Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Odontology 1/2014

01-01-2014 | Original Article

Morphometric analysis of the cranial base in Asians

Authors: Hong-Po Chang, Pao-Hsin Liu, Yu-Chuan Tseng, Yi-Hsin Yang, Chin-Yun Pan, Szu-Ting Chou

Published in: Odontology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that developmental heterogeneity in cranial base morphology increases the prevalence of Class III malocclusion and mandibular prognathism in Asians. Thin-plate spline (TPS) graphical analysis of lateral cephalometric radiographs of the cranial base and the upper midface configuration were compared between a European-American group (24 females and 31 males) and four Asian ethnic groups (100 Chinese, 100 Japanese, 100 Korean and 100 Taiwanese; 50 females and 50 males per group) of young adults with clinically acceptable occlusion and facial profiles. Procrustes analysis was performed to identify statistically significant differences in each configuration of landmarks (P < 0.001). The TPS graphical analysis revealed that the greatest differences of Asians were the horizontal compression and vertical expansion in the anterior portion of the cranial base and upper midface region. The most posterior cranial base region also showed horizontal compression between the basion and Bolton point, with forward displacement of the articulare. Facial flatness and anterior displacement of the temporomandibular joint, resulting from a relative retrusion of the nasomaxillary complex and a relative forward position of the mandible were also noted. These features that tend to cause a prognathic mandible and/or retruded midface indicate a morphologic predisposition of Asian populations for Class III malocclusion.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Susami R, Asai Y, Hirose K, Hosoi T, Hayashi I. The prevalence of malocclusion in Japanese school children. J Jpn Orthod Soc. 1972;31:319–24. Susami R, Asai Y, Hirose K, Hosoi T, Hayashi I. The prevalence of malocclusion in Japanese school children. J Jpn Orthod Soc. 1972;31:319–24.
2.
go back to reference Chang HP. Components of Class III malocclusion in Taiwanese. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1985;1:144–55. Chang HP. Components of Class III malocclusion in Taiwanese. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1985;1:144–55.
3.
go back to reference Kang HK, Ryu YK. A study on the prevalence of malocclusion of Yonsei University students in 1991. Korean J Orthod. 1992;22:691–701. Kang HK, Ryu YK. A study on the prevalence of malocclusion of Yonsei University students in 1991. Korean J Orthod. 1992;22:691–701.
4.
go back to reference Zeng XL. A study of skeletal types of Class III malocclusion. Chin J Stomatol. 1993;28:170–73, 191. Zeng XL. A study of skeletal types of Class III malocclusion. Chin J Stomatol. 1993;28:170–73, 191.
5.
go back to reference Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:599–617.PubMedCrossRef Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:599–617.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Richtsmeier JT, Cheverud JM, Jele S. Advances in anthropological morphometrics. Ann Rev Anthropol. 1992;21:283–305.CrossRef Richtsmeier JT, Cheverud JM, Jele S. Advances in anthropological morphometrics. Ann Rev Anthropol. 1992;21:283–305.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol. 1993;8:129–32.CrossRef Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol. 1993;8:129–32.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bookstein FL. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1989;11:567–85.CrossRef Bookstein FL. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1989;11:567–85.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bookstein FL. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Bookstein FL. Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
11.
go back to reference Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1996. Enlow DH, Hans MG. Essentials of facial growth. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1996.
12.
go back to reference Chang HP, Huang HH. Craniofacial pattern of young adults with various types of malocclusion. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1998;14:168–76.PubMed Chang HP, Huang HH. Craniofacial pattern of young adults with various types of malocclusion. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 1998;14:168–76.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gkantidis N, Halazonetis DJ. Morphological integration between the cranial base and the face in children and adults. J Anat. 2011;218:426–38.PubMedCrossRef Gkantidis N, Halazonetis DJ. Morphological integration between the cranial base and the face in children and adults. J Anat. 2011;218:426–38.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ishii N, Deguchi T, Hunt NP. Morphological difference in the craniofacial structure between Japanese and Caucasian girls with Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:61–7.PubMedCrossRef Ishii N, Deguchi T, Hunt NP. Morphological difference in the craniofacial structure between Japanese and Caucasian girls with Class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:61–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 7th ed. Belmont: Thomson–Brooks/Cole; 2011. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 7th ed. Belmont: Thomson–Brooks/Cole; 2011.
16.
17.
go back to reference Rohlf FJ, Slice D. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool. 1990;39:40–59.CrossRef Rohlf FJ, Slice D. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool. 1990;39:40–59.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Goodall CR. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J Royal Stat Soc. 1991;B53:285–339. Goodall CR. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J Royal Stat Soc. 1991;B53:285–339.
19.
go back to reference Rohlf FJ. Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000;111:463–78.PubMedCrossRef Rohlf FJ. Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000;111:463–78.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Unwin; 1940. p. 122–32. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Unwin; 1940. p. 122–32.
21.
22.
go back to reference Swiderski DL. Morphological evolution of the scapula in three squirrels, chipmunks, and ground squirrels (Sciuridae): an analysis using thin-plate spline. Evolution. 1993;47:1854–73.CrossRef Swiderski DL. Morphological evolution of the scapula in three squirrels, chipmunks, and ground squirrels (Sciuridae): an analysis using thin-plate spline. Evolution. 1993;47:1854–73.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yaroch LA. Shape analysis using the thin-plate spline: Neanderthal cranial shape as an example. Yrbk Phys Anthropol. 1996;39:43–89.CrossRef Yaroch LA. Shape analysis using the thin-plate spline: Neanderthal cranial shape as an example. Yrbk Phys Anthropol. 1996;39:43–89.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yamaguchi B. Facial flatness measurements of the Ainu and Japanese crania. Bull Natl Sci Mus Tokyo. 1973;16:161–71. Yamaguchi B. Facial flatness measurements of the Ainu and Japanese crania. Bull Natl Sci Mus Tokyo. 1973;16:161–71.
25.
go back to reference Dodo Y. A study of the facial flatness in several cranial series from East Asia and North America. J Anthrop Soc Nippon. 1986;94:81–93.CrossRef Dodo Y. A study of the facial flatness in several cranial series from East Asia and North America. J Anthrop Soc Nippon. 1986;94:81–93.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ishida H. Flatness of facial skeletons in Siberian and other circum-Pacific populations. Z Morphol Anthropol. 1992;79:53–67.PubMed Ishida H. Flatness of facial skeletons in Siberian and other circum-Pacific populations. Z Morphol Anthropol. 1992;79:53–67.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Hopkin GB, Houston WJB, James GA. The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1968;38:250–5.PubMed Hopkin GB, Houston WJB, James GA. The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1968;38:250–5.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Ma W, Lozanoff S. Spatial and temporal distribution of cellular proliferation in the cranial base of normal and midfacially retrusive mice. Clin Anat. 1999;12:315–25.PubMedCrossRef Ma W, Lozanoff S. Spatial and temporal distribution of cellular proliferation in the cranial base of normal and midfacially retrusive mice. Clin Anat. 1999;12:315–25.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:140–71.PubMedCrossRef Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod. 1974;66:140–71.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Innocenti C, Giuntini V, Defraia E, Baccetti T. Glenoid fossa position in Class III malocclusion associated with mandibular protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:438–41.PubMedCrossRef Innocenti C, Giuntini V, Defraia E, Baccetti T. Glenoid fossa position in Class III malocclusion associated with mandibular protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135:438–41.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ishii N, Deguchi T, Hunt NP. Craniofacial differences between Japanese and British Caucasian females with a skeletal Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:493–9.PubMedCrossRef Ishii N, Deguchi T, Hunt NP. Craniofacial differences between Japanese and British Caucasian females with a skeletal Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24:493–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Seren E, Akan H, Toller MO, Akyar S. An evaluation of the condylar position of the temporomandibular joint by computerized tomography in Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:483–8.PubMedCrossRef Seren E, Akan H, Toller MO, Akyar S. An evaluation of the condylar position of the temporomandibular joint by computerized tomography in Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105:483–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:27–35.PubMed Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:27–35.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Alkhamrah B, Terada K, Yamaki M, Ali IM, Hanada K. Ethnicity and skeletal Class III morphology: a pubertal growth analysis using thin-plate spline analysis. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 2001;16:243–54. Alkhamrah B, Terada K, Yamaki M, Ali IM, Hanada K. Ethnicity and skeletal Class III morphology: a pubertal growth analysis using thin-plate spline analysis. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 2001;16:243–54.
35.
go back to reference Singh GD, McNamara JA Jr, Lozanoff S. Thin-plate spline analysis of the cranial base in subjects with Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:341–53.PubMedCrossRef Singh GD, McNamara JA Jr, Lozanoff S. Thin-plate spline analysis of the cranial base in subjects with Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:341–53.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bhat M, Enlow DH. Facial variations related to headform type. Angle Orthod. 1985;55:269–80.PubMed Bhat M, Enlow DH. Facial variations related to headform type. Angle Orthod. 1985;55:269–80.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod. 1985;55:127–38.PubMed Siriwat PP, Jarabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod. 1985;55:127–38.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Proffit WR, Fields HW, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:97–106. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:97–106.
39.
go back to reference Rosas A, Bastir M, Alarcón JA, Kuroe K. Thin-plate spline analysis of the cranial base in African, Asian and European populations and its relationship with different malocclusions. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53:826–34.PubMedCrossRef Rosas A, Bastir M, Alarcón JA, Kuroe K. Thin-plate spline analysis of the cranial base in African, Asian and European populations and its relationship with different malocclusions. Arch Oral Biol. 2008;53:826–34.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Sanborn RT. Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1955;25:208–22. Sanborn RT. Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1955;25:208–22.
41.
go back to reference Chang HP, Hsieh SH, Tseng YC, Chou TM. Cranial-base morphology in children with Class III malocclusion. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2005;21:159–65.PubMedCrossRef Chang HP, Hsieh SH, Tseng YC, Chou TM. Cranial-base morphology in children with Class III malocclusion. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2005;21:159–65.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Williams S, Anderson CE. The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:302–11.PubMedCrossRef Williams S, Anderson CE. The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:302–11.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Polat ÖÖ, Kaya B. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusion. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2007;10:216–21.CrossRef Polat ÖÖ, Kaya B. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusion. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2007;10:216–21.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Battagel JM. The aetiology of Class III malocclusion examined by tensor analysis. Br J Orthod. 1993;20:283–95.PubMed Battagel JM. The aetiology of Class III malocclusion examined by tensor analysis. Br J Orthod. 1993;20:283–95.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Battagel JM. Predictors of relapse in orthodontically-treated Class III malocclusions. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:1–13.PubMed Battagel JM. Predictors of relapse in orthodontically-treated Class III malocclusions. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:1–13.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Bastir M, Rosas A, Kuroe K. Petrosal orientation and mandibular ramus breadth: evidence of a developmental integrated petroso-mandibular unit. Am J Phys Anthropl. 2004;123:340–50.CrossRef Bastir M, Rosas A, Kuroe K. Petrosal orientation and mandibular ramus breadth: evidence of a developmental integrated petroso-mandibular unit. Am J Phys Anthropl. 2004;123:340–50.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Baccetti T, Antonini A, Franchi L, Tonti M, Tollaro I. Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study. Br J Orthod. 1997;24:55–9.PubMedCrossRef Baccetti T, Antonini A, Franchi L, Tonti M, Tollaro I. Glenoid fossa position in different facial types: a cephalometric study. Br J Orthod. 1997;24:55–9.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Dhopatkar A, Bhatia SN, Rock P. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:456–63.PubMed Dhopatkar A, Bhatia SN, Rock P. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:456–63.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Morphometric analysis of the cranial base in Asians
Authors
Hong-Po Chang
Pao-Hsin Liu
Yu-Chuan Tseng
Yi-Hsin Yang
Chin-Yun Pan
Szu-Ting Chou
Publication date
01-01-2014
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Odontology / Issue 1/2014
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Electronic ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-012-0096-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Odontology 1/2014 Go to the issue