Top

Published in:

01-03-2022 | Multiple Sclerosis | Original Article

The clinical and paraclinical correlates of employment status in multiple sclerosis

Authors: Barbora Srpova, Lukas Sobisek, Klara Novotna, Tomas Uher, Lucie Friedova, Manuela Vaneckova, Jan Krasensky, Eva Kubala Havrdova, Dana Horakova

Published in: Neurological Sciences | Issue 3/2022

Abstract

Purpose

To identify the clinical and paraclinical markers of employment status in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

This was a cross-sectional sub-study investigating 1226 MS patients. To minimalized confounding effect, two groups of patients, matched by sex, age, and education, were selected: 307 patients with full time employment and 153 unemployed patients receiving disability pension. We explored associations between employment status and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), 25 Foot Walk Test (25FWT), Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), SLOAN charts (SLOAN), and brain volumetric MRI measures.

Results

Both groups differed significantly on all variables of interest (p < 0.001). In the univariate analyses, EDSS, SDMT (Symbol Digit Modalities Test) adjusted for BDI, 25FWT, and 9HPT best explained variability in vocational status. In multivariate analyses, the combination of EDSS, 25FWT, SDMT, BDI, and corpus callosum fraction (CCF) explained the greatest variability. As a next step, after patients were matched by EDSS, differences in SDMT, 25FWT (both p < 0.001), 9HPT, CCF, and T2 lesion volume were still present (all p < 0.005) between both groups. The best multivariate model consisted of SDMT, BDI, and T2 lesion volume.

Conclusions

EDSS, walking ability, cognitive performance, and MRI volumetric parameters are independently associated with employment status.

Available only for authorised users

Julian LJ et al (2008) Employment in multiple sclerosis. Exiting and re-entering the work force. J Neurol 255(9):1354–1360CrossRef

Naci H et al (2010) Economic burden of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 28(5):363–379CrossRef

de Jong M et al (2015) Quality of working life issues of employees with a chronic physical disease: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 25(1):182–196CrossRef

Messmer Uccelli M et al (2009) Factors that influence the employment status of people with multiple sclerosis: a multi-national study. J Neurol 256(12):1989–1996CrossRef

Tauhid S et al (2015) Brain MRI lesions and atrophy are associated with employment status in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 262(11):2425–2432CrossRef

Moore P et al (2013) Demographic and clinical factors associated with changes in employment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 19(12):1647–1654CrossRef

Smith MM, Arnett PA (2005) Factors related to employment status changes in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 11(5):602–609CrossRef

Jongen PJ et al (2014) Relationship between working hours and power of attention, memory, fatigue, depression and self-efficacy one year after diagnosis of clinically isolated syndrome and relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 9(5):e96444CrossRef

Findling O et al (2015) Variables related to working capability among Swiss patients with multiple sclerosis–a cohort study. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0121856CrossRef

10.

Strober LB et al (2012) Unemployment in multiple sclerosis: the contribution of personality and disease. Mult Scler 18(5):647–653CrossRef

11.

Miller A, Dishon S (2006) Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: The impact of disability, gender and employment status. Qual Life Res 15(2):259–271CrossRef

12.

Krokavcova M et al (2010) Self-rated health and employment status in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 32(21):1742–1748CrossRef

13.

Phillips LJ, Stuifbergen AK (2006) Predicting continued employment in persons with multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil 72(1):35

14.

Roessler RT, Rumrill PD, Fitzgerald SM (2004) Predictors of employment status for people with multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Couns Bull 47(2):96–103CrossRef

15.

BoeLunde HM et al (2014) Employment among patients with multiple sclerosis-a population study. PLoS ONE 9(7):e103317CrossRef

16.

Van der Hiele K et al (2014) A pilot study on factors involved with work participation in the early stages of multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE 9(8):e105673CrossRef

17.

Krause I et al (2013) Employment status in multiple sclerosis: impact of disease-specific and non-disease-specific factors. Mult Scler 19(13):1792–1799CrossRef

18.

Honarmand K et al (2011) Predicting employment status in multiple sclerosis patients: the utility of the MS functional composite. J Neurol 258(2):244–249CrossRef

19.

Strober L et al (2014) Unemployment in multiple sclerosis (MS): utility of the MS Functional Composite and cognitive testing. Mult Scler 20(1):112–115CrossRef

20.

Li J et al (2015) Disease-related and functional predictors of employment status among adults with multiple sclerosis. Work 52(4):789–797CrossRef

21.

Fantoni-Quinton S et al (2016) Impact of multiple sclerosis on employment and use of job-retention strategies: The situation in France in 2015. J Rehabil Med 48(6):535–540CrossRef

22.

Kobelt G et al (2017) New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Multiple Sclerosis J 1352458517694432

23.

Ivanova JI et al (2009) The cost of disability and medically related absenteeism among employees with multiple sclerosis in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 27(8):681–691CrossRef

24.

Salter A et al (2017) Employment and absenteeism in working-age persons with multiple sclerosis. J Med Econ 1–10

25.

Kadrnozkova L et al (2018) Combining clinical and magnetic resonance imaging markers enhances prediction of 12-year employment status in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Sci 388:87–93CrossRef

26.

Roessler RT et al (2015) Predictors of differential employment statuses of adults with multiple sclerosis. J Vocat Rehabil 42(2):141–152CrossRef

27.

Simmons RD, Tribe KL, and McDonald EA. Living with multiple sclerosis: longitudinal changes in employment and the importance of symptom management

28.

Uher T et al (2017) Identification of multiple sclerosis patients at highest risk of cognitive impairment using an integrated brain magnetic resonance imaging assessment approach. Eur J Neurol 24(2):292–301CrossRef

29.

McDonald WI et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50(1):121–127CrossRef

30.

Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple-sclerosis - an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33(11):1444–1452CrossRef

31.

Langdon DW et al (2012) Recommendations for a Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Mult Scler 18(6):891–898CrossRef

32.

Dusankova JB et al (2012) Cross cultural validation of the Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis (MACFIMS) and the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS). Clin Neuropsychol 26(7):1186–1200CrossRef

33.

Smith A (1982) Symbol digit modalities test (sdmt): Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services

34.

Delis DC et al (2000) California verbal learning test – second edition. Adult version. Manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation

35.

Benedict R (1997) Brief visuospatial memory test - revised: professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc

36.

Gronwall DM (1977) Paced auditory serial-addition task: a measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills 44(2):367–373CrossRef

37.

Fischer JS et al (2001) Multiple sclerosis functional composite measure (msfc): administration and scoring manual (revised), National Multiple Sclerosis Society

38.

Beck AT, Steer RA (1987) Bdi, beck depression inventory: manual, psychological corporation. San Antonio

39.

Balcer L et al (2003) Contrast letter acuity as a visual component for the multiple sclerosis functional composite. Neurology 61(10):1367–1373CrossRef

40.

Uher T et al (2017) A novel semiautomated pipeline to measure brain atrophy and lesion burden in multiple sclerosis: a long-term comparative study. J Neuroimaging

41.

Uher T et al (2017) Combining clinical and magnetic resonance imaging markers enhances prediction of 12-year disability in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 23(1):51–61CrossRef

42.

Ho DE et al (2011) MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw 42(8)

43.

Benedict RH et al (2005) Predicting quality of life in multiple sclerosis: accounting for physical disability, fatigue, cognition, mood disorder, personality, and behavior change. J Neurol Sci 231(1–2):29–34CrossRef

44.

Benedict RH et al (2016) Benchmarks of meaningful impairment on the MSFC and BICAMS. Mult Scler

45.

Nunnari D et al (2015) Impact of depression, fatigue, and global measure of cortical volume on cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Biomed Res Int 2015:519785CrossRef

46.

Papathanasiou A et al (2015) Thalamic atrophy predicts cognitive impairment in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. Effect on instrumental activities of daily living and employment status. J Neurol Sci 358(1–2):236–242CrossRef

47.

Benedict RHB et al (2006) Validity of the minimal assessment of cognitive function in multiple sclerosis (MACHMS). J Int Neuropsychol Soc 12(4):549–558CrossRef

48.

Chiu C-Y et al (2013) State vocational rehabilitation services and employment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J 19(12):1655–1664CrossRef

Title: The clinical and paraclinical correlates of employment status in multiple sclerosis
Authors: Barbora Srpova
Lukas Sobisek
Klara Novotna
Tomas Uher
Lucie Friedova
Manuela Vaneckova
Jan Krasensky
Eva Kubala Havrdova
Dana Horakova
Publication date: 01-03-2022
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Keyword: Multiple Sclerosis
Published in: Neurological Sciences / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Electronic ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05553-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The clinical and paraclinical correlates of employment status in multiple sclerosis

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

Addiction-induced plasticity in underlying neural circuits

A novel homozygous mutation in TBK1 gene causing ALS-FTD

Guillain–Barré syndrome associated with BNT162b2 COVID vaccination: a first case report from South Korea

Multi-auxiliary domain transfer learning for diagnosis of MCI conversion

The first case of infantile-onset multisystem neurologic, endocrine, and pancreatic disease caused by novel PTRH2 mutation in Japan

Hippocampal atrophy and quantitative EEG markers in mild cognitive impairment in temporal lobe epilepsy versus extra-temporal lobe epilepsy