Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Endoluminal Surgery

Natural orifice surgery: initial US experience utilizing the StomaphyXTM device to reduce gastric pouches after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Authors: Dean Mikami, Bradley Needleman, Vimal Narula, Janice Durant, W. Scott Melvin

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Weight gain after gastric bypass can occur in up to 10% of patients 5 years following and in about 20% of patients 10 years following surgery. The nadir weight is usually reached within the first 2 years after bypass surgery. However, weight may slowly be regained for numerous reasons. This phenomenon has been studied extensively, but there is often no one reason this occurs. Once psychological and dietary reasons have been investigated, revisional surgery may be the only alternative for treatment. Revisional gastric bypass surgery is associated with a much higher morbidity and mortality when compared with a primary gastric bypass procedure.

Patients and methods

Thirty-nine patients underwent endoluminal gastric pouch reduction with the StomaphyXTM device after informed consent. The StomaphyXTM device is a sterile, single-use device for use in endoluminal transoral tissue approximation and ligation in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

Results

Average age was 47.8 (29–64) years, and 36/39 (92.3%) patients were female. Average body mass index (BMI) and weight prior to the StomaphyXTM procedure were 39.8 (22.7–63.2) kg/m2 and 108.0 kg (65.90–172.2 kg). The average preprocedure excess body weight was 51.1 kg. Weight loss at 2 weeks (n = 39) was 3.8 kg (7.4% excess body weight loss, EBWL), at 1 month (n = 34) was 5.4 kg (10.6% EBWL), at 2 months (n = 26) was 6.7 kg (13.1% EBWL), at 3 months (n = 15) was 6.7 kg (13.1% EBWL), at 6 months (n = 14) was 8.7 kg (17.0% EBWL), and at 1 year (n = 6) was 10.0 kg (19.5% EBWL). No major complications were observed. The minor complications that were seen included a sore throat lasting less than 48 h in 34/39 patients (87.1%) and epigastric pain that lasted for a few days in 30/39 patients (76.9%). Three patients with chronic diarrhea had their symptoms resolved after the procedure. Eight patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease reported improvement in their symptoms post procedure.

Conclusions

Endoluminal revision of gastric bypass patients with weight gain using the StomaphyXTM procedure may offer an alternative to open or laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292(14):1724–1737CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E et al (2004) Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 292(14):1724–1737CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W et al (2000) Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg 232(4):515–529CrossRefPubMed Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W et al (2000) Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg 232(4):515–529CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Yale CE (1989) Gastric surgery for morbid obesity. Complications and long-term weight control. Arch Surg 124:941–946PubMed Yale CE (1989) Gastric surgery for morbid obesity. Complications and long-term weight control. Arch Surg 124:941–946PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Engle KM et al (1992) Gastric bypass for treating server obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 55:560S–566SPubMed Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Engle KM et al (1992) Gastric bypass for treating server obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 55:560S–566SPubMed
5.
go back to reference Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD (2006) Weight gain after short and long limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg 244(5):734–740CrossRefPubMed Christou NV, Look D, Maclean LD (2006) Weight gain after short and long limb gastric bypass in patients followed for longer than 10 years. Ann Surg 244(5):734–740CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Steele SR et al (2004) A case-match analysis of failed prior bariatric procedures converted to resectional gastric bypass. Am J Surg 187:666–671CrossRefPubMed Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Steele SR et al (2004) A case-match analysis of failed prior bariatric procedures converted to resectional gastric bypass. Am J Surg 187:666–671CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gagner M, Gentileschi P, de Csepel J et al (2002) Laparoscopic reoperative bariatric surgery: experience from 27 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 12:254–260CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Gentileschi P, de Csepel J et al (2002) Laparoscopic reoperative bariatric surgery: experience from 27 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 12:254–260CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jones KB (2005) Revisional surgery—potential safe and effective. SOARDS 599-603 Jones KB (2005) Revisional surgery—potential safe and effective. SOARDS 599-603
9.
go back to reference Khaitan L, Van Sickle K, Gonzalez R et al (2005) Laparoscopic revision of bariatric procedures: is it feasible? Am Surg 71(1):6–10PubMed Khaitan L, Van Sickle K, Gonzalez R et al (2005) Laparoscopic revision of bariatric procedures: is it feasible? Am Surg 71(1):6–10PubMed
10.
go back to reference Harris PL, Freedman BE, Bland KI et al (1987) Collagen content, histology, and tensile strength determinants of wound repair in various gastric stapling devices in a canine gastric partition model. Surg Res 42(4):411–417CrossRef Harris PL, Freedman BE, Bland KI et al (1987) Collagen content, histology, and tensile strength determinants of wound repair in various gastric stapling devices in a canine gastric partition model. Surg Res 42(4):411–417CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ethicon Wound Closure Manual (2004) The suture, p 28 Ethicon Wound Closure Manual (2004) The suture, p 28
12.
go back to reference Dobrin PB (1989) Surgical manipulation and the tensile strength of polypropylene sutures. J Surg Res 124(6):665–668 Dobrin PB (1989) Surgical manipulation and the tensile strength of polypropylene sutures. J Surg Res 124(6):665–668
13.
go back to reference Dobrin PB (1998) Some mechanical properties of polypropylene sutures relationship to the use of polypropylene in vascular surgery. J Surg Res 45(6):568–573CrossRef Dobrin PB (1998) Some mechanical properties of polypropylene sutures relationship to the use of polypropylene in vascular surgery. J Surg Res 45(6):568–573CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dobrin PB, Mrkvicka R (1998) Chronic loading and extension increases the acute breaking strength of polypropylene sutures. Ann Vasc Surg 12(5):424–429CrossRefPubMed Dobrin PB, Mrkvicka R (1998) Chronic loading and extension increases the acute breaking strength of polypropylene sutures. Ann Vasc Surg 12(5):424–429CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rothstein RI, Filipi CJ (2003) Endoscopic suturing for gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical outcome with the Bard EndoCinch. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 13(1):89–101CrossRefPubMed Rothstein RI, Filipi CJ (2003) Endoscopic suturing for gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical outcome with the Bard EndoCinch. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 13(1):89–101CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Natural orifice surgery: initial US experience utilizing the StomaphyXTM device to reduce gastric pouches after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Authors
Dean Mikami
Bradley Needleman
Vimal Narula
Janice Durant
W. Scott Melvin
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0640-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2010 Go to the issue