Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Nerve Stimulation | Original Article

Short-term clinical and manometric outcomes of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a large single-centre series

Authors: A. O’Connor, C. Molyneux, K. Foster, G. Faulkner, A. Sharma, E. Kiff, D. H. Vasant, K. Telford

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Faecal incontinence (FI) is common, with a significant impact on quality of life. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) is a therapy for FI; however, its role has recently been questioned. Here we report the short-term clinical and manometric outcomes in a large tertiary centre.

Methods

A retrospective review of a prospective PTNS database was performed, extracting patient-reported FI outcome measures including bowel diary, the St Marks’s Incontinence Score (SMIS) and Manchester Health Questionnaire (MHQ). Successful treatment was > 50% improvement in symptoms, whilst a partial response was 25–50% improvement. High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) results before and after PTNS were recorded.

Results

Data were available from 135 patients [119 (88%) females; median age: 60 years (range: 27–82years)]. Overall, patients reported a reduction in urge FI (2.5–1) and passive FI episodes (2–1.5; p < 0.05) alongside a reduction in SMIS (16.5–14) and MHQ (517.5–460.0; p < 0.001). Some 76 (56%) patients reported success, whilst a further 20 (15%) reported a partial response. There were statistically significant reductions in rectal balloon thresholds and an increase in incremental squeeze pressure; however, these changes were independent of treatment success.

Conclusion

Patients report PTNS improves FI symptoms in the short term. Despite this improvement, changes in HRAM parameters were independent of this success. HRAM may be unable to measure the clinical effect of PTNS, or there remains the possibility of a placebo effect. Further work is required to define the role of PTNS in the treatment of FI.
Literature
8.
go back to reference Oliveira LCC (2020) Anorectal physiology: a clinical and surgical perspective. Springer International Publishing AG, ChamCrossRef Oliveira LCC (2020) Anorectal physiology: a clinical and surgical perspective. Springer International Publishing AG, ChamCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Knowles CH, Horrocks EJ, Bremner SA, Stevens N, Norton C, O’Connell PR et al (2015) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults (CONFIDeNT): a double-blind, multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10004):1640–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60314-2CrossRefPubMed Knowles CH, Horrocks EJ, Bremner SA, Stevens N, Norton C, O’Connell PR et al (2015) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults (CONFIDeNT): a double-blind, multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386(10004):1640–1648. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(15)60314-2CrossRefPubMed
14.
33.
39.
Metadata
Title
Short-term clinical and manometric outcomes of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: a large single-centre series
Authors
A. O’Connor
C. Molyneux
K. Foster
G. Faulkner
A. Sharma
E. Kiff
D. H. Vasant
K. Telford
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-02916-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2024 Go to the issue