Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 3/2021

Open Access 01-03-2021 | Multiple Sclerosis | Original Communication

Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis

Authors: Johannes Lorscheider, Pascal Benkert, Carmen Lienert, Peter Hänni, Tobias Derfuss, Jens Kuhle, Ludwig Kappos, Özgür Yaldizli

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod are oral disease modifying treatments (DMTs) that reduce relapse activity and slow disability worsening in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in a real-world setting, where both agents are licensed as a first-line DMT for the treatment of RRMS.

Methods

We identified patients with RRMS commencing dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod in the Swiss Federation for Common Tasks of Health Insurances (SVK) Registry between August 2014 and July 2019. Propensity score-matching was applied to select subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics. Relapses and disability outcomes were compared in paired, pairwise-censored analyses.

Results

Of the 2113 included patients, 1922 were matched (dimethyl fumarate, n = 961; fingolimod, n = 961). Relapse rates did not differ between the groups (incident rate ratio 1.0, 95%CI 0.8–1.2, p = 0.86). Moreover, no difference in the hazard of 1-year confirmed disability worsening (hazard ratio [HR] 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.6; p = 0.80) or disability improvement (HR 0.9; 95%CI 0.6–1.2; p = 0.40) was detected. These findings were consistent both for treatment-naïve patients and patients switching from another DMT.

Conclusion

Dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod have comparable effectiveness regarding reduction of relapses and disability worsening in RRMS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Cohen JA, Barkhof F, Comi G et al (2010) Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 362:402–415CrossRef Cohen JA, Barkhof F, Comi G et al (2010) Oral fingolimod or intramuscular interferon for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 362:402–415CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kappos L, Radue E-W, O’Connor P et al (2010) A Placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 362:387–401CrossRef Kappos L, Radue E-W, O’Connor P et al (2010) A Placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 362:387–401CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Calabresi PA, Radue EW, Goodin D et al (2014) Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 13:545–556CrossRef Calabresi PA, Radue EW, Goodin D et al (2014) Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 13:545–556CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL et al (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1098–1107CrossRef Gold R, Kappos L, Arnold DL et al (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1098–1107CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT et al (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1087–1097CrossRef Fox RJ, Miller DH, Phillips JT et al (2012) Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 367:1087–1097CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fox RJ, Chan A, Zhang A et al (2017) Comparative effectiveness using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 33:175–183CrossRef Fox RJ, Chan A, Zhang A et al (2017) Comparative effectiveness using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 33:175–183CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Trojano M, Tintore M, Montalban X et al (2017) Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis—insights from real-world observational studies. Nat Rev Neurol 13:105 Trojano M, Tintore M, Montalban X et al (2017) Treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis—insights from real-world observational studies. Nat Rev Neurol 13:105
10.
go back to reference Kalincik T, Butzkueven H (2016) Observational data: understanding the real MS world. Mult Scler. 22:1642–1648CrossRef Kalincik T, Butzkueven H (2016) Observational data: understanding the real MS world. Mult Scler. 22:1642–1648CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Boster A, Nicholas J, Wu N et al (2017) Comparative effectiveness research of disease-modifying therapies for the management of multiple sclerosis: analysis of a large health insurance claims database. Neurol Ther 6:91–102CrossRef Boster A, Nicholas J, Wu N et al (2017) Comparative effectiveness research of disease-modifying therapies for the management of multiple sclerosis: analysis of a large health insurance claims database. Neurol Ther 6:91–102CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hersh CM, Love TE, Cohn S et al (2016) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up. Mult Scler Relat Disord 10:44–52CrossRef Hersh CM, Love TE, Cohn S et al (2016) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up. Mult Scler Relat Disord 10:44–52CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hersh CM, Love TE, Bandyopadhyay A et al (2017) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 3:2055217317715485PubMedPubMedCentral Hersh CM, Love TE, Bandyopadhyay A et al (2017) Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 3:2055217317715485PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Vollmer B, Nair KV, Sillau SH, Corboy J, Vollmer T, Alvarez E (2017) Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: two-year experience. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 3:2055217317725102PubMedPubMedCentral Vollmer B, Nair KV, Sillau SH, Corboy J, Vollmer T, Alvarez E (2017) Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: two-year experience. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 3:2055217317725102PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Vollmer B, Ontaneda D, Bandyopadhyay A et al (2018) Discontinuation and comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in 2 centers. Neurol Clin Pract 8:292–301CrossRef Vollmer B, Ontaneda D, Bandyopadhyay A et al (2018) Discontinuation and comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in 2 centers. Neurol Clin Pract 8:292–301CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kalincik T, Kubala Havrdova E, Horakova D et al (2019) Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 90:458–468CrossRef Kalincik T, Kubala Havrdova E, Horakova D et al (2019) Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 90:458–468CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Prosperini L, Lucchini M, Haggiag S et al (2018) Fingolimod vs dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis: a real-world propensity score-matched study. Neurology 91:e153–e161CrossRef Prosperini L, Lucchini M, Haggiag S et al (2018) Fingolimod vs dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis: a real-world propensity score-matched study. Neurology 91:e153–e161CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lorscheider J, Benkert P, Lienert C et al (2018) Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 24:777–785CrossRef Lorscheider J, Benkert P, Lienert C et al (2018) Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 24:777–785CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kalincik T, Cutter G, Spelman T et al (2015) Defining reliable disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Brain 138:3287–3298CrossRef Kalincik T, Cutter G, Spelman T et al (2015) Defining reliable disability outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Brain 138:3287–3298CrossRef
21.
go back to reference R Core Development Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In: Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing R Core Development Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In: Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
22.
go back to reference Ho D, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2011) MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw 42:1–28CrossRef Ho D, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2011) MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw 42:1–28CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Disanto G, Benkert P, Lorscheider J et al (2016) The Swiss multiple sclerosis cohort-study (SMSC): a prospective swiss wide investigation of key phases in disease evolution and new treatment options. PLoS One 11:e0152347CrossRef Disanto G, Benkert P, Lorscheider J et al (2016) The Swiss multiple sclerosis cohort-study (SMSC): a prospective swiss wide investigation of key phases in disease evolution and new treatment options. PLoS One 11:e0152347CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis
Authors
Johannes Lorscheider
Pascal Benkert
Carmen Lienert
Peter Hänni
Tobias Derfuss
Jens Kuhle
Ludwig Kappos
Özgür Yaldizli
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Journal of Neurology 3/2021 Go to the issue