Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2010

01-07-2010

Comparison of detectability of a simple object with low contrast displayed on a high-brightness color LCD and a monochrome LCD

Authors: Keita Takahashi, Junji Morishita, Takeshi Hiwasa, Shiro Hatanaka, Shuji Sakai, Noriyuki Hashimoto, Yasuhiko Nakamura, Fukai Toyofuku, Yoshiharu Higashida, Masafumi Ohki

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of the different luminance settings of a high-brightness color liquid-crystal display (LCD) on the detectability of a simple grayscale object with low contrast by use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The detectability of a high-brightness color LCD with two maximum-luminance settings (500 and 170 cd/m2) was compared with the detectability of a monochrome LCD (500 cd/m2). The two LCDs used in this study were calibrated to the grayscale standard display function. The average areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) and the standard deviations for all thirteen observers for the 500 cd/m2 color LCD, 500 cd/m2 monochrome LCD, and 170 cd/m2 color LCD were 0.937 ± 0.040, 0.924 ± 0.056, and 0.915 ± 0.068, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the average AUCs among the three LCD monitor conditions. On the other hand, the total observation time for the 170 cd/m2 color LCD was significantly shorter than that for the 500 cd/m2 color and monochrome LCDs (p < 0.05). Irrespective of the maximum luminance settings (500 and 170 cd/m2), the color LCD provided a performance comparable to the monochrome LCD for detection of a simple grayscale object with low contrast.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Barten PGJ. Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 1999.CrossRef Barten PGJ. Contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its effects on image quality. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 1999.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Digital imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 14: grayscale standard display function PS 3.14-2007. VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2007. http://www.nema.org/stds/ps3-14.cfm. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Digital imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 14: grayscale standard display function PS 3.14-2007. VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2007. http://​www.​nema.​org/​stds/​ps3-14.​cfm.
6.
go back to reference Herron MJ, Bender TM, Campbell WL, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Gur D. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs. Radiology. 2000;215:169–74.PubMed Herron MJ, Bender TM, Campbell WL, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Gur D. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs. Radiology. 2000;215:169–74.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Goo JM, Choi JY, Im JG, Lee HJ, Chung MJ, Han D, et al. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs. Radiology. 2004;232:762–6.CrossRefPubMed Goo JM, Choi JY, Im JG, Lee HJ, Chung MJ, Han D, et al. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs. Radiology. 2004;232:762–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ishihara S, Shimamoto K, Ikeda M, Kato K, Mori Y, Ishiguchi T, et al. CRT diagnosis of pulmonary disease: influence of monitor brightness and room illuminance on observer performance. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2002;26:181–5.CrossRefPubMed Ishihara S, Shimamoto K, Ikeda M, Kato K, Mori Y, Ishiguchi T, et al. CRT diagnosis of pulmonary disease: influence of monitor brightness and room illuminance on observer performance. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2002;26:181–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Samei E, Poola A, Ulissey JM, Lewin MJ. Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:539–46.CrossRefPubMed Samei E, Poola A, Ulissey JM, Lewin MJ. Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:539–46.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ikeda R, Katsuragawa S, Shimonobou T, Hiai Y, Hashida M, Awai K, et al. Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Jpn J Rad Tech. 2006;62:734–41 (in Japanese). Ikeda R, Katsuragawa S, Shimonobou T, Hiai Y, Hashida M, Awai K, et al. Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Jpn J Rad Tech. 2006;62:734–41 (in Japanese).
11.
go back to reference Krupinski EA, Roehrig H, Jiahua F, Yoneda T. High luminance monochrome vs low luminance monochrome and color soft-copy displays: observer performance and visual search efficiency, vol 6515. In: Proceedings of SPIE; 2007. p. 65150R-1–5. Krupinski EA, Roehrig H, Jiahua F, Yoneda T. High luminance monochrome vs low luminance monochrome and color soft-copy displays: observer performance and visual search efficiency, vol 6515. In: Proceedings of SPIE; 2007. p. 65150R-1–5.
12.
go back to reference Araki Y, Sanada S, Kobayashi T, Hashimoto N, Funabasama S. Evaluation of the perceptional performance of high resolution flat panel displays. Jpn J Rad Tech. 2005;61:1151–7 (in Japanese). Araki Y, Sanada S, Kobayashi T, Hashimoto N, Funabasama S. Evaluation of the perceptional performance of high resolution flat panel displays. Jpn J Rad Tech. 2005;61:1151–7 (in Japanese).
13.
go back to reference Kimura N, Fujioka K. Fundamentals of liquid crystal displays and its recent technology. Jpn J Rad Tech. 2004;60:1361–8 (in Japanese). Kimura N, Fujioka K. Fundamentals of liquid crystal displays and its recent technology. Jpn J Rad Tech. 2004;60:1361–8 (in Japanese).
14.
go back to reference Hashimoto N. Image display devices (1). Jpn J Rad Tech. 2002;58:1297–302 (in Japanese). Hashimoto N. Image display devices (1). Jpn J Rad Tech. 2002;58:1297–302 (in Japanese).
15.
go back to reference Morishita J, Dogomori K, Hatanaka S, Hiwasa T, Nakamura Y, Hashimoto N, et al. Effect of test patterns on measurement of the luminance of LCD devices by use of a telescopic-type luminance meter. Radiol Phys Technol. 2008;1:95–9.CrossRef Morishita J, Dogomori K, Hatanaka S, Hiwasa T, Nakamura Y, Hashimoto N, et al. Effect of test patterns on measurement of the luminance of LCD devices by use of a telescopic-type luminance meter. Radiol Phys Technol. 2008;1:95–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Takahashi K, Sueoka M, Yoon Y, Hiwasa T, Hatanaka S, Nakamura Y, et al. Detectability of a lung nodule displayed on a liquid-crystal display monitor with different maximum luminance settings. Radiol Phys Technol. 2010;3:10–5.CrossRef Takahashi K, Sueoka M, Yoon Y, Hiwasa T, Hatanaka S, Nakamura Y, et al. Detectability of a lung nodule displayed on a liquid-crystal display monitor with different maximum luminance settings. Radiol Phys Technol. 2010;3:10–5.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Metz CE. Fundamental ROC analysis. In: Beutel J, editor. Handbook of medical imaging: physics and psychophysics. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 2000. pp. 751–64.CrossRef Metz CE. Fundamental ROC analysis. In: Beutel J, editor. Handbook of medical imaging: physics and psychophysics. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 2000. pp. 751–64.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pisano ED, Chandramouli J, Hemminger BM, Glueck D, Eugene Johnston R, Muller K, et al. The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting. J Digital Imaging. 1997;10:174–82.CrossRef Pisano ED, Chandramouli J, Hemminger BM, Glueck D, Eugene Johnston R, Muller K, et al. The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting. J Digital Imaging. 1997;10:174–82.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:723–31.CrossRefPubMed Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:723–31.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Metz CE, Pan X. “Proper” binormal ROC curves: theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. J Math Psychol. 1999;43:1–33.CrossRefPubMed Metz CE, Pan X. “Proper” binormal ROC curves: theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. J Math Psychol. 1999;43:1–33.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pesce LL, Metz CE. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of “proper” binormal ROC curves. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:814–29.CrossRefPubMed Pesce LL, Metz CE. Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of “proper” binormal ROC curves. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:814–29.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wagner RF, Metz CE, Campbell G. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:723–48.CrossRefPubMed Wagner RF, Metz CE, Campbell G. Assessment of medical imaging systems and computer aids: a tutorial review. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:723–48.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Roehrig H, Dallas WJ, Krupinski EA, Redford GR. Measurement of luminance noise and chromaticity noise of LCDs with a colorimeter and a color camera, vol 6707. In: Proceedings of SPIE; 2007. p. 67070V. Roehrig H, Dallas WJ, Krupinski EA, Redford GR. Measurement of luminance noise and chromaticity noise of LCDs with a colorimeter and a color camera, vol 6707. In: Proceedings of SPIE; 2007. p. 67070V.
25.
go back to reference Pollard BJ, Chawla AS, Delong DM, Hashimoto N, Samei E. Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions. Med Phys. 2008;35:2204–13.CrossRefPubMed Pollard BJ, Chawla AS, Delong DM, Hashimoto N, Samei E. Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions. Med Phys. 2008;35:2204–13.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chawla AS, Samei E. Ambient illumination revisited: a new adaptation-based approach for optimizing medical imaging reading environments. Med Phys. 2007;34:81–90.CrossRefPubMed Chawla AS, Samei E. Ambient illumination revisited: a new adaptation-based approach for optimizing medical imaging reading environments. Med Phys. 2007;34:81–90.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of detectability of a simple object with low contrast displayed on a high-brightness color LCD and a monochrome LCD
Authors
Keita Takahashi
Junji Morishita
Takeshi Hiwasa
Shiro Hatanaka
Shuji Sakai
Noriyuki Hashimoto
Yasuhiko Nakamura
Fukai Toyofuku
Yoshiharu Higashida
Masafumi Ohki
Publication date
01-07-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-010-0095-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Radiological Physics and Technology 2/2010 Go to the issue