Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2014

01-02-2014

New Developed DR Detector Performs Radiographs of Hand, Pelvic and Premature Chest Anatomies at a Lower Radiation Dose and/or a Higher Image Quality

Authors: Helle Precht, Anders Tingberg, Dag Waaler, Claus Bjørn Outzen

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

A newly developed Digital Radiography (DR) detector has smaller pixel size and higher fill factor than earlier detector models. These technical advantages should theoretically lead to higher sensitivity and higher spatial resolution, thus making dose reduction possible without scarifying image quality compared to previous DR detector versions. To examine whether the newly developed Canon CXDI-70C DR detector provides an improved image quality and/or allows for dose reductions in hand and pelvic bone examinations as well as premature chest examinations, compared to the previous (CXDI-55C) DR detector version. A total of 450 images of a technical Contrast-Detail phantom were imaged on a DR system employing various kVp and mAs settings, providing an objective image quality assessment. In addition, 450 images of anthropomorphic phantoms were taken and analyzed by three specialized radiologists using Visual Grading Analysis (VGA). The results from the technical phantom studies showed that the image quality expressed as IQFINV values was on average approximately 45 % higher with the CXDI-70C detector compared to the CXDI-55C detector. Consistently, the VGA results from the anatomical phantom studies indicated that by using the CXDI-70C detector, diagnostic image quality could be maintained at a dose reduction of in average 30 %, depending on anatomy and kVp level. This indicates that the CXDI-70C detector is significantly more sensitive than the previous model, and supports a better clinical image quality. By using the newly developed DR detector a significant dose reduction is possible while maintaining image quality.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Inc C: Medical Equipment group: Digital Radiography: CXDI-70C, User’s Manual. Canon Inc., Tokyo, 2011 Inc C: Medical Equipment group: Digital Radiography: CXDI-70C, User’s Manual. Canon Inc., Tokyo, 2011
3.
go back to reference Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JJM: The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2002 Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JJM: The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2002
4.
go back to reference European Commission: European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images in Paediatrics. Bruxelles, Luxemburg, 1996a. European Commission: European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiographic Images in Paediatrics. Bruxelles, Luxemburg, 1996a.
5.
go back to reference Fahey FB, Treves ST, Adelstein SJ: Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med Technol 52(8):1240–1251, 2011 Fahey FB, Treves ST, Adelstein SJ: Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med Technol 52(8):1240–1251, 2011
7.
go back to reference ICRP, V., J.: ICRP Publication 93, Managing patient dose in digital radiology. Orlando, Amsterdam, Tokyo, Singapore. Elsevier Ltd., 2004. ICRP, V., J.: ICRP Publication 93, Managing patient dose in digital radiology. Orlando, Amsterdam, Tokyo, Singapore. Elsevier Ltd., 2004.
8.
go back to reference Carlander A, Hansson J, Söderberg J, Steneryd K, Båth M: The effect of radiation dose reduction on clinical image quality in chest radiography of premature neonates using a dual-side readout technique Computed Radiography system. Radiat Prot Dosim 139(1–3):275–280, 2010CrossRef Carlander A, Hansson J, Söderberg J, Steneryd K, Båth M: The effect of radiation dose reduction on clinical image quality in chest radiography of premature neonates using a dual-side readout technique Computed Radiography system. Radiat Prot Dosim 139(1–3):275–280, 2010CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Østergaard M: Can Imaging Be Used for Inflammatory Arthritis Screening? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 16:401–409, 2012PubMedCrossRef Østergaard M: Can Imaging Be Used for Inflammatory Arthritis Screening? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 16:401–409, 2012PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Personal communication through Chris Deurman to Canon Inc., Canon Europe, Amsterdam, May/June 2013. Personal communication through Chris Deurman to Canon Inc., Canon Europe, Amsterdam, May/June 2013.
11.
go back to reference Canon Inc. Medical Equipment group: Digital Radiography: CXDI-55C, User’s Manual. Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan, 2009. Canon Inc. Medical Equipment group: Digital Radiography: CXDI-55C, User’s Manual. Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan, 2009.
12.
go back to reference Precht H, Gerke O, Rosendahl K, Tingberg A, Waaler D: Digital radiography: Optimization of image quality and dose using multi frequency software. Pediatr Radiol 42(9):1112–1118, 2012PubMedCrossRef Precht H, Gerke O, Rosendahl K, Tingberg A, Waaler D: Digital radiography: Optimization of image quality and dose using multi frequency software. Pediatr Radiol 42(9):1112–1118, 2012PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gonzales RC, Woods RE: Digital Image Processing, 3rd edition. Pearson, Prentice Hall, USA, 2008 Gonzales RC, Woods RE: Digital Image Processing, 3rd edition. Pearson, Prentice Hall, USA, 2008
14.
go back to reference Canon Inc.: CXDI Image Processing Software MLT(S) User’s Manual. Japan, Canon Inc., 2008. Canon Inc.: CXDI Image Processing Software MLT(S) User’s Manual. Japan, Canon Inc., 2008.
15.
go back to reference Artinis: Manual – Contrast-Detail Phantom. Artinis CDRAD type 2.0. Zetten, The Netherlands, Artinis, 2006. Artinis: Manual – Contrast-Detail Phantom. Artinis CDRAD type 2.0. Zetten, The Netherlands, Artinis, 2006.
16.
go back to reference Gammex: The neonatal chest phantom-Physics behind the phantom, 2nd edition. Gammex, Nottingham, 2008 Gammex: The neonatal chest phantom-Physics behind the phantom, 2nd edition. Gammex, Nottingham, 2008
17.
go back to reference The Phantom Laboratory: Sectional Hand Phantoms, XA231R and XA231P, part number XA231. New York, USA, The Phantom Laboratory, 2012. The Phantom Laboratory: Sectional Hand Phantoms, XA231R and XA231P, part number XA231. New York, USA, The Phantom Laboratory, 2012.
18.
go back to reference Neofostistaou V, Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Schreiner-Karoussou A, Vano E: Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? Radiat Prot Dosimetry 117(1–3):204–210, 2005 Neofostistaou V, Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Schreiner-Karoussou A, Vano E: Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? Radiat Prot Dosimetry 117(1–3):204–210, 2005
19.
go back to reference Norrman, E.: Optimisation of radiographic imaging by means of factorial experiments. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Örebro, Sweden, 2007. Norrman, E.: Optimisation of radiographic imaging by means of factorial experiments. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Örebro, Sweden, 2007.
20.
go back to reference Tingberg A, Sjöström D: Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:1–3, 2005CrossRef Tingberg A, Sjöström D: Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114:1–3, 2005CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Almén A, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Besjakov J, Kheddanche S, Lanhede B, Månsson, Zankl M: The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. Br J Radiol 73:1192–1199, 2000PubMed Almén A, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Besjakov J, Kheddanche S, Lanhede B, Månsson, Zankl M: The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria. Br J Radiol 73:1192–1199, 2000PubMed
22.
go back to reference Sund P, Båth M, Kheddache S, Mansson L: Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography. Eur Radiol 14(1):143–150, 2004 Sund P, Båth M, Kheddache S, Mansson L: Comparison of visual grading analysis and determination of detective quantum efficiency for evaluating system performance in digital chest radiography. Eur Radiol 14(1):143–150, 2004
23.
go back to reference Månsson LG: Methods for the evaluation of image quality: A review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 90:89–99, 2000CrossRef Månsson LG: Methods for the evaluation of image quality: A review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 90:89–99, 2000CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Båth M, Månsson LG: Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 80:169–176, 2007PubMedCrossRef Båth M, Månsson LG: Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 80:169–176, 2007PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bontrager KL: Textbook of Radiographic Positioning and Related Anatomi, 4th edition. Bontrager Publishing, Phoenix, 2002 Bontrager KL: Textbook of Radiographic Positioning and Related Anatomi, 4th edition. Bontrager Publishing, Phoenix, 2002
26.
go back to reference Commission E: European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Bruxelles, Luxemburg, 1996 Commission E: European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Bruxelles, Luxemburg, 1996
27.
go back to reference Lanhede B, Båth M, Kherddache S, Sund P, Björneld L, Widell M, Almén A, et al: The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria. Br J Radiol 75:38–49, 2002PubMed Lanhede B, Båth M, Kherddache S, Sund P, Björneld L, Widell M, Almén A, et al: The influence of different technique factors on image quality of chest radiographs as evaluated by modified CEC image quality criteria. Br J Radiol 75:38–49, 2002PubMed
28.
go back to reference Brennan PC, Johnston D: Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique. Br J Radiol 75:243–248, 2002PubMed Brennan PC, Johnston D: Irish X-ray departments demonstrate varying levels of adherence to European guidelines on good radiographic technique. Br J Radiol 75:243–248, 2002PubMed
29.
go back to reference Rainford LA, Al-Qattan E, McFadden S, Brennan PC: CEC analysis of radiological images produced in Europe and Asia. Radiography 13:202–209, 2006CrossRef Rainford LA, Al-Qattan E, McFadden S, Brennan PC: CEC analysis of radiological images produced in Europe and Asia. Radiography 13:202–209, 2006CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Larsen ALS: Videnskab og forskning: en lærebog for professionsuddannelser, 2nd edition. Gads Forlag, Denmark, 2006 Larsen ALS: Videnskab og forskning: en lærebog for professionsuddannelser, 2nd edition. Gads Forlag, Denmark, 2006
31.
go back to reference Polit DF, Beck CT: Nursing Research generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, 8th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philiadelphia, 2008 Polit DF, Beck CT: Nursing Research generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, 8th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philiadelphia, 2008
32.
go back to reference Randolph, J.J.: Free-marginal multirater kappa: An alternative to Fleiss’ fixed-marginal multirater kappa. Paper presented at the Joensuu University Learning and Instruction Symposium 2005, Joensuu, Finland, October 14-15th, 2005. Randolph, J.J.: Free-marginal multirater kappa: An alternative to Fleiss’ fixed-marginal multirater kappa. Paper presented at the Joensuu University Learning and Instruction Symposium 2005, Joensuu, Finland, October 14-15th, 2005.
33.
go back to reference StataCorp: Stata Release 12. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. Texas, USA, 2011. StataCorp: Stata Release 12. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. Texas, USA, 2011.
34.
go back to reference Tonkopi E, Daniels C, Gale MJ, Schofield SC, Vanlarkin JL: Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures. Can Assoc Radiol J 63(4):237–241, 2012PubMedCrossRef Tonkopi E, Daniels C, Gale MJ, Schofield SC, Vanlarkin JL: Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures. Can Assoc Radiol J 63(4):237–241, 2012PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
New Developed DR Detector Performs Radiographs of Hand, Pelvic and Premature Chest Anatomies at a Lower Radiation Dose and/or a Higher Image Quality
Authors
Helle Precht
Anders Tingberg
Dag Waaler
Claus Bjørn Outzen
Publication date
01-02-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-013-9635-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2014 Go to the issue