Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2007

01-09-2007

Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions

Authors: Patricia Carrascosa, Carlos Capuñay, Elba Martín López, Marina Ulla, Roberto Castiglioni, Jorge Carrascosa

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The purpose of our study was to determine the usefulness of a virtual computed tomography colon dissection visualization technique for the detection of polypoid lesions in comparison with conventional virtual colonoscopy analysis and optical colonoscopy.

Methods

Twenty-three patients were evaluated with optical colonoscopy and computed tomography colonoscopy using 16-row MDCT on the same day. CT images were analyzed by the colon dissection workup with unfolded haustra visualization and also using the conventional virtual colonoscopy technique (axial images and endoluminal views). The CT analysis was performed by an experienced radiologist using both viewing methods in a randomized order and blinded to optical colonoscopy results.

Results

Optical colonoscopy revealed 35 colonic lesions; 15 < 5 mm, 18 between 5–9 mm and 2 > 9 mm. For conventional virtual colonoscopy analysis the overall sensitivity was 86.67%; for the colon dissection visualization technique, the overall sensitivity was 82.86%. The average reading time for conventional virtual colonoscopy was 15 ± 3 vs. 8 ± 2 min for the colon dissection visualization technique.

Conclusions

Our results showed that there is a significant reduction in the reading time using the colon dissection visualization technique without detriment to the detection rate, that is, competitive to conventional virtual colonoscopy interpretation results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ferrucci JT (2001) Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:975–988PubMed Ferrucci JT (2001) Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:975–988PubMed
2.
go back to reference Edwards JT, Mendelson RM, Fritschi L, et al. (2004) Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study. Radiology 230:459–464PubMedCrossRef Edwards JT, Mendelson RM, Fritschi L, et al. (2004) Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study. Radiology 230:459–464PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Bechtold RE, et al. (1994) Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality [Abstract]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(suppl):104 Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Bechtold RE, et al. (1994) Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CT and virtual reality [Abstract]. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(suppl):104
4.
go back to reference Saurin JC, Pilleul F (2004) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28:641–643PubMedCrossRef Saurin JC, Pilleul F (2004) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 28:641–643PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. (1996) Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colonography: feasibility of a novel technique. Gastroenterology 110:284–290PubMedCrossRef Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. (1996) Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colonography: feasibility of a novel technique. Gastroenterology 110:284–290PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, et al. (1997) CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1237–1242PubMed Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, et al. (1997) CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1237–1242PubMed
7.
go back to reference Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) Initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 50:309–313PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) Initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 50:309–313PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chung DJ, Huh KC, Choi WJ, et al. (2005) CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:98–103PubMed Chung DJ, Huh KC, Choi WJ, et al. (2005) CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:98–103PubMed
9.
go back to reference Macari M, Bini EJ (2005) CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going? Radiology 237:819–833PubMedCrossRef Macari M, Bini EJ (2005) CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going? Radiology 237:819–833PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dachman AH, Zalis ME (2004) Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology 230:319–323PubMedCrossRef Dachman AH, Zalis ME (2004) Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology 230:319–323PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, et al. (2004) Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1151–1158PubMed Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, et al. (2004) Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1151–1158PubMed
12.
go back to reference Rottgen R, Fischbach F, Plotkin M, et al. (2005) Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography. Acta Radiol 46:222–226PubMedCrossRef Rottgen R, Fischbach F, Plotkin M, et al. (2005) Colon dissection: a new three-dimensional reconstruction tool for computed tomography colonography. Acta Radiol 46:222–226PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S, et al. (2006) CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 16:68–72PubMedCrossRef Juchems MS, Fleiter TR, Pauls S, et al. (2006) CT colonography: comparison of a colon dissection display versus 3D endoluminal view for the detection of polyps. Eur Radiol 16:68–72PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ (2000) Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two-dimensional and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1543–1549PubMed Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ (2000) Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two-dimensional and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1543–1549PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. (1996) Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Radiology 200:49–54PubMed Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. (1996) Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Radiology 200:49–54PubMed
16.
go back to reference Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, et al. (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:989–995PubMed Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, et al. (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:989–995PubMed
17.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi R, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomography virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi R, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomography virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. (2005) False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology 235:495–502PubMedCrossRef Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. (2005) False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology 235:495–502PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gluecker T, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ, et al. (2004) Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search methods. AJR AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:881–889 Gluecker T, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ, et al. (2004) Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search methods. AJR AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:881–889
Metadata
Title
Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions
Authors
Patricia Carrascosa
Carlos Capuñay
Elba Martín López
Marina Ulla
Roberto Castiglioni
Jorge Carrascosa
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2007
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9169-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2007

Abdominal Radiology 5/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.