Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2010

01-01-2010

Quality assurance in flexible sigmoidoscopy: medical and nonmedical endoscopists

Authors: Sushil Maslekar, Philip Waudby, Ged Avery, J. R. T. Monson, Graeme Scott Duthie

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The clinical assessment of position in colon and hence completion during flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is believed to be inaccurate. The technique of applying endomucosal clips with follow-up X-ray has previously been used for establishing completion in colonoscopy. Furthermore, we have now trained non-healthcare professionals (non-medical endoscopists, NME) to perform FS, but there is no data on assessment of their performance of FS. We performed this study with the aims of determining accuracy of endoscopists’ clinical impression regarding actual position of endoscope in colon during FS, comparing medical (ME) and NME in terms of clinical accuracy, and to determine role of endomucosal clips with follow-up X-rays in documenting completion and hence quality assurance.

Methods

All patients undergoing elective FS, except those with surgical resection, were included, after ethics approval. During FS, endoscopist applied an endomucosal clip at most proximal bowel reached and endoscopists recorded their independent opinion about position of clip. Post procedure, all patients underwent an abdominal X-ray, reported by consultant radiologist, blinded to outcome of FS. X-ray results were compared with endoscopist findings. Complete FS was defined as one where descending colon was reached.

Results

Fifty-one patients, with median age of 55 years, participated in study. The endoscopists were accurate in their assessment of position in colon in 38 patients (75%). The attending nurse was accurate in only 31% of cases. The crude and corrected completion rates were 73% and 84%, respectively. There was no correlation between length of endoscope and its position in colon. There were no differences between NME and ME in terms of clinical accuracy.

Conclusion

This study has shown that clinical impression of endoscopist during FS regarding position is not very accurate, implying need for regular quality assurance. The technique of applying endomucosal clips with follow-on abdominal X-ray is an excellent objective measure of quality assurance in FS. NME can perform FS with comparable completion rates and accuracy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CPJ, Weiss NS (1992) A case–control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 326:653–657CrossRef Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CPJ, Weiss NS (1992) A case–control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 326:653–657CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gilbertsen VA, Nelms JM (1978) The prevention of invasive cancer of the rectum. Cancer 41:1137–1139CrossRefPubMed Gilbertsen VA, Nelms JM (1978) The prevention of invasive cancer of the rectum. Cancer 41:1137–1139CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Thompson M, Prytherch D (1996) Rectal bleeding: when is it right to refer? Practitioner 240:198–200PubMed Thompson M, Prytherch D (1996) Rectal bleeding: when is it right to refer? Practitioner 240:198–200PubMed
4.
go back to reference Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Northover JM, Whynes DK (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy. Lancet 341(8847):736–740CrossRefPubMed Atkin WS, Cuzick J, Northover JM, Whynes DK (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by once-only sigmoidoscopy. Lancet 341(8847):736–740CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Lehman GA, Buchner DM, Lappas JC (1983) Anatomical extent of fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 84:803–808PubMed Lehman GA, Buchner DM, Lappas JC (1983) Anatomical extent of fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 84:803–808PubMed
6.
go back to reference Stewart BT, Keck JO, Duncan AV et al (1999) Difficult or incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for a screening programme. Aust NZ J Surg 69:19–21CrossRef Stewart BT, Keck JO, Duncan AV et al (1999) Difficult or incomplete flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for a screening programme. Aust NZ J Surg 69:19–21CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Adam IJ, Ali Z, Shorthouse AJ (2000) How accurate is the endoscopist’s assessment of visualization of the left colon seen at flexible sigmoidoscopy? Colorectal Dis 2:41–44CrossRef Adam IJ, Ali Z, Shorthouse AJ (2000) How accurate is the endoscopist’s assessment of visualization of the left colon seen at flexible sigmoidoscopy? Colorectal Dis 2:41–44CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Maslekar S, Ramachadran M, Avery G, Duthie GS (2005) Role of endomucosal clips in quality assurance in colonoscopy. Endoscopy 27(Suppl 1):A274 Maslekar S, Ramachadran M, Avery G, Duthie GS (2005) Role of endomucosal clips in quality assurance in colonoscopy. Endoscopy 27(Suppl 1):A274
11.
go back to reference Investigators UFSST (2002) Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 359:1291–1300CrossRef Investigators UFSST (2002) Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 359:1291–1300CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thompson MR, Flashman KG, Wooldrage K, Rogers PA, Senapati A, O’Leary DP, Atkin W (2008) Flexible sigmoidoscopy and whole colonic imaging in the diagnosis of cancer in patients with colorectal symptoms. Br J Surg 95(9):1140–1146CrossRefPubMed Thompson MR, Flashman KG, Wooldrage K, Rogers PA, Senapati A, O’Leary DP, Atkin W (2008) Flexible sigmoidoscopy and whole colonic imaging in the diagnosis of cancer in patients with colorectal symptoms. Br J Surg 95(9):1140–1146CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Levin TR, Farraye FA, Schoen RE, Hoff G et al (2005) Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multisociety task group. Gut 54:807–813CrossRefPubMed Levin TR, Farraye FA, Schoen RE, Hoff G et al (2005) Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multisociety task group. Gut 54:807–813CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Maslekar MH, Skinn E, Gardiner A, Culbert B, Duthie GS (2006) Non-medical colonoscopists are safe and effective: results from randomised controlled trial. Gut 55:A5 Maslekar MH, Skinn E, Gardiner A, Culbert B, Duthie GS (2006) Non-medical colonoscopists are safe and effective: results from randomised controlled trial. Gut 55:A5
Metadata
Title
Quality assurance in flexible sigmoidoscopy: medical and nonmedical endoscopists
Authors
Sushil Maslekar
Philip Waudby
Ged Avery
J. R. T. Monson
Graeme Scott Duthie
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0553-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2010 Go to the issue