.CrossRef Andréll P, Yu W, Gersbach P, et al. Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris—results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL). Heart. 2010;96:1132–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Eddicks S, Maier-Hauff K, Schenk M, et al. Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the first placebo-controlled randomised trial. Heart. 2007;93:585–90.CrossRef Eddicks S, Maier-Hauff K, Schenk M, et al. Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the first placebo-controlled randomised trial. Heart. 2007;93:585–90.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Imran TF, Malapero R, Qavi AH, et al. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as an adjunct therapy for chronic refractory angina pectoris. Int J Cardiol. 2017;227:535–42.CrossRef Imran TF, Malapero R, Qavi AH, et al. Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as an adjunct therapy for chronic refractory angina pectoris. Int J Cardiol. 2017;227:535–42.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:333–41.CrossRef Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:333–41.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Charlier L, Dutrannois J, Kaufman L. The SF-36 questionnaire: a convenient way to assess quality of life in angina pectoris patients. Acta Cardiol. 1997;52:247–60.PubMed Charlier L, Dutrannois J, Kaufman L. The SF-36 questionnaire: a convenient way to assess quality of life in angina pectoris patients. Acta Cardiol. 1997;52:247–60.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Baruch Y, Holtom BC. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Hum Relat. 2008;61:1139–60.CrossRef Baruch Y, Holtom BC. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Hum Relat. 2008;61:1139–60.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR. Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res. 2001;35:1347–55.PubMedPubMedCentral Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR. Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res. 2001;35:1347–55.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Lanza GA, Grimaldi R, Greco S, et al. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a multicenter randomized single-blind study (the SCS-ITA trial). Pain. 2011;152:45–52.CrossRef Lanza GA, Grimaldi R, Greco S, et al. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a multicenter randomized single-blind study (the SCS-ITA trial). Pain. 2011;152:45–52.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zipes DP, Svorkdal N, Berman D, et al. Spinal cord stimulation therapy for patients with refractory angina who are not candidates for revascularization. Neuromodulation. 2012;15:550–8.CrossRef Zipes DP, Svorkdal N, Berman D, et al. Spinal cord stimulation therapy for patients with refractory angina who are not candidates for revascularization. Neuromodulation. 2012;15:550–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Augustinsson LE, et al. Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris: the ESBY study. Circulation. 1998;97:1157–63.CrossRef Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Augustinsson LE, et al. Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris: the ESBY study. Circulation. 1998;97:1157–63.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bondesson S, Pettersson T, Erdling A, et al. Comparison of patients undergoing enhanced external counterpulsation and spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris. Coron Artery Dis. 2008;19:627–34.CrossRef Bondesson S, Pettersson T, Erdling A, et al. Comparison of patients undergoing enhanced external counterpulsation and spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris. Coron Artery Dis. 2008;19:627–34.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference McNab D, Khan SN, Sharples LD, et al. An open-label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1048–53.CrossRef McNab D, Khan SN, Sharples LD, et al. An open-label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1048–53.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Di Pede F, Lanza GA, Zuin G, et al. Immediate and long-term clinical outcome after spinal cord stimulation for refractory stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:951–5.CrossRef Di Pede F, Lanza GA, Zuin G, et al. Immediate and long-term clinical outcome after spinal cord stimulation for refractory stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:951–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improvement in quality of life and angina pectoris: 1-year follow-up of patients with refractory angina pectoris and spinal cord stimulation
Authors
F. E. Vervaat
A. van der Gaag
H. van Suijlekom
C. J. Botman
K. Teeuwen
I. Wijnbergen
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-020-01422-0

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Netherlands Heart Journal 9/2020 Go to the issue