Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2007

01-07-2007

Natural orifice surgery with an endoluminal mobile robot

Authors: Mark E. Rentschler, Jason Dumpert, Stephen R. Platt, Shane M. Farritor, Dmitry Oleynikov

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic surgery promises to eliminate skin incisions and reduce postoperative pain and discomfort. Such an approach provides a distinct benefit as compared with conventional laparoscopy, in which multiple entry incisions are required for tools and camera. Endoscopy currently is the only method for performing procedures through the gastrointestinal tract. However, this approach is limited by instrumentation and the need to pass the entire scope into the patient. In contrast, an untethered miniature robot inserted through the mouth would be able to enter the abdominal cavity through a gastrotomy for exploration of the entire peritoneal cavity. In this study, the authors developed an endoluminal robot capable of transgastric abdominal exploration under esophagogastroduodenoscopic (EGD) control. Under EGD control, a gastrotomy was created, and the miniature robot was deployed into the abdominal cavity under remote control. Ultimately, future procedures will include a family of robots working together inside the gastric and abdominal cavities after their insertion through the esophagus. Such technology will help to reduce patient trauma while providing surgical flexibility.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Satava RM (2002) Surgical robotics: the early chronicles. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 6–16PubMedCrossRef Satava RM (2002) Surgical robotics: the early chronicles. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12: 6–16PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc 16: 1389–1402PubMedCrossRef Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Surg Endosc 16: 1389–1402PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisius B, Voges U. (2000) Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 14: 375–381PubMedCrossRef Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisius B, Voges U. (2000) Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 14: 375–381PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 790–795PubMed Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18: 790–795PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dakin GF, Gagner M (2003) Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 17: 574–579PubMedCrossRef Dakin GF, Gagner M (2003) Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Surg Endosc 17: 574–579PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nio D, Bemelman WA, den Boer KT, Dunker MS, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM (2002) Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus)–assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16: 412–415PubMedCrossRef Nio D, Bemelman WA, den Boer KT, Dunker MS, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM (2002) Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus)–assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16: 412–415PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Schneider C, Ellison EC (2002) Computer-enhanced vs standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6: 11–16PubMedCrossRef Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Schneider C, Ellison EC (2002) Computer-enhanced vs standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 6: 11–16PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Choi D, Riviere C (2005) Flexure-based manipulator for active handheld microsurgical instrument. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS). Shanghai, China Choi D, Riviere C (2005) Flexure-based manipulator for active handheld microsurgical instrument. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS). Shanghai, China
9.
go back to reference Ang W (2004) Active tremor compensation in handheld instrument for microsurgery. Doctoral dissertation, tech report SMU-RI-TR-04-28, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University Ang W (2004) Active tremor compensation in handheld instrument for microsurgery. Doctoral dissertation, tech report SMU-RI-TR-04-28, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
10.
go back to reference Riviere C, Ang W, Khosla P (2003) Toward active tremor canceling in handheld microsurgical instruments. IEEE Trans Robotics Automation 15: 793–800CrossRef Riviere C, Ang W, Khosla P (2003) Toward active tremor canceling in handheld microsurgical instruments. IEEE Trans Robotics Automation 15: 793–800CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rosen J, Lum M, Trimble D, Hannaford B, Sinanan M (2005) Spherical mechanism analysis of a surgical robot for minimally invasive surgery: analytical and experimental approaches: medicine meets virtual reality. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 111: 422–428PubMed Rosen J, Lum M, Trimble D, Hannaford B, Sinanan M (2005) Spherical mechanism analysis of a surgical robot for minimally invasive surgery: analytical and experimental approaches: medicine meets virtual reality. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 111: 422–428PubMed
12.
go back to reference Rosen J, Hannaford B, MacFarlane M, Sinanan M (1999) Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery: experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46: 1212–1221PubMedCrossRef Rosen J, Hannaford B, MacFarlane M, Sinanan M (1999) Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery: experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46: 1212–1221PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference MacFarlane M, Rosen J, Hannaford B, Pellegrini C, Sinanan M (1999) Force feedback grasper helps restore the sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 3: 278–285PubMedCrossRef MacFarlane M, Rosen J, Hannaford B, Pellegrini C, Sinanan M (1999) Force feedback grasper helps restore the sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 3: 278–285PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fukuda T, Guo S, Kosuge K, Arai F, Negoro M, Nakabayashi K (1994) Microactive catheter system with multi degrees of freedom. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. San Diego, CA Fukuda T, Guo S, Kosuge K, Arai F, Negoro M, Nakabayashi K (1994) Microactive catheter system with multi degrees of freedom. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. San Diego, CA
15.
go back to reference Suzumori K, Iikura S, Tanaka H (1991) Development of flexible microactuator and its applications to robotics mechanisms. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Seoul, Korea Suzumori K, Iikura S, Tanaka H (1991) Development of flexible microactuator and its applications to robotics mechanisms. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Seoul, Korea
17.
go back to reference Phee L, Accoto D, Menciassi A, Stefanini C, Carrozza M, Dario P (2002) Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49: 613–616PubMedCrossRef Phee L, Accoto D, Menciassi A, Stefanini C, Carrozza M, Dario P (2002) Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gastrointestinal tract. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 49: 613–616PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Slatkin AB, Burdick JW, Grundfest SW (1995) The development of a robotic endoscope. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Nagoya, Japan pp 162–171 Slatkin AB, Burdick JW, Grundfest SW (1995) The development of a robotic endoscope. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Nagoya, Japan pp 162–171
19.
go back to reference Flynn A, Udayakumar K, Barret DS, McLurkin JD, Franck DL, Shectman AN (1998) Tomorrow’s surgery: micromotors and microrobots for minimally invasive procedures. Minim Invasive Surg Allied Technol 7: 343–352CrossRef Flynn A, Udayakumar K, Barret DS, McLurkin JD, Franck DL, Shectman AN (1998) Tomorrow’s surgery: micromotors and microrobots for minimally invasive procedures. Minim Invasive Surg Allied Technol 7: 343–352CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Breedveld P, Danielle E, Van Gorp M (2004) Locomotion through the intestine by means of rolling stents. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Salt Lake City, UT Breedveld P, Danielle E, Van Gorp M (2004) Locomotion through the intestine by means of rolling stents. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences. Salt Lake City, UT
21.
go back to reference Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt SR, Farritor S, Oleynikov D (2006) Mobile in vivo robots provide sole visual feedback for abdominal exploration and cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20: 135–138PubMedCrossRef Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt SR, Farritor S, Oleynikov D (2006) Mobile in vivo robots provide sole visual feedback for abdominal exploration and cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20: 135–138PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt S, Farritor S, Oleynikov D (2006) Mobile In vivo biopsy and camera robot. Studies Health Technol Informatics 119: 449–454 Rentschler M, Dumpert J, Platt S, Farritor S, Oleynikov D (2006) Mobile In vivo biopsy and camera robot. Studies Health Technol Informatics 119: 449–454
23.
go back to reference Kantsevoy S, Jagannath S, Niiyama H, Chung S, Cotton P, Gostout C, Hawes R, Pasticha P, Magee C, Vaughn C (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62: 287–292PubMedCrossRef Kantsevoy S, Jagannath S, Niiyama H, Chung S, Cotton P, Gostout C, Hawes R, Pasticha P, Magee C, Vaughn C (2005) Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 62: 287–292PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jagannath S, Kantsevoy S, Vaughn C, Chung S, Cotton P, Gostout C, Hawes R, Pasricha P, Scorpio D, Magee C (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61: 449–453PubMedCrossRef Jagannath S, Kantsevoy S, Vaughn C, Chung S, Cotton P, Gostout C, Hawes R, Pasricha P, Scorpio D, Magee C (2005) Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 61: 449–453PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Park P, Bergström M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis. Gastrointest Endosc 61: 601–606PubMedCrossRef Park P, Bergström M, Ikeda K, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P (2005) Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis. Gastrointest Endosc 61: 601–606PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Reddy N, Rao VG (2005) Oral communication, May 15 and 19 Reddy N, Rao VG (2005) Oral communication, May 15 and 19
27.
Metadata
Title
Natural orifice surgery with an endoluminal mobile robot
Authors
Mark E. Rentschler
Jason Dumpert
Stephen R. Platt
Shane M. Farritor
Dmitry Oleynikov
Publication date
01-07-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2007
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9400-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2007

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2007 Go to the issue