Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 5/2019

Open Access 01-05-2019 | Multiple Sclerosis | Original Communication

Ocrelizumab efficacy in subgroups of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis

Authors: Benjamin Turner, Bruce A. C. Cree, Ludwig Kappos, Xavier Montalban, Caroline Papeix, Jerry S. Wolinsky, Regine Buffels, Damian Fiore, Hideki Garren, Jian Han, Stephen L. Hauser

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab, versus interferon (IFN) β-1a, for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) from the identically designed OPERA I (NCT01247324) and OPERA II (NCT01412333) phase III studies has been reported; here we present subgroup analyses of efficacy endpoints from the pooled OPERA I and OPERA II populations.

Methods

Patients with RMS were randomized to either ocrelizumab 600 mg administered by intravenous infusion every 24 weeks or subcutaneous IFN β-1a 44 µg three times per week throughout the 96-week treatment period. Relapse, disability, and MRI outcomes were analyzed for predefined and post hoc subgroups based on demographic and disease characteristics along with prior treatment using appropriate statistical tests to determine the treatment effect in subgroups and treatment-by-subgroup interactions.

Results

The significant treatment benefit of ocrelizumab, versus IFN β-1a, observed in the overall OPERA I and OPERA II pooled populations was maintained across most subgroup strata for all endpoints, including annualized relapse rate, disability progression, and MRI outputs.

Conclusions

The treatment effect of ocrelizumab versus IFN β-1a, measured by clinical and MRI outcomes, was maintained across most of the subgroups and strata of interest, and the pattern of treatment benefit across all subgroups was consistent with that from the pooled OPERA studies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G et al (2017) Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 376:221–234CrossRefPubMed Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G et al (2017) Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 376:221–234CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Papeix C, Cree B, Turner B et al (2017) Subgroup analyses of annualised relapse rates in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis who received ocrelizumab or interferon beta-1a in the phase III OPERA I and OPERA II studies. In: 7th Joint European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) Meeting; 25–28 October 2017; Paris, France. Poster P687 Papeix C, Cree B, Turner B et al (2017) Subgroup analyses of annualised relapse rates in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis who received ocrelizumab or interferon beta-1a in the phase III OPERA I and OPERA II studies. In: 7th Joint European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ACTRIMS) Meeting; 25–28 October 2017; Paris, France. Poster P687
3.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Giovannoni G, Turner B, Gnanapavan S, Offiah C, Schmierer K, Marta M (2015) Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis? Mult Scler Relat Disord 4:329–333CrossRefPubMed Giovannoni G, Turner B, Gnanapavan S, Offiah C, Schmierer K, Marta M (2015) Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis? Mult Scler Relat Disord 4:329–333CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tremlett H, Paty D, Devonshire V (2006) Disability progression in multiple sclerosis is slower than previously reported. Neurology 66:172–177CrossRefPubMed Tremlett H, Paty D, Devonshire V (2006) Disability progression in multiple sclerosis is slower than previously reported. Neurology 66:172–177CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Devonshire V, Havrdova E, Radue EW, O’Connor P, Zhang-Auberson L, Agoropoulou C, Häring DA, Francis G, Kappos L, FREEDOMS Study Group (2012) Relapse and disability outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod: subgroup analyses of the double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled FREEDOMS study. Lancet Neurol 11:420–428CrossRefPubMed Devonshire V, Havrdova E, Radue EW, O’Connor P, Zhang-Auberson L, Agoropoulou C, Häring DA, Francis G, Kappos L, FREEDOMS Study Group (2012) Relapse and disability outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod: subgroup analyses of the double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled FREEDOMS study. Lancet Neurol 11:420–428CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Derfuss T, Ontaneda D, Nicholas J, Meng X, Hawker K (2016) Relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod: subgroup analyses of pooled data from three phase 3 trials. Mult Scler Relat Disord 8:124–130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Derfuss T, Ontaneda D, Nicholas J, Meng X, Hawker K (2016) Relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod: subgroup analyses of pooled data from three phase 3 trials. Mult Scler Relat Disord 8:124–130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Giovannoni G, Cook S, Rammohan K, Rieckmann P, Sørensen PS, Vermersch P, Hamlett A, Viglietta V, Greenberg S, CLARITY Study Group (2011) Sustained disease-activity-free status in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis treated with cladribine tablets in the CLARITY study: a post-hoc and subgroup analysis. Lancet Neurol 10:329–337CrossRefPubMed Giovannoni G, Cook S, Rammohan K, Rieckmann P, Sørensen PS, Vermersch P, Hamlett A, Viglietta V, Greenberg S, CLARITY Study Group (2011) Sustained disease-activity-free status in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis treated with cladribine tablets in the CLARITY study: a post-hoc and subgroup analysis. Lancet Neurol 10:329–337CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Miller AE, O’Connor P, Wolinsky JS et al (2012) Pre-specified subgroup analyses of a placebo-controlled phase III trial (TEMSO) of oral teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 18:1625–1632CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller AE, O’Connor P, Wolinsky JS et al (2012) Pre-specified subgroup analyses of a placebo-controlled phase III trial (TEMSO) of oral teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 18:1625–1632CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Bar-Or A, Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Giovannoni G, Selmaj K, O’Gorman J, Stephan M, Dawson KT (2013) Clinical efficacy of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of the DEFINE study. J Neurol 260:2297–2305CrossRefPubMed Bar-Or A, Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL, Giovannoni G, Selmaj K, O’Gorman J, Stephan M, Dawson KT (2013) Clinical efficacy of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of the DEFINE study. J Neurol 260:2297–2305CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hutchinson M, Fox RJ, Miller DH et al (2013) Clinical efficacy of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of the CONFIRM study. J Neurol 260:2286–2296CrossRefPubMed Hutchinson M, Fox RJ, Miller DH et al (2013) Clinical efficacy of BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of the CONFIRM study. J Neurol 260:2286–2296CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kappos L, Gold R, Miller DH et al (2012) Effect of BG-12 on contrast-enhanced lesions in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses from the phase 2b study. Mult Scler 18:314–321CrossRefPubMed Kappos L, Gold R, Miller DH et al (2012) Effect of BG-12 on contrast-enhanced lesions in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses from the phase 2b study. Mult Scler 18:314–321CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Coles AJ, Twyman CL, Arnold DL et al (2012) Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 380:1829–1839CrossRef Coles AJ, Twyman CL, Arnold DL et al (2012) Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 380:1829–1839CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Calabresi PA et al (2009) The efficacy of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL. J Neurol 256:405–415CrossRefPubMed Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Calabresi PA et al (2009) The efficacy of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL. J Neurol 256:405–415CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van Pesch V, Bartholomé E, Bissay V et al (2014) Safety and efficacy of natalizumab in Belgian multiple sclerosis patients: subgroup analysis of the natalizumab observational program. Acta Neurol Belg 114:167–178CrossRefPubMed van Pesch V, Bartholomé E, Bissay V et al (2014) Safety and efficacy of natalizumab in Belgian multiple sclerosis patients: subgroup analysis of the natalizumab observational program. Acta Neurol Belg 114:167–178CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ocrelizumab efficacy in subgroups of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
Authors
Benjamin Turner
Bruce A. C. Cree
Ludwig Kappos
Xavier Montalban
Caroline Papeix
Jerry S. Wolinsky
Regine Buffels
Damian Fiore
Hideki Garren
Jian Han
Stephen L. Hauser
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09248-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Journal of Neurology 5/2019 Go to the issue