Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2021

01-10-2021 | Motor Evoked Potential | Original Research

The influence of depth of anesthesia and blood pressure on muscle recorded motor evoked potentials in spinal surgery. A prospective observational study protocol

Authors: Sebastiaan E. Dulfer, M. M. Sahinovic, F. Lange, F. H. Wapstra, D. Postmus, A. R. E. Potgieser, C. Faber, R. J. M. Groen, A. R. Absalom, G. Drost

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

For high-risk spinal surgeries, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is used to detect and prevent intraoperative neurological injury. The motor tracts are monitored by recording and analyzing muscle transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potentials (mTc-MEPs). A mTc-MEP amplitude decrease of 50–80% is the most common warning criterion for possible neurological injury. However, these warning criteria often result in false positive warnings. False positives may be caused by inadequate depth of anesthesia and blood pressure on mTc-MEP amplitudes. The aim of this paper is to validate the study protocol in which the goal is to investigate the effects of depth of anesthesia (part 1) and blood pressure (part 2) on mTc-MEPs. Per part, 25 patients will be included. In order to investigate the effects of depth of anesthesia, a processed electroencephalogram (pEEG) monitor will be used. At pEEG values of 30, 40 and 50, mTc-MEP measurements will be performed. To examine the effect of blood pressure on mTc-MEPs the mean arterial pressure will be elevated from 60 to 100 mmHg during which mTc-MEP measurements will be performed. We hypothesize that by understanding the effects of depth of anesthesia and blood pressure on mTc-MEPs, the mTc-MEP monitoring can be interpreted more reliably. This may contribute to fewer false positive warnings. By performing this study after induction and prior to incision, this protocol provides a unique opportunity to study the effects of depths of anesthesia and blood pressure on mTc-MEPs alone with as little confounders as possible.
Trial registration number NL7772.
Literature
2.
go back to reference MacDonald DB, Skinner S, Shils J, Yingling C, American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring—a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:2291–316 (cited 13 May 2018). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24055297. MacDonald DB, Skinner S, Shils J, Yingling C, American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring—a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:2291–316 (cited 13 May 2018). http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​24055297.
4.
go back to reference Sala F, Palandri G, Basso E, Lanteri P, Deletis V, Faccioli F, et al. Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:1129–43 (cited 28 May 2019) . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16723892. Sala F, Palandri G, Basso E, Lanteri P, Deletis V, Faccioli F, et al. Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:1129–43 (cited 28 May 2019) . http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​16723892.
8.
go back to reference Dulfer SE, Drost G, Lange F, Journee HL, Wapstra FH, Hoving EW. Long-term evaluation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring-assisted tethered cord surgery. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2017;33:1985–95.CrossRef Dulfer SE, Drost G, Lange F, Journee HL, Wapstra FH, Hoving EW. Long-term evaluation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring-assisted tethered cord surgery. Child’s Nerv Syst. 2017;33:1985–95.CrossRef
12.
16.
go back to reference Malcharek MJ, Loeffler S, Schiefer D, Manceur MA, Sablotzki A, Gille J, et al. Transcranial motor evoked potentials during anesthesia with desflurane versus propofol—a prospective randomized trial. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126:1825–32 (cited 13 May 2018). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25541524. Malcharek MJ, Loeffler S, Schiefer D, Manceur MA, Sablotzki A, Gille J, et al. Transcranial motor evoked potentials during anesthesia with desflurane versus propofol—a prospective randomized trial. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126:1825–32 (cited 13 May 2018). http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​25541524.
20.
go back to reference http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28786839. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28786839.
22.
go back to reference Nimmo AF, Absalom AR, Bagshaw O, Biswas A, Cook TM, Costello A, et al. Guidelines for the safe practice of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA): Joint Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the Society for Intravenous Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018;74(2):4–12. Nimmo AF, Absalom AR, Bagshaw O, Biswas A, Cook TM, Costello A, et al. Guidelines for the safe practice of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA): Joint Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the Society for Intravenous Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018;74(2):4–12.
23.
go back to reference Struys MMRF, Sahinovic MM, Lichtenbelt BJ, Vereecke HEM, Absalom AR. Optimizing intravenous drug administration by applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:38–47.CrossRef Struys MMRF, Sahinovic MM, Lichtenbelt BJ, Vereecke HEM, Absalom AR. Optimizing intravenous drug administration by applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:38–47.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Scheeren TWL, Kuizenga MH, Maurer H, Struys MMRF, Heringlake M. Electroencephalography and brain oxygenation monitoring in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2019;128:265–77.CrossRef Scheeren TWL, Kuizenga MH, Maurer H, Struys MMRF, Heringlake M. Electroencephalography and brain oxygenation monitoring in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2019;128:265–77.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sahinovic MM, van den Berg JP, Colin PJ, Gambus PL, Jensen EW, Agustí M, et al. Influence of an “Electroencephalogram-Based” monitor choice on the delay between the predicted propofol effect-site concentration and the measured drug effect. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(4):1184–92.CrossRef Sahinovic MM, van den Berg JP, Colin PJ, Gambus PL, Jensen EW, Agustí M, et al. Influence of an “Electroencephalogram-Based” monitor choice on the delay between the predicted propofol effect-site concentration and the measured drug effect. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(4):1184–92.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kuchiwaki H, Inao S, Andoh K, Ishiguri H, Sugita K. Changes in spinal cord function evaluated by evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow from a lateral retraction post-cervical laminectomy. Acta Neurol Scand. 1990;82:183–90 (cited 17 June 2019). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2270746. Kuchiwaki H, Inao S, Andoh K, Ishiguri H, Sugita K. Changes in spinal cord function evaluated by evoked potentials and spinal cord blood flow from a lateral retraction post-cervical laminectomy. Acta Neurol Scand. 1990;82:183–90 (cited 17 June 2019). http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​2270746.
32.
33.
35.
go back to reference Gruenewald M, Ilies C. Monitoring the nociception–anti-nociception balance. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013;27:235–47.CrossRef Gruenewald M, Ilies C. Monitoring the nociception–anti-nociception balance. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013;27:235–47.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sahinovic MM, Eleveld DJ, Kalmar AF, Heeremans EH, De Smet T, Seshagiri CV, et al. Accuracy of the composite variability index as a measure of the balance between nociception and antinociception during anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:288–301.CrossRef Sahinovic MM, Eleveld DJ, Kalmar AF, Heeremans EH, De Smet T, Seshagiri CV, et al. Accuracy of the composite variability index as a measure of the balance between nociception and antinociception during anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2014;119:288–301.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Saied NN, Helwani MA, Weavind LM, Shi Y, Shotwell MS, Pandharipande PP. Effect of anaesthesia type on postoperative mortality and morbidities: a matched analysis of the NSQIP database. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:105–11.CrossRef Saied NN, Helwani MA, Weavind LM, Shi Y, Shotwell MS, Pandharipande PP. Effect of anaesthesia type on postoperative mortality and morbidities: a matched analysis of the NSQIP database. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118:105–11.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Saponaro-González Á, Pérez-Lorensu PJ, Rivas-Navas E, Fernández-Conejero I. Suprasegmental neurophysiological monitoring with H reflex and TcMEP in spinal surgery. Transient loss due to hypotension. A case report. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2016;1:54–7 (cited 17 June 2019). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214960. Saponaro-González Á, Pérez-Lorensu PJ, Rivas-Navas E, Fernández-Conejero I. Suprasegmental neurophysiological monitoring with H reflex and TcMEP in spinal surgery. Transient loss due to hypotension. A case report. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2016;1:54–7 (cited 17 June 2019). http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​30214960.
42.
go back to reference Zuckerman SL, Forbes JA, Mistry AM, Krishnamoorthi H, Weaver S, Mathews L, et al. Electrophysiologic deterioration in surgery for thoracic disc herniation: impact of mean arterial pressures on surgical outcome. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:2279–90 (cited 17 June 2019). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24898311. Zuckerman SL, Forbes JA, Mistry AM, Krishnamoorthi H, Weaver S, Mathews L, et al. Electrophysiologic deterioration in surgery for thoracic disc herniation: impact of mean arterial pressures on surgical outcome. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:2279–90 (cited 17 June 2019). http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​24898311.
Metadata
Title
The influence of depth of anesthesia and blood pressure on muscle recorded motor evoked potentials in spinal surgery. A prospective observational study protocol
Authors
Sebastiaan E. Dulfer
M. M. Sahinovic
F. Lange
F. H. Wapstra
D. Postmus
A. R. E. Potgieser
C. Faber
R. J. M. Groen
A. R. Absalom
G. Drost
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00645-1

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2021 Go to the issue