Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Myasthenia Gravis | Research

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study of the clinical burden in myasthenia gravis

Authors: Linda Harris, Sophie Graham, Sharon MacLachlan, Alex Exuzides, Saiju Jacob

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) often experience debilitating exacerbations, with the possibility of life-threatening respiratory crises requiring hospitalization. Long-term longitudinal studies are needed to understand the burden of MG, including in patients whose disease is refractory to conventional treatment.

Methods

A retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study was conducted of patients in England aged ≥ 18 years with treatment-refractory or non-refractory MG, using data recorded during 1997–2016 in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and the Hospital Episode Statistics databases. A control cohort of patients without MG, matched to the patients in the treatment-refractory MG cohort, was also identified. Outcome measures included myasthenic crises, MG exacerbations, MG-related hospitalizations, comorbidities, and all-cause mortality. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the overall MG population. For continuous variables, between-cohort comparisons were made using t tests for normally distributed data and Mann–Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed data. For categorical data, the comparisons were made by chi-squared tests. Differences in clinical outcomes between cohorts were modeled using negative binomial regression.

Results

A total of 1149 patients with MG were included. Overall, 18.4% of patients experienced myasthenic crises, 24.6% experienced exacerbations, and 38.6% underwent MG-related hospitalizations. Most of these events occurred within 2–3 years of diagnosis. Patients with MG refractory to conventional treatment (n = 66) experienced more exacerbations and MG-related hospitalizations than patients with non-refractory disease (n = 1083). Patients with refractory MG experienced a higher frequency of renal disease and hypertension compared with patients with non-refractory MG, and with matched patients without MG. They were also more likely to have diabetes and congestive heart failure than the matched controls. Rates of all-cause mortality during the follow-up period did not differ between patients with refractory MG and non-refractory MG.

Conclusions

These results show that conventional treatments for MG are not adequately managing patients’ symptoms and that patients with refractory MG are more likely to experience certain comorbidities than those with non-refractory MG or matched controls without MG. Future research should focus on the impact of newer targeted therapies on long-term clinical outcomes and comorbid conditions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Jacob S. Refractory myasthenia gravis – patient burden and the need for new therapeutic targets. Eur Neurol Rev. 2018;13(1):18–20.CrossRef Jacob S. Refractory myasthenia gravis – patient burden and the need for new therapeutic targets. Eur Neurol Rev. 2018;13(1):18–20.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Thomas CE, Mayer SA, Gungor Y, Swarup R, Webster EA, Chang I, et al. Myasthenic crisis: clinical features, mortality, complications, and risk factors for prolonged intubation. Neurology. 1997;48(5):1253–60.CrossRef Thomas CE, Mayer SA, Gungor Y, Swarup R, Webster EA, Chang I, et al. Myasthenic crisis: clinical features, mortality, complications, and risk factors for prolonged intubation. Neurology. 1997;48(5):1253–60.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Osserman KE, Kornfeld P, Cohen E, Genkins G, Mendelow H, Goldberg H, et al. Studies in myasthenia gravis; review of two hundred eighty-two cases at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1958;102(1):72–81.CrossRef Osserman KE, Kornfeld P, Cohen E, Genkins G, Mendelow H, Goldberg H, et al. Studies in myasthenia gravis; review of two hundred eighty-two cases at the Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1958;102(1):72–81.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Murai H, Hasebe M, Murata T, Utsugisawa K. Clinical burden and healthcare resource utilization associated with myasthenia gravis: Assessments from a Japanese claims database. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol. 2019;21:1–8. Murai H, Hasebe M, Murata T, Utsugisawa K. Clinical burden and healthcare resource utilization associated with myasthenia gravis: Assessments from a Japanese claims database. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol. 2019;21:1–8.
17.
go back to reference Sudulagunta SR, Sepehrar M, Sodalagunta MB, Settikere Nataraju A, Bangalore Raja SK, Sathyanarayana D, et al. Refractory myasthenia gravis - clinical profile, comorbidities and response to rituximab. Ger Med Sci. 2016;14:Doc12. https://doi.org/10.3205/000239. Sudulagunta SR, Sepehrar M, Sodalagunta MB, Settikere Nataraju A, Bangalore Raja SK, Sathyanarayana D, et al. Refractory myasthenia gravis - clinical profile, comorbidities and response to rituximab. Ger Med Sci. 2016;14:Doc12. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3205/​000239.
18.
go back to reference Suh J, Goldstein JM, Nowak RJ. Clinical characteristics of refractory myasthenia gravis patients. Yale J Biol Med. 2013;86(2):255–60.PubMedPubMedCentral Suh J, Goldstein JM, Nowak RJ. Clinical characteristics of refractory myasthenia gravis patients. Yale J Biol Med. 2013;86(2):255–60.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A retrospective longitudinal cohort study of the clinical burden in myasthenia gravis
Authors
Linda Harris
Sophie Graham
Sharon MacLachlan
Alex Exuzides
Saiju Jacob
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02692-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Neurology 1/2022 Go to the issue