Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports 5/2023

04-07-2023 | Multiple Myeloma

Response-Adapted Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Authors: Winnie Z. Y. Teo, Ian Y. E. Ong, Jason W. Y. Tong, Wan Li Ong, Adeline Lin, Fangfang Song, Bee Choo Tai, Melissa Ooi, Cinnie Yentia Seokojo, Yunxin Chen, Chandramouli Nagarajan, Wee Joo Chng, Sanjay de Mel

Published in: Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports | Issue 5/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The development of potent novel agents has improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Heterogeneity of response to therapy, an expanding arsenal of treatment options, and cost are however major challenges for physicians making treatment decisions. Response-adapted therapy is hence an attractive strategy for sequencing of therapy in MM. Despite its successful application in other haematologic malignancies, response-adapted therapy is yet to become a standard of care for MM. We provide our perspective on response-adapted therapeutic strategies evaluated thus far and how they may be implemented and improved on in treatment algorithms of the future.

Recent Findings

While older studies suggested that early response based on International Myeloma Working Group response criteria could impact long-term outcomes, recent data have contradicted these findings. The advent of minimal residual disease (MRD) as a powerful prognostic factor in MM has raised the promise of MRD-adapted treatment strategies. The development of more sensitive techniques for paraprotein quantification as well as imaging modalities to detect extramedullary disease is likely to change response assessment in MM. These techniques combined with MRD assessment may provide sensitive and holistic response assessments which could be evaluated in clinical trials.

Summary

Response-adapted treatment algorithms have the potential to allow an individualised treatment strategy, maximising efficacy, while minimising toxicities and cost. Standardisation of MRD methodology, incorporation of imaging into response assessment, and the optimal management of MRD positive patients are key questions to be addressed in future trials.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van de Donk NWCJ, Pawlyn C, Yong KL. Multiple myeloma. The Lancet. 2021;397(10272):410–27.CrossRef van de Donk NWCJ, Pawlyn C, Yong KL. Multiple myeloma. The Lancet. 2021;397(10272):410–27.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sonneveld P, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, Blade J, Lahuerta JJ, Cavo M, et al. Bortezomib-based versus nonbortezomib-based induction treatment before autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of phase III randomized, controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(26):3279–87.CrossRefPubMed Sonneveld P, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, Blade J, Lahuerta JJ, Cavo M, et al. Bortezomib-based versus nonbortezomib-based induction treatment before autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of phase III randomized, controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(26):3279–87.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jackson GH, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, Waterhouse A, et al. Optimising the value of immunomodulatory drugs during induction and maintenance in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from Myeloma XI, a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase III trial. Br J Haematol. 2021;192(5):853–68.CrossRefPubMed Jackson GH, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, Waterhouse A, et al. Optimising the value of immunomodulatory drugs during induction and maintenance in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from Myeloma XI, a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase III trial. Br J Haematol. 2021;192(5):853–68.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chong LL, Soon YY, Soekojo CY, Ooi M, Chng WJ, de Mel S. Daratumumab-based induction therapy for multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;159. Chong LL, Soon YY, Soekojo CY, Ooi M, Chng WJ, de Mel S. Daratumumab-based induction therapy for multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;159.
6.
7.
go back to reference Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV. The multiple myelomas — current concepts in cytogenetic classification and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(7):409–21.CrossRefPubMed Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV. The multiple myelomas — current concepts in cytogenetic classification and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(7):409–21.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020;34(4):966–84.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020;34(4):966–84.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Voorhees P. On the need for phase III studies of risk-adapted therapy in multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(2):181–2.CrossRefPubMed Voorhees P. On the need for phase III studies of risk-adapted therapy in multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(2):181–2.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, Rosinol L, Sureda A, de la Rubia J, et al. Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5775–82.CrossRefPubMed Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, Rosinol L, Sureda A, de la Rubia J, et al. Influence of pre- and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(35):5775–82.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van de Velde H, Londhe A, Ataman O, Johns HL, Hill S, Landers E, et al. Association between complete response and outcomes in transplant-eligible myeloma patients in the era of novel agents. Eur J Haematol. 2017;98(3):269–79.CrossRefPubMed van de Velde H, Londhe A, Ataman O, Johns HL, Hill S, Landers E, et al. Association between complete response and outcomes in transplant-eligible myeloma patients in the era of novel agents. Eur J Haematol. 2017;98(3):269–79.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Gay F, Larocca A, Wijermans P, Cavallo F, Rossi D, Schaafsma R, et al. Complete response correlates with long-term progression-free and overall survival in elderly myeloma treated with novel agents: analysis of 1175 patients. Blood. 2011;117(11):3025–31.CrossRefPubMed Gay F, Larocca A, Wijermans P, Cavallo F, Rossi D, Schaafsma R, et al. Complete response correlates with long-term progression-free and overall survival in elderly myeloma treated with novel agents: analysis of 1175 patients. Blood. 2011;117(11):3025–31.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kaddoura M, Binder M, Dingli D, Buadi FK, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, et al. Impact of achieving a complete response to initial therapy of multiple myeloma and predictors of subsequent outcome. Am J Hematol. 2022;97(3):267–73.CrossRefPubMed Kaddoura M, Binder M, Dingli D, Buadi FK, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, et al. Impact of achieving a complete response to initial therapy of multiple myeloma and predictors of subsequent outcome. Am J Hematol. 2022;97(3):267–73.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vij R, Kumar S, Zhang MJ, Zhong X, Huang J, Dispenzieri A, et al. Impact of pretransplant therapy and depth of disease response before autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(2):335–41.CrossRefPubMed Vij R, Kumar S, Zhang MJ, Zhong X, Huang J, Dispenzieri A, et al. Impact of pretransplant therapy and depth of disease response before autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21(2):335–41.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ross DM, To LB, Horvath N. Assessment of early paraprotein response to vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone chemotherapy may help guide therapy in multiple myeloma. Intern Med J. 2004;34(9–10):576–8.CrossRefPubMed Ross DM, To LB, Horvath N. Assessment of early paraprotein response to vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone chemotherapy may help guide therapy in multiple myeloma. Intern Med J. 2004;34(9–10):576–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schaar CG, Kluin-Nelemans JC, le Cessie S, Franck PF, te Marvelde MC, Wijermans PW. Early response to therapy and survival in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2004;125(2):162–6.CrossRefPubMed Schaar CG, Kluin-Nelemans JC, le Cessie S, Franck PF, te Marvelde MC, Wijermans PW. Early response to therapy and survival in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2004;125(2):162–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Tandon N, Sidana S, Rajkumar SV, Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Lacy MQ, et al. Outcomes with early response to first-line treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2019;3(5):744–50.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Tandon N, Sidana S, Rajkumar SV, Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Lacy MQ, et al. Outcomes with early response to first-line treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2019;3(5):744–50.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Yan Y, Mao X, Liu J, Fan H, Du C, Li Z, et al. The impact of response kinetics for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. Blood Adv. 2019;3(19):2895–904.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Yan Y, Mao X, Liu J, Fan H, Du C, Li Z, et al. The impact of response kinetics for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. Blood Adv. 2019;3(19):2895–904.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, et al. Response-adapted intensification with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus no intensification in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. The lancet Haematology. 2019;6(12):e616–29.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, et al. Response-adapted intensification with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus no intensification in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. The lancet Haematology. 2019;6(12):e616–29.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Niesvizky R, Mark TM, Ward M, Jayabalan DS, Pearse RN, Manco M, et al. Overcoming the response plateau in multiple myeloma: a novel bortezomib-based strategy for secondary induction and high-yield CD34+ stem cell mobilization. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(6):1534–46.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Niesvizky R, Mark TM, Ward M, Jayabalan DS, Pearse RN, Manco M, et al. Overcoming the response plateau in multiple myeloma: a novel bortezomib-based strategy for secondary induction and high-yield CD34+ stem cell mobilization. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(6):1534–46.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Durie BGM, Hoering A, Abidi MH, Rajkumar SV, Epstein J, Kahanic SP, et al. Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet (london, england). 2017;389(10068):519–27.CrossRefPubMed Durie BGM, Hoering A, Abidi MH, Rajkumar SV, Epstein J, Kahanic SP, et al. Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet (london, england). 2017;389(10068):519–27.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Shah GL, Weltz J, Zhou Q, Devlin SM, Landau H, Chung DJ, et al. A response adapted approach to induction treatment in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(3):S40–1.CrossRef Shah GL, Weltz J, Zhou Q, Devlin SM, Landau H, Chung DJ, et al. A response adapted approach to induction treatment in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(3):S40–1.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Yoo KH, Yoon DH, Kang HJ, Lee WS, Kim K, Kim JS, et al. Multicenter, phase II study of response-adapted lenalidomide-based therapy for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma without high-risk features. Curr Probl Cancer. 2022;46(1):100788.CrossRefPubMed Yoo KH, Yoon DH, Kang HJ, Lee WS, Kim K, Kim JS, et al. Multicenter, phase II study of response-adapted lenalidomide-based therapy for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma without high-risk features. Curr Probl Cancer. 2022;46(1):100788.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Narkhede M, Valent J, Cummings C, Glass K, Hastings D, Faiman B, et al. Results of an upfront myeloma carepath pilot with response-adapted therapy. Blood. 2014;124(21):2620.CrossRef Narkhede M, Valent J, Cummings C, Glass K, Hastings D, Faiman B, et al. Results of an upfront myeloma carepath pilot with response-adapted therapy. Blood. 2014;124(21):2620.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Charalampous C, Kourelis T. Minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma patients: minimal disease with maximal implications. Front Oncol. 2022;11. Charalampous C, Kourelis T. Minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma patients: minimal disease with maximal implications. Front Oncol. 2022;11.
28.
go back to reference Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson K, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:e328–46.CrossRefPubMed Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson K, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:e328–46.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328–46.CrossRefPubMed Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328–46.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Perrot A, Lauwers-Cances V, Corre J, Robillard N, Hulin C, Chretien ML, et al. Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132(23):2456–64.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Perrot A, Lauwers-Cances V, Corre J, Robillard N, Hulin C, Chretien ML, et al. Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132(23):2456–64.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Rawstron AC, Owen RG, Child JA, Thakurta A, et al. Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(1):28–35.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Rawstron AC, Owen RG, Child JA, Thakurta A, et al. Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(1):28–35.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Paiva B, Puig N, Cedena MT, Rosinol L, Cordon L, Vidriales MB, et al. Measurable residual disease by next-generation flow cytometry in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(8):784–92.CrossRefPubMed Paiva B, Puig N, Cedena MT, Rosinol L, Cordon L, Vidriales MB, et al. Measurable residual disease by next-generation flow cytometry in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(8):784–92.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Costa LJ, Chhabra S, Medvedova E, Dholaria BR, Schmidt TM, Godby KN, et al. Daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone with minimal residual disease response-adapted therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(25):2901–12.CrossRefPubMed Costa LJ, Chhabra S, Medvedova E, Dholaria BR, Schmidt TM, Godby KN, et al. Daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone with minimal residual disease response-adapted therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(25):2901–12.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Chen Y, Gopalakrishnan SK, Ooi M, Sultana R, Lim LH, Grigoropoulos N, et al. A phase 2 study of carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone as frontline treatment for transplant-eligible MM with high-risk features (SGH-MM1). Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(9):150.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chen Y, Gopalakrishnan SK, Ooi M, Sultana R, Lim LH, Grigoropoulos N, et al. A phase 2 study of carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone as frontline treatment for transplant-eligible MM with high-risk features (SGH-MM1). Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(9):150.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Korde N, Mastey D, Tavitian E, Mailankody S, Lesokhin A, Hassoun H, et al. Tailored treatment to MRD response: a phase I/II study for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients using high dose twice-weekly carfilzomib (45 and 56 mg/m(2)) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(6):E193–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Korde N, Mastey D, Tavitian E, Mailankody S, Lesokhin A, Hassoun H, et al. Tailored treatment to MRD response: a phase I/II study for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients using high dose twice-weekly carfilzomib (45 and 56 mg/m(2)) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(6):E193–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hahn TE, Wallace PK, Fraser R, Fei M, Tario JD, Howard A, et al. Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessment before and after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AutoHCT) and maintenance for multiple myeloma (MM): results of the Prognostic Immunophenotyping for Myeloma Response (PRIMeR) study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(3):S4–6.CrossRef Hahn TE, Wallace PK, Fraser R, Fei M, Tario JD, Howard A, et al. Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Assessment before and after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AutoHCT) and maintenance for multiple myeloma (MM): results of the Prognostic Immunophenotyping for Myeloma Response (PRIMeR) study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(3):S4–6.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Junghans RP, Anderson CL. The protection receptor for IgG catabolism is the beta2-microglobulin-containing neonatal intestinal transport receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93(11):5512–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Junghans RP, Anderson CL. The protection receptor for IgG catabolism is the beta2-microglobulin-containing neonatal intestinal transport receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93(11):5512–6.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Pratt G. The evolving use of serum free light chain assays in haematology. Br J Haematol. 2008;141(4):413–22.CrossRefPubMed Pratt G. The evolving use of serum free light chain assays in haematology. Br J Haematol. 2008;141(4):413–22.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Gran C, Afram G, Liwing J, Verhoek A, Nahi H. Involved free light chain: an early independent predictor of response and progression in multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021;62(9):2227–34.CrossRefPubMed Gran C, Afram G, Liwing J, Verhoek A, Nahi H. Involved free light chain: an early independent predictor of response and progression in multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2021;62(9):2227–34.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Claveau J-S, SavaryBélanger S, Ahmad I, Delisle J-S, De Guire V, Roy J, et al. Early free light chain reduction following treatment initiation predicts favorable outcome in intact immunoglobulin myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2022;12(1):3.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Claveau J-S, SavaryBélanger S, Ahmad I, Delisle J-S, De Guire V, Roy J, et al. Early free light chain reduction following treatment initiation predicts favorable outcome in intact immunoglobulin myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2022;12(1):3.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Wong SW, Shah N, Ledergor G, Martin T, Wolf J, Shui AM, et al. Early dynamics and depth of response in multiple myeloma patients treated with BCMA CAR-T cells. Front Oncol. 2021;11:783703.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Wong SW, Shah N, Ledergor G, Martin T, Wolf J, Shui AM, et al. Early dynamics and depth of response in multiple myeloma patients treated with BCMA CAR-T cells. Front Oncol. 2021;11:783703.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Jacobs JFM, Haagen IA, Lodder A, van der Kroft C, de Kat Angelino CM, Croockewit S, et al. Analytical validation of the Hevylite assays for M-protein quantification. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(7):1169–75.CrossRefPubMed Jacobs JFM, Haagen IA, Lodder A, van der Kroft C, de Kat Angelino CM, Croockewit S, et al. Analytical validation of the Hevylite assays for M-protein quantification. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(7):1169–75.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Barnidge DR, Dasari S, Botz CM, Murray DH, Snyder MR, Katzmann JA, et al. Using mass spectrometry to monitor monoclonal immunoglobulins in patients with a monoclonal gammopathy. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(3):1419–27.CrossRefPubMed Barnidge DR, Dasari S, Botz CM, Murray DH, Snyder MR, Katzmann JA, et al. Using mass spectrometry to monitor monoclonal immunoglobulins in patients with a monoclonal gammopathy. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(3):1419–27.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Murray DL, Puig N, Kristinsson S, Usmani SZ, Dispenzieri A, Bianchi G, et al. Mass spectrometry for the evaluation of monoclonal proteins in multiple myeloma and related disorders: an International Myeloma Working Group Mass Spectrometry Committee Report. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(2):24.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Murray DL, Puig N, Kristinsson S, Usmani SZ, Dispenzieri A, Bianchi G, et al. Mass spectrometry for the evaluation of monoclonal proteins in multiple myeloma and related disorders: an International Myeloma Working Group Mass Spectrometry Committee Report. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(2):24.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Waldschmidt JM, Yee AJ, Vijaykumar T, Pinto RA, Frede J, Anand P, et al. Cell-free DNA for the detection of emerging treatment failure in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2022;36(4):1078–87.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Waldschmidt JM, Yee AJ, Vijaykumar T, Pinto RA, Frede J, Anand P, et al. Cell-free DNA for the detection of emerging treatment failure in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2022;36(4):1078–87.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Cheng Q, Cai L, Zhang Y, Chen L, Hu Y, Sun C. Circulating plasma cells as a biomarker to predict newly diagnosed multiple myeloma prognosis: developing nomogram prognostic models. Front Oncol. 2021;11. Cheng Q, Cai L, Zhang Y, Chen L, Hu Y, Sun C. Circulating plasma cells as a biomarker to predict newly diagnosed multiple myeloma prognosis: developing nomogram prognostic models. Front Oncol. 2021;11.
47.
go back to reference Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328–46.CrossRefPubMed Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):e328–46.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference de Mel S, Lim SH, Tung ML, Chng WJ. Implications of heterogeneity in multiple myeloma. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:232546.PubMedCentralPubMed de Mel S, Lim SH, Tung ML, Chng WJ. Implications of heterogeneity in multiple myeloma. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:232546.PubMedCentralPubMed
50.
go back to reference Zamagni E, Nanni C, Gay F, Dozza L, Scalabrini DR, Omede P, et al. MRD evaluation by PET/CT according to deauville criteria combined with bone marrow techniques in newly diagnosed transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients enrolled in the phase ii forte trial. Hemasphere. 2020;4:60. Zamagni E, Nanni C, Gay F, Dozza L, Scalabrini DR, Omede P, et al. MRD evaluation by PET/CT according to deauville criteria combined with bone marrow techniques in newly diagnosed transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients enrolled in the phase ii forte trial. Hemasphere. 2020;4:60.
51.
go back to reference Raza S, Leng S, Lentzsch S. The critical role of imaging in the management of multiple myeloma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017;12(3):168–75.CrossRefPubMed Raza S, Leng S, Lentzsch S. The critical role of imaging in the management of multiple myeloma. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2017;12(3):168–75.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Baffour FI, Glazebrook KN, Kumar SK, Broski SM. Role of imaging in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(8):966–77.CrossRefPubMed Baffour FI, Glazebrook KN, Kumar SK, Broski SM. Role of imaging in multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(8):966–77.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Response-Adapted Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
Authors
Winnie Z. Y. Teo
Ian Y. E. Ong
Jason W. Y. Tong
Wan Li Ong
Adeline Lin
Fangfang Song
Bee Choo Tai
Melissa Ooi
Cinnie Yentia Seokojo
Yunxin Chen
Chandramouli Nagarajan
Wee Joo Chng
Sanjay de Mel
Publication date
04-07-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports / Issue 5/2023
Print ISSN: 1558-8211
Electronic ISSN: 1558-822X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11899-023-00704-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2023

Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports 5/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine