Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009

01-12-2009 | Invited commentary

‘Minority report’: how best to analyze clinical trial data to address disparities

Authors: Dawn L. Hershman, Joseph M. Unger

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Excerpt

Eliminating health disparities is a national priority, and research into the factors that contribute to the disparity in outcome is critical to develop interventions aimed at eliminating them. In cancer research, and especially in breast cancer research, we have made enormous strides in reducing cancer related mortality [1]. Many of cancer research has focused on discovering and proving the efficacy of new interventions to reduce cancer mortality through large-scale clinical trials. In order to be effective, these results need to be disseminated to the community, and they need to be generalizable. If the population studied is similar to the population as a whole with respect to demographics and prognostic factors, the results could be considered generalizable. Often, due to issues related to access to clinical trials, strict enrollment criteria and a mistrust of clinical research, various subgroups of the population are underrepresented, such as the elderly, ethnic and racial minorities, patients with inadequate insurance, and patients of lower socioeconomic status. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA et al (2005) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1407–1427PubMedCrossRef Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA et al (2005) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1407–1427PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goss E, Lopez AM, Brown CL et al (2009) American society of clinical oncology policy statement: disparities in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 27:2881–2885CrossRefPubMed Goss E, Lopez AM, Brown CL et al (2009) American society of clinical oncology policy statement: disparities in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 27:2881–2885CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Albain KS, Unger JM, Crowley JJ et al (2009) Racial disparities in cancer survival among randomized clinical trials patients of the southwest oncology group. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:984–992CrossRefPubMed Albain KS, Unger JM, Crowley JJ et al (2009) Racial disparities in cancer survival among randomized clinical trials patients of the southwest oncology group. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:984–992CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Polite BN, Cirrincione C, Fleming GF et al (2008) Racial differences in clinical outcomes from metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of CALGB 9342 and 9840—cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol 26:2659–2665CrossRefPubMed Polite BN, Cirrincione C, Fleming GF et al (2008) Racial differences in clinical outcomes from metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of CALGB 9342 and 9840—cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol 26:2659–2665CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Unger J, Green S, Albain K (2006) Outcome of African American women with breast cancer in cooperative group clinical trials. In: Williams CO, Olopade OL, Falkson C (eds) Breast cancer in women of African American descent. Springer, New York Unger J, Green S, Albain K (2006) Outcome of African American women with breast cancer in cooperative group clinical trials. In: Williams CO, Olopade OL, Falkson C (eds) Breast cancer in women of African American descent. Springer, New York
7.
go back to reference Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ et al (1999) Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med 341:2061–2067CrossRefPubMed Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ et al (1999) Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med 341:2061–2067CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Haynes AM, Smedley BD (eds) (1999) The unequal burden of cancer: an assessment of NIH research and programs for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved. National Academy Press, Washington, DC Haynes AM, Smedley BD (eds) (1999) The unequal burden of cancer: an assessment of NIH research and programs for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
9.
go back to reference Unger JM, Coltman CA Jr, Crowley JJ et al (2006) Impact of the year 2000 medicare policy change on older patient enrollment to cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 24:141–144CrossRefPubMed Unger JM, Coltman CA Jr, Crowley JJ et al (2006) Impact of the year 2000 medicare policy change on older patient enrollment to cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 24:141–144CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
‘Minority report’: how best to analyze clinical trial data to address disparities
Authors
Dawn L. Hershman
Joseph M. Unger
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0538-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine