Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2010

01-07-2010

Nationwide survey on the operational status of electron accelerators for radiation therapy in Japan

Authors: Ichiro Yamaguchi, Shinji Tanaka, Toshioh Fujibuchi, Tetsuo Kida, Hiroaki Nagaoka, Hiroshi Watanabe

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

A nationwide survey was conducted on electron accelerators for radiation therapy in Japan for obtaining fundamental data on the actual operational situation of these accelerators. The research subjects were all medical institutions equipped with electron accelerators for radiation therapy (874 accelerators) in Japan. Postcards explaining the purpose and procedure of the survey were sent to each institution. Each institution was requested to download a questionnaire from the website and return it by e-mail. We obtained the following results. Energy: about 90% of the accelerators did not exceed 10 MeV as the permitted maximum energy. Beam intensity: a total of 94% of the accelerators did not exceed 4 Gy/min as the mean exposure dose rate. Beam time: a total of 74% of the accelerators were below half of the permitted maximum beam time. However, 2% of the accelerators exceeded 90% of the permitted maximum time. Cumulative dose: about 10% of institutions obtained permission not to use the maximum beam time, but to use the maximum cumulative dose to secure sufficient beam time. From these results, it became clear that the induced radioactivity based on the maximum beam current and the maximum operating time under an official permit would be overestimated. Therefore, the neutron dose should be assessed by use of a daily operational record, not from an official permit.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Japan Radioisotope Association. Statistics on the use of radiation in Japan. Tokyo: Japan Radioisotope Association; 2008. p. 9. Japan Radioisotope Association. Statistics on the use of radiation in Japan. Tokyo: Japan Radioisotope Association; 2008. p. 9.
2.
go back to reference Followill DS, Stovall MS, Kry SF, Ibbott GS. Neutron source strength measurements for Varian, Siemens, Elekta, and General Electric linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003;4:189–94.CrossRefPubMed Followill DS, Stovall MS, Kry SF, Ibbott GS. Neutron source strength measurements for Varian, Siemens, Elekta, and General Electric linear accelerators. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003;4:189–94.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chibani O, Ma CM. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs. Med Phys. 2003;30:1990–2000.CrossRefPubMed Chibani O, Ma CM. Photonuclear dose calculations for high-energy photon beams from Siemens and Varian linacs. Med Phys. 2003;30:1990–2000.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Perrin B, Walker A, Mackay R. A model to calculate the induced dose rate around an 18 MV ELEKTA linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:N75–81.CrossRefPubMed Perrin B, Walker A, Mackay R. A model to calculate the induced dose rate around an 18 MV ELEKTA linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:N75–81.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim HS, Park YH, Koo BC, Kwon JW, Lee JS, Choi HS. Evaluation of the photoneutron field produced in a medical linear accelerator. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2007;123:323–8.CrossRef Kim HS, Park YH, Koo BC, Kwon JW, Lee JS, Choi HS. Evaluation of the photoneutron field produced in a medical linear accelerator. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2007;123:323–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Falcão RC, Facure A, Silva AX. Neutron dose calculation at the maze entrance of medical linear accelerator rooms. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2007;123:283–7.CrossRef Falcão RC, Facure A, Silva AX. Neutron dose calculation at the maze entrance of medical linear accelerator rooms. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2007;123:283–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Powell NL, Newing A, Bullen MA, Sims C, Leaton SF. A radiation safety survey on a Clinac-20 linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 1987;32:707–18.CrossRefPubMed Powell NL, Newing A, Bullen MA, Sims C, Leaton SF. A radiation safety survey on a Clinac-20 linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 1987;32:707–18.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ahlgren L, Olsson LE. Induced activity in a high-energy linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 1988;33:351–4.CrossRefPubMed Ahlgren L, Olsson LE. Induced activity in a high-energy linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 1988;33:351–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference The interim report of the MEXT radiation safety regulation committee. 2006 (in Japanese). The interim report of the MEXT radiation safety regulation committee. 2006 (in Japanese).
10.
go back to reference Ohishi K, Kosako K, Kobayashi Y, Sonoki I, Nakamura T. Consideration to shielding design calculation of radiation oncology. Electron linac facility whose energy is greater than 10 MeV. Radioisotopes. 2008;57:277–86 (in Japanese).CrossRef Ohishi K, Kosako K, Kobayashi Y, Sonoki I, Nakamura T. Consideration to shielding design calculation of radiation oncology. Electron linac facility whose energy is greater than 10 MeV. Radioisotopes. 2008;57:277–86 (in Japanese).CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rawlinson JA, Islam MK, Galbraith DM. Dose to radiation therapists from activation at high-energy accelerators used for conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2002;29:598–608.CrossRefPubMed Rawlinson JA, Islam MK, Galbraith DM. Dose to radiation therapists from activation at high-energy accelerators used for conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2002;29:598–608.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference IAEA Safety Reports Series No. 47. Radiation protection in the design of radiotherapy facilities. 2006. IAEA Safety Reports Series No. 47. Radiation protection in the design of radiotherapy facilities. 2006.
Metadata
Title
Nationwide survey on the operational status of electron accelerators for radiation therapy in Japan
Authors
Ichiro Yamaguchi
Shinji Tanaka
Toshioh Fujibuchi
Tetsuo Kida
Hiroaki Nagaoka
Hiroshi Watanabe
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-010-0083-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2010 Go to the issue