Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Article

Multi-disciplinary proactive follow-up algorithm for patients with advanced NSCLC receiving afatinib

Authors: Parneet K. Cheema, Alia Thawer, Joanne Leake, Susanna Y. Cheng, Suneil Khanna, J. Charles Victor

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Afatinib is a standard first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC. We implemented a pharmacist-led proactive follow-up algorithm to identify and manage early afatinib-related adverse events (AEs).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients treated with afatinib after implementation of the algorithm at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) from April 1, 2015 to July 31, 2016. Our in-house algorithm involved consultations in person and proactive pharmacist-led callbacks on days 5, 10, and 17. All AEs were graded and documented in real time and management based on toxicity grade was standardized. This study evaluated the impact of our algorithm on real-world AEs.

Results and discussion

Thirty-three patients were identified and reviewed. Median follow-up was 248 days. All patients experienced at least one drug-related AE; 18.2% were grade 3/4. The most common AEs were diarrhea 87.9%, rash 81.8%, stomatitis 57.6%, and paronychia 45.5%. Median dose of afatinib was 40 mg daily; 51.5% of patients had ≥ 1 dose reduction and 6.3% discontinued afatinib due to AEs. Proactive calls by the pharmacist identified 36.5% of all drug-related AEs, 33.3% of grade 3/4 AEs, 58.1% of first drug-related AEs and identified two patients that were non-compliant. Only 3.2% of AEs were identified by an emergency room/urgent clinic visit.

Conclusions

This proactive multi-disciplinary AE management algorithm resulted in a low rate of urgent assessments and discontinuation due to toxicity while maintaining afatinib at ideal dose, thus providing a useful tool for centers prescribing afatinib.
Literature
1.
2.
Carey KD (2006) Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Erlotinib Cancer Res 66:8163–8171CrossRefPubMed
3.
Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, Nomura M, Suzuki M, Wistuba II, Fong KM, Lee H, Toyooka S, Shimizu N, Fujisawa T, Feng Z, Roth JA, Herz J, Minna JD, Gazdar AF (2005) Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 97:339–346CrossRefPubMed
4.
Barlesi F, Blons H, Beau-Faller M et al (2013) Biomarkers (BM) France: results of routine EGFR, HER2, KRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA mutations detection and EML4-ALK gene fusion assessment on the first 10,000 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts). J Clin Oncol 31:8000–8000CrossRef
5.
Zhu CQ, da Cunha SG, Ding K et al (2008) Role of KRAS and EGFR as biomarkers of response to erlotinib in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21. J Clin Oncol 26:4268–4275CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zhang YL, Yuan JQ, Wang KF et al (2016) The prevalence of EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget 7:78985–78993PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman J, Chirieac LR, D'Amico TA, DeCamp MM, Dilling TJ, Dobelbower M, Doebele RC, Govindan R, Gubens MA, Hennon M, Horn L, Komaki R, Lackner RP, Lanuti M, Leal TA, Leisch LJ, Lilenbaum R, Lin J, Loo BW Jr, Martins R, Otterson GA, Reckamp K, Riely GJ, Schild SE, Shapiro TA, Stevenson J, Swanson SJ, Tauer K, Yang SC, Gregory K, Hughes M (2017) Non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 15:504–535CrossRef
8.
Masters GA, Temin S, Azzoli CG, Giaccone G, Baker S Jr, Brahmer JR, Ellis PM, Gajra A, Rackear N, Schiller JH, Smith TJ, Strawn JR, Trent D, Johnson DH (2015) Systemic therapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 33:3488–3515CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, Seto T, Satouchi M, Tada H, Hirashima T, Asami K, Katakami N, Takada M, Yoshioka H, Shibata K, Kudoh S, Shimizu E, Saito H, Toyooka S, Nakagawa K, Fukuoka M (2010) Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncology 11:121–128CrossRefPubMed
10.
Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Thongprasert S et al (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin–paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 361:947–957CrossRefPubMed
11.
Rosell R, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, Cardenal F, Garcia Gomez R, Pallares C, Sanchez JM, Porta R, Cobo M, di Seri M, Garrido Lopez P, Insa A, de Marinis F, Corre R, Carreras M, Carcereny E, Taron M, Paz-Ares LG, Spanish Lung Cancer Group (2011) Erlotinib versus chemotherapy (CT) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: interim results of the European erlotinib versus chemotherapy (EURTAC) phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 29:7503–7503CrossRef
12.
Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N et al (2013) Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol 31:3327–3334CrossRefPubMed
13.
Wu Y-L, Zhou C, Hu C-P, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Li W, Hou M, Shi JH, Lee KY, Xu CR, Massey D, Kim M, Shi Y, Geater SL (2014) Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:213–222CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zhou C, Wu Y-L, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, Lu S, Zhang L, Hu C, Hu C, Luo Y, Chen L, Ye M, Huang J, Zhi X, Zhang Y, Xiu Q, Ma J, Zhang L, You C (2011) Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 12:735–742CrossRefPubMed
15.
Solca F, Dahl G, Zoephel A, Bader G, Sanderson M, Klein C, Kraemer O, Himmelsbach F, Haaksma E, Adolf GR (2012) Target binding properties and cellular activity of afatinib (BIBW 2992), an irreversible ErbB family blocker. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 343:342–350CrossRefPubMed
16.
Yang JC, Sequist LV, Zhou C et al (2016) Effect of dose adjustment on the safety and efficacy of afatinib for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma: post hoc analyses of the randomized LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials. Ann Oncol 27:2103–2110CrossRefPubMed
17.
Paz-Ares L, Tan EH, O'Byrne K et al (2017) Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial. Ann Oncol 28:270–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Park K, Tan E-H, O'Byrne K, Zhang L, Boyer M, Mok T, Hirsh V, Yang JCH, Lee KH, Lu S, Shi Y, Kim SW, Laskin J, Kim DW, Arvis CD, Kölbeck K, Laurie SA, Tsai CM, Shahidi M, Kim M, Massey D, Zazulina V, Paz-Ares L (2016) Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): a phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 17:577–589CrossRefPubMed
19.
Passaro A, Di Maio M, Del Signore E, et al: Management of nonhematologic toxicities associated with different EGFR-TKIs in advanced NSCLC: a comparison analysis. Clin Lung Cancer 15:307–312, 2014
20.
Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, Warner E (1997) Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:110–115CrossRefPubMed
21.
Schellens JH (2005) Challenges of oral chemotherapy. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 3:99–100PubMed
22.
McLeod HL, Evans WE (1999) Oral cancer chemotherapy: the promise and the pitfalls. Clin Cancer Res 5:2669–2671PubMed
23.
Lam MS, Cheung N (2016) Impact of oncology pharmacist-managed oral anticancer therapy in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia. J Oncol Pharm Pract 22:741–748CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kearney N, McCann L, Norrie J, Taylor L, Gray P, McGee-Lennon M, Sage M, Miller M, Maguire R (2009) Evaluation of a mobile phone-based, advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) in the management of chemotherapy-related toxicity. Support Care Cancer 17:437–444CrossRefPubMed
25.
Hirsh V (2011) Managing treatment-related adverse events associated with egfr tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Curr Oncol 18:126–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Melosky B, Leighl NB, Rothenstein J, Sangha R, Stewart D, Papp K (2015) Management of egfr tki–induced dermatologic adverse events. Curr Oncol 22:123–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
28.
29.
Lacouture ME, Anadkat MJ, Bensadoun RJ et al (2011) Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of EGFR inhibitor-associated dermatologic toxicities. Support Care Cancer 19:1079–1095CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
Lacouture ME, Mitchell EP, Piperdi B, Pillai MV, Shearer H, Iannotti N, Xu F, Yassine M (2010) Skin toxicity evaluation protocol with panitumumab (STEPP), a phase II, open-label, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a pre-emptive skin treatment regimen on skin toxicities and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:1351–1357CrossRefPubMed
35.
Melosky B, Anderson H, Burkes RL, Chu Q, Hao D, Ho V, Ho C, Lam W, Lee CW, Leighl NB, Murray N, Sun S, Winston R, Laskin JJ (2016) Pan Canadian rash trial: a randomized phase III trial evaluating the impact of a prophylactic skin treatment regimen on epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced skin toxicities in patients with metastatic lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:810–815CrossRefPubMed
36.
Berlin JA, Glasser SC, Ellenberg SS (2008) Adverse event detection in drug development: recommendations and obligations beyond phase 3. Am J Public Health 98:1366–1371CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Chaft JE, Oxnard GR, Sima CS, Kris MG, Miller VA, Riely GJ (2011) Disease flare after tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation in patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer and acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib: implications for clinical trial design. Clin Cancer Res 17:6298–6303CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Basch E, Deal AM, Kris MG, Scher HI, Hudis CA, Sabbatini P, Rogak L, Bennett AV, Dueck AC, Atkinson TM, Chou JF, Dulko D, Sit L, Barz A, Novotny P, Fruscione M, Sloan JA, Schrag D (2016) Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:557–565CrossRefPubMed
39.
Shah A Maroun J, Dranitsaris G. The cost of hospitalization secondary to severe chemotherapy induced diarrhea (CID) in patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016: 22 (14)_suppl pp. 6111–6113
40.
41.
Neuss MN, Gilmore TR, Belderson KM, et al: 2016 updated American Society of Clinical Oncology/Oncology Nursing Society chemotherapy administration safety standards, including standards for pediatric oncology. Oncol Nurs Forum 44:31–43, 2017
Metadata
Title
Multi-disciplinary proactive follow-up algorithm for patients with advanced NSCLC receiving afatinib
Authors
Parneet K. Cheema
Alia Thawer
Joanne Leake
Susanna Y. Cheng
Suneil Khanna
J. Charles Victor
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4392-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 3/2019 Go to the issue

Review Article

Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting: a comparison between MASCC/ESMO, ASCO, and NCCN antiemetic guidelines

Original Article

Real-world use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in ambulatory breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional study

Review Article

Nutritional interventions in elderly gastrointestinal cancer patients: the evidence from randomized controlled trials

Review Article

The new challenge for improving psychosocial cancer care: shifting to a system-based approach

Original Article

Physical activity and associations with treatment-induced adverse effects among prostate cancer patients

Original Article

The role of post-traumatic growth in promoting healthy behavior for couples coping with cancer
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits