Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports 5/2016

01-10-2016 | Regenerative Biology and Medicine in Osteoporosis (T Webster, Section Editor)

Nanotechnology Treatment Options for Osteoporosis and Its Corresponding Consequences

Authors: Donglei Wei, Jinsuh Jung, Huilin Yang, David A. Stout, Lei Yang

Published in: Current Osteoporosis Reports | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Unfortunately, osteoporosis, as a worldwide disease, is challenging human health with treatment only available for the symptoms of osteoporosis without managing the disease itself. Osteoporosis can be linked as the common cause of fractures and increased mortality among post-menopausal women, men, and the elderly. Regrettably, due to osteoporosis, incidents of fractures are more frequent among the presented populations and can be afflictive for carrying out everyday life activities. Current treatments of osteoporosis encompass changing lifestyles, taking orthopedic drugs, and invasive surgeries. However, these treatment options are not long lasting and can lead to complications after post-surgical life. Therefore, to solve this impairment, researchers have turned to nanotechnologies and nanomaterials to create innovative and alternative treatments associated with the consequences of osteoporosis. This review article provides an introduction to osteoporotic compression vertebral fractures (OVCFs) and current clinical treatments, along with the rationale and efficacy of utilizing nanomaterials to modify and improve biomaterials or instruments. The methods of applying bioactive agents (bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), parathyroid hormone 1–34 (PTH 1–34)), as well as 3D printing will be presented from an osteoporosis treatment perspective. Additionally, the application of nanoparticles and nanotube arrays onto the current surgical treatments and orthopedic drug administration methods addressed will show that these systems reinforce a better mechanical performance and provide precise and slow-releasing drug delivery for better osseointegration, bone regeneration, and bone strength. In summary, nanomaterials can be seen as an alternative and more effective treatment for individuals with osteoporosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Organization WH. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study group [meeting held in Rome from 22 to 25 June 1992]. 1994. Organization WH. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study group [meeting held in Rome from 22 to 25 June 1992]. 1994.
2.
go back to reference Ritchie RO et al. A fracture mechanics and mechanistic approach to the failure of cortical bone. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2005;28(4):345–71.CrossRef Ritchie RO et al. A fracture mechanics and mechanistic approach to the failure of cortical bone. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2005;28(4):345–71.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Riggs BL, Melton LR. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone. 1995;17(5):S505–11.CrossRef Riggs BL, Melton LR. The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone. 1995;17(5):S505–11.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Johnell O, Kanis J. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726–33.CrossRefPubMed Johnell O, Kanis J. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726–33.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Svedbom A et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8(1–2):1–218. Svedbom A et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8(1–2):1–218.
6.
go back to reference Consensus N. Development panel on osteoporosis: prevention, diagnosis and therapy. J Am Med Assoc. 2001; 285(11). Consensus N. Development panel on osteoporosis: prevention, diagnosis and therapy. J Am Med Assoc. 2001; 285(11).
7.
go back to reference Khajuria DK, Razdan R, Mahapatra DR. Drugs for the management of osteoporosis: a review. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2011;51(4):372–82.CrossRef Khajuria DK, Razdan R, Mahapatra DR. Drugs for the management of osteoporosis: a review. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2011;51(4):372–82.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cummings SR et al. Goal‐directed treatment of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(3):433–8.CrossRefPubMed Cummings SR et al. Goal‐directed treatment of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(3):433–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Balasundaram G. et al. Nanomaterials for osteoporosis treatment. In Bioengineering Conference, 2005. Proceedings of the IEEE 31st Annual Northeast. 2005. IEEE. Balasundaram G. et al. Nanomaterials for osteoporosis treatment. In Bioengineering Conference, 2005. Proceedings of the IEEE 31st Annual Northeast. 2005. IEEE.
10.
go back to reference Arcos D et al. The relevance of biomaterials to the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(5):1793–805.CrossRefPubMed Arcos D et al. The relevance of biomaterials to the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(5):1793–805.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Emkey GR, Epstein S. Secondary osteoporosis: pathophysiology & diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;28(6):911–35.CrossRefPubMed Emkey GR, Epstein S. Secondary osteoporosis: pathophysiology & diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;28(6):911–35.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Riggs B et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging: differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. J Clin Investig. 1982;70(4):716.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Riggs B et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging: differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. J Clin Investig. 1982;70(4):716.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Krege JH et al. Relationship between vertebral fracture burden, height loss, and pulmonary function in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom. 2015;18(4):506–11.CrossRefPubMed Krege JH et al. Relationship between vertebral fracture burden, height loss, and pulmonary function in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Clin Densitom. 2015;18(4):506–11.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Soriano R et al. Current and future treatments of secondary osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;28(6):885–94.CrossRefPubMed Soriano R et al. Current and future treatments of secondary osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;28(6):885–94.CrossRefPubMed
16.••
go back to reference Gao C et al. Nanotechnology for treating osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:5139. The first review for treating osteoporotic vertebral fractures with nanotechnology.PubMedPubMedCentral Gao C et al. Nanotechnology for treating osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:5139. The first review for treating osteoporotic vertebral fractures with nanotechnology.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference de Souza MPG. Osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. Rev Bras Ortop (Engl Ed). 2010;45(3):220–9. de Souza MPG. Osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment. Rev Bras Ortop (Engl Ed). 2010;45(3):220–9.
18.
go back to reference Ulmar B et al. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis in 120 traumatic lumbar and thoracic burst fractures: evaluation in lateral X-rays and sagittal computed tomographies. Eur Spine J. 2009;19(4):558–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ulmar B et al. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis in 120 traumatic lumbar and thoracic burst fractures: evaluation in lateral X-rays and sagittal computed tomographies. Eur Spine J. 2009;19(4):558–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Papaioannou A et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182(17):1864–73.CrossRef Papaioannou A et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182(17):1864–73.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Garriguet D. Bone health: osteoporosis, calcium and vitamin D. Health Rep. 2011;22(3):7. Garriguet D. Bone health: osteoporosis, calcium and vitamin D. Health Rep. 2011;22(3):7.
21.
go back to reference Lyles KW et al. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1799–809.CrossRefPubMed Lyles KW et al. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1799–809.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Black DM et al. Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(18):1809–22.CrossRefPubMed Black DM et al. Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(18):1809–22.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Body J-J. Calcitonin for the long-term prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone. 2002;30(5):75–9.CrossRef Body J-J. Calcitonin for the long-term prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone. 2002;30(5):75–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gennari C. Analgesic effect of calcitonin in osteoporosis. Bone. 2002;30(5):67–70.CrossRef Gennari C. Analgesic effect of calcitonin in osteoporosis. Bone. 2002;30(5):67–70.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Spivak JM, Johnson MG. Percutaneous treatment of vertebral body pathology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(1):6–17.CrossRefPubMed Spivak JM, Johnson MG. Percutaneous treatment of vertebral body pathology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(1):6–17.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bouza C et al. Balloon kyphoplasty in malignant spinal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Palliat Care. 2009;8(1):1.CrossRef Bouza C et al. Balloon kyphoplasty in malignant spinal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Palliat Care. 2009;8(1):1.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Esses SI et al. The treatment of symptomatic osteoporotic spinal compression fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(3):176–82.CrossRefPubMed Esses SI et al. The treatment of symptomatic osteoporotic spinal compression fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(3):176–82.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Baheti MJ, Toshniwal NG. Nanotechnology: a boon to dentistry. J Dent Sci Oral Rehabil. 2014;5:78–88. Baheti MJ, Toshniwal NG. Nanotechnology: a boon to dentistry. J Dent Sci Oral Rehabil. 2014;5:78–88.
29.
go back to reference Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2001;19(3):97–101.CrossRefPubMed Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2001;19(3):97–101.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC. Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53(2):283–318.PubMed Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC. Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice. Pharmacol Rev. 2001;53(2):283–318.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Wilkinson J. Nanotechnology applications in medicine. Medical Device Technol. 2003;14(5):29–31. Wilkinson J. Nanotechnology applications in medicine. Medical Device Technol. 2003;14(5):29–31.
32.
go back to reference Panyam J, Labhasetwar V. Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(3):329–47.CrossRefPubMed Panyam J, Labhasetwar V. Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery to cells and tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(3):329–47.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Hassim A. and H. Rachmawati. Preparation and characterization of calcium carbonate nanoparticles. In The Third Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Symposium 2010 (NNSB2010). 2010; AIP Publishing. Hassim A. and H. Rachmawati. Preparation and characterization of calcium carbonate nanoparticles. In The Third Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Symposium 2010 (NNSB2010). 2010; AIP Publishing.
34.
go back to reference Noor Z. Nanohydroxyapatite application to osteoporosis management. J Osteoporos. 2013; 2013. Noor Z. Nanohydroxyapatite application to osteoporosis management. J Osteoporos. 2013; 2013.
35.
go back to reference Meirelles L et al. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2008;87A(2):299–307.CrossRef Meirelles L et al. Nano hydroxyapatite structures influence early bone formation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2008;87A(2):299–307.CrossRef
36.••
go back to reference Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials. 1999;20(13):1221–7. The first study indicates the improvement of cell functions by nanostructured surfaces. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials. 1999;20(13):1221–7. The first study indicates the improvement of cell functions by nanostructured surfaces.
37.•
go back to reference Webster TJ et al. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials. 2000;21(17):1803–10. An important early reference on nanomaterial-enhanced cell functions.CrossRefPubMed Webster TJ et al. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials. 2000;21(17):1803–10. An important early reference on nanomaterial-enhanced cell functions.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Liu H, Webster TJ. Nanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials. 2007;28(2):354–69.CrossRefPubMed Liu H, Webster TJ. Nanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials. 2007;28(2):354–69.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Ayre WN, Denyer SP, Evans SL. Ageing and moisture uptake in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;32(100):76–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ayre WN, Denyer SP, Evans SL. Ageing and moisture uptake in polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;32(100):76–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.•
go back to reference Perni S et al. Antimicrobial activity of bone cements embedded with organic nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:6317. This study highlights the antibacterial activities of PMMA after applying paraben nanoparticles. Perni S et al. Antimicrobial activity of bone cements embedded with organic nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:6317. This study highlights the antibacterial activities of PMMA after applying paraben nanoparticles.
41.
go back to reference Perry A et al. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. Spine J. 2005;5(5):489–93.CrossRefPubMed Perry A et al. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. Spine J. 2005;5(5):489–93.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Li T et al. Influence of nano-HA coated bone collagen to acrylic (polymethylmethacrylate) bone cement on mechanical properties and bioactivity. PLoS One. 2015;10(6), e0129018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li T et al. Influence of nano-HA coated bone collagen to acrylic (polymethylmethacrylate) bone cement on mechanical properties and bioactivity. PLoS One. 2015;10(6), e0129018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.•
go back to reference Gillani R et al. Nanofunctionalized zirconia and barium sulfate particles as bone cement additives. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010;5:1–11. Bone cements containing nanometer ZrO2 or BaSO4 particles functionalized with TMS showed the most promise for improving cytocompatibility properties and promoting plastic. Gillani R et al. Nanofunctionalized zirconia and barium sulfate particles as bone cement additives. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010;5:1–11. Bone cements containing nanometer ZrO2 or BaSO4 particles functionalized with TMS showed the most promise for improving cytocompatibility properties and promoting plastic.
44.
go back to reference Khandaker M et al. Effect of additive particles on mechanical, thermal, and cell functioning properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:2699–712.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khandaker M et al. Effect of additive particles on mechanical, thermal, and cell functioning properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:2699–712.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.•
go back to reference Ricker A, Liu-Snyder P, Webster TJ. The influence of nano MgO and BaSO(4) particle size additives on properties of PMMA bone cement. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(1):125–32. Bone cement of PMMA with nanoparticles of MgO and BaSO 4 reduced harmful exothermic reactions of PMMA during solidification and increased radiopacity, respectively. Ricker A, Liu-Snyder P, Webster TJ. The influence of nano MgO and BaSO(4) particle size additives on properties of PMMA bone cement. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(1):125–32. Bone cement of PMMA with nanoparticles of MgO and BaSO 4 reduced harmful exothermic reactions of PMMA during solidification and increased radiopacity, respectively.
46.
go back to reference Gutiérrez-Mejía A et al. Synthesis and characterization of core–shell nanoparticles and their influence on the mechanical behavior of acrylic bone cements. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33(3):1737–43.CrossRef Gutiérrez-Mejía A et al. Synthesis and characterization of core–shell nanoparticles and their influence on the mechanical behavior of acrylic bone cements. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33(3):1737–43.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Shea TM et al. Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:748393.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shea TM et al. Designs and techniques that improve the pullout strength of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: current status. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:748393.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference Hesaraki S et al. Polymerizable nanoparticulate silica-reinforced calcium phosphate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100B(6):1627–35.CrossRef Hesaraki S et al. Polymerizable nanoparticulate silica-reinforced calcium phosphate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100B(6):1627–35.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Fedorovich NE et al. Three-dimensional fiber deposition of cell-laden, viable, patterned constructs for bone tissue printing. Tissue Eng A. 2008;14(1):127–33.CrossRef Fedorovich NE et al. Three-dimensional fiber deposition of cell-laden, viable, patterned constructs for bone tissue printing. Tissue Eng A. 2008;14(1):127–33.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Boland T et al. Application of inkjet printing to tissue engineering. Biotechnol J. 2006;1(9):910–7.CrossRefPubMed Boland T et al. Application of inkjet printing to tissue engineering. Biotechnol J. 2006;1(9):910–7.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Ferris CJ, Gilmore KG, Wallace GG. Biofabrication: an overview of the approaches used for printing of living cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(10):4243–58.CrossRefPubMed Ferris CJ, Gilmore KG, Wallace GG. Biofabrication: an overview of the approaches used for printing of living cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(10):4243–58.CrossRefPubMed
52.
53.
go back to reference Fedorovich NE et al. Hydrogels as extracellular matrices for skeletal tissue engineering: state-of-the-art and novel application in organ printing. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(8):1905–25.CrossRefPubMed Fedorovich NE et al. Hydrogels as extracellular matrices for skeletal tissue engineering: state-of-the-art and novel application in organ printing. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(8):1905–25.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Fedorovich NE et al. Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2011;18(1):33–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fedorovich NE et al. Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2011;18(1):33–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
go back to reference Cohen DL et al. Direct freeform fabrication of seeded hydrogels in arbitrary geometries. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(5):1325–35.CrossRefPubMed Cohen DL et al. Direct freeform fabrication of seeded hydrogels in arbitrary geometries. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(5):1325–35.CrossRefPubMed
56.
57.
go back to reference Lee JW et al. Evaluating cell proliferation based on internal pore size and 3D scaffold architecture fabricated using solid freeform fabrication technology. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(12):3195–205.CrossRefPubMed Lee JW et al. Evaluating cell proliferation based on internal pore size and 3D scaffold architecture fabricated using solid freeform fabrication technology. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(12):3195–205.CrossRefPubMed
58.
go back to reference Taboas J et al. Indirect solid free form fabrication of local and global porous, biomimetic and composite 3D polymer-ceramic scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2003;24(1):181–94.CrossRefPubMed Taboas J et al. Indirect solid free form fabrication of local and global porous, biomimetic and composite 3D polymer-ceramic scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2003;24(1):181–94.CrossRefPubMed
60.
go back to reference Tamimi F et al. Osseointegration of dental implants in 3D-printed synthetic onlay grafts customized according to bone metabolic activity in recipient site. Biomaterials. 2014;35(21):5436–45.CrossRefPubMed Tamimi F et al. Osseointegration of dental implants in 3D-printed synthetic onlay grafts customized according to bone metabolic activity in recipient site. Biomaterials. 2014;35(21):5436–45.CrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Poldervaart MT et al. Prolonged presence of VEGF promotes vascularization in 3D bioprinted scaffolds with defined architecture. J Control Release. 2014;184:58–66.CrossRefPubMed Poldervaart MT et al. Prolonged presence of VEGF promotes vascularization in 3D bioprinted scaffolds with defined architecture. J Control Release. 2014;184:58–66.CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Gaebel R et al. Patterning human stem cells and endothelial cells with laser printing for cardiac regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32(35):9218–30.CrossRefPubMed Gaebel R et al. Patterning human stem cells and endothelial cells with laser printing for cardiac regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32(35):9218–30.CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference Zieber L et al. Microfabrication of channel arrays promotes vessel-like network formation in cardiac cell construct and vascularization in vivo. Biofabrication. 2014;6(2):024102.CrossRefPubMed Zieber L et al. Microfabrication of channel arrays promotes vessel-like network formation in cardiac cell construct and vascularization in vivo. Biofabrication. 2014;6(2):024102.CrossRefPubMed
64.
go back to reference Rezwan K et al. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(18):3413–31.CrossRefPubMed Rezwan K et al. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(18):3413–31.CrossRefPubMed
65.
go back to reference Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL. Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci. 2004;4(8):743–65.CrossRefPubMed Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL. Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci. 2004;4(8):743–65.CrossRefPubMed
66.
go back to reference Do AV et al. 3D printing of scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2015;4(12):1742–62.CrossRef Do AV et al. 3D printing of scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2015;4(12):1742–62.CrossRef
67.••
go back to reference Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today. 2013;16(12):496–504. A compressive review on 3D printing for tissue engineering.CrossRef Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A. Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today. 2013;16(12):496–504. A compressive review on 3D printing for tissue engineering.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Suwanprateeb J et al. Mechanical and in vitro performance of apatite–wollastonite glass ceramic reinforced hydroxyapatite composite fabricated by 3D-printing. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(6):1281–9.CrossRefPubMed Suwanprateeb J et al. Mechanical and in vitro performance of apatite–wollastonite glass ceramic reinforced hydroxyapatite composite fabricated by 3D-printing. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(6):1281–9.CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference Suwanprateeb J, Sanngam R, Suwanpreuk W. Fabrication of bioactive hydroxyapatite/bis-GMA based composite via three dimensional printing. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19(7):2637–45.CrossRefPubMed Suwanprateeb J, Sanngam R, Suwanpreuk W. Fabrication of bioactive hydroxyapatite/bis-GMA based composite via three dimensional printing. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19(7):2637–45.CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Lee CH et al. Three-dimensional printed multiphase scaffolds for regeneration of periodontium complex. Tissue Eng A. 2014;20(7–8):1342–51.CrossRef Lee CH et al. Three-dimensional printed multiphase scaffolds for regeneration of periodontium complex. Tissue Eng A. 2014;20(7–8):1342–51.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Zhou Z et al. Printability of calcium phosphate: calcium sulfate powders for the application of tissue engineered bone scaffolds using the 3D printing technique. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;38:1–10.CrossRef Zhou Z et al. Printability of calcium phosphate: calcium sulfate powders for the application of tissue engineered bone scaffolds using the 3D printing technique. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;38:1–10.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Dellinger JG, Eurell JAC, Jamison RD. Bone response to 3D periodic hydroxyapatite scaffolds with and without tailored microporosity to deliver bone morphogenetic protein 2. J Biomed Mat Res Part A. 2006;76(2):366–76.CrossRef Dellinger JG, Eurell JAC, Jamison RD. Bone response to 3D periodic hydroxyapatite scaffolds with and without tailored microporosity to deliver bone morphogenetic protein 2. J Biomed Mat Res Part A. 2006;76(2):366–76.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Kanczler JM et al. The effect of the delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone morphogenic protein-2 to osteoprogenitor cell populations on bone formation. Biomaterials. 2010;31(6):1242–50.CrossRefPubMed Kanczler JM et al. The effect of the delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone morphogenic protein-2 to osteoprogenitor cell populations on bone formation. Biomaterials. 2010;31(6):1242–50.CrossRefPubMed
74.•
go back to reference Liu H, Webster TJ. Ceramic/polymer nanocomposites with tunable drug delivery capability at specific disease sites. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2010;93A(3):1180–92. Successful in vitro mice studies showed DIF-7c mobilized onto nano-HA placed in PLGA can promote bone regeneration. Liu H, Webster TJ. Ceramic/polymer nanocomposites with tunable drug delivery capability at specific disease sites. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2010;93A(3):1180–92. Successful in vitro mice studies showed DIF-7c mobilized onto nano-HA placed in PLGA can promote bone regeneration.
75.
go back to reference Xin Y et al. Bioactive SrTiO3 nanotube arrays: strontium delivery platform on Ti-based osteoporotic bone implants. ACS Nano. 2009;3(10):3228–34.CrossRefPubMed Xin Y et al. Bioactive SrTiO3 nanotube arrays: strontium delivery platform on Ti-based osteoporotic bone implants. ACS Nano. 2009;3(10):3228–34.CrossRefPubMed
76.••
go back to reference Ortega-Oller I et al. Bone regeneration from PLGA micro-nanoparticles. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:415289. Discusses the mechanism of BMPs and supports the potential of BMP to cause severe complications.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ortega-Oller I et al. Bone regeneration from PLGA micro-nanoparticles. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:415289. Discusses the mechanism of BMPs and supports the potential of BMP to cause severe complications.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
77.
go back to reference Shadjou N, Hasanzadeh M. Silica-based mesoporous nanobiomaterials as promoter of bone regeneration process. J Biomed Materials Research Part A. 2015;103(11):3703–16.CrossRef Shadjou N, Hasanzadeh M. Silica-based mesoporous nanobiomaterials as promoter of bone regeneration process. J Biomed Materials Research Part A. 2015;103(11):3703–16.CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Kyllönen L et al. Local drug delivery for enhancing fracture healing in osteoporotic bone. Acta Biomater. 2015;11:412–34.CrossRefPubMed Kyllönen L et al. Local drug delivery for enhancing fracture healing in osteoporotic bone. Acta Biomater. 2015;11:412–34.CrossRefPubMed
80.
go back to reference Ponnapakkam T et al. Treating osteoporosis by targeting parathyroid hormone to bone. Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(3):204–8.CrossRefPubMed Ponnapakkam T et al. Treating osteoporosis by targeting parathyroid hormone to bone. Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(3):204–8.CrossRefPubMed
81.
go back to reference Narayanan D et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of osteoporosis therapeutic peptide PTH 1–34 loaded PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles. Mol Pharm. 2013;10(11):4159–67.CrossRefPubMed Narayanan D et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of osteoporosis therapeutic peptide PTH 1–34 loaded PEGylated chitosan nanoparticles. Mol Pharm. 2013;10(11):4159–67.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Nanotechnology Treatment Options for Osteoporosis and Its Corresponding Consequences
Authors
Donglei Wei
Jinsuh Jung
Huilin Yang
David A. Stout
Lei Yang
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Osteoporosis Reports / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1544-1873
Electronic ISSN: 1544-2241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-016-0324-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Current Osteoporosis Reports 5/2016 Go to the issue

Craniofacial Skeleton (WE Roberts, Section Editor)

Osteonecrosis of the Jaw—a Bone Site-Specific Effect of Bisphosphonates

Epidemiology and Pathophysiology (J Cauley and B Dawson-Hughes, Section Editors)

Fibrous Dysplasia/McCune-Albright Syndrome: Clinical and Translational Perspectives

Secondary Causes of Osteoporosis (SJ Warden, Section Editor)

Do Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) Cause Fractures?

Osteoporosis and Cancer (M Nanes and M Drake, Section Editors)

MicroRNA Exert Macro Effects on Cancer Bone Metastasis