Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 3/2016

01-06-2016 | Invited Review

Minituriazed percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what does it mean?

Authors: W. Kamal, P. Kallidonis, I. Kyriazis, E. Liatsikos

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

A lot of interest has been recently attracted to miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Smaller diameter tracts and instruments, in comparison to standard PCNL are utilized to decrease the morbidity of PCNL. However, a debate is ongoing regarding the safety and efficacy of these methods. The growing enthusiasm toward miniaturized PCNL led to different techniques and instruments, and eventually generated confusion in the terminology of PCNL. In this review, we highlight the different modalities of miniaturized PCNL, their indication, their safety and efficacy, and the appropriate terminology is suggested. A comprehensive review of current literature was performed using PubMed®. Publications relevant to the subject were retrieved and critically appraised. Miniaturized PCNL was introduced with the desire to reduce access-related complications and bleeding. Miniaturized PCNL has yet to prove clear advantage over the standard PCNL. Nevertheless, the current experience proves the safety of the miniaturized techniques. Advantages of the miniaturized PCNL suggested in the literature are the lower bleeding rate and decreased hospital stay. In addition, the miniaturized PCNL has been proven a safe and effective modality of renal stone treatment in pediatric population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R (1982) Percutaneous kidney stone removal. Eur Urol 8(5):304–311PubMed Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R (1982) Percutaneous kidney stone removal. Eur Urol 8(5):304–311PubMed
2.
go back to reference Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ Jr, Barrett DM, Benson RC Jr, May GR, Bender CE (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1000 cases. J Urol 134(6):1077–1081PubMed Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ Jr, Barrett DM, Benson RC Jr, May GR, Bender CE (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1000 cases. J Urol 134(6):1077–1081PubMed
3.
go back to reference Rassweiler J, Gumpinger R, Miller K, Holzermann F, Eisenberger F (1986) Multimodal treatment (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourology) of complicated renal stone disease. Eur Urol 12(5):294–304PubMed Rassweiler J, Gumpinger R, Miller K, Holzermann F, Eisenberger F (1986) Multimodal treatment (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourology) of complicated renal stone disease. Eur Urol 12(5):294–304PubMed
4.
go back to reference Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (1998) The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):371–374CrossRefPubMed Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (1998) The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):371–374CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Corvin S, Seibold J, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A, Sievert KD (2006) Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement. Urology 68(3):489–493. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.081 (discussion 493–484) CrossRefPubMed Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Corvin S, Seibold J, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A, Sievert KD (2006) Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement. Urology 68(3):489–493. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2006.​03.​081 (discussion 493–484) CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G (2010) Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol Endourol Soc 24(7):1075–1079. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0111 CrossRef Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G (2010) Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol Endourol Soc 24(7):1075–1079. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2010.​0111 CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Doshi A, Ganpule AP, Jagtap J, Desai MR (2013) Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 112(3):355–361. doi:10.1111/bju.12164 CrossRefPubMed Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Doshi A, Ganpule AP, Jagtap J, Desai MR (2013) Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 112(3):355–361. doi:10.​1111/​bju.​12164 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NP, Chomon GB, Grasso M, Saba P, Nakada S, de la Rosette J (2011) Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol Endourol Soc 25(6):933–939. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0606 CrossRef Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NP, Chomon GB, Grasso M, Saba P, Nakada S, de la Rosette J (2011) Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol Endourol Soc 25(6):933–939. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2010.​0606 CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A (2008) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). Der Urologe Ausg A 47(9):1068–1073. doi:10.1007/s00120-008-1814-2 CrossRef Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis AG, Walcher U, Sievert KD, Merseburger AS, Kuczyk M, Stenzl A (2008) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy (MIP). Der Urologe Ausg A 47(9):1068–1073. doi:10.​1007/​s00120-008-1814-2 CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Ganpule AP, Mishra S, Vyas J, Jagtap J, Desai M (2013) Current role of microperc in the management of small renal calculi. Ind J Urol IJU J Urol Soc India 29(3):214–218. doi:10.4103/0970-1591.117282 CrossRef Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Ganpule AP, Mishra S, Vyas J, Jagtap J, Desai M (2013) Current role of microperc in the management of small renal calculi. Ind J Urol IJU J Urol Soc India 29(3):214–218. doi:10.​4103/​0970-1591.​117282 CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tepeler A, Sarica K (2013) Standard, mini, ultra-mini, and micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is next? A novel labeling system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy according to the size of the access sheath used during procedure. Urolithiasis 41(4):367–368. doi:10.1007/s00240-013-0578-3 CrossRefPubMed Tepeler A, Sarica K (2013) Standard, mini, ultra-mini, and micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is next? A novel labeling system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy according to the size of the access sheath used during procedure. Urolithiasis 41(4):367–368. doi:10.​1007/​s00240-013-0578-3 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Nagele U, Schilling D, Sievert KD, Stenzl A, Kuczyk M (2008) Management of lower-pole stones of 0.8 to 1.5 cm maximal diameter by the minimally invasive percutaneous approach. J Endourol Endourol Soc 22(9):1851–1853. doi:10.1089/end.2008.9791 CrossRef Nagele U, Schilling D, Sievert KD, Stenzl A, Kuczyk M (2008) Management of lower-pole stones of 0.8 to 1.5 cm maximal diameter by the minimally invasive percutaneous approach. J Endourol Endourol Soc 22(9):1851–1853. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2008.​9791 CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H (2013) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis 41(3):241–246. doi:10.1007/s00240-013-0552-0 CrossRefPubMed Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H (2013) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis 41(3):241–246. doi:10.​1007/​s00240-013-0552-0 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Long Q, Guo J, Xu Z, Yang Y, Wang H, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Wang G (2013) Experience of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones. Urol Int 90(4):384–388. doi:10.1159/000343668 CrossRefPubMed Long Q, Guo J, Xu Z, Yang Y, Wang H, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Wang G (2013) Experience of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones. Urol Int 90(4):384–388. doi:10.​1159/​000343668 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Yang Z, Song L, Xie D, Hu M, Peng Z, Liu T, Du C, Zhong J, Qing W, Guo S, Zhu L, Yao L, Huang J, Fan D, Ye Z (2012) Comparative study of outcome in treating upper ureteral impacted stones using minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with aid of patented system or transurethral ureteroscopy. Urology 80(6):1192–1197. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.045 CrossRefPubMed Yang Z, Song L, Xie D, Hu M, Peng Z, Liu T, Du C, Zhong J, Qing W, Guo S, Zhu L, Yao L, Huang J, Fan D, Ye Z (2012) Comparative study of outcome in treating upper ureteral impacted stones using minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with aid of patented system or transurethral ureteroscopy. Urology 80(6):1192–1197. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2012.​08.​045 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S, Mai Z, Wu W, Zhong W, Yuan J (2013) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10,000 cases. J Endourol Endourol Soc 27(10):1203–1208. doi:10.1089/end.2013.0061 CrossRef Zeng G, Zhao Z, Wan S, Mai Z, Wu W, Zhong W, Yuan J (2013) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for simple and complex renal caliceal stones: a comparative analysis of more than 10,000 cases. J Endourol Endourol Soc 27(10):1203–1208. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2013.​0061 CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Monga M, Oglevie S (2000) Minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol Endourol Soc 14(5):419–421CrossRef Monga M, Oglevie S (2000) Minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol Endourol Soc 14(5):419–421CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chan DY, Jarrett TW (2000) Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourolo Endourol Soc 14(3):269–272 (discussion 272–263) CrossRef Chan DY, Jarrett TW (2000) Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourolo Endourol Soc 14(3):269–272 (discussion 272–263) CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, Docimo SG (1998) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experience with a new technique. Urology 52(4):697–701CrossRefPubMed Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, Docimo SG (1998) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experience with a new technique. Urology 52(4):697–701CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z, Zhu J, Tuerxun A, Song C, Zhong L, Liu M, Xu K, Li H, Jiang Z, Khadgi S, Pal SK, Liu J, Zhang G, Liu Y, Wu W, Chen W, Sarica K (2015) Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int. doi:10.1111/bju.13242 PubMed Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z, Zhu J, Tuerxun A, Song C, Zhong L, Liu M, Xu K, Li H, Jiang Z, Khadgi S, Pal SK, Liu J, Zhang G, Liu Y, Wu W, Chen W, Sarica K (2015) Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int. doi:10.​1111/​bju.​13242 PubMed
32.
go back to reference Mulvaney WP (1963) The hydrodynamics of renal irrigations: with reference to calculus solvents. J Urol 89:765–768PubMed Mulvaney WP (1963) The hydrodynamics of renal irrigations: with reference to calculus solvents. J Urol 89:765–768PubMed
34.
go back to reference Tepeler A, Akman T, Silay MS, Akcay M, Ersoz C, Kalkan S, Armagan A, Sarica K (2014) Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 42(3):275–279. doi:10.1007/s00240-014-0646-3 CrossRefPubMed Tepeler A, Akman T, Silay MS, Akcay M, Ersoz C, Kalkan S, Armagan A, Sarica K (2014) Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure during micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 42(3):275–279. doi:10.​1007/​s00240-014-0646-3 CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Traxer O, Smith TG 3rd, Pearle MS, Corwin TS, Saboorian H, Cadeddu JA (2001) Renal parenchymal injury after standard and mini percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 165(5):1693–1695CrossRefPubMed Traxer O, Smith TG 3rd, Pearle MS, Corwin TS, Saboorian H, Cadeddu JA (2001) Renal parenchymal injury after standard and mini percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 165(5):1693–1695CrossRefPubMed
37.
40.
go back to reference Zeng G, Zhu W, Li J, Zhao Z, Zeng T, Liu C, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wan SP (2015) The comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones larger than 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney: a matched-pair analysis. World J Urol 33(8):1159–1164. doi:10.1007/s00345-014-1420-4 CrossRefPubMed Zeng G, Zhu W, Li J, Zhao Z, Zeng T, Liu C, Liu Y, Yuan J, Wan SP (2015) The comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for stones larger than 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney: a matched-pair analysis. World J Urol 33(8):1159–1164. doi:10.​1007/​s00345-014-1420-4 CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Pan J, Chen Q, Xue W, Chen Y, Xia L, Chen H, Huang Y (2013) RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2–3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting. Urolithiasis 41(1):73–78. doi:10.1007/s00240-012-0533-8 CrossRefPubMed Pan J, Chen Q, Xue W, Chen Y, Xia L, Chen H, Huang Y (2013) RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2–3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting. Urolithiasis 41(1):73–78. doi:10.​1007/​s00240-012-0533-8 CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Herrmann TR, Walcher U, Abdelhafez MF, Nicklas AP, Holzle L, Schilling D, Bedke J, Stenzl A, Nagele U (2013) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol 31(6):1555–1561. doi:10.1007/s00345-012-0962-6 CrossRefPubMed Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Herrmann TR, Walcher U, Abdelhafez MF, Nicklas AP, Holzle L, Schilling D, Bedke J, Stenzl A, Nagele U (2013) Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol 31(6):1555–1561. doi:10.​1007/​s00345-012-0962-6 CrossRefPubMed
44.
Metadata
Title
Minituriazed percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what does it mean?
Authors
W. Kamal
P. Kallidonis
I. Kyriazis
E. Liatsikos
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0881-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Urolithiasis 3/2016 Go to the issue